Hudson Elms Nursing Center
563 W Streetsboro Road, Hudson, OH 44236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (330) 650-0436 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,693 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 38.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of open and closed medical records, review of hospital records, review of the facility investigation, review of the hazardous chemical policy, review of in-service education, review of Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS), review of facility self-reported incidents, observations of the housekeeping cart, interviews with staff, interviews with residents, and review of an emergency medical services report, the facility failed to properly store hazardous chemicals when a reasonable risk to resident safety was present. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm with subsequent death on 06/12/25 when Resident #55, who was known to have a history of depression and prior suicide attempts, consumed liquid from a bottle of mild acid disinfectant (Drano) bowl cleaner that had been left in the resident's bathroom unsecured by Housekeeper #800. Resident #55 was identified to have intentionally ingested an unknown quantity of the chemical, resulting in the resident's hospitalization and subsequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, the facility failed to develop and implement effective, comprehensive, and individualized dementia/behavioral health care plans to address the total care needs of all residents and to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation resulting in resident injury. This affected two residents (#31 and #35) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 34. Actual harm occurred on 02/13/24 when Resident #35 sustained a head injury, which included bleeding from the head with two bumps (one to the forehead and one behind the ear) as a result of a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred after he wandered into Resident #31's room. Resident #35 was subsequently transferred to the emergency room where he required staples to the area. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/19/24. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia severe with agitation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean sanitary manner and that food was stored and labeled properly. This had the potential to affect 43 out of 43 residents who ate meals in the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1.Interview and observation on 05/04/26 at 9:40 A.M. with Kitchen Director (KD) #875 during kitchen initial tour revealed the following:-A container of Pork and Beans dated 04/28/26. -An unlabeled potato salad container-Unlabeled pitched of orange Kool-Aid-Unlabeled pitched of purple Kool-Aid-Container of pork dated but unlabeled-The wall behind the bread shelf storage was dirty with various dried splatters-Various crumbs and debris on tray line shelving's-The standing fridge by KD #875 office was dirty with various crumbs and splatters-Multiple vents in the kitchen had visible dust build-upKD #875 confirmed observations at the time and revealed the facility keeps leftovers for 2 days.2. Further interview and observation on 05/06/26 at 1:50 P.M. with Regional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0839 — widespreadEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #853 had a valid and active license. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of the State licensure database for LPN's revealed LPN #853 did not have an active license. His nursing license was suspended.Email correspondence on 05/05/26 at 2:46 P.M. from the Chief of Compliance Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN) verified LPN #853 did not have an active license. LPN #853 license was noted to have been suspended on 11/20/25 and remains suspended since that date.Review of LPN #853's time punches revealed he worked 33 days on a suspended nursing license. 11/25/25, 12/01/25, 12/12/25, 12/13/25, 12/19/25, 12/27/25, 12/28/25, 12/31/25, 01/02/26, 01/10/26, 01/11/26, 01/12/26, 01/15/26, 01/22/26, 01/24/26, 01/25/26, 02/05/26, 02/07/26, 02/08/26, 02/09/26, 02/15/26, 02/16/26, 02/17/26, 02/20/26, 02/22/26, 02/25/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement a quality assurance plan to ensure resident pharmacy recommendations were acted upon timely. This finding had the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility. Findings include:Review of Resident #2, #4, #5, and #40's medical record revealed ongoing recommendations from pharmacy starting in July 2025 to make modifications to their medication administration regimen without timely response and justification of declination of the recommendations from Physician #854.Telephone interview on 05/05/26 at 1:52 P.M. with Consultant Pharmacist #857 she had come to the building to talk to Physician #854 about the usage of narcotics for residents with no clear indication of use at some point in the Fall of 2025 and the physician had asked her who made the rules for narcotics. She stated Physician #854 wanted to know who to talk to about administering narcotics and was told Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) guidelines. Telephone interview on 05/06/26 at 10:29 A.M. with Physician #863 revealed she was aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walk-in freezer was in functional working conditions. This had the potential to affect 43 out of 43 residents who ate meals in the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 43.Findings include:Interview and observation on 05/04/26 at 9:40 A.M. with Kitchen Director (KD) #875 during initial tour of kitchen revealed the large walk-in freezer was broken. There were two standing freezers in the beverage area where facility was storing frozen items.Interview and observation on 05/07/26 at 10:35 A.M. with KD #875, Regional Kitchen Director #865 and Registered Dietitian #871 revealed the freezer had been broken for a few months. When asked to see the substitution log, KD #865 revealed that he is substituting a lot of food items due to not having a freezer. He said they were supposed to have pork for dinner that night, but he had to substitute the pork because he did not have a freezer to store the pork in. Regional Kitchen Director #865 said he would get pork for dinner tonight. He said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. This finding affected 16 residents who smoke (Residents #2, #4, #7, #9, #13, #14, #17, #23, #24, #31, #35, #36, #37, #39, #40 and #56) and had the potential to affect all 43 residents at the facility. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1. Interview and observation on 05/11/26 at 3:48 P.M. with Registered Nurse Travel Director of Nursing #861 in Resident #5 and Resident #2 room of paint peeling off above the floor board by the window. Observation of Resident #10 revealed a white wooden cover under the window that was being held up with black duct tape. Interview and observation on 05/11/26 at 3:49 P.M. with Resident #11 in room revealed four 1/2-inch by 1/2-inch holes in the wall with crumbling dry wall exposed to be below the window and above the heat register. Resident #11 said the holes were from a shelf that was removed 3 years ago and that were never fixed. Interview and observations on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control management system in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect 43 out of 43 residents who ate meals in the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 43. Findings include:Interview and observation on 05/04/26 at 9:40 A.M. with Kitchen Director (KD) #875 during kitchen initial tour revealed the beverage area had multiple fruit flies flying around the covered trash can. When trash can lid was lifted numerous fruit flies flew out of the trash can. By the dishwashing area uncovered trash can with no bag and a piece of bread in the can with fruit flies.Observation and interview on 05/06/26 at 4:47 P.M. with KD #875 and Regional Kitchen Director (RKD) #865 of dinner tray line revealed numerous fruit flies around the brownies that were on the tray line and being served to residents. Confirmed observation with both KD #875 and RKD #865.Interview on 05/07/26 at 9:11 A.M. with Registered Dietitian #871 revealed she had observed fruit flies in the kitchen ceiling, in the ceiling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-12 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #5, #6, #21, #27 and #31 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) forms accurately reflected the resident's psychiatric diagnoses. This finding affected six (Residents #2, #5, #6, #21, #27 and #31) of seven residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder recurrent, suicidal ideations and personal history of suicidal behavior. Review Resident #31's discharge (DC)-return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 required modified independence for cognitive skills for daily decision making. Review of Resident #31's PASRR Identification Screen dated 03/19/26 revealed she did not have any indications of serious mental illness and/or developmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted upon timely and the recommendations reflected a valid reason a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was not attempted. This finding affected four (Residents #2, #4, #5 and #40) of 11 records reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2 medical record revealed an admission date of 01/09/26 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, major depressive disorder and insomnia.Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/11/26 (discontinued 04/13/26) for Ambien oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for sleep.Review of Resident #2's Consultant Pharmacist's Report dated 02/20/26 revealed resident was ordered Zolpidem (Ambien) 10 mg one tablet by mouth at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided education on influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations and the vaccinations were offered and/or administered as ordered. This finding affected four (Residents #2, #3, #23 and #31) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #2's electronic health record (EHR) revealed immunizations including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were not listed as given.Interview on 05/11/26 at 12:09 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Travel Director of Nursing (DON) #861 confirmed Residents #2's medical record did not have evidence the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-12 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided education on COVID-19 vaccinations and the vaccinations were offered and/or administered as ordered. This finding affected four (Residents #2, #3, #23 and #31) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #2's electronic health record (EHR) revealed the COVID-19 vaccination was not listed as given. Interview on 05/11/26 at 12:09 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Travel Director of Nursing (DON) #861 confirmed Residents #2's medical records did not have the evidence the resident was educated on COVID-19 vaccine use, consents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure individualized interventions were developed and implemented to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse between Resident #2 and Resident #24. This finding affected two (Residents #2 and #24) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 43.Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder and essential hypertension.Review of Resident #2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition.Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence.Review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was provided a notification in writing the reason for the discharge to the hospital in a language the resident understands and a bed hold policy indicating the bed hold days remaining and the process for returning to the facility. This finding affected one (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 43.Findings include:Review of Resident #48's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, hyperlipidemia and essential hypertension. Resident #48 did not return to the facility.Review of Resident #48's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #48's progress note dated 02/24/26 at 5:24 A.M. revealed during morning care, the resident had an episode of coffee ground…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was provided timely incontinence care. This finding affected one resident (#31) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 43. Findings include:Record review of Resident #43 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included cerebral infarction, heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, generalized anxiety disorder, shortness of breath, asthma and personal history of pulmonary embolism.Record review of Resident #43's care plan dated 03/05/26 revealed he was resistive to care related to refusing to shower, refusing to change clothes, refusing incontinence care, refusing wound care and refusing to sleep in his bed. Interventions were to allow the resident to make decisions about treatment regime to provide a sense of control, encourage as much participation/interaction by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure scheduled narcotics for pain were administered as ordered and quarterly pain assessments were completed for residents on narcotic pain medications. This finding affected three (Residents #10, #31 and #40) of eleven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety disorder and essential hypertension.Review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #10's quarterly pain assessments (admit date [DATE]) revealed a pain assessment dated [DATE]. The resident's record did not have a pain assessment for 02/2026.Review of Resident #10's pain care plans revised 04/06/26 revealed to administer analgesia as per orders, anticipate the resident's need for pain relief, identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals to meet their individual needs. This finding affected two residents (Residents #24 and #35) of four residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 43.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence.Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #24's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/26/24 for a regular diet, regular texture with a regular consistency and double portions for meals.Review of Resident #24's meal ticket dated 05/06/26 revealed the resident wanted juice and hot cereal with no pasta and double portions for all meals.Interview on 05/04/26 at 12:13 P.M. with Resident #24 revealed he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during wound care for Resident #31. This affected one resident (Resident #31) of one resident observed for wound care. The census was 43.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility 03/19/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to acquired absence of left leg below-knee amputation (BKA).Record review revealed Resident #31 had an order to cleanse the left stump with soap and water, pat dry, apply Santyl and an abdominal pad and cover with kerlix. Observation of the wound care and dressing change with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/06/26 at 1:31 P.M. revealed the bedside table was visibly dirty and not cleaned/wiped down with an antiseptic cloth prior to the DON putting two paper towels from Resident #31's bathroom on it, as a barrier. The DON stated she forgot her marker and scissors so started removing the old dressing by removing what tape she could get ahold of with gloves on, from the top of the dressing closest to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents call lights were in working order. This affected three residents (Residents #6, #9, and #41) of 56 residents reviewed for call light function. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Interview on 05/06/26 at 3:02 P.M. with Resident Council members Resident #16, Resident #11 and Resident #36 revealed call light response times at night are very long and response times are sometimes over two hours.Interview on 05/07/26 at 3:45 P.M. with Resident #41 revealed he needed a new call light and his had not worked for three weeks. The bedside call cord was pulled revealing the bedside station light was activated but the corridor dome light outside the room did not light up. Interview and observation on 05/07/26 at 3:48 P.M. with Resident #6 revealed the resident tested bedside call cord revealed the bedside station light was activated but the corridor dome light outside the room did not light up and the light was missing the cover. Interview on 05/07/26 at 3:55 P.M. with Director of Clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services per the plan of care. This affected four residents (#3, #10, #17, and #37) of four reviewed for restorative nursing services. The facility census was 36.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 05/02/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, need for assistance with personal care, spinal stenosis in the lumbar region, spinal enthesopathy in the cervical region, and intervertebral disc disorders.Review of the activities of daily living (ADL) plan of care, dated 10/02/24, revealed Resident #3 had impaired functional abilities, mobility deficit, required staff intervention to complete self-care and mobility activities, and was at risk for decline in functional ability and usual performance associated complications. Interventions included, but were not limited to: restorative nursing to ambulate or walk resident with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of self-reported incident (SRI) and interviews with staff the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#55) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 41.Finding include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 12/26/24. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, paranoid personality disorder, mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, and schizoid personality disorder. A diagnosis of delusion disorder was added on 05/15/25 and diagnoses of suicidal ideations (SI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were added on 06/13/25. Review of the progress noted dated 06/07/25 and timed 1:57 P.M. revealed Resident #55 accused the nurse of being a murderer and an abuser. Review of the hospital records for Resident #55 revealed an admitting history and physical dated 06/13/25 at 4:40 A.M., listed the chief complaint as intentional ingestion of acid and attempt to self-harm. Past medical history included paranoid psychosis, schizoaffective disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident pain medication was available for administration. This affected one (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 05/17/24 at 11:00 A.M. with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, insomnia, hypertensive kidney disease with stage three kidney failure, heart arrhythmia, pneumonia, adult failure to thrive, prostatic hypertrophy, and a history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #39 revealed an order dated 05/17/24 to administer Lyrica 25 milligrams (mg) in the morning and Lyrica 50 mg orally at bedtime for pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #39 dated May 2024 revealed the resident missed the following doses of Lyrica due to the medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 had physician orders for BiPAP (breathing support administered through a face mask, nasal mask or helmet), and failed to ensure Resident #9's diagnostic test for obstructive sleep apnea was scheduled. This affected one resident (Resident #9) out of three reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/24/22, a re-entry date of 12/28/23 and diagnoses included obstructive sleep apnea, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #9's medical record including progress notes and the vital sign tab which included oxygen saturations from 02/20/24 through 05/01/24 did not reveal evidence oxygen saturations were checked. Review of Resident #9's progress notes dated 02/22/24 at 2:00 P.M. included Resident #9's care conference was held on 02/22/24 at 2:00 P.M. Resident #23's power of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect/mistreatment/abuse of Resident #21 by a staff member. This affected one resident (#21) of three residents revealed for abuse. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 11/12/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), hypertension (high blood pressure) , and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in the blood). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/20/24, revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact, was independent for oral and toileting hygiene, required set up or clean up assistance for personal hygiene and eating, and supervision for showering/bathing self. Resident #21 was able to walk independently 150 feet. Review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) dated 02/21/24 revealed Resident #21 alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility billing records, invoices and past due notices, and interviews with facility staff and contracted company personnel, the facility neglected to meet financial obligations for the delivery of care and maintenance to all the residents and to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid in a timely manner to prevent potential interruption in services and to meet the needs of all residents in the facility. The facility census was 31. Findings included: Review of the facility utility companies and vendor bills/invoices revealed the following bills were not paid timely: a. Review of the City electric/water/sewage statement dated June 2023 revealed the facility had a previous balance of $5291.45 and a current billing of $3076.52. The facility made a payment on 05/16/23 for $5291.45. The balance due was $3076.52. Review of the City electric/water/sewage statement dated July 2023 revealed the facility had a previous balance of $3076.52 and a current billing of $2695.27. The facility did not make a payment. The balance due was $5771.79. Review of the City…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 27. Findings include: Review of annual Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) training revealed no evidence of demonstrated competency of required skills and techniques. Interview on 06/22/23 11:33 A.M. with Regional Registered Nurse (RN) #533 revealed after several attempts to provide evidence of CNA competencies, he unable to provide evidence of the training. Interview on 06/22/23 at 1:04 P.M. with Regional RN #534 stated the CNA competencies had never been completed but would be reinstated immediately.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was assessed accurately for her involuntary movements. This affected one of five residents reviewed for antipsychotic medications. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, psychosis, depression, mild cognitive impairment, anxiety and schizoeffective disorder. An interview with Resident #10 on 01/21/20 at 3:33 P.M. revealed Resident #10 was unable to sit still and had continuous leg and tongue movements. During the interview, Resident #10 indicated she was unable to control her tongue thrusting and leg movements. A review of Resident #10's clinical assessments indicated an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessment dated [DATE]. The AIMS assessment indicated when a resident received antipsychotic medication an AIMS assessment would be performed. The AIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered wound treatment was applied to Resident #24's coccyx/right buttock pressure ulcer. This affected one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney, heart and lung disease, diabetes mellitus type II, depression and chronic pain. A review of Resident #24's plan of care indicated a risk for actual impaired skin integrity related to fragile skin, impaired mobility and diabetes mellitus initiated on 09/03/19. Interventions on the plan of care indicated provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician. A review of Resident #24's wound assessment dated [DATE] indicated a stage III pressure ulcer (involves the full thickness of the skin and may extend into the subcutaneous tissue layer) was present on the right buttock/coccyx area measuring 3.5 centimeters (cm)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed in a timely manner for Resident #8. This affected one (Resident #8) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 34. Findings include. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute Hepatitis C, endocarditis and post-procedural hematoma of a nervous system organ. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition and required total assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the physician's orders dated 01/14/20 revealed orders for urinalysis and culture and sensitivity on 01/15/20. Review of the progress note dated 01/19/20 revealed the facility was unable to obtain the urine due to Resident #8 was having her menstrual cycle. The physician was notified. Interview on 01/22/20 Registered Nurse (RN) #4 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations. This affected three residents (Resident #3, #10 and #17) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 34. Findings include: 1. Review of a medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, macular degeneration, diabetes, pseudobulbar affect, major depressive disorder, delirium, dementia, hypertension, chronic pain, obesity and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 12/17/18 revealed Resident #3 had received 500 milligrams (mg) of Depakote (mood stabilizer and antiseizure medication) three times a day since 12/2017. Please consider a gradual dose reduction. The pharmacy recommendation was never addressed by the physician. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 09/25/19 revealed Resident #3 had orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for Resident #17. This affected one resident (Resident #17) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of intraspinal abscess and granuloma, cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, fracture of left femur, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, anemia, anxiety disorder, acute respiratory failure and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of January 2020 physician's orders revealed Resident #17 had an order dated 12/17/19 for five milligrams of Midodrine HCL (blood pressure support) every 12 hours as needed for systolic blood pressure less than 100. Review of the January 2020 medication administration records revealed Resident #17's systolic blood pressure was less than 100 on: 01/01/20, 01/03/20, 01/04/20, 01/05/20, 01/08/20, 01/09/20, 01/10/20,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to Resident #21. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of six resident's reviewed for dental services. The facility census 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of respiratory failure, hypertension, diabetes, major depressive disorder, seizures and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Review of the dental assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had four or more decayed or broken teeth. Review of the 360 care of Ohio Dental summary report for visit dated 07/30/19 revealed Resident #21 needed tooth #31 extracted. Interview on 01/21/20 at 11:10 A.M. Resident #21 indicated he had a tooth that needed to be pulled, it hurt when he ate, and he had told the staff it had been bothering him too long. Interview on 01/22/20 at 12:40 P.M., the Administrator indicated it was the social workers responsibility to follow up with the dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to honor the food preferences of Resident #20. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of six residents reviewed for food and nutrition. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident # 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenias, insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, convulsions, peripheral vascular disease, psychotic disorder, pain, nicotine dependence, benign prostatic hyperplasia, diabetes, dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition, required supervision with eating and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of the meal tickets for breakfast and lunch revealed Resident #20 was to have a two handled cup, four ounces of tomato juice, eight ounces of milk, and disliked chicken.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-23 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide ordered adaptive eating equipment for Resident #20. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of six residents reviewed for food and nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenias, insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, convulsions, peripheral vascular disease, psychotic disorder, pain and nicotine dependence, benign prostatic hyperplasia, diabetes, dementia and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition, required supervision with eating and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of the January 2020 physician's orders revealed Resident #20 had an order dated 10/15/19 for the use of two handled cups during meal times. Review of the meal tickets for breakfast and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) #8 washed her hands appropriately while performing the wound treatment for Resident #24. This affected one of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney, heart and lung disease, diabetes mellitus type II, depression and chronic pain. A review of Resident #24's plan of care initiated on 09/03/19 indicated a risk for actual impaired skin integrity related to fragile skin, impaired mobility and diabetes mellitus. An intervention on the plan of care indicated to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician. A review of Resident #24's wound assessment dated [DATE] indicated a stage II pressure ulcer (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis) was present on the coccyx/right buttock area measuring 3.5 centimeters (cm) long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to follow the weekly menu and maintain a substitution log. This had the potential to affect 43 out of 43 residents who ate meals in the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 43.Findings include:Review of weekly menu for 05/03/26 to 05/09/26 revealed on 05/06/26 the supper entree options on the menu were jerk chicken sandwich on a hamburger bun or grilled ham and cheese sandwich on sandwich bread. The side items were buttered carrots and dessert was a frosted spice cake. Observation and interview 05/06/26 at 4:47 P.M. of dinner tray line with Kitchen Director #875 and Regional Kitchen Director #865 revealed the entree was a hamburger with shredded lettuce and a tomato. The side item was french fries and the dessert was chocolate frosted spice cake. The RKD #865 revealed they substituted the buttered carrots for French fries because the lettuce and tomato on the hamburger was the vegetable. He said the hamburger was an option on the spreadsheet menu. Interview on 05/07/26 at 9:11 A.M. with Registered Dietitian #871 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,693 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,693 — penalty dated 2025-07-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-21 for 48 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 02/01/2020 |
| SHERMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 33% | since 02/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365874. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.