Heritage Plaza Nursing Center
600 W 52nd St, Texarkana, TX 75501 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (903) 792-6700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $89,633 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-18)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.49 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.1%CMS range 29.7–62.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.8–18.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 46.2 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect in that: The facility failed to suspend an alleged perpetrator immediately following CNA A roughly handling Resident #1 during ADL care. The facility allowed CNA A to work 7 more shifts before suspension while investigation the abuse allegations, and the facility failed to report the abuse within 24 hours to the state agency. The ADON and CNA B failed to report the abuse to the abuse coordinator immediately. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/09/2024 and ended on 04/17/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to report the allegations of abuse timely. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was offered when there were nutritional problems and the therapeutic diet was recommended for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition.The facility failed to put interventions in place when Resident # 1 had poor intake related to swallowing food, inability to consume meals as result of physical decline. Resident #1 had a wound and did not receive a dietician consult as needed. Resident #1 did not have updated care plan interventions related to her change in condition . This failure could cause residents to lose weight and not have interventions in place that could lead to significant weight loss.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of abnormal weight loss.Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident was cognitively stable with a BIMS score of 13. Resident #1's functional abilities with eating was setup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #3 and Resident #5) 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed safe repositioning with two staff members during incontinent care for Resident #3 on 3/26/24, which resulted in Resident #3 falling off the bed and required stitches to the inside of her lip. 2. The facility failed to transfer Resident #5 with the required 2 people for a safe mechanical lift transfer from his bed to his chair. These failures could place residents at risk of injury from accident and hazards. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 8/29/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (disruption of blood flow to the brain, resulting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0635 — patternProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #46) of 5 residents reviewed for admission physician orders. 1.The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the immediate care of Resident #45's surgical wounds, diet, and isolation status. 2.The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the immediate care of Resident #46's surgical wound, pressure wounds, diet, and isolation status. These failures could affect residents who were admitted or readmitted to the facility by placing them at risk for not receiving the appropriate care, medication, and treatment services.Findings included: 1.Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (Stage 5 chronic kidney disease, occurs when the kidneys lose 85% to 90% of their function, meaning they can no longer filter waste and fluids), Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Resident #2, #5, #29, and #6) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans.1. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #2's use of Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication that thins the blood and places the resident at an increased risk of bleeding and bruising more easily).2. The facility failed to update Resident #5's care plan to include he often refused to take his insulin or full dosage of insulin as prescribed by his physician.3. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #29's use of Paroxetine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority promptly after a significant change in their mental condition for 1 of 5 residents screened for PASRR (Resident # 37). The facility failed to refer a resident with a newly identified serious mental illness for a PASRR Resident Review following a significant change in status. Resident #37 received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder on 07/24/2025; however, the facility did not complete a PASRR Level II Resident Review referral (form 1012) until 01/26/2026. This failure could delay the identification of specialized services and support needed to address the residents' mental health needs.Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #37 was a [AGE] year-old, female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses cerebral infarction (a critical medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to a specific area of the brain is blocked or significantly reduced, preventing brain tissue from receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #45) The facility did not complete a baseline care plan or have a baseline care plan meeting with Resident #45 within 48 hours of admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (Stage 5 chronic kidney disease, occurs when the kidneys lose 85% to 90% of their function, meaning they can no longer filter waste and fluids), Diabetes type II (a chronic metabolic condition where the body resists insulin or cannot produce enough of it), heart failure (heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Residents #7)The facility failed to document Resident #7's Post (after) Dialysis assessment on his Dialysis Communication (Pre/Post-before/after) Forms on 5/04/26, 5/08/26, 5/13/26, 5/18/26 and 5/20/26.This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 6/01/26 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] originally and re-admitted [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function), hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease with chronic kidney disease, heart failure and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar).Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: In excessive doses (including duplicate therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had monitoring for an anticoagulant medication, Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication thins the blood and could cause serious, potentially fatal bleeding and bruising more easily).The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's order for Eliquis had an appropriate diagnosis.These failures could place residents at risk for adverse drug reactions (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medicines).Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6/01/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 14 (Resident #6, Resident #45) residents reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to wear PPE when providing direct care to Resident #6 on EBP. 2. The facility failed to wear PPE when providing direct care to Resident #45 on contact isolation. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections.Findings included: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease), acute and chronic respiratory failure (acute failure develops suddenly as an emergency, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident and determines that drug records are accurate to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an order for Acetaminophen/Tylenol 650 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain/fever in the Electronic Medication Administration Record per the facility's standing orders. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented the administration of Acetaminophen/Tylenol 650 mg every 4 hours as needed for Resident #1 on 07/17/2025. These failures could place residents at an increased risk for inaccurate drug administration and not receiving the care and services to meet their individual needs.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 08/18/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure an opened box of powdered sugar was securely closed or stored in a secure container with a label and date. 2. The facility failed to ensure a plastic container with a lid, containing what appeared to be a red sauce in it, was labeled and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure a plastic container with a lid, containing what appeared to be green beans, corn, and potatoes in it, was labeled and dated. 4. The facility failed to ensure a plastic bag containing an unknown meat with ice particles covering it was labeled and dated. 5. The facility failed to ensure a plastic bag containing what appeared to be chicken, with ice particles covering approximately half of it, was labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination. Findings included: During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 3 of 13 residents and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for environment. (Resident #1, Resident #33, and Resident #96) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #33, and Resident #96 had furniture in good repair. 2. The facility failed to ensure the activity cabinet in the dining room was in good repair. These failures placed residents at risk of injury, an uncomfortable environment, and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet 04/22/25 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, pain, and convulsions (seizures). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 08 indicating Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 13 residents (Resident #12, #22, and #196) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure signage was located outside Resident #196's room to indicate he required transmission-based droplet precautions. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C used transmission-based droplet precautions when entering Resident #196's room. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA L changed her gloves and perform hand hygiene during Resident #12's indwelling foley catheter care. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and CNA B followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (interventions to prevent spread of infection in high-risk residents) policy of wearing a gown during Resident #22's wound care to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's catheter drainage bag was in a privacy bag. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment and a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/23/25, reflected Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behaviors (memory loss) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/30/2025, reflected Resident #12 had clear speech and was sometimes understood by staff. The MDS reflected Resident #12 was rarely/never able to understand others. The MDS reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents #2 and Resident #33) The facility failed to provide Residents #2 and Resident #33 with consistent, scheduled activities. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet 04/22/25 indicated Resident #2 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, peripheral vascular disease (a condition where blood flow to the extremities, particularly the legs and arms, is restricted due to narrowing or blockage of blood vessels), and pain. Record Review of Physician's Orders for Resident #2 reviewed on 04/22/25 indicated an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their activities program was directed by a qualified professional for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Activity Director. The facility failed to employ a certified activities director. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving a program of activities that meets their assessed activity needs. Findings included: Record review of a personnel file for the Activity Director revealed did not indicate an Activity Director Certification and the Activity Director had 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program. The personnel file indicated a hire date of 05/08/19. Record review of a letter dated 04/02/25 and addressed to the Activity Director indicated confirmation of enrollment in a course to begin in August 2025 that taught the standardized National Council of Certified Activity Profession curriculum. During an interview on 04/23/25 at 9:59 a.m., the Activity Director said she became the Activity Director on 01/06/25. She said before that she was a CNA on the floor and worked in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #196) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA H performed a safe mechanical lift transfer for Resident #196. This failure could place residents at risk of injury. Findings include: Record review of Resident #196's face sheet dated 4/22/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #196 had diagnoses which included dementia (forgetfulness), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety (feeling of worry). Record review of the MDS assessment list, accessed 04/22/25, reflected Resident #196's admission MDS had not been completed yet. Record review of Resident #169's Care Plan dated 4/22/25 indicated he was at risk for falls, and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA L changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene during Foley catheter care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's indwelling Foley catheter had a catheter securement device to anchor the catheter to her leg. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's Foley catheter drainage bag was kept off the floor. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, injuries, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/23/25, reflected Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behaviors (memory loss) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #38) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had a trauma screening completed upon admission to the facility that identified possible triggers when Resident #38 had a history of trauma. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/22/25, reflected Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia (memory loss). Record review of the admission referral packet, dated 11/08/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a dignified existence by allowing her to be covered in feces on 2/27/25. These failures could place residents at risk of humiliation, diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and loss of self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 3/03/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included diverticulitis (occurs when an infected pouch becomes filled with pus) of large intestine with perforation (rupture) and abscess (pocket of pus), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (persistent sadness that can interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #4's MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 17 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach while Resident #1 and Resident #2 were in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/03/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, amputation at knee level of right lower leg, and impulse disorder (a group of behavioral conditions that make it hard to control reactions or actions). Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a BIMs score of 10, which indicated she had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse was provided for 1 of 18 reviewed for abuse. (Resident #3) The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from abuse when CNA D told him, all you do is lie and that's why people don't want to deal with you. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/03/25 revealed Resident #3 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurological disorder that affects movement, balance, and coordination), and insomnia (a common sleep disorder characterized by difficulty falling or staying asleep, resulting in poor sleep quality and daytime fatigue). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #3 required moderate to maximal assistance with most ADLs. Record review of a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy services, received such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for ostomy care. The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with appropriate colostomy care resulting in her colostomy leaking and covering her in feces. This failure could place the resident at risk of skin irritation and breakdown from exposure to fecal matter. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 3/03/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included diverticulitis (occurs when an infected pouch becomes filled with pus) of large intestine with perforation (rupture) and abscess (pocket of pus), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression (persistent sadness that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1's refusal of care, refusal to be repositioned, and refusal to take medications. This failure could place residents in the facility at an increased risk of a decline in physical or functional well-being, of not receiving necessary care or services, and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/01/24 revealed he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/23/24. Resident #1 had diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of adequate oxygen in the body's tissues to sustain function), cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle which makes it hard for the heart to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #1 and Resident #4) 1. The facility failed to treat Resident #1 with dignity and respect by denying his request to be repositioned in bed. 2. The facility failed to treat Resident #4 with dignity and respect when the previous Administrator told him he looked like a child molester on 03/25/24. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increase anxiety. Findings included: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for resident abuse. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1, was free from physical abuse when CNA A roughly placed his legs into the bed when he asked for assistance into bed. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse when CNA E verbally abused him on 4/09/24. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress. The findings included: 1.Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), major depression (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours of the allegation being reported to the ADON on 04/09/2024. The ADM (abuse coordinator) reported the abuse to HHS on 04/17/2024 within 1 hours of being notified of the allegation of abuse by the ADON. These failures could place residents at risk of physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow for private Resident Council meetings and without facility staff present for 5 of 5 Residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide a private space for Resident Council meetings. The facility failed to inform members of the Resident Council they could have their meetings in private and staff could only attend if invited. This failure placed residents at risk of not having the right to voice their concerns without staff being present or overhearing their concerns and to conduct resident council meetings without interference. Findings include: During a confidential resident group interview on 3/5/2024 at 10:00 a.m., the residents in attendance stated that the Resident Council meetings were always held in the dining room. All residents in the confidential group interview were upset and unhappy that staff continuously interrupted the resident council meeting. All residents agreed they would feel more willing to express their views without a staff person being able to overhear the meeting. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #144) The facility failed to manage Resident #144's pain by not administering his ordered pain medication. This failure placed residents at risk for increased pain, decline in mobility, functioning, inability to perform activities of daily living and decreased quality of life. Findings Include: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/01/24 revealed Resident #144 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the right scapula (the scapula is a thick, flat bone lying on the thoracic wall), fracture of ribs right side, fracture of left tibia (the tibia is the shinbone, the larger of the two bones in the lower leg). Record review of the MDS assessment indicated Resident #144 did not have a MDS created yet as he was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 2 of 4 medication carts (100 hall cart and 300/400 hall cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to lock 2 medication carts for hall 100 and 300/400 Halls split cart. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E removed expired eye drops from the nurse medication cart for 100-hall. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their medications available as prescribed, a drug diversion, and an adverse reaction to expired medications. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 3/5/2024 at 8:02 a.m., of the 100-hall nurse medication cart, when Multiple staff and residents were present in the hallway. There was no staff present at the medication cart. The ADM was nearby and approached the medication cart and locked it. LVN E said the cart was the 100-hall cart and the staff member for the cart was not in the facility. The unlocked medication cart had various medications for residents including multivitamins, eye drops,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #32, Resident #35) 1. The facility did not assist Resident #32 out of bed as often as she preferred. 2. The facility failed to shower Resident #35 instead of a bed bath per his request. These failures could place dependent residents at risk for feelings of depression, lack self-determination and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 03/05/24 indicated Resident #32 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, and anxiety disorder. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 14 which indicated Resident #32 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #32 was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #9) The facility failed to repair the wall behind the bed of Resident #9. This failure placed residents at risk of an unsafe or uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet 03/05/24 indicated Resident #9 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and diabetes. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 was rarely/never understood and sometimes understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 0 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of a care plan revised on 01/11/24 indicated Resident #9 had a history of depression.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of life (Resident #21 and Resident #35). 1.The facility failed to provide scheduled bath/showers for Resident #21. 2. The facility failed to provide scheduled bath/showers and shave Resident #35. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 3/04/2024 revealed that she was a [AGE] year-old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and cerebral infarction. Record review of quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS with a score of 1, which indicated Resident #21 had severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities in accordance with the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of life. (Residents #32) 1.The facility failed to provide Residents #32 with consistent, scheduled activities . 2.The facility failed to provide Resident #32 with a calendar of scheduled activities. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/05/24 indicated Resident #32 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, diabetes, and anxiety disorder. Record review of an admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS score of 14 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #193) who were reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident# 193 had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) securement/anchor device (used to secure an indwelling urinary catheter). This failure could place residents at risk for indwelling urinary catheter dislodgement, urethral (empties urine from the bladder and out of the body) damage, pain, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #193's face sheet dated 3/04/24 indicated Resident #193 was a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #193 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells depriving them of oxygen causing parts of the brain to die), depression (persistent sadness),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 6 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food and nutrition services (Resident #11). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #11 did not contain expired and decomposing meat products. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/12/2019 indicated Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning), Anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and Heart Failure (occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Record review of an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 understood others and made herself understood. The MDS indicated Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 09. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 11 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #1 had pressure ulcers, wounds, or skin problems on his admission MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/12/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility initially on 12/28/23 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of pancreas (pancreatic cancer-type of cancer often detected late, spreads rapidly, and poor prognosis), muscle weakness, anemia in chronic disease (blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells), abnormality of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injury. The facility failed to adequately document Resident #1's wounds upon admission. The facility failed to measure Resident #1's wounds upon admission. The facility failed to obtain initial wound care orders for Resident #1's wounds. The facility failed to provide appropriate wound care for Resident #1 from admission [DATE] until seen by wound care specialist 1/3/24. These failures could place residents at risk for deterioration of wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/12/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility initially on 12/28/23 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of pancreas (pancreatic cancer-type of cancer often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 30-day notice to the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand before the resident was discharged for 1 of 1 (Resident #1) reviewed for Discharge Rights. The facility did not provide a written discharge notice to Resident #1 (who admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/16/23) or their representative prior to discharging the resident, not allowing the 30-day advance notice. The facility discharged Resident #1 to an acute hospital. This failure could place residents who are transferred or discharged from the facility, at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge and the right to appeal. Findings included: Resident review of Resident #1's face sheet printed on 10/09/23 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/16/23 with diagnoses including acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$89,633 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
- $77,227 — penalty dated 2024-09-04
- $3,296 — penalty dated 2023-10-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/31/2017 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| SANDERSON, CLARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/29/2012 |
| PF HERITAGE SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| NASH, BELINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2025 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2017 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| FERGUSON, CLAY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| LYNCH, KACEY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/13/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675561. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.