No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Simpson Place

3922 Simpson Street, Dallas, TX 75246 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (214) 231-0864 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (214) 231-0864 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
411 N Washington Ave · (469) 334-0624 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3410 Worth St · (214) 820-8400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4005 Gaston Ave · (615) 559-9522 · Call to confirm hours
Park
501 N Carroll Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.4%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.7%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%12.3%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 28.0–67.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.0–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified64.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting75.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.4–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 45.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-30)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and of exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for five (RN A, CNA B, MA C, CNA D, and LVN E) of six employee personnel files reviewed for pre-employment screening The facility failed to search the Employee Misconduct Registry (EMR) for RN A, CNA B, MA C, CNA D and Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) for RN A, CNA B, MA C, CNA D, and LVN E prior to date of hire. These failures could affect all 47 residents by placing them at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of property.Findings included: Review of Employee Summary dated 04/28/2026 revealed the following dates of hire:-RN A date of hire 03/18/2026-CNA B date of hire 02/27/2026-MA C date of hire 02/18/2026-CNA D date of rehire 04/21/2026-LVN E date of hire 03/13/2026 Review of RN A's employee file dated 03/18/2026 revealed RN A was hired on 03/18/2026. RN A attended New Employee Orientation on 03/18/2026. A search of the EMR and NAR was conducted on 03/19/2026 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to receive registry verification that an individual had met competency evaluation requirements prior to the individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for two of two CNAs (CNA A, and CNA D) and one of one medication aide (MA C) reviewed for training and competency. The facility failed to search the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) for CNA B, MA C, and CNA D prior to date of hire. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or receiving improper care given by uncertified personnel.Findings included: Record review of Employee Summary, dated 04/28/2026, revealed the following dates of hire:-CNA B date of hire 02/27/2026-MA C date of hire 02/18/2026-CNA D date of rehire 04/21/2026 Record review of CNA B's employee file, dated 02/27/2026, revealed CNA B was hired on 02/27/2026 and attended New Employee Orientation on 02/27/2026. Record review revealed a search of the NAR was conducted on 03/08/2026 for CNA B. Record review of MA C's employee file dated 02/18/2026 revealed MA C was hired on 02/18/2026 and attended New…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for the facility's one of one kitchen (only kitchen) observed for food service safety.Facility failed to ensure:Two bags of burger buns stored in the bread crate, outside the walk-in refrigerator was dated and put back in the refrigerator on 04/28/2026.The expired scrambled egg in a plastic bag inside the walking refrigerator was labelled and discarded on 04/28/2026.Three bags of shredded cheese stored inside the walk-in refrigerator were dated 04/28/2026.The dessert cart kept in the walk-in refrigerator was covered on 04/29/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses and food contamination.Observation on 04/28/2026 at 09:38 AM, in the facility's only kitchen, revealed two bags of burger buns stored in the bread crate outside the walk-in refrigerator, were undated and not put back in the refrigerator.Observation on 04/28/2026 at 09:41 AM, in the facility's only kitchen, revealed scrambled egg in a plastic bag did not have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 24 residents (Resident # 24 and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control.1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's privacy curtains were clean and free of feces on 04/28/2026.2) The facility failed to ensure resident's mattress was cleaned from the urine before putting new fitted sheet on the bed for Resident # 3 on 04/28/26. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illnesses. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's MDS assessment, dated 03/19/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), Asthma, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (breathing difficulty), Morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Resident #24 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognitive functioning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #9) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 4/28/26. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] . Diagnoses included : dementia (a decline in mental ability, reasoning, and communication, severe enough to interfere with daily life) and depression. Resident #9's BIMS score of 3, indicated Resident #9's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #9 required moderate assistance with personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #1) of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility staff failed to follow physician orders for wound care on the left lower extremity for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and treatment needed to meet their needs and could result in undetected skin issues and delay in treatments.Findings included: Review of Record of admission for Resident #1 dated 04/30/2026 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Cellulitis (common, potentially serious bacterial skin infection affecting the dermis and underlying tissues, causing rapid-spreading red,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for two of six residents (Resident #21 and #39) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure the supplemental oxygen was provided at the physician ordered rate for Residents #21 and #39 This failure could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of oxygen toxicity.Resident #21 Review of Record of admission for Resident #21 dated 04/30/2026 revealed Resident #21 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility originally on 09/08/2025 and his most recent admission was on 03/02/2026. Resident #21 was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- progressive, incurable lung disease-primarily caused by smoking or long-term irritant exposure-that restricts airflow, causing chronic coughing, wheezing, and severe shortness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Medication Cart 617 - 631) of 2 carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN K and LVN L, responsible for Medication Cart 617 - 631, counted controlled drugs every shift change. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to drug diversion. Findings included: Observation on 04/28/26 at 11:13 AM of Medication Cart 617 - 631 with MA M, revealed missing signatures on the narcotic count sheet. Review of the narcotic count sheet revealed missing signatures for Off duty and On duty for 04/03/2026 (6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift) and 04/13/26 (6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift) of the narcotic count sheet. During an interview on 04/30/26 at 11:46 AM, the DON stated she expected nurses to sign the narcotic count sheet at the beginning and at the end of their shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 resident (Resident #1), reviewed for care plan development. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan included a plan of care for ADLs. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Record review of a face sheet dated 03/03/26 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system (kidneys, ureters, bladder, or urethra) caused by bacteria, most commonly E. coli [is a group of bacteria that can cause infections in your gut,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was unable to carry out activities of daily living ,received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent grooming/shaving for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed hygiene care which could cause skin breakdown, a loss of dignity, and self-worth. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/03/26 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system (kidneys, ureters, bladder, or urethra) caused by bacteria, most commonly E. coli [is a group of bacteria that can cause infections in your gut, urinary tract and other parts of your body]); anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, accurate assessment within 14 days after the facility determined or should have determined there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (Residents #1) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Review. The facility failed to complete the significant change MDS assessment for Resident #1 was hospitalized for atypical chest pain, Hypoxia, and altered mental status, and Leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) on [DATE].The facility failed to complete the significant change MDS assessment for Resident #1 was hospitalized for Hypernatremia (elevated sodium in the blood) on [DATE]. These failures could prevent residents from obtaining services and equipment to improve and maintain their level of functioning and well-being. Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with: Metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the status for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in that: Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], did not address his diet in Section K with changes to thickened liquids and his respiratory treatments in Section O. The failure place residents at risk for missed treatments, aspiration, and changes in health that could result in death.Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/15/2026, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with: Metabolic Encephalopathy (brain disorder that mimics dementia due to memory loss), Diabetic Mellitus ( unstable blood sugar levels) type Hyperosmolality (high concentration in blood.like sodium, sugar, and urea (compound produced by the liver) and Hypernatremia (elevated sodium levels), Acute and Chronic Respiratory failure with Hypoxia (low blood oxygen) Record Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #1, and Resident#3) of two residents observed for infection control during incontinent care. 1-The facility failed to ensure LVN A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E wear proper PPE while caring for Resident#1 in EBP Isolation. 2-The facility failed to ensure CNA F performed hand hygiene between glove changes, and LVN B did not put the dirty linen on the floor while providing incontinent care to Resident #3. These failures could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination.1- A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive uropathy (a condition where urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2), reviewed for care plan development. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan included a plan of care for ADLs. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health.Record review of a face sheet dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident #2 was 90-years-old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (damage to the nerves that control involuntary bodily functions), depression (mental health condition), secondary hypertension (high blood pressure ), unspecified atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of five residents reviewed for catheter and incontinence care. The facility failed to ensure CNA G provided timely incontinence care for Resident #2 on 10/14/25. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care to address their incontinence and could increase the risk of urinary tract infectionRecord review of a face sheet dated 10/14/25 revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a BIMs score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Resident #2's diagnoses included other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (damage to the nerves that control involuntary bodily functions), depression (mental health condition), secondary hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular rapid heart rate), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C maintained Resident #1's indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder) drainage bag below the bladder level during transfer from bed to Geri-Chair (a supportive, reclining chair designed for individuals with limited mobility, offering more comfort and stability than a traditional wheelchair) on 10/15/25. This failure placed residents at risk for infection. A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive uropathy (a condition where urine flow is blocked, leading to the accumulation of urine in the urinary tract), and cancer (a group of diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility kitchen had use-by date. This failure could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included: In an Observation on 02/11/25 at 10:00 AM of the facility walk in refrigerator revealed two packets of liquid eggs were opened but did not have use by date. In an interview and observation on 2/11/25 10:05 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed liquid egg packets were opened but not dated. She stated that all open items need to have 'open date' and 'used by date' depending on the food item. She stated that liquid eggs were open for breakfast on 2/11/25 and should have had use by date of 2/14/25 since liquid eggs were good for consuming for 3 days after opening. She stated that everyone in the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge MDS was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for two (Resident #23 and Resident #43) of two residents reviewed for discharge assessments. The facility failed to complete and transmit Resident #23's and Resident #43's discharge MDS assessment within 14 days of completion. This failure could place the residents at risk of having incomplete records. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 02/13/25, reflected Resident #23 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #23's facility death record, dated 02/13/25, reflected Resident #23 date of death [DATE]. Review of Resident #23's MDS assessments on 02/12/25 revealed Resident #23 did not have a discharge MDS assessment completed. This MDS record was identified as greater than 120 days late on the resident assessment facility task. Review of Resident #43's face sheet dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for care plan development. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan included a plan of care for dialysis. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. The findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/12/25 revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition), hypotension of hemodialysis (occurs when a large amount of blood is rapidly filtered during dialysis), muscle wasting and atrophy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 residents (Resident #30 and Resident #19) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30, and Resident #19 had their fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 2/11/25. These failures could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1- Resident #30 Record review of Resident #30's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #30 was [AGE] year-old male with initial admission date to the facility of 02/28/2024. His diagnoses included stroke (interrupted blood flow to the brain leading to partial or complete brain damage), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high lipid levels), and anxiety. Resident #30 had BIMS of 15 which indicated Resident #30 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of two residents (Resident #12) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C maintained Resident #12's indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder) drainage bag below the bladder level during wound care on 2/11/25. This failure placed residents at risk for infection. Findings included: A record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate (a cancerous tumor that starts in the prostate gland), and pressure ulcer of the sacral region (located at the lower end of the spine). Resident #12 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated Resident #12's cognition was intact. He required extensive assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date for 1 (nurses cart hall 600 (617 through 631) of 2 medication carts reviewed for labeling of drugs and biologicals in that: The Nurses' Cart on Hall 600 (617 through 631) had 1 insulin pen for Resident #20 with no open date. Observation of the pen reflected it was not full and it was used. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medications. The Findings included: Observation on 02/11/25 at 10:31 AM of the nurses' cart on hall 600 (617 through 631), with LVN A revealed the pen of insulin Humalog (lispro) 100 unit/ml for Resident #20 with no open date. Observation of the pen reflected it was not full and it was used. Interview on 02/11/25 at 10:35 AM, LVN A stated she gave insulin to Resident #20 in the morning at 7:00 AM and she did not check the pen for the open date. LVN A stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests of 1 floor (600 floor) of six floors reviewed for effective Pest control. The facility failed to have an effective pest control treatment plan, subsequently, Residents #4 had a reported bed bug in his room on 05/01/24 and Resident #5 had a bed bug report in his room on 05/19/24. The facility failed to follow their Beg bug policy and take actions to eliminate bed bugs reported in two resident's rooms and check all rooms on the 600-hall floor for bed bugs and train all staff on bed bug prevention. These failures could place residents at risk of bed bug bites and skin infections causing allergic reactions, scratch marks and skin tears, which could result in pain and decreased quality of life and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #4's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with a BIMS Score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and not use verbal and mental abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not snatch the call light out of Resident #1's hand and verbally abuse Resident #1, during patient care in her room on 05/19/24. This failure could place residents at risk of injury causing fractures, bruising, skin tears, and psychological harm resulting in in decreased health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted [DATE] with a BIMS Assessment score of 06 (Moderate Cognitive impairment). She did reject care 1 to 3 days with no upper and lower extremity impairments. She used a wheelchair and needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. She had medically complex conditions, hypertension, Viral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all assistive devices were maintained and free of hazards for two (Residents #2 and #3) of 8 residents reviewed for medical equipment. The facility failed to properly maintain Residents #2 and #3's wheelchair armrests. These failures could place residents at risk of skin tears, bruises, and falls which could lead to bleeding, and pain resulting in a decline in their health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with a BIMS Score of 05. He used a wheelchair with an active diagnoses of having a stroke and has had one fall with no injury since he admitted . Review of Resident #'2s plan of care dated 05/14/24 for fall risk related to fall, history of hemiplegia, history of hypertension, fall risk score 7-8 high risk and evidence by joint mobility (joint range and motion) interferes with balance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 (Dietary Aide G) of four dietary staff reviewed for food services. Dietary Aide G failed to properly wear a hair restraint effectively covering all of her hair, while preparing the food for the residents, from the steam table on the 600-hall floor. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness which could result in gastro-intestinal issues and loss of desire to eat the food and emotional distress. Findings included: Observation and interview on 05/22/24 at 12:52 pm, Dietary Aide G was on the 600-hall floor standing in front of the mobile food hot cart (Steam table). She was preparing the resident's meal plates and her hair was approximately 3 inches in length. She had a brown 2-inch diameter hair net on top of the right side of her head, a 2-inch diameter hair net on top of the left side of her head, and the front sides and back of her hair was loose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to complete a weekly skin assessment on Resident #1 from 04/14/24 through 04/20/24. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Finding Included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 05/14/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 09/03/21 and a re-admission date of 03/29/24. The Face Sheet reflected Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (inflammation of the urinary tract), Dementia (impaired ability to think, remember, or make decisions), absence of left leg above knee, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. RN D failed to not remove his gloves over Resident #1's open wound. 2. RN D failed to not perform hand hygiene with hand sanitizer over Resident #1's open wound. These failures could put residents at risk of worsened or infected wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 05/14/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 09/03/21 and a re-admission date of 03/29/24. The Face Sheet reflected Resident #1 had a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (inflammation of the urinary tract), Dementia (impaired ability to think, remember, or make decisions), absence of left leg above knee, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for one of twelve rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for resident call systems. The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] had a working call light. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to have their needs met and call for staff assistance when they needed it. The findings include: Observation on 04/18/24 at 3:11 PM revealed the call lights in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not work. The State Surveyor pressed both bedside call light buttons in room [ROOM NUMBER], the light outside of the room illuminated but the phone did not ring at the nurse's station to indicate the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] needed assistance. In an interview on 04/18/24 at 3:11 PM, with the resident who resided in room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 9 of 9 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included: Observation and interview on 12/19/23 beginning at 10:00 AM, during a confidential resident group meeting with 9 residents, revealed the meeting was held in the dining room. There were no doors or solid walls to separate the dining hall from the open nurses' station or the hallway between the two areas. There were no signs posted to indicate that a confidential meeting was being held; however, multiple staff walked through the space to get from one hall to the next hall. The Surveyor asked the Administrator if they had a private space for the meeting to be held due to the openness and proximity to the nurse's station. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for one (Hall 600) of one hall and one kitchen reviewed for pest control program. The facility had live common house flies, gnats, and roaches in areas of the facility including resident rooms, and the kitchen area. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection, cross contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Observation on 12/18/23 at 9:30 AM revealed a large live roach was observed crawling on the wall behind the automated dishwasher system, in the kitchen. Several live black gnats were observed under the three compartment sink in the dishwashing area. Observation on 12/18/23 at 12:45 PM revealed 2 live house flies and 2 black gnats on a stuffed animal laying on the belly of Resident #26, on the 600 hall Resident #26 was non-interviewable. An interview on 12/18/23 at 12:48 PM with Resident #20 revealed that the resident had seen a live roach in her room on the evening of 12/17/23. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one (Med cart 1) of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to lock Med cart 1 leaving all medications on the cart accessible. These failures could residents by placing them at risk for possible drug diversions. Findings included: Observation of Medication pass on 08/04/23/23 at 10:35 AM of Med aide A passing medication to a resident and leaving the cart unlocked while entering the resident room. Observation on 08/04/23 at 11:33 AM revealed a unlocked med cart on the 600 hall not facing in toward a resident room. All drawers were accessible and able to be pulled open. There was no staff member near the med cart. Med aide A walked out of a resident room and stated it was his cart. Interview on 08/03/23 at 11: 37AM with Med aide A revealed he had worked in the facility for 1 year. Med aide A stated he was aware the med cart should always be locked when he was not present, and the cart should be turned in toward the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HOPKINS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/28/2024
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 08/01/2025
SMITH, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/06/2009
PF SP ALF OPS II, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
ADDISON, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2024
LONE, JAMALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
PARRISH, ERIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2024
DALLAS HOUSING CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2024
SIMPSON PLACE ALF REALTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$211K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 9%Other / private 14%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $211K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$264per resident / day
operating cost
$8,032per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$242per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next