Garland Road Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/23/25 at 12:11 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation related to the facility's failure to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for Resident #8 to prevent an elopement.Resident #8 was cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 2. Resident #8 had two elopement assessments which identified Resident #8 as a moderate risk for elopement.Resident #8's care plan did not show elopement as a risk and did not contain any interventions.On 12/09/25, Resident #8 eloped from the facility. The resident was located nearby at a church with scratches. On 12/23/25 at 12:31 p.m., the administrator, DON, ADON, corporate nurse #1, dietary manager, and RDO were notified of the immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation and provided the IJ template.On 12/23/25 at 4:38 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was accepted by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal showed,a. Residents with an elopement score greater than 11 should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/23/25 at 12:11 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation related to the facility's failure to ensure Resident #7 was not dropped from a mechanical lift during a transfer.Resident #7's quarterly assessment, dated 07/23/25, showed their cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The assessment showed Resident #7 was dependent for all transfers.A facility incident report, dated 12/16/25, showed Resident #7 had a fall from a mechanical lift on 12/16/25 when a sling broke resulting in a fracture to the right clavicle and the left tibia.On 12/23/25 at 12:31 p.m., the administrator, DON, ADON, corporate nurse #1, dietary manager, and RDO were notified of the immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation and provided the IJ template.On 12/23/25 at 4:38 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was accepted by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal showed,a. Resident #7 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated with interventions to prevent wandering into other residents' room for 1(#4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans interventions. The administrator identified 102 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 09/23/25 at 3:30 p.m., Resident #5 was observed seated on their walker at the nurses' station with a fast-food bag in their hands. Resident #5's care plan, dated 6/20/25, showed Resident #5 had a focus for wandering into other residents' rooms. The interventions were dated 06/20/25 which included redirecting the resident and analyzing the circumstances, times, and places to deescalate the resident's behavior.Resident #5's nursing note, dated 07/08/25, read in part, .resident found in [gender withheld] residents' bed. Resident asleep near private area. Both residents fully clothed. Resident removed from [gender withheld] residents' bed and took back to [their] own room. Resident #5's nursing note, dated 07/10/25, read in part, .Resident found trying to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident:a. missed their prescribed antibiotic dose; and b. had an abnormal heart rate for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The administrator identified 97 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A MEDICATION-GUIDELINES ON CLINICAL PRACTICE policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide medications in accordance with standard practice guidelines.Resident #6's quarterly resident assessment, dated 08/09/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure and unspecified atrial fibrillation.A physician's order, dated 07/24/25, showed metoprolol succinate (an antihypertensive) 50 mg tablet, extended release for essential primary hypertension. Give one tablet by mouth three times a day. Take one 50mg tablet if systolic blood pressure is less than 110.A physician's order, dated 08/03/25, read in part, ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (an antibiotic) 500 mg tablet for urinary tract infection. Start 08/04/25 at 08:00 [8:00 a.m.].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for 3 (#2, 5, and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for showers.The DON identified 97 residents required assistance with bathing. Findings:A BATHING (NOT PARTIAL OR COMPLETE BED BATH) policy, revised 02/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide bathing services for residents within standard practice guidelines.1. Resident #2's quarterly resident assessment, dated 07/31/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included unspecified hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. The assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS of 15. The assessment showed the resident required setup or clean-up assistance with showers.There was no documentation the resident had a shower on 06/03/25, 06/05/25, 06/07/25, 06/24/25, and 06/26/25.The June 2025 shower sheets showed the resident refused a shower on 06/12/25, 06/14/25, 06/19/25, and 06/25/25.Resident #2 had three out of 12 showers for the month of June 2025.There was no documentation the resident had a shower on 07/01/25, 07/03/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for 2 (#5 and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The administrator identified 97 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A MEDICATION-GUIDELINES ON CLINICAL PRACTICE policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide medications in accordance with standard practice guidelines.1. A physician's order for Resident #5, dated 06/18/25, showed insulin glargine 100units/1mL, give 30 units subcutaneous at bedtime for type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications.A June 2025 Medication Record showed M on 06/20/25 for 9:00 p.m. dose. Resident #5's discharge assessment return not anticipated, dated 07/12/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications.On 08/22/25 at 11:32 a.m., LPN #2 stated they were not sure what the M meant on the medication record. They stated the medication record did not show the insulin was administered on 06/20/25.On 08/22/25 at 11:33 a.m., LPN #2 stated if a resident refused their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the amount of insulin administered was documented on a resident who received sliding scale insulin for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 28 residents received insulin resided in the facility. Findings:A MEDICATION-GUIDELINES ON CLINICAL PRACTICE policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide medications in accordance with standard practice guidelines.A physician's order for Resident #5, dated 06/21/25, showed Humalog kwikpen 200 units/1mL solution. Give one dose subcutaneous for blood sugar 70-100= 0 units, 100-150= 4 units, 151-200= 6 units, 201-250= 8 units, 251-300= 10 units, 301-350= 12 units, 351-400= 14 units, 401-500= 16units, over 500, give 5 additional fast acting units before meals and bedtime for type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma.A Medication Record reviewed from 06/21/25 through 06/30/25 did not show how many units of the sliding scale insulin was administered for all blood sugars above 100.A physician's order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician's order and a self-administration of medication assessment for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The administrator identified 97 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 08/20/25 at 12:49 p.m., fluticasone propionate (a corticosteroid) nasal spray was observed on Resident #6's bedside table.A MEDICATION PROGRAM policy, revised 12/01/23, read in part, Residents who self-administration their medication and keep them locked in their room must be counseled at least monthly by community staff to ascertain if the residents continue to be capable of self-administering their medications/treatments and if security of the medications can continue to be maintained. The community must keep a written record of such counseling.A physician's order, dated 03/11/25, showed fluticasone propionate nasal spray 50 micrograms, give one spray twice a day for unspecified cough.Resident #6's quarterly resident assessment, dated 08/09/25, showed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with low blood sugar received appropriate care for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON identified 28 residents received insulin resided in the facility. Findings:A HYPOGLYCEMIA TREATMENT policy, revised 02/12/20, read in part, Guidelines for Mild Hypoglycemia: Treat, even if biochemical hypoglycemia is not present with a. glucose-15 40% oral gel (Dextrose) gm gel, b. Glucose 15 gm tablets.Repeat blood glucose level in fifteen (15) minutes.A physician's order, dated 06/21/25, showed Humalog kwikpen 200 units/1mL solution. Give one dose subcutaneous for blood sugar 70-100= 0 units, 100-150= 4 units, 151-200= 6 units, 201-250= 8 units, 251-300= 10 units, 301-350= 12 units, 351-400= 14 units, 401-500= 16units, over 500, give 5 additional fast acting units before meals and bedtime for type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma.A Medication Record for Humalog sliding scale on 07/06/25 for 7:00 a.m. dose, showed insulin was held due to vital signs parameters.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-06 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 2 (#28 and #81) of 24 residents sampled for MDS assessments. The administrator identified 91 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Resident Assessment, dated 09/13/17, read in part, It is the standard of Care to conduct, initially and periodically, a comprehensive, accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity utilizing the Minimum Data set (MDS) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual.The assessment process included direct observation, the medical record, as well as communication with the resident and direct care staff across all shifts. 1. Resident #28's admission record, dated 09/14/24, showed they were admitted with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and displaced fracture of the lower right leg. Resident #28's physician orders, dated 09/14/24, read in part, Dialysis Monday, Wednesday and Friday on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a physician's order was obtained for a medication kept at beside to treat an abrasion for 1 (#55); b. a physician's order was in place for a treatment that was provided for 1 (#55); c. an abrasion was assessed routinely for 1 (#55) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for skin conditions; and d. communication was maintained with hospice for 1 (#68) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospice services. The administrator identified 91 residents resided in the facility. The ADON identified 10 residents received hospice services. Findings: 1. On 04/28/25 at 2:10 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to go into Resident #55's room, pick up a tube of mupirocin (topical antibiotic) ointment from the resident's bedside table, and apply it to Resident #55's head. On 05/06/25 at 12:55 p.m., the back of Resident #55's head was observed. A ribbon of cotton was observed on the left side of Resident #55's head. A medication box of triple antibiotic ointment was observed on the dresser next to the resident. The directions on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff donned gloves when applying an ointment to a resident for 1 (#55) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wound care; b. staff changed gloves while performing peri-care to a resident for 1 (#23) of 1 sampled resident observed for peri-care; c. trends in infections were identified through monthly review of tracking for 3 of 3 sampled months reviewed; and d. respiratory equipment was bagged and labeled for 1 (#24) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The administrator identified 91 residents resided in the facility. The ADON identified 17 residents received oxygen services and 28 residents had nebulizers. Findings: 1. On 04/28/25 at 2:06 p.m., LPN #1 was observed to apply mupirocin (topical antibiotic) ointment to the back of Resident #55's head with out wearing gloves. A policy titled Non-Pressure Wound, dated July 2018, showed to follow standard precautions and infection control methods. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 03/13/25, showed Resident #55's BIMS score was 15, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK