Ranchwood Nursing Center
824 South Yukon Parkway, Yukon, OK 73099 · Non profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (405) 354-2022 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $168,835 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 13.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.7% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.6% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.5% | 74.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.9% | 27.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.3% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 2.31 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.64 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 17.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.4%CMS range 45.5–68.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 10.4–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 17.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 17.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 89.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.0–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 107.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were notified when a resident had a change of condition for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for a change of condition which resulted in death. Resident #1 had low blood pressure of 73/47, 81/59 and a pulse of 41 without notification to the physician of the change. The MDS coordinator identified 105 residents resided in the facility.On 04/10/26, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to notify the physician and family of a change in condition for Resident #6 who was reported to have a low blood pressure and pulse which resulted in death.On 04/10/26 at 11:55 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation.On 04/10/26 at 11:57 a.m., the administrator and DON were verbally notified of the IJ in existence and provided the IJ template via email at 12:01 p.m.On 04/13/26 at 1:14 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly assess, identify, and intervene when a resident experienced an acute emergent change in condition for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for changes in conditions when facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of critical emergent vital signs/symptoms and identify hypoglycemia on a resident with known history of diabetes and known recent history and hospitalizations for hypoglycemia resulting in transfer to the acute care hospital and subsequent death.Specifically, the facility failed to:a. Identify, monitor, intervene, and provide continuing assessments for Resident #6 who was admitted with a known history of diabetes and hypoglycemia experiencing signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia.b. Notify the medical provider of, or intervene, for Resident #6's critically abnormal vital signs of a blood pressure of 73/47 and an oxygenation of 84% on [DATE], andc. Notify the medical provider of, or intervene, for Resident #6's critically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 09/16/25 at 2:02 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation related to the facility's failure to assess and identify a wound for Resident #128. This likely resulted in an infected diabetic foot ulcer which caused the resident to be admitted to the hospital and resulted in a right below-knee amputation.On 09/16/25 at 2:15 p.m., regional director was notified of the IJ and provided the IJ template.On 09/17/25 at 8:25 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,Plan Of Removal 09/16/2025:What measures will be put into place or what systemic changes will be made to ensure that the deficient practice does not occur. Resident #128 was discharged . Skin assessment for current residents in house will be completed by 09/16/25 at 11:59 p.m. Weekly skin assessments will be documented in the TAR. DON/designee will provide education to all clinical staff on completion of weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan:a. for a resident who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 and acute kidney injury for 1 (#6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #1 had no care plan for glucose levels and showed the resident's cause of death was protein calorie malnutrition, cognitive impairment disorder, and acute kidney failure. The Certificate of Death showed a significant condition contributing to Resident #6's death was diabetes mellitus.b.to include interventions for weight loss for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for weight loss.The MDS coordinator identified 105 residents resided in the facility.Findings: 1. A facility policy titled Care Plan Process, dated 03/27/23, read in part, The plan of care identifies the date, problem, goals, measurable and realistic, time frames for achievement, interventions, discipline specific services, resolution/goal analysis, and [sic] discharge option.A care plan for Resident #6, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure the highest practicable well-being of each resident. The director of nurses reported 98 residents resided in the facility.The Quality of Care Monthly Report dated December 2025 showed 3 days with insufficient direct care staff for the reported resident census.The Quality of Care Monthly Report dated January 2026 showed 5 days with insufficient direct care staff for the reported resident census.The Quality of Care Monthly Report dated February 2026 showed 1 day with insufficient direct care staff for the reported resident census.A Bath List provided by the facility showed Res. #1 in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was to have baths on Monday and Thursday every week. Facility provided Bath Sheet documents showed Resident #1 had baths on 03/05/26, 03/19/26, and 03/24/26. A Bath List provided by the facility showed Res. #8 in room [ROOM NUMBER]B was to have baths every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Facility provided Bath Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was available for administration as ordered for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The administrator identified 105 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Medication Administration, dated 01/2024, read in part, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices.A physician order for Resident #1, dated 02/17/25, showed the resident was to receive divalproex (anticonvulsant) 125 mg one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for unspecified dementia.A physician order for Resident #1, dated 06/04/25, showed the resident was to receive levothyroxine (thyroid hormone) 150 micrograms one tablet by mouth at early morning time for hypothyroidism. A 02/2026 MAR for Resident #1 showed:a. levothyroxine was held on 02/07/26 at 6:00 a.m., due to being unavailable,b. levothyroxine was held on 02/08/26 at 6:00 a.m., due to being unavailable,c. levothyroxine was held on 02/12/26 at 6:00 a.m., due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the hall 8 computer on top of the treatment cart was locked and secured to prevent the exposure of resident medical records for 1 of 1 treatment cart observed. The administrator identified 105 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/04/26 at 12:26 p.m., LPN #1 was observed on hall 8 to leave the treatment cart and go inside of a room. The treatment cart had a laptop computer on top that was unlocked with the screen exposed, showing medical records from the electronic medical record. The treatment cart and computer were positioned in front of the room slightly sideways near the wall with the front of the computer screen facing the hallway. On 03/04/26 at 12:27 p.m., an unknown resident was observed to walk up to the cart, face the computer, and talk to LPN #1 from the door, while LPN #1 was inside the room. A policy titled Medication Administration, dated 01/2024, read in part, Resident's health information needs to remain private. The pages of the MAR notebook containing resident health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinent care was provided for 1 (#3) of 2 sampleds resident observed for incontinent care.The administrator identified 105 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/04/26 at 1:50 p.m., there was a strong odor of urine and an overly urine saturated brief in the trash can observed in Resident #3's room. On 03/04/26 at 1:58 p.m., Resident #3's family member was observed to remove the blanket, sheet, and cloth pad and place on the floor. The bed was observed to have a wet ring in the center of the mattress. A policy titled Perineal Care, dated 04/10/23, read in part, Staff will provide perineal care in accordance with the standard of practice to prevent skin breakdown and infection. Dispose of gloves and used supplies and perform hand hygiene. Apply new gloves and place new brief and change linens as needed.A resident admission assessment for Resident #3, dated 02/11/26, showed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief score for mental illness of 14. The assessment showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the treatment cart for hall 8 was secure when staff were not in attendance for 1 of 1 treatment cart observed. The administrator identified 105 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/04/26 at 12:26 p.m., LPN #1 was observed on hall 8 to leave the treatment cart and go inside of a room. The treatment cart was not locked. The treatment cart was positioned in front of the room slightly sideways near the wall with the front of the cart facing the hallway. On 03/04/26 at 12:27 p.m., an unknown resident was observed to walk up to the front of the treatment cart and talk to LPN #1 from the door, while LPN #1 was inside the room. A policy titled Medication Administration, dated 01/2024, read in part, During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse.The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications when unlocked.On 03/04/26 at 12:29 p.m., LPN #1 stated they did not think it was a big deal since they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices were maintained during the provision of perineal care for 1 (#4) of 2 sampled residents observed for incontinent care. The administrator identified 105 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/04/26 at 11:18 a.m., CNA # 2 was observed to begin incontinent care on Resident #4. CNA #2 obtained wipes, performed perineal care to the front, then turned the resident onto their side. Resident #4 had a bowel movement. On 03/04/26 at 11:21 a.m., CNA #2 was observed to wipe the stool off of Resident #4 with a wipe. CNA #2 was observed to wipe stool that was on their left gloved hand onto the pad under the resident. CNA #2 placed a clean brief under Resident #4 and proceeded to touch the wipes package and place them on the resident's table, turned the resident back over, touched the resident, the wipes package, and cleaning solution with the same gloves. CNA #2 did not change their gloves. On 03/04/26 at 11:22 a.m., CNA #2 was observed to fasten Resident #4's clean brief, remove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for 1 (#129) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for discharge from the facility. The administrator identified 109 residents resided in the facility.Findings: A quarterly assessment, dated 01/01/25, documented Resident #129 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and anxiety. The assessment showed the resident had a BIMS of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment showed the resident was independent with eating and personal hygiene. A social services discharge note, dated 03/21/25, documented resident #129 was discharged from the facility. There was no discharge summary located in the resident's medical record. On 09/17/25 at 10:12 a.m., the corporate nurse consultant reported a discharge summary was not completed for Resident #129.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident for smoking safety/privileges for 1 (#32) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for smoking assessments. The administrator identified 15 residents who smoked. Findings: On 09/09/25 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #32 was observed in their room lying in bed. An unidentified staff member was asked by the surveyor to verify if Resident #32 was in the second bed by the window. The staff member stated, yes, and upon looking in on the resident, stated to the resident, you know the drill, give it to me. The resident was observed to hand the staff member their vape, which was held in the resident's hand under their blanket. The staff member reported the resident's smoking/vaping privileges were suspended at one time and staff were supposed to keep the resident's smoking supplies. The staff member stated the resident's family continued to bring the resident vapes and they had several stored in a large baggie, locked in the medication cart. On 09/11/25 at 1:42 p.m., Resident #32 was observed outside in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a. anxiety disorder for 1 (#70) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, and b. smoking for 1 (#16) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking.The DON identified 15 residents in the facility were smokers.The DON reported 109 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1. A care plan policy, dated 02/12/20, showed it was the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident's rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.Resident #70's physician's order, dated 03/20/25, showed the resident was to receive, sertraline (antidepressant) 50 mg one time daily for anxiety disorder and unspecified depression.duloxetine hcl (serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) 30 mg one by mouth every 12 hours for anxiety disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. revise and update the care plan for Resident #32 when their smoking privileges were suspended, andb. include the resident's legal guardian in the development and review of the care plan for Resident #76. The administrator identified 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 09/09/25 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #32 was observed in their room lying in bed. An unidentified staff member was asked by the surveyor to verify if Resident #32 was in the second bed by the window. The staff member stated, yes, and upon looking in on the resident, stated to the resident, you know the drill, give it to me. The resident was observed to hand the staff member their vape, which was held in the resident's hand under their blanket. The staff member stated the resident's smoking/vaping privileges were suspended at one time and staff were supposed to keep the resident's smoking supplies. The staff member reported the resident's family continued to bring the resident vapes and they had several stored in a large baggie,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure incontinent care was provided for 1 (#100), and b. ensure showers were provided for 1 (#127) of sampled 8 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.The DON identified 109 residents resided in the facility.Findings:1. A progress note showed Resident #127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 04/24/25. Review of bath sheet forms for Resident #127 showed the resident received showers on 04/16/25, 4/20/25 and 04/23/25. There was no documentation to show showers were provided from 04/03/25 to 04/16/25. On 9/10/25 at 2:45 p.m., an unidentified charge nurse stated there was a shower list displayed at the nurse's station indicating the room numbers and the days showers were scheduled. The charge nurse stated once showers were complete, the charge nurse signed off on the sheet. The unidentified charge nurse acknowledged sometimes showers were missed if staff did not show up to work. On 9/10/25 at 4:00 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Statement of Deficiency:Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's legal guardian of a change in the resident's condition and treatment for 1 (#76) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification. The administrator identified 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy Change of Condition, dated 02/13/23, read in part, Patient families, guardians, or other appropriate people are to be contacted when there is a significant change in the patient's condition or health status. A quarterly assessment for Resident #76, dated 08/15/25, showed a BIMS of 10, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A physician's order dated 08/20/25 showed the resident was to receive Ceftriaxone 2 g, intravenous. There was no documentation to indicate the legal guardian was notified. On 09/10/25 at 2:52 p.m., Resident #76's legal guardian stated they were not notified when the resident was diagnosed with a UTI and the need for IV antibiotic treatment on 08/20/25. On 09/11/25 at 10:00 a.m., the DON reported the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 (#126) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for baseline care plans. The administrator identified nine residents admitted to the facility in the previous 30 days. Findings:A Care Plan - Process policy, dated 03/27/23, read in part, The interdisciplinary team will coordinate with the resident and their legal representative an appropriate care plan for the resident's needs or wishes based on the assessment and reassessment process.Initiate a Baseline Care Plan and complete within forty-eight (48) hours of admission based on the physician's orders and nursing evaluation.The Baseline Plan of Care facilitates care until the comprehensive Care Plan is developed. Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A baseline care plan, dated 09/03/25, showed Resident #126 had diagnoses which included infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 (#100) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified 13 residents in the facility had pressure ulcers.Findings: On 09/09/25 at 11:03 a.m., Resident #100 was observed lying on their back in bed. The resident was observed with a gauze bandage on the left foot. The resident's heels were observed on the mattress and not offloaded.On 09/11/25 at 9:25 a.m., Resident #100 was observed in bed lying on their back. The resident's heels were on the mattress and not offloaded.On 09/11/25 at 11:33 a.m., the ADON entered Resident #100's room to provide wound care. The resident was in bed lying on their back and heels were not offloaded. The ADON performed wound care to the left heel per physician's orders. The ADON exited the room after the wound care was performed, and the resident's heels were not offloaded and no pressure relieving devices were in place.On 09/17/25 at 12:08 p.m., Resident #100 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for 3 (#1, 2, and #3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. The administrator identified 115 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 04/07/25 at 1:07 p.m., Res #1 was observed lying in bed. The resident' s hair was kempt. No odors were observed. A policy titled Bathing, revised 02/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide bathing services for residents within standard practice guidelines .If the resident refuses to independently or allow staff to assist with bathing, document the refusal in the record. Res #1 was admitted with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/13/25, showed Res #1 had a BIMS score of 13 and was cognitively intact. The assessment showed Res #1 was dependent with bathing. The medical record documented Res #1 was to receive a bath/shower weekly on Wednesday and Saturday. There was no documentation for February 2025 Resident #1 received a bath/shower on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 3 (#1, 2, and #3) of 3 residents sampled for timely administration of medications. The administrator identified 115 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Liberalized & Standardized Medication Administration, read in part, The licensed nurse and/or technicians (as allowed by state regulations) are responsible for adhering to the facility's standardized and liberalized medication administration schedules. Liberalized schedules - will allow for medication administration during the defined window of time; these are presented by a descriptor (e.g 'in the morning') or time frame (e.g '0700-0900') on the MAR/EMAR [medication administration record/electronic medication administration record]. Medications scheduled are considered timely as long as they are administered within one and a half hours before or after the defined time or window of time.If the medication is not available, the Director of Nursing or designee will be notified. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified when the resident experienced a fall requiring transport to the hospital for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The administrator identified 115 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/08/25 at 1:00 p.m., Res #2 was observed being wheeled into the facility entrance by family member #1. Family member #1 was frowning and upset. Res #2 was observed with a swollen area of golf ball size above the left eye. A policy titled Change of Condition, revised 02/13/23, read in part, Patient families, guardians, or other appropriate people are to be contacted when there is a significant change in a patient's condition or health status. Examples of circumstances of when it is appropriate to communicate information to these parties may include, but are not limited to: .b) transfer of a patient to another healthcare community for assessment, treatment, or care .d) significant injury or illness. Res #2 was admitted with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program for EBPs and ensure staff followed infection control guidelines to prevent the potential spread of disease during wound care for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The DON identified 30 residents with wounds and 33 residents on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 04/09/25 at 1:14 p.m., wound care for Res #7 was observed. LPN #1 was observed performing hand hygiene and donning gloves prior to the wound care. LPN #1 was not observed to have donned a personal protective gown prior to or during the wound care. Res #7 was observed to have been incontinent of bowel upon removal of their brief for access to the wounds. LPN #1 was observed to have cleaned the bowel movement from Res #7 and then continued to perform wound care to the wound on Res #7's left lower back without having performed hand hygiene or donning clean gloves after incontinent care was completed. LPN #1 continued to perform wound care to Res #7's sacrum without completing hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The assistant director of nursing identified 117 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Bathing policy, dated 02/12/20, read in part, Staff will provide bathing services for residents within standard practice guidelines. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included endocarditis (inflammation of heart valves). An admission resident assessment, dated 12/12/24, showed Resident #2 required substantial to maximum assistance with bathing. On 02/27/25 at 1:40 p.m., CNA #3 stated residents had shower schedules. CNA #3 stated they were not aware of what schedule Resident #2 would have been on during their stay in the facility. On 03/03/25 at 10:35 a.m., the traveling interim DON was asked to provide bathing records for Resident #2's stay in the facility. Resident #2 was in the facility during the month of December 2024. On 03/03/25 at 11:07 a.m., the traveling interim DON stated they were unable to find any documentation on Resident #2's bathing.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after receiving an allegation of missing doses of medication for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications being administered as ordered. The administrator reported there were 112 residents residing in the facility. Findings: An Abuse, Neglect and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property policy, reviewed 02/12/20, read in parts, All facility staff members have a duty to ensure that all alleged violations .including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported to the Administrator of the facility, who serves as the Abuse Coordinator .Upon receiving an allegation .the Abuse Coordinator will .initiate an investigation into the allegation. Resident #8 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus and end stage renal disease. A physician's order, dated 12/23/24, documented Resident #8 was to receive Ozempic 2mg via subcutaneous injection every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive MDS assessment within the required time frame for one (#6) of eleven sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessment completion. The DON identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, documented an admission assessment must be completed no later than the 14th day of the resident's admission. Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region. There was no documentation in the EHR that a comprehensive MDS assessment was completed for Resident #6. On 01/15/25 at 3:45 p.m., the DON was asked to review Resident #6's clinical record. After consulting with the MDS coordinator, the DON acknowledged no comprehensive MDS assessment had been completed for Resident #6 since their admission on [DATE].
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive the wrong medications for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication being administered as ordered. The administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings A Medication Administration- General Guidelines policy, dated 01/2024, read in parts, Residents are identified before medication is administered using at least two resident identifiers .the resident's room number or physical location is not used as an identifier Resident #3 had diagnoses which included pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis. An incident report, dated 12/25/24 at 8:02 a.m., documented CMA #2 had given Resident #3 medications that belonged to another resident. A nurses note, signed 12/25/24 2:10 p.m., documented CMA #2 reported giving Resident #3 the following medications that belonged to another resident: aspirin 81mg (NSAID- reduce risk of heart attack), buspirone 10mg (anxiolytic- treats anxiety), linezolid 600mg (antibacterial- treats skin infection & pneumonia), and potassium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a home like environment during two of two observations by ensuring: a. carpets were in good repair and clean, b. walls were in good repair and not damaged, c. outlets and exposed wires were covered, d. tiles were in good repair and not torn or missing e. walls and ceilings were clean and free of debris and stains, and f. strong odors of urine were prevented. The DON identified 102 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Resident Room Cleaning policy, dated 11/2021, read in part, Purpose: To provide a clean, attractive, and safe environment for residents, visitors, and staff. The facility's Maintenance Work Order Log sheet document, dated 08/08/24, documented a work order for room [ROOM NUMBER]'s carpet being torn was submitted. It did not document the repairs were completed. On 09/06/24 at 1:54 p.m., the following observations were made in room [ROOM NUMBER]: the carpet was torn across the middle of the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling practices of covering food in a sanitary condition when on the tray line. The DON stated 101 residents received nutritional meals from the kitchen Findings: On 09/03/24 at 8:23 a.m., it was found that bowls of cereal were unwrapped, stacked and stored on tray line. The bottom of the bowls came in contact with cereal product. On 09/03/24 at 8:24 a.m., the Kitchen Aide #1 reported that the bowls of cereal are supposed to wrapped and not stacked on each other. On 09/10/24 at 9:43 a.m., the Dietary Manager reported the bowls of cereal was an infection control issue and not to serve the cereal to residents. On 09/10/24 at 9:44 a.m., the Dietary Manager reported we have no policy for this issue.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a catheter bag was covered with a vanity bag to maintain residents dignity for one (#96) of three sampled resident reviewed for catheter bags covered to maintain a residents dignity during two of two observations. The DON identified 9 residents had catheters in the facility. Findings: The facility's Insertion of a Straight or Indwelling Urinary Catheter policy, revised on 01/12/23, read in part, Cover drainage bag with privacy bag as necessary. Resident #96 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and cellulitis. A physicians order, dated 7/19/24, read in part, Foley Catheter Care every 2 shift privacy bag checked and verified Q Shift. On 09/03/24 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #96's catheter bag was observed hanging on the lower bedside from the hall while standing in the door way. The bag was not covered with a vanity bag. On 09/06/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident #96's catheter bag was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for one (#4) of 32 sampled residents whose advanced directive acknowledgments were reviewed. The DON identified 102 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Advance Directive Management policy, revised 03/27/23, read in part, The Director of admission will ensure that the Advanced Directive Acknowledgment Form is completed during the admission process and scan the Acknowledgment Form into the resident's EMR. Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis and paraplegia. Resident #4's EMR did not document the the resident was assisted with formulating an advanced directive. On 09/04/24 at 2:08 p.m., Corporate Nurse #1 was asked where Resident #4's advanced directive was located in the EMR. Corporate Nurse #1 stated they audited the charts the night before and Resident #4 did not have an advanced directive acknowledgment in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document the alleged abuse for one (#44) of three sampled residents. The DON reported 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's ABUSE, NEGLECT AND EXPLOITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF RESIDENT PROPERTY dated 06/23/17, read in parts .The person receiving the report or designee must document all incidents of alleged abuse/neglect on incident reports, which are forwarded directly to the Abuse Counselor . Resident #44 had diagnosis of Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease and Anxiety Disorder. On 09/20/24 at 10:20 p.m., there was no records of initial report found. On 09/10/24 at 10:58 a.m., LPN # reported that CMA# had received allegation of abuse from Resident #44 and reported to me on 09/06/24 at 7:30a.m. during shift change. On 09/10/24 at 10:59 a.m., LPN# reported there was no documentation. On 09/1024 at 11:07 a.m., the DON reported the company policy and procedure states that the person receiving the allegation should fill out an incident report and no documentation was completed by the CMA # .
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed within 92 days of the previous ARD for two(#1 and #75) of 32 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 102 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Resident Assessment policy, revised 01/12/20, read in part, Quarterly assessments will be conducted not less than once every 3 months (92 days). 1. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included morbid obesity and hypotension. A summary of Resident #1's MDS Resident's MDS List document, dated 09/10/24, documented, a quarterly assessment with an ARD date of 04/25/24 was completed. The next assessment documented a significant change assessment with an ARD date 09/04/24 was completed. There was no documentation an MDS assessment was completed within 92 days on 07/25/24 of the 04/25/24 quarterly assessment. 2. Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #102 MDS records accurately reflected the residents status of discharge. The DON stated 101 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/09/24 at 10:40 a.m., the MDS assessment records inaccurately documented that Resident #102 discharged from the facility to the hospital. On 09/09/24 at 10:41 a.m., Resident #102 Nursing Notes dated, 06/03/24, documented Resident #102 phone call arrangements were made for resident to be discharged home on Sunday at 10 a.m On 09/09/24 at 10:42 a.m., Resident #102 Physician Orders dated 06/23/24, documented Resident #102 was discharged home. On 09/09/24 at 10:43 a.m., the MDS Coordinator #1 reported the MDS records were inaccurately coded resident discharged home and not to the hospital. On 09/09/24 at 11:01 a.m., the Administrator reported we do not have an policy for inaccurate MDS documentation.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents carpet was not torn and frayed causing a resident to fall for one (#45) of one resident sampled for accidents and hazards. The DON identified 102 residents resided in the facility Findings: The facility's Fall Management policy, dated 01/12/18, read in part, If a fall occurs, the qualified staff assesses for injury from the fall, immediately investigates the reason and determines the intervention to prevent future falls-complete the Incident/Accident Report in the EHR. The facility's Resident Room Cleaning policy, dated 11/2021, read in part, Purpose: To provide a clean, attractive, and safe environment for residents, visitors, and staff. A Maintenance Work Order Log Sheet document, dated 08/08/24 documented a work order was submitted to repair the floor torn. It did not document a repair was completed. Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to OSDH for seven (#1, #3, #4, #7, #9, #10, and #11) of 11 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse reported to the OSDH. The facility census was 115. Findings: An Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, dated 06/23/17, read in parts, .comply with federal and state regulations .timely investigation of and reporting to state and local agencies .Upon receiving an allegation .report such allegation to the State Regulatory Agency, Adult Protective Services .Local law enforcement .not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events .involve abuse . 1. Resident #1 had diagnosis to include pleural effusion, ascities, and anxiety. A Progress Note, dated 12/26/23 at 6:43 a.m., read in part, .could hear resident shouting at a male and female CNA, 'Don't touch me! Go get the nurse, if you touch me I'm going to call 911' . An Incident Report was not completed or reported to OSDH or other required agencies. A Progress Note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of abuse for nine (#1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #9, #10, and #11) of eleven sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 115. Findings: An Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, dated 06/23/17, read in parts, .comply with federal and state regulations .timely investigation .Upon receiving an allegation .immediately begin an investigation . 1. Resident #1 had diagnosis to include pleural effusion, ascities, and anxiety. A Progress Note, dated 12/26/23 at 6:43 a.m., read in part, .could hear resident shouting at a male and female CNA, 'Don't touch me! Go get the nurse, if you touch me I'm going to call 911' . The records contained no documentation an investigation was not initiated. A Progress Note, dated 01/04/24 at 12:19 p.m., read in part, . Called nonemergency police dept. [sic] to come .resident wanting to make a report .states that during care CNA leaned on her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: a. remove discontinued medications from current medication supply for three (#5, 6, and #7), and b. use corresponding blister cards and controlled drug sheets when dispensing controlled medications for two (#8 and #9) of five sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Disposal of Medications policy, read in parts, .Discontinued medications and/or medications left in the nursing care center after a resident's discharge .are identified and removed from current medication supply in a timely manner . On 01/26/24 at 10:00 a.m., the following observations were made on Hall 400 medication cart: 1. Blister card for Resident #6 containing Zolpidem 5mg 6 tabs remaining- order discontinued 10/09/23. On 01/26/24 at 10:15 a.m., the following observations were made on Hall 500 medication cart: 1. Blister card for Resident #7 containing Clonazepam 1mg 81 tabs remaining- order discontinued 01/16/24. On 01/26/24 at 11:00 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe to self-administer medication for two (#10 and #11) of two sampled residents reviewed for self-administering medications. The Administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Self-Administration by Resident policy, dated 11/2017, read in parts, .Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so with a prescriber's order and if the nursing care center's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe .The decision that a resident has the ability to self-administer medication is subject to periodic assessment by the IDT . 1. Resident #10 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes. A physician order, dated 03/23/23, documented Resident #10 was to receive insulin detemir 14 units subcutaneously every 12 hours and insulin lispro 8 units subcutaneously before meals. On 01/25/24 at 2:36 p.m., Resident #10 was observed in their room. An insulin pen labeled detemir 100u/ml and an insulin pen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for the administration of intravenous fluids for one (#4) of one sampled resident reviewed for intravenous fluid administration. The Administrator identified 112 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administration of IV Fluids and Medications policy, dated 08/2021, read in parts, .The nurse should monitor the patient for therapeutic response .Monitoring of patients should be ongoing .After spiking the bag of solution/medication, it must be infused or discarded within 24 hours . Resident #4 had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy. A Physician's Order, dated 11/13/23 at 3:02 p.m., documented to administer normal saline 0.9% Inj 1 liter intravenously one time only infuse at 70ml/hr. A pharmacy packing slip documented a 1000 ml bag of Sod Chloride Inj 0.9% was received by the facility on 11/13/23. A Nurses Note, dated 11/13/2023 at 7:31 p.m., documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's family was notified of a room change for one (#50) of three sampled residents reviewed for notification of change. Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Room Transfer policy, dated 01/12/20, read in parts, .Prior to the room transfer, the resident .and the resident's responsible party will be provided with information concerning the decision to make the room transfer .Documentation of a room transfer is recorded in the resident's medical record . Resident #50 had diagnoses which included dementia. On 06/05/23 at 8:17 a.m., Resident #50 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] next to the window. On 06/05/23 at 8:33 a.m., Resident #50's family member was asked if the facility notified them regarding changes in the resident's care. They stated the resident moved rooms in April, and they were not notified. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a NOMNC and ABN was provided for a facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services with days remaining for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The Entrance Conference Worksheet, undated, documented 33 residents discharged from Medication Part A services with days remaining in the last six months. Findings: A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review report, documented Resident #1 started Medicare Part A skilled services on 12/16/22 and the last covered day was 01/05/23. It documented the facility/provider initiated the Medicare Part A discharge. It documented a SNF ABN had not been provided to the resident, and there wasn't an answer documented if a NOMNC had been provided. On 06/05/23 at 2:44 p.m., MDS #1 stated they couldn't locate a SNF ABN or NOMNC had been provided to Resident #1.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for one (#27) of 22 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Care Plan Process, revised on 02/12/20, read in parts, .Interdisciplinary Team meets and reviews the care plan as follows .Quarterly and annually . Resident #27 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of bladder, cardiac arrhythmia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A physician's order, dated 04/04/22, documented the resident was a full code. Resident #27's care plan conference/discharge planning, dated 01/09/23, documented the resident was a full code. Resident #27's care plan, dated 01/20/23, documented the resident was a full code. The care plan documented the following interventions: a. assure advanced directives were discussed and appropriate paperwork was obtained, and b. the facility staff will discuss and confirm the resident's advanced directives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided as scheduled for one (#96) of seven sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented 97 residents required assistance for bathing. Findings: A facility policy titled, Bathing (Not Partial or Completed Bed Bath), revision date 01/20/23, read in parts, .Staff will provide bathing services for residents within standard practice guidelines .Document bath in EHR .document the refusal in the record . Resident #96 had diagnoses which included weakness, repeated falls, and seizures. Resident #96's admission Assessment, dated 05/17/23, documented the Resident's cognition was moderately impaired. It documented Resident #96 required one person physical assistance with bathing. A bathing list provided to the CNAs, documented Resident #96 was scheduled for bathing on Mondays and Thursdays. Resident #96's CNA task charting, dated 05/15/23 through 06/05/23, documented the resident had not received a bath, six out of six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain wound measurements to fully assess pressure wounds for healing or worsening for one (#102) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident's Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented seven residents with pressure ulcers and the census was 109. Findings: Resident #102 admitted with diagnoses to include unspecified skin changes, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, a history of a pressure ulcer of the sacral region - stage 3, and pain. A Skin Data form, dated 04/19/23, documented Resident #102 had discoloration with scabs on bilateral heels. It did not document the size of the scabs. A Skin Breakdown care plan, dated 04/19/23, read in parts, .Heel discoloration .Inspect skin complete body head to toe every week and document results . An admission Assessment, dated 04/27/23, documented Resident #102 had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use, and hygiene; was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices were followed for two (#78 and #88) of six sampled residents observed during medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/2023, read in part, .Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared . 1. Resident #78 had diagnoses which included gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Physician's order, dated 03/07/22, documented famotidine 20 mg give one tablet by mouth one time per day. 2. Resident #88 had diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and vitamin deficiency. Physician's orders, dated 03/09/23, documented a one daily multivitamin give two tablets by mouth one time per day. Physician's orders, dated 03/09/23, documented finasteride 5 mg give one tablet by mouth one time per day. Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled linen were not placed on the floor to prevent the spread of infection for one (#10) of three sampled residents observed for linen handling. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 06/01/23, documented 109 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Infection Control policy, revised August 2018, read in part, .Soiled Laundry is .not to be placed on the floor, chairs, counters, or other surfaces . On 06/06/23 at 9:10 a.m., bed linen were observed on the floor near the bathroom door and doorway to the hallway in Resident #10's room. There was a strong smell of urine coming from the room. The linen were loose and not in a bag. On 06/06/23 at 9:15 a.m., LPN #2 was asked how soiled linen should be handled. LPN #2 stated it should be bagged and placed in a designated barrel. LPN #2 was asked if soiled linen should be placed on the floor. LPN #2 stated, No. On 06/06/23 at 10:03 a.m., the IP was asked what were the policies for handling soiled linen. The IP stated they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$168,835 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $124,260 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
- $44,575 — penalty dated 2025-09-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF SOUTH YUKON SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2020 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/23/2021 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 09/23/2021 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| RUSSELL, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/22/2025 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2020 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/12/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/12/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/24/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/24/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/29/2017 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| JOHN, TENEY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| NORMAND, NATASHA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375229. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.