Montevista Rehabilitation And Skilled Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 287 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 24.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 92.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 04/04/24 related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to ensure a resident remained safe and free from elopement. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent the resident from exiting the facility and leaving the premises unsupervised. On 05/01/24 at 9:57 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to protect the resident and prevent elopement. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one (#3) of four sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The Administrator reported a resident census of 80. Findings: The facility's Elopement Risk Assessment policy, dated 01/12/20, read in part, The licensed nurse completes the Elopement Risk Assessment in the electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-04-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received food prepared to meet the resident's needs, which resulted in hospitalization, for one (#1) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The administrator reported a census of 84 residents. Findings: A Menu Planning policy, dated 11/01/17, documented in part, .Nutrition Services will be responsible to prepare and serve the diet as ordered .Nursing staff will notify the NSM of needed consistency changes .Resident response to special and modified diets will be evaluated. Ineffective or inappropriate diets, including texture modifications, will be referred .to the attending physician, dietitian, and/or therapy department for evaluation . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and muscle spasms. A physician order, dated 11/29/23, documented a diet order for puree level 4. An MDS assessment, dated 02/17/24, documented the resident required a mechanically altered diet. The assessment documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-07-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was controlled for one (#95) of two sample residents were reviewed for pain. The facility failed to have a physician ordered pain medication available for the resident when they requested two separate doses at six hour intervals. The resident requested to go to the hospital due to uncontrolled pain. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/09/23, documented 91 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #95 had diagnoses which included CAD, HTN, MDRO, CVA, hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, and MS. The resident's Pain Risk Assessment read in part, .Does the resident have a diagnosis or condition likely to cause pain? Cutaneous abscess of right foot, Other chronic pain, .Onset of Pain - (Chronic) over 3 months .What improves the pain? - Pain medication . The care plan read in part, .Care Area/Problem *Pain [05/25/23] Goal-Chronic pain will be managed effectively at a level that is tolerable to the resident over the next 90 days .Give pain medications before pain becomes severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0635 — pattern
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. verify and obtain clarification from the physician to determine how often to flush the cholecystostomy drain and to measure and record the drain output for 1 (#1) of one sampled resident with a cholecystostomy drain; and b. administer medications as physician ordered for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for new admissions to the facility. The administrator reported 88 residents resided in the facility and had 47 new admits to the facility in the last 30 days. The administrator reported they currently had no cholecystostomy drains in the facility. Findings: 1. A performance checklist skill Managing Wound Drainage Evacuation policy, dated 2018, read in part, Recording and Reporting, 1. Recorded all pertinent information in the appropriate log. 2. Recorded amount of drainage on I&O record. 3. Documented evaluation of patient learning. 4. Reported sudden change in amount of drainage, pungent odor of drainage or new signs of purulence, severe pain, or dislodgement of tube to health care provider immediately. A H&P for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan to include a IR drain/cholecystostomy drain within 48 hours of admission to the facility for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for an IR drain. The administrator reported 47 new admissions in the past 30 days. Findings: A Care Plan - Process policy, dated 03/27/23, read in part, Initiate a Baseline Care Plan and complete within forty-eight (48) hours of admission based on the physician's orders and nursing evaluation. Resident #1's diagnoses included intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, perforation of gallbladder in cholecystitis, and acute kidney failure. Resident #1's admission assessment, dated 01/29/25, showed renal/urinary history-other (describe below)-IR drain. Current bladder/urine status-urinal at bedside. A Baseline Care Plan, dated 02/07/25, showed Physician Orders/Medications/Treatments. The IR drain was not listed under physician orders/treatment or listed under the nursing evaluation on the baseline care plan. On 02/24/25 at 5:52 p.m., the DON was asked about specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a a skin assessment for 1 (#1) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for physician ordered wound treatments. The administrator identified 88 residents resided in the facility and the facility matrix showed seven residents had wounds in the facility. Findings: A policy titled An Overview of Wound Care, dated July 2018, read in part, It is important that existing PU/PI be identified, whether present on admission or developed after admission, and that factors that influenced its development, the potential of additional PU/PIs or the deterioration of the PU/PIs be recognized, assessed and addressed. Any new PU/PI suggests a need to reevaluate the adequacy of prevention measures in the resident's care plan. A policy titled Documentation and Measurement of Wounds, revised July 2018, read in part, Wounds are measured and documented within professional practice guidelines. Resident #1's diagnoses included, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and perforation of gallbladder in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy for cholecystostomy drain care for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident with a cholecystostomy drain and ensure the nursing staff were properly trained and determined competent for 3 (LPN #3, 5 and #6) of 4 sampled LPNs interviewed for drain care. The administrator reported 88 residents resided in the facility and had no cholecystostomy drains in the facility. Findings: A performance checklist skill Managing Wound Drainage Evacuation policy, dated 2018, read in part, Recording and Reporting 1. Recorded all pertinent information in the appropriate log. 2. Recorded amount of drainage on I&O record. 3. Documented evaluation of patient learning. 4. Reported sudden change in amount of drainage, pungent odor of drainage or new signs of purulence, severe pain, or dislodgement of tube to health care provider immediately. The physician order packet (physicians order), dated 01/29/25, read in part, Septic shock 12/31/24 - 01/29/25, return visit 02/04/25 with gastrointestinal cancer clinic .Other instructions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified of changes in skin condition for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for notifications. The administrator identified 88 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Change of Condition policy, dated 02/13/23, read in part, Examples of circumstances of when it is appropriate to communicate information to these parties may include, but are not limited to .unexpected deterioration in condition or status. Resident #1's had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and perforation of gallbladder in cholecystitis. An admission assessment, dated 01/29/25, read in part, Does resident wish to have a representative involved in care decision-yes (enter name in text box)- [Family member name withheld]. A skin assessment, dated 01/29/25, showed Rash/Redness/Denuded (Includes MASD/IAD)- Yes. Location of Rash/Redness- Buttocks blanchable redness. Surgical wound - Yes. Location of surgical wound-abdomen upper right side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated with smoking interventions for 2 (#2 and #3) of 3 residents sampled for smoking safety. The administrator reported 14 smokers resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Resident Smoking Policy, dated 01/01/24, read in part, The resident's care plan will include the amount of assistance the resident is to receive during smoking. The care plan will be updated quarter and as necessary to document changes in the resident's need for assistance. 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included seizure disorder and bilateral below knee amputation. A Smoking Risk assessment, dated 06/09/24, showed Resident #2 agreed to keep smoking paraphernalia at the nurse's station. A care plan, dated 09/23/24, read in part, Resident has been informed that this is a non smoking facility and continues too smoke at times. The care plan failed to show the facility's change to allow smoking in the courtyard and interventions to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide staff supervision while smoking for 1 (#1) of 3 residents sampled for smoking supervision. The administrator reported 14 smokers resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Smoking Policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, Residents who wish to smoke will be evaluated for the level of assistance required while smoking. All residents will be supervised while smoking for their personal safety. Resident #1's care plan, dated 09/05/24, showed the resident smoked and was at risk for injury. The care plan showed the resident would not have any injury while smoking and would smoke in designated areas at all times. The care plan showed cigarettes and lighter would be kept at the nurse's station/designated area. The annual assessment for Resident #1, dated 11/10/24, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living. On 02/06/25 at 11:10 a.m., the administrator reported they implemented smoking in the facility in June 2024 and stated they had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse and determine when to report the allegation for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 92 residents resided in the facility. The administrator reported six allegations of abuse in the past ninety days. Findings: An Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, dated 06/23/27, read in part, The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all healthcare facilities comply with federal and state regulations regarding (i) protecting facility patients and residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation, and (ii) timely investigation of and reporting to state and local agencies all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy also read, All residents, family members, visitors, and others are encouraged to report actual or suspected incidents of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of resident property without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Findings: A Position Description, documented, position title: Registered Nurse, essential duties to evaluate staffing pattern needed to meet the needs of the residents in conjunction with the Director of Resident Care Services. Organizes/coordinators subordinates, job tasks and time allotments. Oversees/monitors function and activities of subordinate staff. On 09/06/24 at 8:45 a.m., the administrator reported the DON was hired in June 2024 and the ADON was hired on 02/21/24. They reported they were short during the month of April/May 2024. On 09/06/24 at 9:30 a.m., the administrator reported they were short RN coverage for every Saturday and Sunday in May 2024 and two weekends in April 2024.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served prepared food with clean tongs and restrained all hair with beard guards as indicated. Findings: A facility policy, Employee Infection Control, dated 08/01/18, read in part, Anyone who enters the kitchen will have all hair restrained using bouffant caps, mesh or net, beard guard and clothing which covers body hair. A facility policy, General Food Preparation and Handling, dated 02/06/24, read in part, Food is prepared and served with clean tongs, scoops, forks, spoons, spatulas, or other suitable implements to avoid manual contact of prepared foods. On 09/03/24 at 07:30 a.m., an initial tour was conducted of the kitchen. [NAME] #1 was preparing the morning meal and was observed without a beard guard in place. They reported they were running late this morning. On 09/03/24 at 11:40 a.m., the dietary supervisor was asked about the staff not wearing a beard guard. They reported it was their policy for them to wear beard guards when preparing meals. On 09/03/24 at 12:00 p.m., cook #1 donned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$20,069 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-04-02
• $10,036 — penalty dated 2024-04-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK