No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Garnet Hill Rehabilitation And Skilled Care

1420 McCreary Rd, Wylie, TX 75098 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (972) 442-6776 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$31,959 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,959 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-06)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3080 E Farm to Market Road 544 · (972) 202-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
223 E FM 544 · (972) 535-2020 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1400 McCreary Rd · (972) 202-4007 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.4%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.3%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.2%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.212.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.182.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.6%CMS range 49.7–65.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.6–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.2–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
31.3%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 89.5 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-24)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from sexual abuse. Resident #1 was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of Alzheimer's. Resident #1 was sexually assaulted by a visitor whom she did not know, on 11/28/24. An IJ was identified on 12/05/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:04 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/06/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimum harm to resident health or safety because all staff had not been trained on the plan of removal. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, printed 12/05/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained free of accident and hazards for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #12 and #97) reviewed for accident and hazard free environment. The facility failed to ensure a water leak in Resident #12's bathroom was properly repaired, and the Resident had an accident as a result of the continued water leak. Resident #12 had a hematoma to the front right side of head and a and a bruise to her right arm. The facility failed to prevent employees from bringing their personal dogs into the facility and allowed them to roam unsupervised in the facility's courtyard, which resulted in Resident #97 sustaining an injury. These deficient practices could place the residents at risk for harm, or serious injury. The findings were: A record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 12/08/23 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included: Parkinson's disease (nervous system disorder),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 5 of 7 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for pharmacy services.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not administered a discontinued medication when she was administered the anti-anxiety medication, lorazepam 0.5 mg, on 05/29/26 after it had been discontinued on 04/30/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and proper administration for the use of Compound ABH Gel for Resident #2 (06/02/26, 06/04/26, 06/08/26, 06/10/26, 06/11/26) and the use of Clonazepam 0.5 mg for Resident #3 on 06/02/26. 3. The facility failed to document the administration of controlled medications in a timely manner for Residents #4 and #5.These failures could place residents at risk for medication error, drug diversion, and delay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction was considered for Resident #2's antidepressant, trazadone, in January 2026 after she began the medication in July 2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/03/26, reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated mild cognitive impairment. Resident #2's active diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life and is difficult to control),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by providing foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition for 1 of 16 (Resident #83) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to ensure foot care, specifically trimming of toenails, was provided for Resident #83. This failure could place residents at risk for poor personal hygiene, odors and a decline in their quality of life . Findings include:Record review of Resident #83's significant change in status MDS Assessment, dated 03/24/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #83 had diagnoses which included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (problems with memory and thinking), anxiety disorder (excessive fear or worry about a specific situation), and heart failure. Resident #83's BIMS score was 06, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of two residents (Resident #6) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had physician's orders for catheter care after he admitted to the facility with a suprapubic catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for infections and improper treatment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS Assessment, dated 03/26/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. His MDS indicated he used an indwelling catheter. His diagnoses included Renal Insufficiency/Renal Failure/End-Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure) and diabetes mellitus (occurs when the body cannot properly use blood sugar). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for intravenous fluids . 1. The facility failed to change and maintain the integrity of the dressing on Resident #85's midline catheter (an intravenous (IV) catheter inserted into a peripheral vein in the upper arm, with the tip positioned near the axilla, used for intermediate-term IV therapy) per professional standards.2. The facility failed to have physician orders to change Resident #85's midline catheter dressing, flushing, and to monitor for infection infiltration.These failures could place residents at risk for infections and cross-contamination.Findings include:Record review of Resident #85's admission MDS Assessment, dated 02/06/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified drug irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it and if there was to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for psychotropic medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's attending physician addressed the pharmacist's recommendation to consider a gradual dose reduction. Resident #2 had been receiving trazadone (an antidepressant) 100 MG every day since 07/31/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's attending physician addressed the pharmacist recommendation to review Resident #2's cyclobenzaprine (a muscle relaxer) Resident #2 had been receiving cyclobenzaprine 10 MG every day since 09/25/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received showers consistently for June and July 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/16/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not transfer Resident #1 using a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer an individual with limited mobility) by herself on 07/16/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of injury. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/16/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a diagnosis which included muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 07/01/25, reflected the resident was cognitively intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two of 4 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) and breathing mask (used to receive medications by breathing in mist through nose and mouth), were properly stored when not in use on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Based interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Farxiga medication was in stock. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medication as ordered by the physician and having high glucose levels. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/16/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident representative had the right to exercise the resident's rights to the extent those rights are delegated to the representative for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain consent from Resident #1's RR, prior to administering an antibiotic medication which resident was allergic to. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in care decisions. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1's face sheet identified her representative was a family member, RR. Resident #1's RR was listed as medical power of attorney. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Essential (primary) Hypertension (high blood pressure), Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and AMS (Altered Mental Status). Resident #1's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1) The facility failed to update Resident #1's allergy list completely when they manually transcribed the information into their new operating system. 2) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not administered Bactrim (Sulfa drug) on 3/13/25 when Resident #1 had an allergy to Sulfa. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving medications they have allergies to which could contribute to adverse reactions resulting in a decline in health and/or hospitalization. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1's face sheet identified her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to add one of Resident #1's medication allergies, Sulfa, into the new operating system when they transferred the information. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered which could cause a decline in the resident's overall health. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1's face sheet identified her representative was a family member. Resident #1 had 37 allergies listed which included: Albuterol, Methocarbamol, Levodopa, Acetaminophen, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Lidocaine, Docusate, Senna, Calcium Carbonate, Carbidopa, Ferrous Sulfate, Potassium Chloride, Iodine, Penicillin G, Polyethylene Glycol, Pantoprazole,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the right to personal privacy and confidentiality which includes privacy during medical treatment and confidentiality of medical records for four (Resident #31, Resident #42, Resident #79, and Resident #91) of eighteen residents reviewed for Privacy and Confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN E and RN F closed the door while administering Resident #79's breathing treatment on 01/23/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN E closed the door while administering Resident #91's medication through g-tube on 01/23/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA I did not leave Resident #31's and Resident #42's health information on top of the medication cart unattended on 01/23/25. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained during medical treatment and their medical information exposed to unauthorized individuals. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #79's Face Sheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of the ice to prevent contamination and the potential for waterborne illness by one CNA (CNA D) out of four staff attending to the residents during lunch time. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not put the ice scooper on the bowl of ice while preparing drinks for the residents during lunch time on 01/22/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: An observation on 01/22/2025 at 12:03 PM revealed CNA D was preparing some drinks for the residents. At the middle of the dining area was a table with some boxes of milk, a bowl of ice, a small plate, and some pitchers of iced tea. She placed four glasses on a tray, scooped some ice from a bowl of ice, and put them on the glasses. She used an ice scooper to put the ice. After she put the ice on the glasses, she placed the scooper on the bowl of ice, and poured iced tea on the glasses. She put the scooper on top of the bowl of ice with the handle of the scooper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two (Resident #20 and Resident #49) of eight residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that the resident had an external catheter (non-invasive device used to manage urinary incontinence) and was on oxygen therapy. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that the resident was receiving Hospice Care (end of life care). This failure could place the resident at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #20's Face Sheet, dated 01/24/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #20 was diagnosed with overactive bladder (sudden…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of (Resident #20) two residents reviewed for Incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20's external catheter was properly stored on 01/22/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #20's Face Sheet, dated 01/24/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #20 was diagnosed with overactive bladder. Review of Resident #20's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/24/2024, reflected the had a moderate impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 11. Resident #20's Quarterly MDS Assessment did not indicate that the resident was using an external catheter. Review of Resident #20's Comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #49 and Resident #64) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's suction machine and the Yankauer suction tip (oral suctioning tool used to remove fluid and secretions from the airway) connected to it was properly stored on 01/22/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #64's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) connected to the oxygen concentrator was properly stored on 01/22/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #49's Face Sheet, dated 01/24/2025, reflected a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for Incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure CNA G did not use the same wipes used to clean Resident #5's lower abdomen to clean the resident's perineal area on 12/03/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 12/03/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function) and overactive bladder (frequent feeling of needing to urinate). Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 10/08/2024, reflected the resident had a moderate impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 11. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medications for two of two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's bottle of Nature Made Fish Oil was not left on resident's recliner on 12/03/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's Equate Lubricant eye drops was not left on top of the resident's overbed table on 12/03/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's bottle of Allegra tablets was not left on top of the resident's overbed table on 12/03/2024. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications, accidental overdose, or misuse of medications. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 12/03/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 was diagnosed with dementia (term used to describe a group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #5 on 12/03/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA G did not hang Resident #1's new brief on the wooden frame of the bed on 12/03/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 12/03/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function) and overactive bladder (frequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerators, and freezer were labeled and dated according to guidelines and in a sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure damaged food can was discarded according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager wore a hair cover for his head. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitized. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other foodborne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 12/05/23 from 09:10 AM to 09:30 AM in the facility's only kitchen revealed: The ice machine had dark black dirt stains along the inside door of the machine and along the inside walls of the machine. The lid of the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for four (Resident #91, Resident #92, Resident #93, and Resident #48) of eight residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #91, #92, #93 and #48's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #91 Review of Resident #91's Face Sheet, dated 12/07/2023, reflected that resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified transient ischemic attack (mini strokes) and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #91's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/11/2023, reflected Resident #91 had a moderately impaired cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 12 (Resident #'s 5, 6, 13, 19, 35, 42, 48, 49, 71, 81, 83, and 101's) of 24 resident rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #'s 5, 6, 13, 19, 35, 42, 48, 49, 71, 81, 83, and 101's rooms were cleaned, sanitized, and maintained. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation of Residents #13 and #19's room on 12/05/23 at 10:50 AM revealed the wall alongside Resident #13's bed had grayish stains and the two deep scrapes mixed among the stains. Both bed side tables in the room had dried-up reddish fluid stains on the bottom of the frames. The bathroom wall between the sink and toilet had brownish and grayish stains midway and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #49, #50, and #111) reviewed for ADLs care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Residents #49, #50, and #111 received showers consistently based on records reviewed for November 2023. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #49's Face Sheet, dated 12/08/23, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (severe memory loss), and difficulty in walking. Record review of Resident #49's MDS comprehensive assessment, dated 10/14/18, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that three(Resident #4, Resident #91, and Resident #25) of six residents were provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of the residents. The facility failed to ensure CMA W re-ordered medications in a timely manner for Resident # 4 Resident #91, and Resident #25. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 12/06/2023, reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included unspecified hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood) and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/22/2023, reflected the resident had a moderate intact cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% for four medication administration errors identified out of 42 opportunities for one (Resident #26) out of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services. There were three medication errors out of forty two opportunities yielding a medication error of 7.14% 1. The facility failed to ensure CMA W administered 3 capsules of Duloxetine to Resident #26 as ordered. 2. The facility failed to ensure CMA W read the alternate order for Omeprazole for Resident #26. 3. The facility failed to ensure CMA W did not crush medication with do not crush instruction for Resident #26. These failures could place residents at risk of wrong medication administration, mismanagement of care, adverse effects, and physical harm. Findings included: Resident #26 Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Residents #26, Resident #63, and Resident #4) of ten residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z performed hand hygiene between resident (Resident #26 and Resident #63) care in the dining room on 12/05/2023 between 12:19 PM and 12:40 PM. 2. The facility failed to ensure CMA W sanitized the blood pressure cuff between Resident #4 and Resident #26. 3. The facility failed to ensure CMA W washed her hands wore gloves before administering nasal spray to Resident #4. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #63) of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z did not provide dining assistance to Resident #63 and Resident #26 at the same time during the dining observation on 12/05/2023. This failure could affect residents that require dining assistance during mealtimes, placing them at risk for not receiving care and services with dignity. Findings Included: Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (syndrome of a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes neurological deficits), right side contractures (abnormal thickening of the tissues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 6 (Resident #49) residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 was not left sitting in a Geriatric (elderly) Chair (with the feeding tray still fully attached, while the resident was sitting in the media room. This failure could unnecessarily inhibit the resident's freedom of movement or activity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's Face Sheet, dated 12/08/23, revealed she was an 81 -year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (severe memory loss), and difficulty in walking. Record review of Resident #49's MDS comprehensive assessment, dated 10/14/18, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05 (severe cognitive impairment) and for Activities for Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately for 1 of 1 Resident (Residents #12) reviewed for neglect, and exploitation or misappropriation. The facility failed to report Resident #12's fall to the Texas Department of Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) on 11/23/23. This failure could place residents at risk of sustaining an injury and not receiving all services . Findings included: A record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 12/08/23 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with Diagnoses which included: Parkinson's disease (nervous system disorder), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/31/23, reflected resident had a BIMS of 13 (cognitively intact), and the Resident required assistance to perform ADL care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] and 10/29/2023 accurately reflected that Resident #26 had impairments to the upper extremity and lower extremity on one side of the body. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Resident #26 Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet, dated 12/06/2023, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. One of the relevant diagnosis was unspecified joint contracture (tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review , the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #26) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for Residents #26 was developed and identified and implemented goals and interventions to accurately address the resident's need for dining assistance. This failure could place residents that require dining assistance at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings Included: Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (syndrome of a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes neurological deficits,) right side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for 1 (Resident #26) of 6 residents reviewed for Revised Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's care plan was revised to reflect the specific devices used for Resident #26's impairment. This failure could place the resident at risk of needs not being met. Findings included: Review of Resident #26's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. One of the relevant diagnosis was unspecified joint contracture. Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/29/2023, revealed the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 02. Resident #26 was totally dependent upon two or more staff for bed mobility and transfers. She required limited assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received services and assistance to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for urinary incontinence. The facility failed to place Resident #4's indwelling urinary foley catheter device below the bladder. This failure placed the resident at risk for the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 12/06/2023, reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. One of the relevant diagnosis was neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (The muscles and nerves that control the bladder do not work properly due to illness). Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/22/2023, reflected the resident had a moderate intact cognition with a BIMS score of 10. Resident #4 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, walk in, dressing, toilet use, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed the medication was labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for labelling of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure CMA W placed a change of instruction label for Resident #4's Phenytoin after a change to the order. This failure could place residents at risk of wrong medication administration, mismanagement of care, adverse effects, and physical harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet dated 12/06/2023 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses include allergic rhinitis (an allergic reaction to tiny particles in the air called allergens) and seizures. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected resident had a moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 10. Resident #4 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,959 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $18,179 — penalty dated 2024-12-06
  • $13,780 — penalty dated 2023-12-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/27/2015
UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/23/2021
PRICE, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/1982
PF GH SNF OPS, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
ANENE, SYLVIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/17/2025
CAMPBELL, SCOTTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2025
CHANCE, JAMESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2025
FISHER, JAMESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2025
LANGDON, THOMASIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2025
MCGEHEE, WILLIAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2025
TAYLOR, JOHNIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2025
LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2023
PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/27/2017
PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
REHAB PRO LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
SANCTUARY LTC, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
ALLISON, JENNIFERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2019
SHARMA, NEERAJIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 11%Other / private 20%

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,690per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$257per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676192. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next