Tuscany Village Nursing Center
2333 Tuscany Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73120 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 137 certified beds · (405) 286-0835 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,033 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-01)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.1% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.3% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.6% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.6% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 74.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.9% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 16.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 30.9–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.4–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.1–15.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.16 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure a resident experiencing pain received treatment for pain for two (#1 and #15) of four sampled residents reviewed for pain. CNA #1 failed to notify the nurse when Resident #15 experienced pain during incontinent care. Resident #15 continued to holler/cry out in pain throughout the incontinent care provided by CNA #1. The Administrator identified a census of 128. Findings: A Pain Management and Basic Comfort Measures policy, revised 08/19/20, read in part, .Staff will evaluate pain and provide basic comfort measures in accordance with standard practice guidelines .Utilize pain level scale to determine acceptable level of pain .Examine the site of patient's pain .Evaluate the resident's medical history for successful pain relief therapies .Provide pain medication as prescribed by an authorized prescriber . 1. Resident #15 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and cognitive communication deficit. A Pain Care Plan, last reviewed 02/12/24, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure family and the physician was notified of a resident's refusal of care for 1 (#8) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for notification of refusal of care.The administrator identified 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Refusal of Care and Treatment, dated 02/16/23, read in part, When a resident refuses treatment/procedure ordered by the physician, staff shall notify the physician.Staff will notify the resident's responsible party unless the resident chooses not to allow.Physician orders for Resident #8, dated 10/08/25, showed the resident had the following orders:a. weekly weights for 4 weeks,b. 60 milliliters of milk/soy protein supplement twice a day, andc. sodium bicarbonate (an antacid) 650 milligrams tablet twice a day.An admission assessment for Resident #8, dated 10/14/25, showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS score of 3. The assessment showed Resident #8 was admitted with a diagnoses of obstructive uropathy and non-Alzheimer dementia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. assess, monitor, and intervene for urine changes for 1 (#9) of 4 sampled residents; andb. failed to ensure a resident with a catheter had a physician order specifying the type of catheter for 1 (#8) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care. The corporate nurse identified 11 residents had catheters. Findings: A Care and Removal of an Indwelling Catheter policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, Evaluate the need for catheter removal by validating the record and physician's order.Staff will provide care and removal of an indwelling catheter in accordance with standard practice guidelines.Observe urinary output and urine characteristics; evaluate for discharge, redness, bleeding, or presence of tissue trauma around the urethral meatus. 1.An admission assessment for Resident #8, dated 10/08/25, did not show the resident had a catheter upon admission. Physician orders for Resident #8, dated 10/08/25, showed the resident had physician orders to: a. change suprapubic catheter as needed, b. monitor the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for suctioning of a tracheostomy for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for tracheostomy care.The DON stated three residents had a tracheostomies. Findings:A facility Tracheostomy Care policy, dated 03/02/23, showed staff would provide care for residents with a tracheostomy (an opening in the neck into the windpipe) in accordance with standard practice guidelines and provide suctioning per practice guidelines.A baseline care plan for Resident #1, dated 01/14/26, showed the resident required suctioning and had a tracheostomy.Physician orders for Resident #1, dated 01/14/26 through 01/27/26, showed no order for tracheostomy suctioning.An admission assessment for Resident #1, dated 01/21/26, showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired and had a BIMS score of 07. The assessment showed the resident required suctioning and tracheostomy care and had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.On 02/03/26 at 3:26 p.m., the DON stated Resident #1 should have had a physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents physician orders were accurate for 1 (#8) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for accurate physician orders.The administrator identified 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Care and Removal of an Indwelling Catheter, dated 01/12/20, read in part, Evaluate the need for catheter removal by validating the record and physician's order.Physician orders for Resident #8, dated 10/08/25, showed the resident had physician orders to:a. change suprapubic catheter as needed,b. monitor the output on every shift, c. suprapubic catheter care every shift, andd. enteral tube feeding twice a day. A treatment administration record for Resident #8, dated 10/08/25 through 10/31/25, showed the resident received care for a suprapubic catheter.An annual assessment for Resident #8, dated 10/14/25, showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS score of 3. The assessment showed Resident #8 was admitted with a diagnoses of obstructive uropathy and non-Alzheimer dementia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 (#8) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The administrator identified 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Comprehensive care plans, dated 04/17/23, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implementation a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.The comprehensive care plan will be developed within seven (7) days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care. Other factors identified by the interdisciplinary team, or in accordance with the resident's preferences, will also be addressed in the plan of care. The facility's rationale for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed for 2 (#1 and #2) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for bathing.The administrator identified 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1.A facility policy titled Bathing (Not Partial or Complete Bed Bath), revised 02/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide bathing services for residents with standard practice guidelines.If the resident refuses to independently or allow staff to assist with bathing, document the refusal in the record. A CNA flow sheet, dated 01/14/26 through 01/27/26, showed Resident #1 received a shower on 01/18/26 and 01/25/26. Interdisciplinary progress notes for Resident #1, dated 01/14/26 through 01/27/26, showed no documented refusals of showers. An admission assessment for Resident #1, dated 01/21/26, showed the resident's cognition was severely impaired, and had a BIMS score of 07. The assessment showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a physician ordered dressing change as ordered for 1 (#12) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for wound care.The DON identified 23 residents required wound care.Findings:A physician's order for Resident #12, dated 07/09/25, showed IV-Midline (access device inserted into upper arm veins) dressing change on the day shift weekly on Friday, or when it becomes damp, loose, soiled, or if the patient develops problems at the site that require further inspection.A medication administration record for Resident #12, dated 07/11/25, showed the IV-Midline dressing change was missed. The record showed no reason the dressing change was missed.An admission assessment for Resident #12, dated 07/12/25, showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and their cognition was severely impaired. The assessment showed the resident's BIMS score was 07, required assistance for activities of daily living, and had IV access while a resident. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure responsible parties were notified:a) for a change in condition, and b) an order for a new medication for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for notification of change.LPN #2 identified 120 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A policy titled Change of Condition, dated 02/13/23, read in part, Patient families, guardians, or other appropriate people are to be contacted when there is a significant change in a patients condition or health status.An undated face sheet for Resident #2's showed diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non-dominant side, muscle weakness and cerebral infarction, and bipolar disorder. The face sheet showed HealthCare Contact to be Resident #2's daughter. The resident's spouse/roommate was listed as the primary contact.Resident #2's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed cognitively intact cognition with BIMS of 15. An Interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a significant change MDS assessment for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments.LPN #2 identified 120 residents resided at the facility.Findings:An undated face sheet for Resident #2's, showed diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, and bipolar disorder. Resident #2's significant change assessment, dated 05/01/25, showed cognitively intact cognition with a BIMS of 15. The assessment showed the Special treatments, procedures, and programs section, O0100 Z1 was coded as none of the above. Hospice care while a resident at K1 was not marked. A hospice certification document, dated 04/17/25, showed the certification date range of 04/17/25 to 07/15/25. The document was signed by an RN. A physician's order, dated 04/18/25, showed admit to hospice.On 06/19/25 at 12:56 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated the significant change assessment, dated 05/01/25, for Resident #2 was related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor and intervene in a timely manner for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment.LPN #2 identified 120 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An Interdisciplinary Team Notes, dated 04/09/25 at 9:17 p.m., showed family member #1 called the facility requesting their family member be sent to the emergency room to be tested for C-Diff since their other family member that was a roommate was hospitalized and positive for it. A Medication Administration Record, dated 04/01/25 through 04/30/25, showed Zofran (medication for nausea and vomiting) ordered PRN, was administered on:a. 04/07/25 at 10:40 p.m. b. 04/08/25 at 12:05 p.m.c. 04/09/25 at 8:37 p.m.A facility policy Medication Administration, dated 01/2024, read in part, If two consecutive doses of a vital medication are withheld or refused, the physician is notified.An Interdisciplinary Progress Notes, dated 04/02/25 through 04/11/25 showed the following:On 04/08/25 at 10:45 a.m., CMA#1 documented all morning medications were refused, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living documentation was completed for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for ADL's.LPN #2 identified 120 residents resided at the facility.Findings:An undated face sheet for Resident #2, showed diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affection left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, and bipolar disorder. Resident #2's significant change assessment, dated 05/01/25, showed cognitively intact cognition with a BIMS of 15.A policy titled ADL Dysphagia and Dining, dated 01/23/23, read in part, 17. Document percentage consumed in EHR. Review of the ADL documentation for March and April 2025, did not show any documentation of intake and output or meal percentages for 04/01/25 through 04/07/25, the days leading up to the 04/07/25 hospital stay.On 06/18/25 at 3:49 p.m., the regional nurse consultant stated via an email response, they had provided all the ADL documentation they had for March and April 2025.On 06/20/25 at 9:33 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff did not use disinfectant wipes to clean residents' skin for 2 (#23 and #70) of 2 sampled residents observed during a finger stick for blood sugar and insulin observation. The corporate nurse identified 39 diabetic residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/01/25 at 7:41 a.m., LPN #2 was observed to gather supplies to obtain a blood sugar. They were observed to go to Resident #70 and clean the resident's finger with a disinfectant wipe prior to obtaining the blood sugar. On 04/01/25 at 7:49 a.m., the disinfectant wipe container was observed to show Not for use on skin. On 04/01/25 at 7:51 a.m., LPN #2 was observed to gather supplies to obtain another blood sugar. They were observed to go to Resident #23 and clean the resident's finger with a disinfectant wipe prior to obtaining the blood sugar. On 04/01/25 at 8:02 a.m., LPN #2 was observed to clean Resident #23's skin on their abdomen with a disinfectant wipe and administer insulin. A Safety Data Sheet for the disinfectant wipes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent with the facility's EMR for 3 (CMA #1, LPN #2, and AD) of 3 staff observed for competent staff. The DON identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/01/25 at 8:05 a.m., during a medication observation pass with CMA #1, a medication for a Resident #70 was observed not to be administered. In-service sheets for the new EMR, dated 03/05/25, 03/06/25, 03/10/25, and 03/12/25, did not show CMA #1, LPN #2, or the AD attended the in-services. On 04/01/25 at 8:08 a.m., CMA #1 stated the medication was not in the facility. They were asked how medications were ordered. CMA #1 stated as far as they knew, it was on the new EMR system. CMA #1 was asked if they could look at the new EMR and tell if the medication had been ordered. They stated they had not been trained on the new EMR and did not know how to tell if the medication had been ordered. CMA #1 stated they came into work one morning and the new EMR was in place. On 04/02/25 at 10:35 a.m., LPN #2 stated they did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 5 (#70, 71, 77, 106, and #226) of 10 sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/01/25 at 7:17 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #71. Resident #71 had an order for hydrocodone/acetaminophen (an opiate medication) 7.5/325 mg every six hours that was not administered. 2. On 04/01/25 at 7:25 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #226. Resident #226 was administered Vitamin B12 10 mcg without an order. Resident #226 had physician's orders to administer thiamine (a vitamin) 100 mg daily at 9:00 a.m. and ferrous sulfate (a iron supplement) 325 mg daily at 9:00 a.m. that were not observed to be administered. 3. On 04/01/25 at 7:46 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #106. Resident #106 had an order for lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor)10 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than 5 percent for 5 (#70, 71 77, 106, and #226) of 10 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The medication error rate was 23.68 percent. The DON identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/01/25 at 7:17 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #71. Resident #71 had an order for hydrocodone/acetaminophen (an opiate medication) 7.5/325 mg every six hours that was not administered. 2. On 04/01/25 at 7:25 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #226. Resident #226 was administered Vitamin B12 10 mcg without an order. Resident #226 had physician's orders to administer thiamine (a vitamin) 100 mg daily at 9:00 a.m. and ferrous sulfate (a iron supplement) 325 mg daily at 9:00 a.m. that were not observed to be administered. 3. On 04/01/25 at 7:46 a.m., CMA #2 was observed to administer medications to Resident #106. Resident #106 had an order for lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor)10 mg daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained for handling soiled linen and hand hygiene during incontinent care for 1 (#52) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The DON identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/25/25 at 9:18 a.m., LPN #1 was observed exiting a resident's room while holding a soiled incontinent pad and took it into the soiled utility room. On 03/31/25 at 5:46 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to provide incontinent care to Resident #52 whose brief was soiled with urine and feces. CNA #1 did not change their gloves after cleaning the resident. CNA #1 used soiled gloves to put a clean brief on Resident #52 and placed a clean incontinent pad and a clean draw sheet under the resident. CNA #1 placed the soiled linen and soiled wipes onto the floor and not into a plastic bag. On 03/31/25 at 6:01 a.m., CNA #1 was observed to place soiled items from the floor into a plastic bag. CNA #1 used soiled gloves to place a clean sheet on top of Resident #52. CNA #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified eight residents in the facility with pressure ulcers. Findings: A policy titled An Overview of Wound Care, dated July 2018, read in parts .The comprehensive assessment should provide the basis for defining approaches to address residents at risk of developing or already having a PU/PI .Effective prevention and treatment are based upon consistently providing routine and individualized interventions .Repositioning or relieving constant pressure is a common, effective intervention for an individual with a PU/PI or who is at risk of developing one . Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, and overactive bladder. A care plan, dated 08/09/23, documented at risk for/actual skin breakdown. The care plan documented staff where to assist the resident to turn and reposition frequently and inspect skin of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure a care plan meeting was held and a resident's representative was included for one (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for representative included in plan of care. The Administrator identified a census of 128. Findings: Resident #4 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease and chronic pain. Resident #4 had a Care Plan Conference on 07/31/23. Resident #4's Annual Resident Assessment was completed on 10/10/23. A Nurse's Note, dated 10/17/24, documented an email was sent to Resident #4's representative regarding setting up a care plan meeting. The next documented Care Plan Conference for Resident #4 was on 02/09/24. On 03/27/24 at 9:18 a.m., LPN #1 stated they were responsible for care plan meetings. They stated the meetings were supposed to be every three months. They stated Resident #4 had a care plan meeting that was missed. They stated the meeting was scheduled, but LPN #1 wasn't working, and no one covered them. They stated it was the meeting that fell between the 07/23 and the 02/24 care plan meetings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for accurate records. The Administrator identified a census of 128. Findings: A Records Management policy, revised 06/01/17, read in part, .The Organization requires that its records be maintained in a consistent and logical manner and be managed so that the Organization .Meets legal standards for protection, storage, and retrieval .Protects the privacy of healthcare facility residents and patients . Resident #3 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction and aphasia. Resident #14's hospital records, dated 08/05/23, were observed in Resident #3's clinical record. Resident #13's hospital records, dated 08/07/23, were observed in Resident #3's clinical record. Resident #11's hospital records, dated 09/08/23, were observed in Resident #3's clinical record. Resident #12's hospital records, dated 09/25/23, were observed in Resident #3's clinical record. On 03/21/24 at 2:42 p.m., Medical Records stated they received any resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly securely, dated, and labeled for one of one kitchen observation. The Administrator identified 130 residents received services from the kitchen in the facility. Findings: The FOOD STORAGE policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, .Air-tight containers or bags are used for all opened packages of food. All containers are accurately labeled with the item or date opened .All foods are covered, labeled and dated . On 02/26/24 at 9:00 a.m., during the initial kitchen visit of the dry storage pantry, two opened boxes of quick creamy wheat were observed. The opened boxes were not secured. On 02/26/24 at 9:01 a.m., the CDM picked the two boxes up. They stated the boxes were not secured. On 02/26/24 at 9:02 a.m., two white bulk storage containers containing a white substance were not labeled or dated. On 02/26/24 at 9:04 a.m., the CDM was observed putting a label on each bulk storage container. One container was labeled flour and dated 02/26 and the other was labeled sugar and dated 02/26. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident's blood pressure was abnormal for one (#105) of three sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The Administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The MEASURING BLOOD PRESSURE policy, revised 01/12/18, read in part, .Report abnormal findings to the nurse in charge or the healthcare provider . Resident #105 had a diagnosis of hypertension. A physician's order, dated 07/17/23, documented amlodipine 5 mg give one tablet by mouth one time per day related to hypertension. Hold for systolic blood pressure below 100 or diastolic blood pressure below 60. Notify physician if held times three days. Resident #105's January 2024 EMAR documented the following blood pressures with the administration of amlodipine 5 mg: a. 198/78 on 01/08/24; b. 189/89 on 01/09/24; c. 176/87 on 01/14/24; d. 171/96 on 01/19/24; e. 165/97 on 01/20/24; f. 166/92 on 01/21/24; g. 160/93 on 01/24/24; h. 173/94 on 01/26/24; and i. 197/92 on 01/27/24. On 02/28/24 at 1:54 p.m., the ADON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for one (#29) of 27 sampled residents reviewed for home like environment. The Administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side. On 02/26/24 at 3:17 p.m., a hole was observed on the wall behind Resident #29's head of the bed. There was a tan, rectangular wall plate with a silver adapter hanging below the hole. On 02/26/24 at 3:20 p.m., a hole was observed on the wall by the air conditioner in Resident #29's room. Resident #29 stated they did not know what caused the holes or when they occurred. On 02/26/24 at 3:29 p.m., CNA #1 observed the holes in Resident #29's room. They stated they saw the holes the night before but did not know when they occurred. On 02/26/24 at 3:30 p.m., CNA #1 stated they had not put in a maintenance request for the holes in the Resident's room. On 02/28/24 at 1:45 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor stated they expected staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for one (#124) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Recapitulation Summary policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, .The staff will complete a recapitulation summary per standard practice guidelines .The recapitulation summary should be completed as an interdisciplinary teams at the time of discharge .The summary should be completed within 20 days of the date of discharge . Resident #124 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy and malignant neoplasm of brain. Resident #124's face sheet documented the resident discharged on 12/23/23. On 02/28/24 at 11:00 a.m., the DON was asked for Resident #124's discharge summary. On 02/28/24 at 11:02 a.m., the DON stated the discharge summary had not been completed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents toenails were trimmed for one (#232) of 27 sampled residents who were reviewed for ADL's. The Administrator identified 134 resident who resided in the facility. Findings: A Foot and Toenail Care, Routine policy, read in part, Residents will be provided routine foot and toenail care within the professional scope of practice for CNAs, LVN/LPNs and RNs as is dictated per state guidelines and in accordance with standard practice . Resident #232 had diagnoses which included brain stem stroke syndrome and pain. They did not have diagnoses of diabetes or peripheral vascular disease. A physician's order, dated 02/24/24, documented podiatrist consult to evaluate and treat and trim painful, mycotic, toenails and calluses for prophylactic measures. On 2/26/24 at 2:56 p.m., resident #232's right foot was observed to have long, thick, curved toe nails. The resident stated they would like them cut. On 2/27/24 at 8:51 a.m., resident #232's bilateral feet were observed to have long, thick, curved toe nails. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were assessed upon admission for one (#38) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified 18 residents had pressure ulcers. Findings: An Overview of Wound Care policy, effective July 2018, read in part, .It is important that each existing PU/PI be identified, whether present on admission or developed after admission .When assessing the PU/PI itself, it is important that documentation addresses .The type of injury .The PU/PI's stage .A description of the PU/PI's characteristics The progress toward healing .Presence of infection .The presence of pain .A description of dressings and treatments . Resident #38 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of right hip, stage 4, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, and pressure ulcer of left heel, stage 4. A Skin Data form, dated 08/30/23, read in part, .Upon assessment, this nurse noticed all wounds were covered with dressings. The dressings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication with the dialysis center and ongoing assessment of a resident before and after dialysis for one (#20) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The DON identified 4 residents residing in the facility received dialysis. Findings: A facility policy, titled Dialysis - Hemodialysis, reviewed 04/14/23, read in part, .The dialysis staff and the community staff will participate in ongoing communication by completing the dialysis collection form as follows: .EHR .Resident Data Collection>Dialysis .Pre-Dialysis: Section A to be completed by the sending community licensed nurse and to accompany patient to the dialysis center .Post Dialysis: Community nurse to complete Section B with dialysis with dialysis center information. Community nurse to assess and complete Section C .Place document in the appropriate section of the medical record . Resident #20 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease with heart failure with stage 5 chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one (#105) of three sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The Administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The PHYSICIAN ORDERS (ADMISSION) policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, .The licensed nurse reviews orders from the transfer record from an acute care hospital or other entity .A call is placed to the physician to confirm the orders . Resident #105 had a diagnosis of hypertension. A physician's order, dated 07/17/23, documented amlodipine 5 mg give one tablet by mouth one time per day related to hypertension. Hold for systolic blood pressure below 100 or diastolic blood pressure below 60. Notify physician if held times three days. A hospital Discharge Summary Notes, dated 01/29/24, documented to continue taking amlodipine 10 mg take one tablet by mouth daily. A nursing note, dated 01/29/24, documented Resident #105 returned from the emergency room with no new order. On 02/28/24 at 10:59 a.m., LPN #1 stated when a resident returned from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for one (Hall 200) of 7 treatment carts observed for medication storage. The facility identified three medication carts and four nurse carts. Findings: A Storage of Medication policy, read in part, .The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications .allowed access to medication carts .should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. On 02/29/24 at 9:05 a.m., LPN #3 was observed to walk away from the treatment cart without locking it, and went to the nurses' station. Observed inside the cart were insulin syringes, needles, insulin, alcohol pads, and creams. On 02/29/24 at 9:08 a.m., LPN #3 stated the cart was not locked when they returned and that it should always be kept locked. LPN #3 stated that a resident could get something out of the cart and harm themselves if it was not locked.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate portion sizes were offered to residents for one of one meal service observed. The Administrator identified 130 residents received services from the kitchen in the facility. Findings: The PORTION CONTROL policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, .Portion control will be maintained to ensure nutritional value for all foods offered .Spreadsheets indicating portion sizes per diet are posted at tray line and used to guide the serving at each meal . An undated SSC Tuscany Village F/W 2023, Alternate extended menu for lunch documented a number eight scoop for Spanish rice. On 02/26/24 at 11:15 p.m., the CDM identified the above menu as scheduled to be served for lunch on 02/26/24. On 02/26/24 at 12:15 p.m., [NAME] #2 added one quesadilla, one green scoop of Spanish rice, and one green spoodle of zucchini to a plate. On 02/26/24 at 12:19 p.m., [NAME] #2 added one green scoop of Spanish rice, one green spoodle of pork roast, one black spoodle of potatoes, and one ladle of gravy to a plate. On 02/26/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for one (#119) of six sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The Administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility and 20 residents were on antibiotics. Findings: The Antibiotic Stewardship policy, revised 11/17, read in part, .We will monitor antibiotic use .Antibiotic Starts .Days of therapy .Measurement process .Will include tracking of specific key aspects of antibiotic use data for each resident .Antibiotic use data will be compiled monthly by the Director of Nursing or designee, and the Infection Preventionist will interpret the monthly data . Resident #119 had diagnoses which included sepsis and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A physician's order, dated 02/20/24, documented zyvox 600 mg give one tablet by mouth two times per day related to sepsis. It had an end date of 12/31/9998. The Infection Control Log dated 02/02/24 to 02/27/24 was reviewed. There was no documentation Resident #119's antibiotic use was monitored. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light system for one (#29) of 27 sampled residents reviewed for a functioning call light system. The Administrator identified 134 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The CALL LIGHTS ANSWERING policy, revised 02/12/20, read in part, .When leaving the room, be sure the call light is placed within the resident's reach . Resident #29 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side. Resident #29's care plan for stroke, revised 12/06/23, documented to keep call light and most frequently used personal items within reach of the Resident. On 02/26/24 at 3:13 p.m., Resident #29's call light was out of reach of the Resident. The call light was on the recliner with one half of the plate on the floor. Resident #29 was laying in bed. The call light wall plate had exposed red and blue cables. Resident #29 stated the call light was broken a week ago and they holler when they needed help. On 02/26/24 at 3:25 p.m., CNA #1 stated Resident #29 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dishware was clean for one of one kitchen observation. The Administrator identified 114 Residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A Cleaning Dishes in Dish Machine policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, .remove dishes, inspect, and put away if clean and dry .if dishes are not clean, repeat steps . On 01/26/24 at 2:54 p.m., blue handled coffee cups were observed in the clean dish area stacked on trays inverted. 32 cups had a white residue, white small particles, and visible contaminants inside. On 01/26/24 at 2:58 p.m., cook #1 was shown the blue handle plastic coffee cups. They stated they saw some white stuff inside the cup and it did not look clean. [NAME] #1 stated, I don't know what that stuff is, you can wipe it out. On 01/26/24 at 3:05 p.m., the Corporate Dietary Manager was shown the blue plastic coffee cups stored in the clean dish area. They stated they could see the debris and residue inside the cups.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. maintain infection control during the provision of incontinent care for two (#8 and #10) of three sampled residents observed receiving incontinent care; and b. ensure staff donned PPE prior to entering a covid-19 positive room for one (#11) of three sampled residents positive for Covid-19. The Administrator identified 123 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The PERINEAL CARE policy, revised 04/10/23, read in part, .Dispose of gloves and used supplies and perform hand hygiene .Apply new gloves and place new brief and change linens as needed . The CORONAVIRUS 2-2019; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19 policy, revised 08/23, read in part, .The required PPE for COVID-19 isolation rooms or when providing care or services to a COVID-19 positive resident .staff should wear an N95, face shield or goggles, gown, and gloves . 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness. On 01/29/23 at 5:33 a.m., CNA #3 entered Resident #8's room and informed the Resident they would be performing incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure thorough incontinent care was provided for one (#9) of three sampled residents observed receiving incontinent care. The Administrator identified 123 residents resided in the facility and 70 residents were dependent on staff for incontinent care. Findings: The PERINEAL CARE policy, revised 04/10/23, read in part, Staff will provide perineal care in accordance with standard of practice .Perineal care for a female .Wash labia majora .With dominant hand wash downward from pubic area toward rectum in one smooth stroke . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Resident #9's care plan for elimination, reviewed 10/02/23, documented to provide pericare with incontinent changes. On 01/29/23 at 5:16 a.m., CNA #1 informed Resident #9 they would be performing incontinent care. CNA #1 donned gloves, lowered the Resident's head of the bed, pulled down their brief and wiped the Resident's groin with one wipe. They stated the brief was wet. CNA #1 turned Resident #9 and used one wipe to wipe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for dependent residents in a timely manner for one (#9) of three sampled residents reviewed for incontinence care. The Administrator identified 125 residents resided in the facility and 71 residents needed assistance with incontinence care. Findings: The Perineal Care policy, revised 04/10/23, read in part, .Staff will provide perineal care in accordance with the standard of practice to prevent skin breakdown and infection . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility. Resident #9's admission resident assessment, dated 10/13/23, documented Resident #9 was cognitively intact and they are dependent on another person for toileting hygiene. Resident #9's care plan for self-care deficit, dated 10/05/23, documented, to provide assistance with self-care as needed. On 12/29/23 at 8:17 a.m., Resident #9 stated incontinence care was last provided around 2:00 a.m. Resident #9 stated they told staff an hour ago that he was incontinent. Resident #9 stated they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one (#9) of two sampled residents observed during medication pass. The Administrator identified 125 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Medication Administration General Guidelines policy, dated 09/18, read in part, .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included vitamin deficiency, GERD, congestive heart failure. A physician's order, dated 10/09/23, documented magnesium oxide 420 mg give one tablet two times a day. A physician's order, dated 10/05/23, documented pantoprazole 40 mg delayed release give one tablet one time a day. A physician's order, dated 10/09/23, documented probiotic 100 billion cell capsule, give one capsule two times a day dietary supplement. On 12/28/23 at 9:20 a.m., a medication pass for Resident #9 was observed. A review of Resident #9's medication administration record for 12/28/23 documented the following medications were not administered in the morning due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of an investigation that resulted in a resident being found in possession of an illegal substance for one (#2) of four sampled residents reviewed for being treated with dignity and respect. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/02/23, documented 121 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Internal Investigative Summary, dated 09/22/23, read in part, .residents complaining about a resident smoking/selling marijuana to other residents A Medication Destruction Log, dated 09/22/23, read in part, .Confiscated marijuana from resident . On 10/03/23 at 3:45 p.m., the Administrator acknowledged a report had not been submitted to OSDH regarding the incident documented in the Internal Investigative Summary written on 09/22/23.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. call lights were in reach for three (#3,18, and #75), and b. a call light was provided that communicated the resident's needs to staff on duty for one (#36) of 24 sampled resident reviewed for call lights . The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Call Lights policy, revised 02/12/20, read in parts, .be sure the call light is placed within the resident's reach . 1. Resident #36 had diagnoses which included seizure disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar type. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated 12/23/22, documented Resident #36's cognition was intact and they used a wheelchair and walker to ambulate. On 01/17/23 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #36 stated they had no call light and were given a hand bell, but staff couldn't hear it. On 01/18/23 at 5:31 p.m., Resident #36 was observed ringing their hand held call bell. The bell sound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to ensure the following: a. a cold water faucet was in good working order one (#49), b. a power wheelchair was clean for one (#10) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment, c. carpets were clean and flat for one (Hall 500) of five halls, and d. odors did not linger on one (Hall 500) of five halls observed for odors and homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #49 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/15/22, documented Resident #49's cognition was intact. On 01/18/23 at 6:50 p.m., Resident #49 was sitting in their wheelchair outside their room. Resident #49 stated the cold water faucet was broken in their bathroom. Resident #49 stated it had been broken for a couple of months. Resident #49's bathroom's sink was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: A. provide assistance with eating for one (#71), and B. provide incontinent care in a timely manner for one (#33) of six sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. It documented 63 residents required assistance with eating, and 25 residents were dependent on staff for eating. It documented 85 residents were occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder. Findings: 1. Resident #71 had a diagnoses of quadriplegia. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/13/22, documented Resident #71's cognition was intact and they required extensive assistance from staff for eating. On 01/17/23 at 8:51 a.m., Resident #71 stated they didn't get assisted with breakfast a couple of days ago. They stated the staff told them they would be back but didn't return. On 01/18/23 at 5:09 p.m., Resident #71 was laying in bed and their dinner tray was observed next to the resident. The dinner plate was observed to have saran…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment and hall areas were free from potential fall hazards for one (#49) of three sampled residents and one (Hall 500) of five halls observed for accidents hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #49 had diagnoses which included muscle weakness. A Physician Progress Note, dated 11/11/22, documented the resident was able to self propel short distances in a manual wheelchair. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/15/22, documented Resident #49's cognition was intact, the resident utilized a wheelchair, and the resident was independent with locomotion on the unit. On 01/18/23 at 6:50 p.m., Resident #49 was sitting in their wheelchair outside their room. Resident #49 stated the lock on their wheelchair was broken. Resident #49 was observed to push the handle forward, on the right side of the wheelchair, to place it in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Resident #24 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia. A Resident Assessment, dated 12/07/22, documented Resident #24 required total assistance of two staff for transfers. A Care Plan, dated 12/27/22, documented Resident #24 required total assistance of two and a lift for transfers. On 01/18/23 at 6:00 p.m., Resident #24's call light sounded. On 01/18/23 at 6:01 p.m., LPN #3 was observed to enter Resident #24's room. Resident #24 told LPN #3 they wanted to go to bed. LPN #3 was observed to go inform CNA #11 that Resident #24 wanted to go to bed. On 01/18/23 at 7:04 p.m., CNA's #11 and #12 were observed to enter Resident #24's room with a total body lift. They were observed to use the lift and transferred Resident #24 to bed. On 01/18/23 at 7:23 p.m., CNA #11 was asked how long Resident #24 waited to be transferred to bed. They stated over an hour. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure: A. feeding assistance was provided timely for one (#71), B. incontinent care was completed timely for one (#33), C. hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: A. medications were administered as ordered for three (#98, 121, and #59) of 11 sampled residents reviewed for medications, and B. an adequate system to track and verify discontinued narcotics to prevent potential misappropriation for five (#181, 183, 125, 184, and #180) of five sampled residents reviewed for narcotic destruction. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medical Administration General Guideline, policy dated 09/16, read in part, .If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time .An explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record . 1. Resident #98 had diagnoses which included vitamin deficiency. A Resident's Consolidated Order report, dated 05/19/21, documented Resident #98 was to receive folic acid 1 mg every day. On 01/23/23 at 8:50 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer folic acid 400 mcg to Resident #98. On 01/23/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff wore masks covering their mouth and nose and washed their hands after touching their face while serving food to residents, b. a Foley catheter bag was not on the floor for one (#71), and c. oxygen tubing was not stepped on or in contact with dried fecal matter on the floor for one (#22) of two sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility, seven had indwelling catheters. The DON identified 117 residents received nutrition from the kitchen and 24 residents had orders for oxygen. Findings: A Personal Protective Equipment Audit policy, undated, read in part , .Mask fits snug to face and below chin . 1. On 01/17/23 at 12:39 p.m., Dietary aide #1 was observed in the kitchen preparing lunch meal trays for in room service. Dietary aide #1 was observed with their mask below their nose. Dietary aide #1 was observed touching their face and nose without washing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were conducted after a fall for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Neurological Evaluation policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, .nursing staff will evaluate the resident following suspected head injury or change in level of consciousness .Every fifteen (15) minutes times four .Every thirty (30) minutes times four .Every one (1) hour times four .Every four (4) hours times four .Every eight (8) hours times four .Level of Consciousness .Pupil Reaction .Hand Grasp . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included epilepsy and aphasia. An Incident Report, dated 06/14/22, read in part, .Fall .Witnesses No .Action Taken - Neuro check . A Nurse Progress note, dated 06/14/22 at 10:31 p.m., documented the family requested Resident #1 be sent to the hospital due to the fall. A Discharge Hospital record, dated 06/14/22, documented Resident #1 had a mild,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide range of motion restorative care to one (#93) of one sampled resident reviewed for restorative care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Program Philosophy, Goals and Objectives policy, dated 04/2012, read in parts, .The restorative program, promotes and enhance quality of life for patient/residents by assisting them in obtaining or maintaining as much independence and functional skills as possible, as well as preserving, dignity, and self-esteem . Resident #93 had diagnosis of impairment to upper and lower right side. A Restorative Care Plan sheet, dated 04/27/22, documented Resident #93 was to receive continuous restorative care six times a week to maintain and improve adequate range of motion for upper and lower right side range of motion impairment. A Nursing Restorative Care Program, dated from 04/07/22 through 01/24/23, Resident # 93 did not receive restorative care 219 ordered days out of 236 scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for a Foley catheter and catheter care for one (#378) of four sampled residents reviewed for catheters. The DON identified four residents with Foley catheters. Findings: A Physician Orders policy, dated 01/12/20, read in part, .The licensed nurse will receive and transcribe the physician's orders . Resident #378 had diagnosis of unstageable pressure ulcer to right buttock. On 01/17/23 at 10:37 a.m., Resident #378 was observed to have a Foley catheter bag. On 01/24/23 at 9:13 a.m., Corporate Nurse #1 stated there were no orders for the resident's Foley or catheter care in the resident's clinical records.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure urostomy supplies were available for one (#10) of five sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. The DON identified one resident had a urostomy. Findings: Resident #10 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy. A Care plan, dated 11/05/22, documented to keep Resident #10's urostomy tubing below the level of the bladder. A Resident Assessment, dated 12/16/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact. On 01/18/23 at 6:12 p.m., Resident #10 was being assisted to bed. CNA #11 asked Resident #10 where the urostomy drain bag was. Resident #10 stated the staff were using a colostomy bag because the facility didn't have the correct supplies. Resident #10 was observed to have a colostomy bag in place. The bag was observed to be two thirds full of urine. CNA #12 stated LPN #3 had placed the colostomy bag over the urostomy last night. CNA #12 stated LPN #3 couldn't locate a urostomy bag. On 01/18/23 at 7:00 p.m., LPN #3 was asked the reason Resident #10 had a colostomy bag in place over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding formula was changed within the manufacturers recommended time frames for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented seven residents received tube feedings. Resident #1 had diagnosis which included aphasia. Findings: A Physician's Order, dated 08/24/22, documented Isosource 1.5 formula to be administered at 60 cc per hour for tube feeding. A Resident Assessment, dated 11/03/22, documented Resident #1 had a tube feeding. A Care plan, revised 12/13/22, documented Resident #1 had enteral tube feeding. On 01/18/23 at 5:04 p.m., Resident #1 was observed to be in bed. Isosource 1.5 formula was observed to be infusing via pump at 60 cc per hour. The formula bag was labeled with the date of 01/17/23 and a time of 1:30 p.m. On 01/18/23 at 5:13 p.m., LPN #5 was asked what the policy was for staff changing out a residents' tube feeding formula. They stated staff changed it every 24 hours. LPN #5 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration observation error rate was less than five percent. There were three errors out of 27 opportunities observed during a medication pass which made the medication error rate 11.11%. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #98 had diagnoses which included vitamin deficiency. A Resident's Consolidated Order report, dated 05/19/21, documented Resident #98 was to receive folic acid 1 mg every day. On 01/23/23 at 8:50 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer folic acid 400 mcg to Resident #98. On 01/23/23 at 9:51 a.m., CMA #1 was asked how they ensured medications were administered as ordered. CMA #1 stated they look at the physician's orders. CMA #1 showed the bottle of folic acid 400 mcg they had administered to Resident #98. CMA #1 stated it wasn't the correct dose and it should have been 1 mg. 2. Resident #121 had diagnoses which included severe protein-calorie malnutrition and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs for one (#102) of five sampled residents reviewed for laboratory services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #102 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type two and seizures. A Resident's Consolidated Order report, documented lab orders as follows: a. on 06/10/22 for a Complete Blood Count With Auto Differential and a complete metabolic panel to be completed every six months, b. on 10/24/22 for a Hemoglobin A1C to be completed every February, May, August, and November, and c. on 11/16/22 for a LEVETIRACETAM to be completed every December and June. On 01/23/23 at 12:35 p.m., the DON was asked to provide the lab orders listed in the physician orders from January 2022 to current. On 01/23/23 at 1:11 p.m., Corporate nurse #1 stated there were no lab results located. Corporate nurse #1 was asked if the labs should have been completed. They stated Yeah.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review , observation, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's religious diet restrictions for one (#36) of one sampled resident reviewed for religious dietary preferences. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented there were 120 residents residing in the facility. The DON identified 117 residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A Food and Nutrition policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, .Menus are personalized to reflect religious, cultural/ethnic needs and preferences . Resident # 36 had a diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. A Care Plan, dated 10/24/22, read in part, .Doesn't want coffee or tea on [their] meal tray . On 01/17/23 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #36 was observed to have tea served with their meal in the resident's room. Resident #36 stated they were served tea which is against their religious practices. Resident #36 stated they have informed the facility and they continued to be served tea. On 01/19/23 at 11:34 a.m., MDS Coordinator #2 was asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and at an appetizing temperature for one (#71) of eight sampled residents reviewed for dietary services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 01/18/23, documented 120 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 117 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's Hot and Cold Food Temperatures policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, .All hot food items must be served to the resident at a palatable temperature . Resident #71 had a diagnosis of quadriplegia. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 12/13/22, documented Resident #71's cognition was intact and they required extensive assistance from staff for eating. On 01/18/23 at 5:09 p.m., Resident #71 was laying in bed and their dinner tray was observed next to the resident. The dinner plate was observed to have saran wrap over the food. Resident #71 stated the tray had been there 40 to 45 minutes. On 01/18/23 at 5:40 p.m., CNA #8 gave Resident #71 a french fry. Resident #71 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-01 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ the services of a qualified social worker on a full time basis. The Administrator identified 134 resided in the facility. Findings: There was no designated Social Services in the facility. A facility form list of Department heads, revised 2/21/24, did not have a name listed in the space for Social Services Director. On 2/28/24 at 1:58 p.m., the DON stated they did not have a Social Services person in the facility. They stated to ask the Administrator how long they had been without one. On 2/28/24 at 1:59 p.m., the Administrator stated they had not had a Social Services person for approximately 30 days. They stated that the Corporate Social Worker Consultant met the regulation. They stated the Corporate Social Worker was in the facility once a month and would stay for a week at a time. The Administrator stated the regulation was met by the Admissions Coordinator being the assistant to the Corporate Social Worker. They stated the Admissions Coordinator was not a Social Worker and did not have a degree in Social Work.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-03-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-24 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF TUSCANY SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2020 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/23/2021 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 09/23/2021 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| FONANG, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/06/2022 |
| IKUGBAYIGBE, HARRIET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2025 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/11/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/11/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/20/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/20/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/29/2017 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTIN, JOHN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375536. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.