Noble Health Care Center
1501 North 8th Street, Noble, OK 73068 · Non profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (405) 872-7102 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.7% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.8% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.5% | 74.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.0% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.1% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.63 | 2.31 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.2%CMS range 28.4–54.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.8–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 2.9–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, reviewed 02/12/20, read in part, Residents must not be subjected to abuse. neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident's property by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident,family members, legal guardians, resident representative, friends or other individuals. 1. Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/20/25, showed they had a BIMS score of 13 indicating they were cognitively intact. On 06/24/25 at 9:43 a.m., Resident #1 stated, I just witnessed [Resident #5] hit other people. They took [Resident #5] somewhere else, [Resident #5] does not live here anymore. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for monitoring for weight loss by documenting weekly weights for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition.The administrator identified 84 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A care plan for Resident #7, dated 07/02/26, showed they were at risk for weight changes and the facility's goal was to improve or maintain the current weight. The care plan showed to weigh the resident per physician orders and as needed.A physician's order for Resident #7, dated 06/05/26 to 06/26/26, showed the resident was ordered weekly weight checks on Wednesdays for four weeks on the 7:00 a.m. to 7 p.m. shift, by the nurse.A review of Resident #7's history of vitals showed only three recorded weights on the following dates: 06/05/26 (215 pounds), 06/10/26 (215 pounds), and 06/24/26 (222 pounds). Resident #7 was missing a recorded weight for the date 06/17/26.On 07/01/26 at 4:18 p.m., the corporate nurse stated ordered weekly weights were done on Wednesdays. They stated some weights had been missed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in reach for 1 (#1) of 7 sampled residents whose call lights were observed.The ADON identified 74 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 11/19/25 at 1:21 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in their chair. Their call light was on the floor by the head of the bed.The call light was out of reach of the resident.On 11/19/25 at 1:30 p.m., CNA #1 handed Resident #1 their call light. The resident demonstrated how to use the call light by pressing the button on the end.The CALL LIGHTS ANSWERING policy, revised 02/12/20, read in part, When leaving the room, be sure the call light is placed within the resident's reach.A fall care plan, initiated 04/25/25, showed to keep the call light within the resident's reach. The care plan showed the resident had diagnoses which included frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction.A BIMS, dated 10/30/25, showed the Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 9.On 11/19/25 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practice during incontinent care for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents observed for incontinent care.The ADON identified 74 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 11/19/25 at 10:32 a.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 entered Resident #1's room to perform incontinent care. They both wore gloves.On 11/19/25 at 10:33 a.m., CNA #1 wiped the resident's abdominal folds and peri area. Resident #1 was turned to their right side. Resident #1 had a bowel movement. CNA #1 wiped the resident's fecal matter, removed the dirty brief, and discarded in a trash bag. With the same gloves, CNA #1 put a new pad under the resident. Resident #1 was turned to their left side and CNA #2 removed the soiled pad and adjusted the new pad. CNA #2 put a new brief on the Resident. Resident #2 was then turned to their right side and CNA #1 adjusted the brief. The brief tab tore.On 11/19/25 at 10:37 a.m., CNA #1 removed their gloves and exited the room to get a new brief.On 11/19/25 at 10:38 a.m., CNA #1 came back with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments for one (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for skin assessment and monitoring. The BOM identified 78 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Skin Data Collection: Licensed Nurses policy, revised July 2018, read in parts, Weekly, the Licensed Nurse performs a head to toe check of the resident's skin, pay attention to: the surfaces of the skin that come in contact with the bed and chair, bony prominences, and the surfaces of the skin that come in contact with any orthotic device, tube, brace or positioning device, breast and gluteal folds .The licensed nurse should pay attention to: redness, rashes, discolorations, open areas, blisters, dry/flaking skin, and edema .Any significant abnormal findings are reported to the resident's physician and resident or responsible party .Documentation that the check was performed is denoted on the EMR/medical record. Res #4 had diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus, rash, and irritant contact dermatitis due to fecal, urinary or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services maintained a clean environment. The DON reported 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/23/24 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #2 reported their restroom was dirty. The resident reported housekeeping did not clean the restrooms. On 12/23/24 at 10:46 a.m., Resident #2's restroom sink was observed to be brown with grime and there were brown rings on the countertop. Black debris was observed randomly on the restroom floor and around the toilet. On 12/23/24 at 12:22 p.m., housekeeper #1 was observed entering Resident #6's room. The housekeeper was not observed to sweep the floor. The housekeeper was observed dragging a mop through the room and chatting with Resident #6. The housekeeper was observed to exit the room and went down the hall to another resident's room. On 12/23/24 at 12:31 p.m., CNA #1 informed housekeeper #1 resident room [ROOM NUMBER] needed to be cleaned. The CNA reported it was badly stained and state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff used infection control measures when getting ice for a resident (name unknown). The DON reported 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 12/23/24 at 2:45 p.m., housekeeper #1 was observed carrying a resident's (name unknown) ice cup down the hallway to the ice machine without the lid on it to get the resident some ice. The housekeeper was observed to carry the cup and their thumb was inside the cup. The housekeeper was observed cleaning rooms before taking the cup to get ice for the resident. On 12/23/24 at 2:50 p.m., housekeeper #1 was observed pushing the housekeeping cart down the hall with the resident's (name unknown) ice cup set on top of wet floor signs on top of the cart. On 12/23/24 at 2:51 p.m., the DON was made aware of housekeeper #1's actions and the concerns related to infection control. The DON reported that was not proper infection control practices.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene for: A. a resident who tested positive for COVID-19 for one (Res #6) of one sampled resident reviewed for COVID-19, and B. a resident with a PICC line for one (Res #31) of one sampled resident reviewed for IV therapy. The administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Vascular Access Devices and Infusion Therapy Procedures, dated 2011, documented a PICC line as a peripheral intravenous line that ends just above the atria of the heart. The external length of the PICC line should be measured with every dressing change. The procedure documented the extension kit should be changed every seven days. 1. Res #6 had diagnoses which included weakness and difficulty swallowing after a stroke. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #6 was cognitively intact. A progress note, dated 08/02/24 at 1:30 a.m., documented Res #6 had complained of difficulty breathing and was assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures during meals. The Administrator identified 80 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: 08/05/24 at 8:08 a.m., Resident #72 stated the food is not good. trays sit out too long in the hallway, and it is cold when we get it. On 08/05/24 at 8:45 a.m., Resident #37 stated it could be better, the taste is not good and we need variety. On 08/05/24 at 9:23 a.m., Resident #7 stated what is served is never what is on the menu. On 08/05/24 at 11:14 a.m., Resident # 41 stated I would rather have decent food, its atrocious. On 08/06/24 at 9:09 a.m., there were 2 uninsulated wire carts on hall 200 with trays waiting to be passed. At 9:13 a.m., a tray is taken into room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 08/06/24 at 9:23 a.m., Resident # 31's tray is observed sitting on the bedside table unopened and not within reach due to a fall mat against the bed. Resident # 31 is lying in bed and did not answer when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled, dated, and stored according to the facility policy. The administrator identified 80 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's Food Storage policy, revised February 6, 2024, read in part, air-tight containers or bags are used for all opened packages of food. All containers are accurately labeled with the item and date opened. On 08/05/24 at 7:20 a.m., a container that read sugar was observed with the lid completely open. A large bag of flour was in the original bag, but was ripped open with more than half already absent from the container. On 08/05/24 at 7:24 a.m., the DM stated they believed that one of the unmarked containers in the refrigerator was jello, and the other contained cream corn. They stated there was no label or date. On 08/05/24 at 7:26 a.m., the DM stated they had premade ice cream snacks in cups in the freezer, but agreed they had no label or date. On 08/05/24 at 7:29 a.m., the DM stated they had no idea why the sugar was open and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to follow their enhanced barrier precautions while providing wound care for one (# 3) of 20 residents that required enhanced barrier precautions and failed to follow infection control practices during medication pass. The Administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated April 1, 2024, read in part, this facility uses enhanced barrier precautions as a strategy to decrease transmission of CDC-targeted and epidemiologically important MDROs when contact precautions do not apply. Indications: Wounds and high contact resident care activities that include wound care. 1. Resident # 3 was readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included stage 4 pressure ulcer to right buttocks, congenital scoliosis, and contractures of right upper arm and bilateral lower legs. A physician order, dated 04/10/24, documented to conduct hand hygiene before entering and after leaving room, all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program and infection surveillance to monitor antibiotic use for residents from April 2024 through June 2024. The MDS coordinator identified 6 residents who were prescribed antibiotics. Findings: The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy, dated January 2022, read in part, . stewardship actions .prescription record keeping, dose, duration, route, and indication of every prescription MUST be documented in the medical record of every resident, regardless of prior prescriptions or documentation elsewhere .records will be reviewed monthly to assess compliance with this requirement as well as prescription appropriateness .site and type of infection .utilize the McGreer's Criteria .data will be compiled monthly .interpret monthly data .compile monthly information for the Quality Committee . During antibiotic stewardship and infection surveillance review, there was missing documentation of the McGreers criteria, symptoms, organism from culture from April to June 2024. On 08/08/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote resident dignity by staff standing over residents while assisting them to eat. The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the building and 17 required assistance with eating. Findings: On 08/06/24 at 8:37 a.m., CMA #1 was observed standing while assisting two residents to eat at the dining table. CNA #1 was at the next table standing while assisting a resident to eat. There were eight empty dining chairs within a few feet of both staff that were standing. There was also another staff that was seated while feeding residents. On 08/06/24 at 9:26 a.m., CMA #1 stated they did not know about standing or sitting because they usually worked the night shift. On 08/06/24 at 9:29 a.m., CMA #1 stated they are supposed to sit down with the resident, but they were just trying to help the resident get the food on the spoon, so it wouldn't get scooped off the plate. They stated they did not mean any disrespect towards the resident. On 08/06/24 at 10:03 a.m., the DON stated the policy is to sit down eye level to feed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for two (#7 and #40) of 24 sampled residents whose advance directive acknowledgements were reviewed. The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Advanced Directives policy, reviewed April 22, 2024, read in part, Upon admission, identify if the resident has an advance directive and if not, determine if the resident wishes to formulate an advance directive. 1. Resident #7 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury. 2. Resident #40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia of left side and acute kidney failure. On 08/05/24 at 11:57 a.m., the DON stated that they are to ask each resident at admission, and they did not see that an advance directive was uploaded for either resident. On 08/07/24 at 1:20 p.m., the DON stated they were unable to locate the advance directives for Resident #7 or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurately coded on two of the MDS assessments completed for one (#7) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The Administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #7 had diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury, nephrolithiasis, and left upper extremity paralysis. A Resident Summary, dated 01/19/24, 01/20/24/01/21/24, and 01/22/24, all document resident #7 had an indwelling catheter. A Physician's order, dated 01/24/24, documented to change foley catheter as needed for clogged/dislodged/or clinically indicated. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident #7 had no bowel or bladder appliances. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident #7 had no bowel or bladder appliances. On 08/07/24 at 11:46 a.m. the MDS Coordinator stated the 01/23/24 and 04/24/24 quarterly MDS were both coded inaccurately because Resident #7 did have an indwelling catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete neurological checks per protocol after an unwitnessed fall for one (#71) of seven sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORTING policy, reviewed 01/12/22, documented a neurological assessment flow sheet will be immediately initiated and maintained for each incident/accident involving an injury of any kind to the head or any unwitnessed fall. It documented monitoring is triggered to be completed for 72 hours. Res #71 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of right femur fracture and spinal disc disorder. An incident report, dated 07/04/24, documented the resident had an unwitnessed fall resulting in a small bruise to the residents top right side of the head. The incident report documented neuro checks were started. A neuro check log for Res #71 dated 07/04/24 through 07/06/24, documented neuro checks were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the placement of a foley catheter for one (#31) of three sampled residents reviewed for catheters. The administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #31 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis. A progress note, dated 07/12/2024 at 6:24 p.m., documented a foley catheter was inserted per provider order. A review of physician orders from 07/11/24 to 08/06/24 did not document an order for placement of a foley catheter. On 08/06/24 at 12:15 p.m., Res #31 was observed seated in their wheelchair in the dining room. A foley catheter drainage bag was observed hanging from the wheelchair. On 08/07/24 at 9:46 a.m., the DON stated the nurse did not enter an order to place the foley before it was placed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to supervise a resident while administering a breathing treatment for one (#49) of one sampled residents reviewed for respiratory treatments. The administrator identified 82 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #49 had diagnoses which included COPD. A physician order, dated 05/21/24, documented to administer budesonide 0.5 mg/2 mL suspension for nebulization twice per day for pneumonia. On 08/05/24 at 11:00 a.m., Res #49 was observed seated on the end of their bed holding a breathing treatment mask to their face. A nurse was not observed in the room or in the hall. The resident was observed turning off the treatment and setting the mask aside. On 08/05/24 at 11:06 a.m., Res #49 stated the nurse set up his breathing treatment and left. They stated the nurses never stay to monitor them during the treatment. On 08/05/24 at 11:08 a.m., LPN #2 stated the resident should be monitored during the breathing treatment unless they have been assessed to self administer medications. Res #49 did not have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were monitored for target behaviors and side effects for one (#28) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 50 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: Res #28 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 06/19/24, documented to administer mirtazapine 7.5 mg at bedtime for anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 04/24/22, documented to administer buspirone 5 mg twice per day for anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 02/28/24, documented to administer fluoxetine 40 mg in the morning for anxiety disorder. Behavior and side effect monitoring for 06/01/24 through 06/30/24 documented missing documentation for 25 of 60 opportunities. Behavior and side effect monitoring for 07/01/24 to 07/31/24 documented missing documentation for 25 of 62 opportunities. Behavior and side effect monitoring for 08/01/24 to 08/07/24 documented missed documentation for 11 of 14 opportunities. On 08/08/24 at 11:18 a.m., the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the kitchen was kept clean and maintained in good repair, b. food products were properly thawed, c. soiled/damp cloths were properly stored, and d. staff changed their gloves and/or washed their hands after touching parts of their body before handling food. The DM identified 71 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: On 07/05/23 at 8:46 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted and breakfast meal service was observed. The following observations were made: a. there was an accumulation of lint on the return vents, b. there was food splatter on the ceiling in the cook area, c. there were five soiled/damp cloths laying in and/or on the two compartment sink, d. there was a metal container of multiple packages of pre-cooked sliced turkey stored in standing water in the two compartment sink. The water was not running in the sink. The temperature of the standing water in the metal container was 73 degrees F, e. base board tiles were missing near the hot water heater closet and in the dish wash area, f.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were seated while providing feeding assistance for one (#1) resident and failed to ensure staff did not refer to residents as feeders. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented five residents were dependent on staff for eating. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included non-Alzheimer's dementia and seizure disorder. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had limited range of motion on one upper extremity. On 07/05/23 at 9:09 a.m., CNA #3 was observed standing in front of Res #1 and feeding them the meal. On 07/05/23 at 9:47 a.m., CNA #3 stated they should not stand while feeding residents. On 07/06/23 at 11:20 a.m., the DON was asked how staff were instructed to provide eating assistance to residents. They stated staff should be at eye level with residents when providing assistance with eating. 2. On 07/05/23 at 8:47 a.m., RA #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident electronic medical records were kept confidential during medication pass. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/05/23 between 8:38 a.m. and 9:25 a.m., CMA #1 was observed passing medications in the dining room. CMA #1 administered 10 different resident's medications leaving the EMR on the laptop open and unattended with resident information visible. On 07/05/23 at 9:45 a.m., CMA #1 was asked how the facility ensured residents' electronic medical records were kept confidential while the medication cart was left unattended. They stated they were to pull the laptop screen down where it was not visible. CMA #1 was asked if they had pulled the laptop screen down. They stated, No, I get busy and forget. On 07/05/23 at 10:12 a.m., CMA #2 was observed passing medications on Hall 200 leaving the EMR on the laptop open and unattended with resident electronic medical records visible. On 07/05/23 at 10:29 a.m., CMA #2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. change nebulizer tubing according to physician orders for one (#49) of two residents sampled for respiratory care and, b. date oxygen tubing according to physician orders for one (#59) of two residents sampled for respiratory care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented eight residents received respiratory treatment. Findings: 1. Res #49 had diagnoses which included COPD. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #49 was cognitively intact and was blind. A physician order, dated 04/18/23, documented to administer ipratropium 0.5 mg-albuterol 3 mg (2.5 mg base)/3 ml nebulization solution three times per day for COPD. A physician order, dated 06/29/23, documented to change nebulizer tubing and respiratory bag every Sunday on night shift. On 07/05/23 at 11:03 a.m., Res #49 was observed in their room. They stated they had been receiving breathing treatments for a cough. A nebulizer machine was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one (#20) of three residents sampled for medication pass. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, dated 01/2023, titled Nursing Care Center Pharmacy Policy and Procedure Manual Section 9.5 Sample Medication Administration Schedule, read in parts .medication frequency and administration are to be interpreted as follows daily medications to be administered between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. unless specified otherwise by the prescriber . Res #20's physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer multivitamin daily for vitamin deficiency 8:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer polyethylene glycol 3350 17 grams in 8 ounces of liquid for constipation at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer sertraline 100 mg daily for depression at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 27 opportunities were observed with 11 errors. Total medication error rate was 39.29%. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #20's physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer multivitamin daily for vitamin deficiency 8:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer polyethylene glycol 3350 17 grams in 8 ounces of liquid for constipation at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer sertraline 100 mg daily for depression at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) 125 mcg for vitamin D deficiency at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer docusate sodium 100 mg daily for constipation at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer duloxetine 60 mg daily for depression at 9:00 a.m. A physician order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. expired supplies and medications were disposed of, b. a medication label accurately documented the physician order for one (#20) of three sampled residents observed during medication pass, c. medications and vaccines were labeled with the date opened, d. non-medication food items were not stored in medication refrigerators, and e. temperature logs for medication refrigerators were completed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #20 had diagnoses which included anxiety. A physician order, dated 01/23/23, documented to administer lorazepam 0.5 mg one tab twice daily. On 07/06/23 at 11:10 a.m., CMA #2 was observed during medication pass preparing medications for Res #20. The directions on Res #20's card of lorazepam documented to administer the lorazepam 0.5 mg every eight hours. On 07/11/23 at 1:20 p.m., the DON was made aware of resident #20's lorazepam discrepancy order and what the card read. The DON stated she would put a change of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were collected as ordered by the physician for two (#38 and #42) of five sampled residents reviewed for lab services. Findings: 1. Res #42 had diagnoses which included recurrent major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms. A physician order, dated 01/20/23, documented valproic acid every three months in February, May, August, and November. On 07/11/23 at 8:25 a.m., the DON was asked to locate valproic acid labs for February and May 2023. On 07/11/23 at 9:47 a.m., the DON stated the labs were not drawn. 2. Res #38 had diagnoses which included hypothyroidism and hypertension. A physician order, dated 03/25/21, documented to collect a thyroid cascade profile laboratory study every 12 months in January for hypothyroidism. A physician order, dated 03/25/21, documented to collect a vitamin K1 laboratory study every six months in January and July for hypertension. The laboratory results were not provided or documented in the resident record. On 07/11/23 at 9:59 a.m., the DON stated the thyroid cascade…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 30 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Infection Control Policy, dated 2020, read in part, .strategies for preventing and reducing healthcare associated infection will include .stringent hand hygiene .routine surveillance rounds including; the environment, hand hygiene practices .improving hand hygiene compliance with hand hygiene guidelines .monitoring of compliance with hand hygiene . On 07/05/23 between 8:38 a.m. and 9:25 a.m., CMA #1 was observed passing medications in the dining room. CMA #1 administered 10 different resident medications. No hand hygiene was observed during any of the medication administration. CMA #1 was observed to touch bare handed the trash can on multiple occasions, med cart keys, laptop, pill crusher, a resident's geri-chair, medication bottles and pills, and the medication cart drawers. On 07/06/22 at 11:24 a.m., CMA #2 was observed preparing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not self administer medications without a physician order for one (#59) of one sampled resident observed for self administration of medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #59 had diagnoses which included vitamin deficiency and constipation. A physician order, dated 04/18/23, documented alpha lipoic acid (antioxidant medication) 600 mg one capsule one time per day. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 04/26/23, documented the resident's cognition was intact. On 07/05/23 at 10:03 a.m., Res #59 was observed with a 120 capsule bottle of alpha lipoic acid and a 26.9 ounce bottle of Miralax (laxative medication) in their room. The resident stated a family had brought the Miralax, but they had not taken it. There was no documentation the resident had physician orders to self administer the medications stored in their room. On 07/05/23 at 10:30 a.m., LPN #1 was made aware the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of resident transfer/discharge for one (#19) of two residents sampled for hospitalization. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A discharge return anticipated MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #19 was discharged to an acute care facility. An entry record MDS, documented Res #19 returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 07/11/23 at 10:34 a.m., the administrator was asked how the ombudsman was notified of resident transfers, they stated the facility does not routinely notify the ombudsman of resident discharges. They stated they were unaware of the requirement to notify in the event of emergency discharge to the hospital.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new diagnosis of possible serious mental illness for a level II resident review for one (#64) of one residents sampled for PASARRs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #64 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A nursing facility level of care assessment (PASARR level I), dated 07/29/22, documented the resident had no diagnosis of a serious mental illness. On 03/28/23, a diagnosis of bipolar disorder was added to Res #64's list of diagnoses. On 07/11/23 at 9:06 a.m., corporate RN #1 stated the resident was not referred for a level II resident review when the new diagnosis was added.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan with fall interventions for one (#1) of one resident sampled for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, repeated falls, senile degeneration of the brain, and seizures. A care plan, revised 04/12/23, documented the resident was at risk for falls related to balance, impaired cognition, and right upper extremity weakness. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/29/23, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assist with all of their ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had two or more falls with no injury and two or more falls with minor injury since the last assessment. A fall report, dated 06/08/23, documented the resident had an unwitnessed fall with minor injury. The fall report documented an intervention of reclining wheelchair back. A fall report, dated 06/10/23, documented the resident had a witnessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for one (#125) of one sampled resident reviewed for bathing. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #125 had diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy. The June 2023 bathing record documented the resident was bathed one out of two opportunities during the week of 06/11/23 through 06/17/23. A comprehensive resident assessment, dated 06/29/23, documented the resident's cognition was intact and required physical help in part of bathing with one person physical assist. A physician order, dated 06/29/23, documented bathe every Wednesday and Saturday on day shift. On 07/05/23 at 10:51 a.m., Res #125 was asked if they were bathed according schedule or their preference. They stated they were supposed to be bathed twice a week and they were not. On 07/06/23 at 10:56 a.m., CNA #2 was asked how often the resident was bathed. They stated the aides were provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely physician response to monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews for one (#38) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/05/23, documented 72 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, dated January 2023, documented in part .Recommendations shall be acted upon within 30 calendar days . Res #38 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. A physician order, dated 11/24/20, documented to administer oxcarbazepine 150 mg tablet at bedtime for bipolar disorder. A physician order, dated 04/21/22, documented to administer quetiapine 300 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for schizoaffective disorder. A physician order, dated 10/09/22, documented to administer Lunesta 1 mg tablet by mouth at bedtime for anxiety. A MRR, dated 03/09/23, documented a request for a gradual dose reduction of oxcarbazepine, quetiapine, and Lunesta. A MRR,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented to staff during resident council meetings. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 11/30/21, documented 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident council meeting minutes, dated 09/03/21, documented the residents felt the resident council meetings were pointless because things were not being taken care of. Resident council meetings minutes were reviewed for 09/03/21, 10/01/21, and 11/05/21. There was no documentation the residents' grievances had been acted upon. On 12/02/21 at 10:02 a.m., a confidential group meeting was conducted with four cognitive residents. They were asked if the facility acted upon their grievances and/or recommendations presented during their resident council meetings. They stated their concerns during their meetings were not being addressed. They stated there was no communication and they paid too much money to not have their issues addressed. At 1:21 p.m., the AD was asked what the process was for acting upon residents' grievances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing services for six (#47, 77, 85, 145, 146, and #196) of nine sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 95 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included glaucoma and a recent fracture to his leg. An admission assessment, dated 11/07/21, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with ADLs including bathing. On 11/30/21 at 11:02 a.m., the resident stated he had only two showers since he had been at the facility. The resident's medical record was reviewed. There was no documentation of bathing in the record. On 12/06/21 at 4:24 p.m., the DON stated she could not find any documentation of showers being given. 2. Res #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An admission assessment, dated 11/16/21, documented the resident was cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for two (#12 and #196) of two residents reviewed for accident hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 95 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #196 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/26/20. A significant change assessment, dated 05/17/20, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with ADLs. On 12/08/21 at 10:12 a.m., the resident's room video camera footage for 05/12/20 at 4:29 p.m. was viewed. The camera had filmed two CNAs changing the resident's shirt and then having the resident lean forward lifting off the wheelchair slightly to pull her pants up. When the resident was sitting back down the wheelchair moved and the CNAs, one on each side, held her and put her back in the chair. The wheelchair brakes were not locked and the CNAs were not using a gait belt while having the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supplements as ordered for one (#12) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 12 residents with unplanned weight loss/gain. Findings: Resident (Res) #12 had diagnoses to include unspecified dysphagia, GERD, and vitamin deficiency. A significant change assessment, dated, 08/28/21, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired and he required supervision with setup help only. It documented he was 69 inches in height and weighed 135 pounds. It documented he had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months and was not on a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen. A physician order, dated 09/22/21, documented the resident was to receive a house shake thickened to nectar consistency three times a day with meals. A nutrition note, dated 12/01/21, documented, the resident's weight had been stable since the last RD note on 09/22/21. The note documented the resident took the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Res #6 had diagnoses which chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic diastolic heart failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen and COPD. A physician order, dated 03/21/20, documented the resident was to receive oxygen 2 lpm via NC. A breathing patterns care plan, last reviewed 08/24/21, documented to administer oxygen as ordered. On 11/30/21 at 11:48 a.m., the resident was observed with a portable O2 tank in place on the back of her W/C. The gauge on the portable O2 tank was observed to be full and the dial was set on zero. At 1:00 p.m., the DON was shown the resident's portable O2 tank. She was asked if the resident was supposed to be on continuous O2. She stated she was, but was not sure what the order was for. She was asked if the dial was set at zero. She stated it was. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen in residents' portable oxygen tanks and/or failed to turn on the oxygen for two (#6 and #24) of three residents sampled for respiratory care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to administered pain medications as ordered for three (#5, 24, and #146) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents identified 64 residents on a pain management program. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #146 had diagnoses which arthritis, acute embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins, pain, diabetic neuropathy, pneumonia, and angina pectoris. Physician orders, dated 10/18/21, documented the resident was to receive gabapentin (nerve pain medication) 600 mg four times per day. Physician orders, dated 10/21/21, documented the resident was to receive morphine ER (extended release pain medication) 15 mg q 12 hrs. The eMAR, dated 10/18/21 - 11/09/21, documented the resident was to receive gabapentin 600 mg one tablet four times per day at 6:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m., and 8:00 p.m. During this time period the eMAR documented the resident received the medication a total of 21 out of 84 opportunities from 1 hr and 15 min to 2 hrs and 8 min before or after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff on a 24-hour basis to meet the needs of the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 95 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 11/30/21 at 11:02 a.m., Resident (Res) #77 stated he had only two showers since he had been at the facility. He said sometimes you have to wait a long time for call lights to be answered. The resident's medical record was reviewed. There was no documentation of bathing in the record. 2. On 11/30/21 at 12:49 p.m., Res #85 stated his medications were late. He stated sometimes they come in to give evening medications after he has gone to sleep for the night. He said it has been as late as 2:00 p.m. On 12/01/21 at 8:57 a.m., Res #85 stated he did not get a shower for two weeks after he arrived. He stated he did not know where the shower room was until he asked someone and they showed him where it was. He stated he had to have supervision because of his recent falls. The resident's medical record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have medications available and/or administer medications as ordered for five (#52, 84, 85, 145, and #146) of ten sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents identified 95 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #145 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physician orders, dated 09/25/19, documented the resident was to receive Basaglar KwikPen (Insulin) 35 U SQ q 12 hrs. Physician orders, dated 09/28/19, documented the resident was to receive NovoLog Flexpen (INSULIN) 10 U SQ before meals. Hold if FSBS <100 and inject as directed per sliding scale before meals. The November 2020 eMAR documented the resident was to receive Basglar KwikPen 35 Units SQ q 12 hrs at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. During this time period the eMAR documented the resident received the medication a total of 11 out of 62 opportunities from one hr and 17 min to 10 hrs and 56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates residents' preferences for seven (#12,14, 33, 47, 61, 70, and #79) seven residents sampled for food preferences. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents identified 95 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #61 had diagnoses which included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris and diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 10/18/21, documented the resident was to receive a reduced concentrated sweets/no added salt/thin liquid/regular consistency diet. An admission assessment, dated 10/27/21, documented the resident's cognition was intact and she required supervision with setup help only with eating. On 12/01/21 at 8:47 a.m., the resident was observed in her room and just received her breakfast tray. She was asked if she received what she ordered. She stated she did not, but she would eat what they sent her. The resident's meal ticket indicated she was to have received two cranberry juices, a large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals in a timely manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents identified 95 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A meal service procedure sheet, undated, documented lunch service was to begin at 11:30 a.m. It documented hall carts were supposed to go out of the kitchen at 11:30 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 12:30 p.m. On 11/30/21 at 12:12 p.m., the first food tray was served out of the kitchen for the lunch service. At 12:14 p.m., resident (Res) #11, #34, and #50 were observed at an assisted dining table in the dining room waiting to receive their meals. At 12:44 p.m., the corporate IP was heard telling the staff in the kitchen to give her resident #50's food and she would feed him. She was then observed taking the resident's food tray to him and assisted him with his meal. At 12:49 a.m., Res #34 received his food tray. At 12:50 p.m., Res #11 received her food tray. At 12:51 p.m., CNA #2 was observed assisting Res #11 and #34 with their meals. At 1:16 p.m., Res #91 could be heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in good repair and clean. The RD identified 94 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: On 11/30/21 at 8:05 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. ceiling lights were burned out, b. dead cockroaches were on the floor and in the light shields in the dish wash area, c. base boards were loose from the wall in the dish wash area and around the hand sink, d. an accumulation of black and white residue was on the floor in the dish wash area, e. an accumulation of white residue was on the dish machine in the dish wash area, f. there was a hole in the wall around the piping below the three compartment sink in the dish wash area, g. an accumulation of dried food splatter was on the base of the Ninja mixer, h. there was dried food splatter on the wall in the prep area, i. an accumulation of grease was on the metal rack next to the fryer, j. an accumulation of dried food debris was on the bulk bin of dried oatmeal in the cook area, k. an accumulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was not transported and left at his home alone for one (#245) of two residents sampled for abuse and neglect. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 95 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: Resident (Res) #245 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE]. The resident was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses which included COPD, DM, heart failure, HTN, chronic kidney disease, weakness, and pain. A Baseline Care Plan, dated 05/17/21, documented the resident's discharge goal was to be discharged home and live with family. The care plan documented the resident's concern about the home environment was he was unable to care for himself. The assessment documented the primary caregiver was his son. The assessment documented the resident did not have the potential to discharge/return to the community. The assessment documented the resident was at the facility for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify OSDH within two hours of an allegation of abuse for two (#13 and #79) of three resident sampled for abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 95 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: The facility's abuse policy read in parts .report such allegation to the State Regulatory Agency .not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury . The initial Incident Report Form, with an incident date of 10/27/21, documented at approximately 6:30 on 12/27/21, Resident (Res) #13 gave Res #79 a cupcake and sat it on her table. The report documented Res #79 told Res #13 that she did not want the cupcake and gave it back to her. Res #13 picked up the cupcake and threw it at Res #79 and began yelling. Res #13 then wheeled herself towards Res #79 and grabbed Res #79 by both arms. The residents were separated and redirected. The report documented red marks were noted to both of Res #79 arms. The report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF NHCC SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2020 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/23/2021 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 09/23/2021 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| WEST, KASANDRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/08/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/24/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/24/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/29/2017 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| IGBEKOYI, OLADIPO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| SWAIN, TAMMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375245. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.