Edgewood Manor Of Greenfield
850 Nellie Street, Greenfield, OH 45123 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (937) 981-2165 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.2% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 64.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of a change in medical condition. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for notification of change in medical condition. The facility total census was 46 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 08/24/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and vascular dementia. Review of the physician's note for Resident #10 dated 06/16/26 at 11:59 P.M. revealed the resident was readmitted with a non-pressure chronic ulcer due to peripheral artery disease after post-acute care and vascular surgery and debridement on 06/011/26 resulting in a wound vac treatment placement. Review of the nursing note for Resident #10 dated 06/15/26 at 5:02 P.M. revealed the resident returned from hospital a hospital stay with the left lower extremity wrapped with dressing. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician and per professional standards of nursing practice. This affected three (Residents #10, #32 and #20) of three resident reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 04/22/26 with diagnoses including fracture of the left femur, diabetes, and venous insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #32 dated 06/15/26 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #32 dated June 2026 revealed an order to cleanse the left heel with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Betadine and pad and kerlix once daily on day shift. Review of the nurse progress notes for Resident #32 dated 06/20/26 to 06/23/26 revealed the notes did not include documentation regarding why the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview. and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to document changes in a resident's medical condition in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for documentation of a change in condition. The facility total census was 46 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 08/24/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and vascular dementia. Review of the physician's note for Resident #10 dated 06/16/26 at 11:59 P.M. revealed the resident was readmitted with a non-pressure chronic ulcer due to peripheral artery disease after post-acute care and vascular surgery and debridement on 06/011/26 resulting in a wound vac treatment placement. Review of the nursing note for Resident #10 dated 06/15/26 at 5:02 P.M. revealed the resident returned from hospital a hospital stay with the left lower extremity wrapped with dressing. Review of the nursing notes for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident dependent on staff for activities of daily living received a bath or shower as scheduled or requested. This affected one (Resident #32) out of four residents reviewed for bathing care. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 11/07/25. Diagnosis included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, dementia, anxiety disorder, and psychoactive substance abuse. Review of Resident #32's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #32 was noted to be dependent of staff for bathing, dressing and toileting hygiene. Review of the facility's current bathing schedule revealed Resident #32 was scheduled to receive a bath or shower twice a week on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights to request for help or assistance was within reach for all residents. This affected one (Resident #32) out of four residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 11/07/25. Diagnosis included nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, dementia, anxiety disorder, and psychoactive substance abuse. Review of the plan of care dated 05/10/26 and revised 05/11/26 revealed Resident #32 was at risk for falls and had an actual fall with no injury. Interventions related to fall safety included keeping a call light in reach. Review of Resident #32's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #32 was noted to be dependent of staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interview, review for the facility grievance log, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve dietary grievances. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the October 2024 grievance log revealed the facility received four grievances regarding dietary services and the quality of the food. The resolutions listed included to educate on tray line and availability and will cook the food longer. Review of the November 2024 grievance log revealed the facility received two grievances regarding dietary services, the quantity of food, and the quality of the food. The resolutions listed were the facility offered alternatives and adjusted portions. Review of the December 2024 grievance log revealed the facility received two grievances regarding dietary services and food. The resolution listed was the facility educated staff. Interview with Resident #9 on 01/21/25 at 9:25 A.M. revealed the food did not taste good at the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of menu spreadsheets, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed during meal service. This affected all 50 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the menu spreadsheet dated 01/22/25 revealed residents on a regular diet were to receive one country fried steak with mushroom gravy, four ounces of carrots, four ounces of potatoes, and a square of cornbread, and residents on mechanical soft diets were to receive a four ounce scoop of ground country fried steak with mushroom gravy, four ounces of carrots, four ounces of potatoes, and a square of cornbread. Observation of meal service on 01/22/25 at 4:45 P.M. revealed [NAME] #406 served residents on regular diets one country fried steak, three ounces of gravy, four ounces of carrots, three ounces of potatoes, and a square of corn bread. [NAME] #406 served residents on mechanical soft diets three ounces of mechanically altered country fried steak, three ounces of gravy, four ounces of carrots, three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a dishwasher operation manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a safe and sanitary manner, failed to ensure the kitchen was properly cleaned, and failed to ensure the dishwasher was appropriately functioning. This affected all 50 residents residing in the facility. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 01/21/25 at 8:50 A.M. revealed staff were actively using the dishwasher. The dishwasher had a wash temperature of 111 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and a rinse temperature of 146 degrees F. Dietary Manager (DM) #410 was observed testing the chemical sanitizer in the dishwasher and the dishwasher tested at 200 parts per million (ppm). Interview with DM #410 on 01/21/25 at 8:50 P.M. verified the dishwasher had a wash temperature of 111 degrees F and a rinse temperature of 146 degrees F. DM #410 stated the dishwasher was a low temperature dishwasher, and the wash and rinse temperature should be above 120 degrees F. Review of the facility policy titled, Warewashing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affected all 50 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Interview and observation with the Administrator on 01/23/25 at 9:25 A.M. confirmed the light over the nurses' station when walking onto the unit from the front door did not have a cover and had exposed florescent lighting. The light to the left of the main nurses' station when walking onto the unit was missing a light cover and had exposed florescent lighting. The [NAME] Court hallway had four missing light covers with exposed bulbs. The [NAME] hallway had exposed ceiling with no ceiling tiles outside of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and damage on the ceiling with no tiles cover outside of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Their was also a light out over the seating areas of the resident living room. The [NAME] Court hallway had a total of four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were encoded and transmitted within required timeframes. This affected five (#17, #5, #30, #27, and #11) of five residents reviewed for resident assessment. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 03/02/22. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and anemia. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the MDS was completed 08/13/24 but not submitted until 09/24/24. Interview on 01/22/25 at 3:22 P.M., MDS Coordinator (MDSC) #328 verified Resident #17's was submitted on 09/24/24. MDSC #328 stated the MDS assessment should have been submitted within seven days of completion. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24. The resident discharged from the facility on 08/19/24. Diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop care plans to address resident needs and interventions. This affected four (#12, #24, #39, and #42) of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus with other specified complications, congestive heart failure, polyneuropathy, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, constipation, and centrilobular emphysema. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was assessed to receive an anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #12's physician order dated 06/06/24 revealed the resident received the anticoagulant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a resident list, and review of a food recipe, revealed the facility failed to prepare food in a palatable and attractive manner. This affected four (#1, #3, #6, and #42) of four residents who received mashed potatoes during meal observations. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observation of meal service on 01/22/25 at 4:45 P.M. revealed [NAME] #406 served mashed potatoes as an alternate using a four ounce scoop. Further observation revealed [NAME] #406 went to scoop out a portion of mashed potatoes and part of the scoop was the dry potato mix. Interview with [NAME] #406 on 01/22/25 at 4:45 P.M. verified the mashed potatoes were not thoroughly mixed and residents were served dry mashed potato mix in their mashed potatoes. Review of the facility's undated mashed potato recipe revealed to mix the dry potato mix and water together, add margarine, and mix thoroughly. Review of the facility's undated list of residents that received mashed potatoes on 01/22/25 revealed four (#1, #3, #6 and #42) residents received the alternate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of a resident diet list, the facility failed to ensure mechanically altered meat was prepared in a form to meet resident needs. This affected 11 (#1, #4, #3, #6, #20, #23, #36, #42, #46, #47, and #202) of 11 residents that received mechanically altered diets. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observation of meal service on 01/22/25 at 4:45 P.M. revealed a pan of mechanically altered country fried steak on the tray line. There were large chucks of the country fried steak in the pan that were larger than the size of a quarter. [NAME] #406 was observed to use a three ounce scoop to serve the mechanically altered country fried steak with chunks in it to residents that received mechanical diets. Interview with [NAME] #406 on 01/22/25 at 4:45 P.M. verified there were large chucks of mechanically altered pieces of country fried steak that were larger than the size of a quarter in the pan on the tray line. [NAME] #406 also verified she served residents that received mechanical soft diets the mechanically altered country fried steak…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed notify the state mental health authority with a significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a change in their mental health condition. This affected two (#2 and #33) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, personal history of traumatic brain injury, hypokalemia, other developmental disorders of speech and language, muscle weakness, and xerosis cutis. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed as severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #33's PASARR document dated 11/05/21 revealed Resident #33 had no diagnoses of mental disorders. Resident #33 did not have indications of serious mental illness. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospital documentation review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure wounds were properly assessed and treated in a timely manner. This affected one (#37) of one residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: Record review for Resident #37 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, rheumatoid arthritis, essential primary hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Resident #37 was dependent on staff for bathing, toilet use, dressing, and personal hygiene, and required maximum assistance from staff with eating, and oral hygiene. Review of the hospital discharge report titled, admission Continuity of Care, included in Resident #37's admission paperwork dated 11/30/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was served food on a divided plate per the physician order. This affected one (#37) of one residents reviewed for assistive eating equipment and utensils. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, essential primary hypertension, gastro-esophageal, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Resident #37 was dependent on staff for medication administration, bathing, toilet use, dressing, and personal hygiene, and required maximum assistance from staff with eating and oral hygiene. Review of Resident #37's diet order dated 12/12/24 revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with regular texture and regular consistency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper signage and personal protective equipment for a resident with an indwelling medical device placed on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected one (#9) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/18/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, mixed hyperlipidemia, tracheostomy status, cognitive communication deficit, disease of the pancreas, acquired absence of the larynx, dysphagia pharyngeal phase, obesity due to excess calories, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia. Review of the 12/23/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact and require tracheostomy care while a resident. Review of Resident #9's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/03/24 for enhanced barrier precautions related to a tracheostomy.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely administer pneumococcal vaccines. This affected two (#11 and #29) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/16/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, mild cognitive impairment, vascular dementia, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #11's medical record on 01/23/25 revealed no documented evidence of the resident receiving a pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/01/23. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, anxiety disorder, nausea, anemia, psychoactive substance abuse, tobacco use, spinal stenosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, cord compression, solitary pulmonary nodule, and chronic pain syndrome.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the residents. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations of the facility on 05/01/24 at 9:45 A.M. revealed multiple rain gutters that were hanging unattached to the fascia board on the left side front of the building near resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Gutter mounting nails had broken loose from the building due to extended weather conditions causing the wood to rot and an unstable attachment. A second area was located outside the main entrance above the business office. The gutter system had also become unattached to the fascia board causing the wood to rot. A third area was located at the back of the building near a resident courtyard, with the gutters hanging below the attachment points. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 05/01/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed a large brown stain on the ceiling above the room window. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of online Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure the use of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and hand hygiene when providing care to residents in isolation precautions for active infection with Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except two residents (#13 and #399) who had an active infection with C-Diff. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review for Resident #13's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/19/22 and had diagnosis including enterocolitis due to C-Diff infection. Review of the physicians order for Resident #13, dated 05/21/22, revealed an order for Vancomycin 125 milligram (mg) capsule, administer one capsule four times a day for 10 days for enterocolitis due to C-Diff. Record review for Resident #399 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-06 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on patient trust account review, surety bond review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond covered the total balance of resident funds. This had the potential to affect 23 of 23 residents who had their funds handled by the facility. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing for entrance conference on 05/31/22 at 9:35 A.M., revealed the surveyors need a copy of the surety bond and all resident funds with their total balances. Review of the funds balance dated 05/27/22 on 06/02/22 revealed the balance of the residents facility accounts was $37,042.43. There was 23 resident accounts listed. Review of the facility surety bond on 06/02/22 revealed the bond was increased from $35,000 to $50,000 on 06/01/22. Interview with the Administrator on 06/02/22 at 11:53 A.M., verified the funds have been over the amount of the $35,000 surety bond amount and she noticed it on 06/01/22 and got the surety bond increased to $50,000. Review of the monthly funds balance report from 01/31/22 to present revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-06 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Beneficiary Notice- Residents discharged list review, and staff interview, the facility failed to inform the resident or his or her legal representative in writing that Medicare will not pay for covered skilled services, and why these specific services may not be covered and the potential liability for payment for the non-covered services. This affected three (#30, #97, and #98) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/17/21. Diagnoses included chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, gastro-esophageal reflux, personal history venous thrombosis and embolism, osteoarthritis, lack of physical excercise, and weakness. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers, dependent on one person for toileting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident personal funds list review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify a resident who receives medicaid benefits when their personal funds account reaches less than $200 of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit of $2000. This affected two (#20 and #44) of five reviewed for personal funds. The facility currently identified eight (#2, #5, #6, #7, #20, #22, #28, and #44) residents with over $2000 in their accounts. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1 Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/20/16, with diagnoses including: hemiplegia, history of COVID-19, hypertension, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Resident #20's pay source was Medicaid Review of the Resident personal funds account list dated 05/27/22 revealed Resident #20 current balance was $5461.72 and has been over $5000 since 01/31/22. Interview with the Administrator on 06/02/22 at 11:15 A.M., revealed the policy is to notify the Resident when their account reaches $200 less than the Supplemental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsmen of a resident's discharge from the facility. This affected one (#28) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission of 04/11/11, with diagnoses including transient ischemic attack, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require one-person extensive assistance with transfers, dressing, toileting, and bathing, and supervision in eating. Review of the progress note dated 03/24/22 at 3:45 P.M., revealed Resident #28 had edema and redness to left lower extremity and redness and warmth to right lower extremity as well as pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices to residents/resident representatives within 24-hours of transferring to the hospital. This affected two (#10 and #28) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/08/20. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The resident transferred to the hospital again on 05/07/22 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, lack of coordination, osteoarthritis, abnormal posture, attention and concentration deficit, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident exhibited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was lifted in a safe manner in order to prevent potential injury. The facility also failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented. This affected one (#10) of two reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/08/20. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, repeated falls, lack of coordination, osteoarthritis, abnormal posture, attention and concentration deficit, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident exhibited fluctuating inattention and altered level of consciousness during the assessment period. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's vaccination matrix, review of staff vaccination records, staff interview, review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) memorandum, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure 100 percent of their staff were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or had been granted a medical or religious exemption. The vaccination rate for the facility was calculated at 94.2%. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the undated facility staff COVID-19 vaccination matrix revealed the facility had a total of 70 employees. There were 66 employees fully vaccinated for COVID-19 or were granted a medical or religious exemption and four employees partially vaccinated for COVID-19, indicating a staff vaccination rate of 94.2%. Review of the COVID-19 vaccination record for Activities Aide #2 revealed the employee had received the first dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on 11/24/21. There was no documentation of the second dose of the vaccine being administered. Review of the COVID-19 vaccination record for Certified Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was properly functioning. This affected one (Resident #19) of 16 residents reviewed in the initial pool sample. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, parapleural psychosis, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #19 was assessed to required one-person extensive assistance with toileting and bathing. Observation on 05/31/22 at 11:12 A.M. revealed Resident #19's call light was lying on the floor underneath the bed. Resident #19's call light was not properly functioning. Interview on 05/31/22 at 11:15 A.M. with Occupational Therapist Assistant #64…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a policy or procedure for time frames in the medication regimen review and steps when an irregularity required immediate action and failed to ensure a residents pharmacy recommendations were not addressed for over a month. This affected one Resident (#32) of five Residents reviewed for medications and had the potential to affect all residents who had monthly pharmacy medication reviews. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/01/19 at 10:18 A.M. revealed she would get the facility policy on time frames in the medication regimen review and steps when an irregularity requires immediate action. Review of a facility policy titled Medication Utilization and Prescribing dated 09/01/12 revealed no information concerning time frames in the medication regimen review and steps when an irregularity required immediate action. Interview with the Administrator on 08/01/19 at 12:53 P.M., verified the policy did not address the time frames in the medication regimen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean and well maintained resident smoking area that was free from used smoking materials and failed to keep ash trays emptied and in good condition. This had the potential to affect 20 residents ( Resident #16, #28, #256, #40, #44, #43, #39, #5, #307, #257, #13, #258, #29, #22, #306, #305, #255, #41, #34, and #37) in the facility who are smokers. The facility census was 59. Findings include : Observation was conducted on 07/29/19 at 11:22 A.M., of the resident smoking area and noted one smoking receptacle with no lid that contained multiple cigarette butts, ashes, a plastic bag, a pop can, and empty packs of cigarettes. Another smoking receptacle with half of a lid and contained cigarette butts, ashes, a paper coffee cup, and packs of empty cigarettes. There was one trash can that contained a lid and noted cigarette butts and ashes and numerous trash. There was one ash tray that sat on table that was noted to be in poor repair with the sides rusted open exposing ashes and cigarettes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess antidepressant use on a resident's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This affected one resident (Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 05/21/19 with diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. Review of physician orders dated July 2019 revealed Resident #25 had an order dated 05/21/19 for an antidepressant medication Prozac daily for depression. Review of medication administration record dated May 2019 revealed Resident #25 received an antidepressant medication everyday from 05/23/19 through 05/27/19 and from 05/29/19 through 05/31/19. Review of admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact and received no antidepressant medication. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete Long Term Care Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 (a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long term care nursing facilities) assessment was completed. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of 15 resident records reviewed. Findings Include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, depression and schizophrenia. The physician's orders included Prolixin 2.5 milligrams (mg) daily for schizophrenia. Review of the annual MDS 3.0 assessment completed on 04/28/19 revealed Section C (cognitive assessment), Section D (mood assessment), and Section F (personal preferences) was not completed for Resident #4. A psychoactive medical evaluation completed on 05/02/19 identified Prolixin was used for the diagnoses of schizophrenia. Behaviors identified on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow up on the assistive hearing device needs for one (Resident #17) of one resident reviewed for hearing services. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/04/08 with diagnoses including intellectual disabilities (unspecified), anxiety disorder, dysphagia, and schizophrenia. Review of the Certificate of Medical Necessity dated 12/07/18 revealed Resident #17 had a hearing test on 09/13/18 with a moderately severe hearing loss noted to the right and left ears and digital hearing aids prescribed to provide optimal sound quality to be programmed to specifically meet the need of a hearing loss configuration. Review of Resident #17's care plan dated 01/13/19 revealed a category of Cognition/Neurology and resident had a hearing loss and hearing aids with an intervention of resident chose when to wear them and have been lost or misplaced multiple times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with oxygen had the nasal cannula changed and dated weekly. This affected one (Resident #16) of two Residents reviewed for oxygen care. This had the potential to affect 15 (Resident #2, #12, #15, #16, #17, #21, #25, #28, #34, #37, #44, #48, #52, #256, and #308,) facility identified residents on oxygen. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Record review of Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 5/10/19 with pertinent diagnosis of: acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and used oxygen while in the facility. Observation on 07/31/19 at 8:25 A.M., revealed an undated oxygen nasal cannula tubing was noted in Resident #16's room. The resident stated she did not know when it was last changed. Interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors for one resident (Resident #4) who was receiving antipsychotic medications of six residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder, depression and schizophrenia. The physician's orders included Prolixin 2.5 milligrams (mg) daily for schizophrenia. The plan of care dated 10/12/17 indicated Resident #4 received an antipsychotic medication and to monitor behavior symptoms with the goal the resident would not resist care. A Psychoactive medical evaluation completed on 05/02/19 identified Prolixin was used for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Behaviors identified on the evaluation included aggression, inappropriate responses, unwarranted suspiciousness, delusions and paranoia. A physician progress note dated 06/2019 indicated Resident #4 continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facilities policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices with a resident on contact precautions. This affected one (Resident #13) of two residents reviewed on precautions. The facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 01/16/19 with diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic brain injury, seizures, and clostridium difficile (c-diff). Review of physician orders dated 06/28/19 revealed an antibiotic order and to place Resident #13 under contact precautions. Review of physician progress note dated 07/17/19 revealed Resident #13 was being treated for c-diff colitis. Observation conducted on 07/29/19 at 11:47 A.M., revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #56 went into Resident #13's room with clean bed linens in hand and made his bed. STNA #56 did not wash hands upon entering and exiting room and did not have on any personal protective equipment when making Resident #13's bed. STNA #56 then took in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the use of overhead paging was for only emergency situations. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/31/22 at 11:22 A.M. revealed the overhead paging system was utilized by staff to announce meal trays were being ready for delivery. Interview on 05/31/22 at 11:22 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #20 verified the overhead paging system had been used by staff in the kitchen to announce meal trays being ready for delivery. Observation on 05/31/22 at 3:45 P.M. revealed the facility overhead paging system was utilized by staff to announce a phone call for an employee. Observation on 06/02/22 at 7:10 A.M. revealed the overhead paging system was utilized by staff to announce meal trays being ready for delivery. Interview with CNA #15 on 06/02/22 at 7:15 A.M. verified the overhead paging system was utilized by kitchen staff to announce meal trays being ready for delivery at every meal. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-08-01 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a list of pertinent state agencies and advocacy groups and the complaint hotline were posted in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview with a confidential resident on 07/30/19 at 1:05 P.M., revealed he was unaware of how to file a complaint and where the state agency contact information was located. Observation throughout the facility on 08/01/19 at 10:00 A.M., revealed there were no postings of the complaint hotline or State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. Interview with the Administrator on 08/01/19 at 10:00 A.M., verified there were no postings of the complaint hotline or State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERENITY EQUITY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| ZW AOM RE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 21% | since 01/15/2024 |
| SHERMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 17% | since 01/15/2024 |
| HOROWITZ, ZALEMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WAGSCHAL, ZALMAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 16% | since 09/18/2017 |
| WEINBERGER, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 09/18/2017 |
| MICHELSON, SUSAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/18/2018 |
| SHERMAN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/18/2017 |
| AOM HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/18/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $355K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.