Edgewood Manor Of Wellston

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 95.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 45.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility fall report, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely and necessary pain management (including the administration of effective pain medication) for Resident #23 following the identification of an injury to the resident's hip/leg. Actual Harm occurred on 05/19/24 when direct care staff identified Resident #23, who was severely cognitively impaired had increased incontinence (not his baseline) and verbal and non-verbal signs of pain including facial grimacing and grabbing his right leg during care resulting in unrelieved pain. On 05/19/24 at 11:16 A.M. nursing staff received an order for Ultram for pain. However, the medication was not administered on this date until 4:05 P.M. (almost five hours after the order was received). The resident was subsequently transferred to the emergency room on 0519/24 at 8:32 P.M. for treatment of a fractured right hip. This affected one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#22) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44. Actual Harm occurred on 11/27/23 and continued through 01/29/24 when the facility failed to clarify medication orders with Resident #22's referring hospital and include the resident in an admission care plan meeting, resulting in chemotherapy medication being administered in error to Resident #22. As a result of the medication errors, Resident #22 reported and suffered increased weakness, pain, nausea, constipation, and weight loss. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, syncope and collapse, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, malignant neoplasm of larynx, malignant neoplasm of liver,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were not prescribed for longer than 14 days without being re-ordered by the physician or discontinued. This affected two residents (#37 and #42) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include:1.Record review for Resident #37 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, depression, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/23/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition.Review of the physicians order, dated 05/27/25, revealed an order to administer 25 milligrams (mg) of hydroxyzine (an antianxiety medication) every 24 hours as needed. The order did not contain a date to stop the medication and was not discontinued until 06/27/25 (31 days after it was ordered).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure a care plan was in place for a resident diagnosis with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) This affected one (Resident #3) of the one resident reviewed for accurate PTSD care planning. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an initial admission date of 09/10/2024 and a re-entry date of 04/08/2025. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #3 was noted to receive antianxiety, antidepressant, opioids, and anticonvulsants daily. Review of Trauma assessments completed for Resident #3 on 09/11/24, 04/08/25, and 07/15/25 verified this resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a referral appointment was made timely with ophthalmology for Resident #11. This affected one (Resident #11) of two residents reviewed for communication and sensory. The facility census was 40. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed a readmission date of 04/10/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease, dementia and bilateral cataracts.Review of the physician orders revealed an order written on 04/11/25 for audiology, dental, vision and podiatry ancillary services per 360 as needed. An order dated 04/14/25 for artificial tears ophthalmic solution 1%, instill one drop in both eyes three times daily. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 was cognitively intact with delusions and rejection of care. Resident #11 required minimal assistance to complete activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to ensure neuro checks were completed after a resident experienced a unwitnessed fall. This affected one (Resident #23) of the four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was at 40. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 08/31/2020. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, peripheral vascular disease, restlessness and agitation, and optic atrophy bilateral. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #23 was noted to experience impairment to bilateral lower extremities and was dependent on staff assistance for bed mobility. Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/2022 and revised 04/15/24 revealed Resident #23 had the potential for injury or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and review of hospital discharge instructions, the facility failed to ensure discharge orders for medications were accurately implemented. This affected one resident (#39) out of the 16 residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and adult failure to thrive.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/07/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition.Review of the hospital discharge medication instructions, dated 07/30/25, revealed Resident #39 was to continue taking one half of a tablet of 25 milligram (mg) metoprolol (an anti-hypertensive medication) twice a day after discharge from the hospital.Review of the physicians order, dated 07/31/25, revealed Resident #39 was ordered one whole tablet of 25 mg metoprolol to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to include pertinent information on the minimum data set (MDS) assessment for two residents (#15 and #26) out of 13 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26, revealed an admission date of 01/15/21. Diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, major depressive disorder, end stage renal disease and chronic kidney disease, stage 4. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 indicated cognitive intactness. The resident was assessed to require supervision or touching assistance with shower/bathe self and independent with bed mobility and transfers. The assessment did not include hemodialysis. Review of Resident #26's active orders revealed dialysis was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit a resident review (RR) when Resident #17 received a new diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #17) of two residents reviewed for PASARRs (pre-assessment screens and resident reviews). The facility census was 44. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, metabolic encepalopathy, type II diabetes, anemia, cognitive communication disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. An additional diagnosis of schizophrenia was added on 06/11/24. Review of a PASARR dated 06/06/24 revealed section E (a screen for serious mental illness) indicated Resident #17 had a mood disorder (depression) and a panic/severe anxiety disorder. The PASARR did not indicate Resident #17 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Interview on 07/24/24 at 8:44 A.M. with Social Worker (SW) #445 revealed she does complete PASARRs for the facility, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurate upon admission for Resident #15. This affected one of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/07/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, anxiety, PTSD, borderline personality disorder, panic disorder and obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 was cognitively intact with inattention and disorganized thinking. Resident #15 was independent with activities of daily living. Active diagnoses list included anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, PTSD and borderline personality disorder. The MDS did not list antianxiety or antidepressant medications. Review of the physician orders dated 06/24 indicated Resident #15 received the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed develop a care plan addressing schizophrenia for Resident #17 and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for Resident #15. This affected two (Resident #15 and #17) of two residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, metabolic ecepalopathy, type II diabetes, anemia, cognitive communication disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. An additional diagnosis of schizophrenia was added on 06/11/24. Review of a care plan dated 06/27/24 revealed no evidence of a plan of care, goals, or interventions had been implemented related to the new diagnosis of schizophrenia. Interview on 07/24/24 at 10:42 A.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was not a care plan in place for Resident #17 related to schizophrenia. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, record review and policy review, the facility failed to have bilateral palm protectors in place for one (Resident #10) reviewed for prevention of decrease of limited range of motion. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10, revealed an admission date of 01/08/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, contracture of muscle, unspecified upper arm, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gastrostomy status and aphasia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident is rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to be dependent on all aspects of care. Review of Resident #10's active care plans revealed the resident is to wear bilateral palm protectors at all times except during hygiene and range of motion for contractual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,655 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $18,655 — penalty dated 2024-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AOM HEALTHCARE — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $306K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH