Meadowlake Estates

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 17.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 01/03/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to follow Resident #10's minced and moist level 5 diet which resulted in the resident choking. A physician's order, dated 11/29/24, documented Resident #10 was to have a minced and moist level 5 diet. An incident report, dated 12/19/24, documented Resident #10 was eating lunch in their room when a medication aide saw that the resident was choking and alerted the nurse who performed the Heimlich maneuver. It documented the brownie was expelled. It documented the nurse practitioner was notified and a x-ray was ordered. It documented family was notified. It documented the facility investigated and determined Resident #10 was given a brownie that was not on their diet. It documented the nurse stated the resident was still moving air and coughing and was able to cough the brownie up with a gentle Heimlich maneuver. It documented the dietary manager was notified and kitchen staff were in-serviced on following the resident's diet on their diet sheet. It documented the resident would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 09/14/23 at 10:50 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence an immediate jeopardy situation existed due to the facilities failure to have a system in place to ensure residents were not missing from the facility. On 09/08/23 the facility was notified by someone in the community that Resident #8 was outside behind the facility on the ground. During an interview with LPN #1, they stated Resident #8 had been outside 30 minutes or less. They stated Resident #8 was found with wet muddy shoes and pants. They stated the resident was able to exit through the back door that went to the smoking area due to the door being broke, and the code and alarm do not work. LPN #1 stated it appeared that the resident had exited a gate behind the facility, as it was found to be open when they went to the back where Resident #1 was located in the alley behind the facility. On 09/14/23 at 10:50 a.m., the administrator was informed of the immediate jeopardy situation. On 09/14/23 at 6:02 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was received. The plan of removal documented:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely to prevent unauthorized access during 1 of 2 observations of medication storage.The DON identified 109 residents received medication from the facility.Findings:On 03/25/26 at 10:25 a.m., a white pill identified as a 100 mg gabapentin (an anticonvulsant) was observed laying on top of a medication cart in the hall outside of a resident's room. There was no staff in sight of the medication cart.A facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/2024, read in part, 17. During administration of medications, the medications cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering the medications when unlocked.On 03/25/26 at 10:30 a.m., the DON was shown the pill located on top of the medication cart. The DON stated the pill was a 100 mg gabapentin (an anticonvulsant). The DON stated a resident could have picked up the pill…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with ADLs. The DON identified 114 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/11/25 at 12:25 p.m., Res #1 was observed lying in bed. The resident's hair was braided and kempt. No odors were observed. A policy titled Bathing, revised 02/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide bathing services for residents within standard practice guidelines .If the resident refuses to independently or allow staff to assist with bathing, document the refusal in the record. Res #1 was admitted with diagnoses which included quadriplegia, multiple sclerosis, and muscle wasting. A quarterly assessment, dated 11/22/24, showed Res #1 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 and was cognitively intact. The assessment showed Res #1 was dependent with bathing and mobility. A care plan, dated 12/18/24, showed the resident preferred to be bathed in the morning and for staff to provide the resident assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide incontinent care to prevent a moisture associated pressure ulcer for 1 (#5); and b. ensure care was provided as ordered by the physician for 1 (#6) of 3 residents sampled for ADL care to prevent/worsening of pressure ulcers. The DON reported 114 residents resided in the facility. Six residents had wounds. Findings: A facility policy titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, dated July 2018, read in part,Based upon the assessment and the resident's clinical condition, choices and identified needs, basic or routine care could include, but is not limited to, interventions to: a. Redistribute pressure (such as repositioning, protecting and/or offloading heels); b. Minimize exposure to moisture and keep skin clean, especially of fecal contamination. 1. Res #5 admitted with diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy, major depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. An Incident Investigation Report, dated 02/23/24, read in part, On 02/23/25, it was reported by the 11-7 nurse that the residents: [Res…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. raw meat items were stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination; b. dented cans were removed from circulation in the dry storage; c. leftover food items were discarded within the appropriate timeframe; d. food items in the refrigerator were stored in a sealed container; e. expired food items were removed from circulation; and f. food items were appropriately dated and labeled during the kitchen observation. The DON identified 106 residents received services from the kitchen. Findings: A Use of Leftovers policy, dated 08/01/18, read in parts, Leftovers will be properly handled and used .Leftovers should be covered, labeled, dated and stored appropriately .Unless otherwise indicated on package, leftover food is used within 72 hours or discarded. A Food Storage policy, dated 08/01/18, read in parts, Storeroom .Air-tight containers or bags are used for all opened packages of food. All containers are accurately labeled with the item and date opened .All stock is rotated with each new order received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide incontinent care in a manner which prevented cross contamination for two (#33 and #42) of four sampled residents observed during incontinent care; b. handle linens in a manner which prevented cross contamination for one (#42) of four sampled residents observed during incontinent care; c. ensure proper PPE was worn in a room with a COVID-19 positive resident for three (#46, 55 and #89) of three sampled residents observed with COVID-19; d. ensure the same PPE was not worn when assisting two different residents with COVID-19 in the same room for two (#46 and #55) of three sampled residents observed with COVID-19; and e. medications were not handled with bare hands. The DON identified 67 incontinent residents and four Covid-19 positive residents resided in the facility. ADON #1 identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Perineal Care/Incontinent Care policy, effective 04/2012, read in parts, Staff will perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS entry tracking was completed per RAI guidelines for one (#45) of 27 sampled residents who were reviewed for resident assessments. ADON #1 identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Assessment policy, revised 01/12/20, read in parts, Purpose: To enter this assessment data into a computerized format that will be transmitted to the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS). The policy also read, Tracking records .will be transmitted electronically, in a CMS specified format. Resident #45's MDS list documented a discharge return anticipated on 05/19/23. It documented a quarterly assessment dated [DATE]. There was no entry tracking record. On 12/31/24 at 10:42 a.m., the clinical reimbursement specialist stated the resident went to the hospital and did need an entry. They stated the RAI was not followed.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurately coded for one (#111) of 27 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. ADON #1 identified 111 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Assessment policy, revised [DATE], read in part, Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment will sign to certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. Resident #111 had diagnoses which included history of seizures and history of traumatic brain injury. A Nurse Note, dated [DATE], documented at 5:25 p.m., Resident #111 coded, CPR was started, emergency personnel arrived, and eventually restored Resident #111's pulse. It documented Resident #111 transferred from the facility to the hospital. The note was electronically signed by the DON on [DATE]. A Transfer Form, dated [DATE], documented Resident #111's blood pressure was 147/79, pulse 68, respirations 18, oxygen 95 percent, and the resident was transferred to the hospital.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a manner to prevent UTI's for one (#42) of four sampled residents observed during incontinent care. The DON identified 67 incontinent residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Perineal Care/Incontinent Care policy, effective 04/2012, read in parts, Staff will perform perineal/incontinent care with each bath and after each incontinent episode .Clean groin using sweeping motion .For female .Separate labia and wash downward .then downward on each side of the labia using a different peri wipe with each stroke .Wash downward toward the base of the vaginal opening .Remove gloves and wash hands or alcohol gel and re-glove hands .Turn resident on side facing staff. Roll soiled brief/incontinent pad and apply clean brief and/or incontinent pad. Turn resident away from staff. (ONLY USE ONE WIPE PER SWIPE) .Clean outer hip of buttocks going upwards towards back .Clean anal area with upward motion .Remove gloves and wash hands with alcohol gel. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered and a concentrator had a filter and was dust free for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. The DON identified 24 residents who received oxygen therapy in the facility. Findings: The OXYGEN THERAPY, CONCENTRATOR INITIATION policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, The licensed staff will provide the prescribed amount of oxygen therapy to the residents as prescribed by physician and according to practice guidelines. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A physician's order, dated 12/27/24, documented oxygen 2 liters per minute inhalation every shift via nasal cannula, may remove for ADLs. On 12/30/24 at 11:58 a.m., Resident #1 was observed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula. The concentrator vent had extreme dust build up. On 01/02/25 at 11:33 a.m., Resident #1 was observed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute. On 01/02/25 at 1:32 p.m., RN #1 reviewed Resident #1's oxygen order. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a outdated medication was removed from stock for one of one medication storage observation. ADON #1 identified 111 residents resided in the facility and 111 residents were administered medications by the nursing staff. Findings: A medication storage policy, dated 01/2024, read in part, Outdated, contaminated, discontinued or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock. On [DATE] at 11:02 a.m., a magnesium chloride with calcium bottle was observed to be expired. The best by date was 09/2024. On [DATE] at 11:03 a.m., ACMA #2 stated someone was supposed to check the expiration dates and rotate the stock. They identified the best by date to be 09/2024 and stated the medication would not be appropriate to use. On [DATE] at 11:13 a.m., CMA #3 stated they checked the medications last on [DATE]. They stated they were surprised to know that something was expired.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,611 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,441 — penalty dated 2025-01-06
• $11,170 — penalty dated 2023-09-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK