The Plaza At Lubbock
4910 Emory, Lubbock, TX 79416 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (806) 740-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2024
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $38,594 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.5% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.5% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.6% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.63 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.4%CMS range 25.7–49.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.5–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.5–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 101.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7). The RN A did not initiate CPR for Resident #1 when Resident #1 was found with no pulse or respirations. Resident #1 was listed as Full Code (all resuscitation procedures are provided to keep a person alive during a medical emergency). This failure could place all residents in the facility who requested a full code status at risk of death. An Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified on [DATE] at 3:20 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE] at 3:24 PM The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated incident of and a severity level of potential actual harm due to the facility's need to complete in service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place all residents in the facility who requested a full code status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with respect, dignity, and care when they failed to obtain clear informed consent on 8/11/2024 at approximately 3:30 AM, to perform a straight catheter procedure to collect a urine sample. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to have existed on 8/11/24. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance on 8/19/24 and updated 9/4/2024 prior to the beginning of the survey. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse in that: 1. The facility staff failed to protect Resident #1 from abuse when staff woke up the resident at approximately 3:30 AM on 8/11/24 and performed an invasive straight catheter procedure which caused Resident #1 physical pain and mental anguish, and Resident #1 reported she felt violated, traumatized, abused, and raped. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from verbal abuse from CNA C, when CNA C continued call Resident #2 names and belittle him and made a threat to do it again (call him names), at the nurse's station after being told to stop. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to have existed on 8/11/24. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance on 8/29/24, updated 9/4/24 prior to beginning of the survey. These failures could place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and/or neglect for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. 1. The facility failed to keep RN A made inappropriate sexual comments to Resident #1 resulting in Resident #1 feeling ashamed and embarrassed. 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B did not refuse to change Resident #2 when Resident #2's brief was saturated. 3. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B did not make verbally abusive comments to Resident #2 when Resident #2 was talking to CNA B 4. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B was not excessively rough when transferring Resident #3 from wheelchair to the commode. These failures could affect residents resulting in physical or emotional harm resulting in in deterioration in their health condition, need for medical treatment, physical impairment, exacerbation of their condition, serious bodily harm, emotional distress, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 2 of 4 shower rooms (Hall 200 and Hall 400) and 1 of 1 public toilet, reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to ensure:The shower room on hall 200 had loose and missing tiles in numerous areas of the showerThe shower room on hall 400 had loose and missing tiles in numerous areas of the shower.The door to the shower room on hall 200 was broken. The vanity in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] contained water damage. The hand sink in shower room [ROOM NUMBER] contained corrosion and calcium build up under the sink faucet. The toilet seat in the public bathroom near the nurse's station was loose. This failure could lead to residents falls, injuries, and experiencing a diminished quality of life. Findings include:During an observation on 01/06/2026 at 02:10 PM, the public bathroom near the nurse's station was observed to have a broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe, and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 food forms (Regular, Mechanical Soft, and Pureed) for 1 of 1 (Lunch) meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for the lunch meal on 01/07/26. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During confidential individual interviews 3 of 15 residents voiced concerns related to food palatability. One resident stated the food was not good and lacked flavor. One resident stated the food lacked seasoning and tasted like nothing. One resident stated the food was very bland and had little taste. Observation on 01/07/26 at 12:38 PM the test trays arrived at the family dining room and were sampled by three surveyors at 12:40 PM with the following results:Regular Meal - Regular TextureBaked Ham - blandMashed Potatoes - blandSpinach Bake - no issuesCorn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to store bowls and plates upside down, ensure the deep fryer was cleaned, ensure no expired food items were in the kitchen, ensure all food items in the refrigerator were properly labeled or stored in airtight containers, ensure all food items in the dry storage area were properly sealed, and ensure the oven door was clean. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings include: Observations during the initial tour on 01/06/26 at 9:45 AM revealed 5 stack of bowls (each stack of bowls contained 10 - 15 each), 2 stacks of small plates (each stack of plates contained about 20 each), 3 stacks of medium bowls (each stack bowls contained 2 - 9 each), and 1 stack of small bowls (7 bowls contained) on metal shelves and all of the items were stored right side up, meaning the inside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 9 residents observed for infection control (Resident #33, #98, #94, and #8) .LVN A failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during medication administration for Resident #98.The facility failed to ensure Resident #94 had an EBP sign on her door and a personal protective equipment (PPE) box available.CNA B failed to remove the dirty pad from the bed during incontinence care for Resident #33.CNA C failed to change his gloves during incontinence care for Resident #8.CNA D failed to utilize hand hygiene between glove changes during incontinence care for Resident #8. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.The findings include:Resident #98Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #16 and #5) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that:The facility failed to ensure:Residents #5 and #16's PASRR Level 1 assessment did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness. These failures could place residents who had a mental illness at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.The findings were as follows:Resident #5Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 had a primary diagnosis of syringomyelia and syringobulbia (a spinal disorder with a fluid-filled cyst (syrinx) in the spinal cord, while syringobulbia is when that syrinx extends into the brainstem) and a medical history of bipolar II (a mood condition marked by significant depressive episodes and less intense up periods called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 noon meals observed for puree texture. The facility failed to ensure puree meat, and spinach bake were prepared to a smooth uniform texture on 01/07/26. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, choking and aspiration.The findings included: During an observation on 01/07/26 at 12:40 PM [NAME] A prepared puree ham, bread, spinach bake, and potatoes and provided a sample tray to the surveyors. The surveyors tasted the puree ham, and it had small chunks of meat and required chewing. The spinach bake had a very thick consistency and required a small amount of chewing. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 9:31 AM [NAME] A stated he was last trained on food form when he started working at the facility. [NAME] A stated puree should be a pudding-like texture and be smooth when your tongue touches the food to the top of your mouth. [NAME] A stated he tasted the puree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the residents physician and representative regarding a change in the resident's condition, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for changes in condition. 1. RN C failed to notify Resident #1's family and physician when RN C administered Resident #2's lorazepam to Resident #1 on 11/21/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their family and physicians notified of changes resulting in a delay in decision making for medical interventions. Findings: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of urinary tract infection, obstructive sleep apnea (the most common sleep-related breathing disorder), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS Section- C Cognitive Patterns revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free of significant medication errors when a dose of lorazepam 1 mg was administered on 11/21/2024 by RN C. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reaction related to taking medications not ordered by the physician. Findings: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of urinary tract infection, obstructive sleep apnea (the most common sleep-related breathing disorder), and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS Section- C Cognitive Patterns revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders did not reveal an order for lorazepam 1mg (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property was provided for 1 of (Resident #4) 10 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility did not prevent CNA F from taking a bag of chips from Resident #4. This failure could place residents at risk of continued misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of face sheet, dated 10/17/2024 revealed that Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with, but not limited to the following diagnoses: chronic kidney disease, unspecified, primary osteoarthritis, unspecified site, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, depression, unspecified, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, essential (primary) hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, other lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 7 of 18 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 7 of 18 confidential residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure, were provided access to the Grievance form, were provided information who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Interviews during confidential interviews on, 10/10/2024 at 2:00pm, attendees 7 of 18 confidential residents, stated they did not know the grievance process, they did not know where to obtain or submit a grievance form, they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in confidential interviews,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group, individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 7 of 18 residents (confidential residents) reviewed for quality of life. The facility: 1. Failed to engage in activities at scheduled times. 2. Failed to offer engaging activity replacement for scheduled activities that were cancelled or not completed. This failure could affect Residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. The findings included: Observation and an interview of the dining room and the common area on 10/09/24 beginning at 10:10am, revealed the scheduled activity at 10:00am was Washer Toss. There were four confidential residents sitting in the common area and three confidential residents sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1of 2 treatment carts observed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure 1 tube of Medih [NAME] Gel and 1 tube of zinc oxide ointment were dated when opened. The facility failed to ensure that all medical supplies in the treatment cart were not past their expiration date. The facility failed to ensure single use open collagen packets were not stored in the treatment cart after being opened. This failure could result in harm due to resident received expired medical supplies, such as wound dressings, as well as those supplies not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. The findings were: During an observation on [DATE] at 11:00 AM during treatment cart inspection observed 1 tube of Med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure food was accurately dated and labeled. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: The following observations were made during a kitchen tour on 10/9/24 that began at 10:00 AM and concluded at 11:40 AM: Observation on 10/9/2024 at 10:12 AM revealed the following unlabeled and undated items: Ziplock bag of 2 ounce mayonnaise and mustard cups, tray of approximately 15 sandwich halves, glass of white substance that was later identified by the KMGR as milk, stainless steel container of yellow substance that was later identified by the KMGR as egg salad, four 2 ounce cups of a red substance that was later identified as salsa, 8 serving flutes of juice, and a Ziplock bag of 2 ounce cups of a white substance later identified by the KMGR as tartar sauce. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 4 Residents and 5 of 5 staff members (LVN A, CNA A, CNA C, CNA E and CNA F) observed for infection control practices (Resident #7, #15, #87, and #257). in that: 1. CNA A failed to use proper hand hygiene before or after assisting with incontinent care for Resident #7. 2. CNA C failed to use proper hand hygiene before or after assisting with wound care for Resident #15. 3. LVN A failed to use proper wound care techniques and CNA D did not use proper hand hygiene before or after assisting with wound care for Resident #87 4. LVN A failed to use proper wound care techniques and CNA D did not wash hands before or after assisting with wound care for Resident #257. 5. CNA F failed to ensure using good hygienic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was provided for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident #257) 1. CNA D and LVN A failed to pull the privacy curtain while providing wound care for Resident #257. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: Resident #257: Record Review of Resident #257's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnoses of spinal stenosis lumbar region (narrowing of the spinal canal, compressing the nerves traveling through the lower back into the legs), acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood), major depressive disorder, and hypothyroidism (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #87 and Resident #257) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. 1. LVN A failed to use the correct wound techniques during wound care for Resident #87 and #257. These failures could place residents with wounds at an increased and unnecessary risk of complications such as pain, acquiring new pressure ulcers, worsening of existing pressure ulcers, and infection. Findings included: Resident #87: Record Review of Resident #87's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, senile degeneration of the brain (loss of intellectual ability),Guillain-Barre syndrome (condition in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician notification of changes. 1. The facility failed to follow their policy on change of condition by not immediately notifying the physician, and DON of Resident #1's UTI symptoms on 8/9/2024. 2. The facility failed to consult with Resident #1's physician and provide all necessary details, when Resident #1 complained of feeling burning and discomfort when urinating on 8/9/2024. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical treatment, decline in health, and death. The findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of acute kidney failure (kidneys no longer work on their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was continent of bowel and bladder, received appropriate treatment for a urinary tract infection, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for urinary straight catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a physician order prior to performing a straight catheter procedure. 2. The facility failed to follow their policy on urine specimen collection by not determining the appropriate measurement method for urine collection. 3. The facility failed to follow their policy on physician orders by not receiving and transcribing physician orders for a UA recollection for Resident #1. 4. The facility failed to follow the physician order for Resident #1 by performing an invasive straight catheter procedure when the physician order did not specify what method of UA recollection was needed. These failures could place the residents at risk of unnecessary straight catheter procedures and risk for urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0771 — isolatedEnsure laboratory services, blood blanks and transfusion services provided on-site meet requirements for certified laboratories.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for laboratory services in that: 1. The facility failed to follow physician standing orders for lab blood analysis, on facility admission of Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of not having laboratory services completed and cause delay in their care. Findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of acute kidney failure (kidneys no longer work on their own), muscle weakness (lack of strength), and muscle wasting (thinning of muscle). Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] Section C- Cognitive patterns revealed a BIMS score of 13 which indicates resident was cognitively intact. Section GG- Functional Abilities and goals- Admission, revealed resident required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that 1. The facility failed to document communication between RN D and Resident #1 when Resident #1 reported feeling as if she had a UTI on 8/9/2024. 2. The facility failed to document Resident #1's change in condition when she reported to staff, she felt she had a UTI on 8/9/2024. 3. The facility failed to document communication between RN D and FNP when Resident #1 reported feeling as if she had a UTI and obtaining an order for the UA on 8/9/2024. 4. The facility failed to document communication between staff and FNP when a contaminated UA sample was reported to the facility on 8/10/24 at 8:30pm for Resident #1. 5. The facility failed to document when the FNP ordered a UA recollection order for Resident #1, and what time and staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 39 of 46 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10,#11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, # 27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40 and #41) The facility failed to ensure MA F administered medications to (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10,#11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, # 27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40 and #41) accurately within the 2 hour window per physician orders. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 did not receive another resident's medication during medication pass. The facility failed to reconcile narcotic sheets after MA F documented administering narcotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintian residnet medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practicies. The facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented. The facility failed to ensure staff documented medications given to residents in the Medication Administration Record for 41 of 46 ((Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10,#11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, # 27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40 and #41) ) reviewed for acurrate documentation. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect amounts of medication as prescribed by their physician Finding include: Record review of Resident #1 undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female. Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility 07/22/2019 with the following diagnoses: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (condition in which the stomach contents move…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a change in residents health status for 2 of 46 residents (Residents #6 & # 25) reviewed for notification of changes. This failure could affect all Residents by causing their physicians, and representatives to be unaware of changes in a Resident's condition. Finding include: Record review of Resident #6's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male. Resident #6 was originally admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: hyperlipidemia (elevated lipids in the blood), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), protein-calorie malnutrition, and neuropathic bladder (lack of bladder control). Record review of Resident #6's annual MDS dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive patterns revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated resident is cognitively intact. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, psychosocial status and when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's responsible party when Resident #1 expired. This failure could place residents at the risk of not being aware/informed of residents' condition. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was discharged on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (cognitive loss) and pain. Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive MDS. dated [DATE], indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 CNA of 7 employees observed during infection control observation. The facility failed to ensure CNA A properly removed his N-95 mask after exiting a COVID positive resident room. The facility failed to ensure CNA A disinfected his hands after removing his N-95 mask. These failures could place residents at risk of transmission of a communicable disease or infection. Finding included: Record Review of the facility CII report , dated 9/22/23 contained the following, COVID Outbreak Investigation Summary revealed that on 9/21/23 Resident A tested positive for COVID. During an interview on 9/29/23 at 10:30 a.m., the Administrator stated that the facility had 6 total residents on Hall 200 that tested positive for COVID and all had been cleared but Resident #1. Administrator stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal reviewed for palatability. 1) The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 3 of 3 food forms served (Regular, Mechanical soft and pureed) at 1 of 1 meal observed (8/23/23 lunch). These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During a confidential individual interviews, 5 of 17 residents voiced concerns with the palatability of foods served. On 8/22/23 at 10:29 AM, a resident stated that the food sucks. She stated there was not much taste to the food and was bland with no flavor. She stated that the lunch and the dinner were not good. On 8/22/23 at 10:36 AM, another Resident stated she did not like the food. She added the ham and cheese sandwiches did not have any mayonnaise and the bread was hard when she got it. On 8/22/23 at 2:57 PM, one other Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services and 10 of 24 resident rooms (rooms 102, 109, 202, 205, 206, 211, 212, 213, 214 and 215), in that: 1)The facility failed to ensure foods were processed under sanitary conditions, 2) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff dated and labeled foods as required, 3) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff maintained quaternary sanitizer levels within acceptable ranges in wiping cloth solutions. 4) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff ensured food contact surfaces were clean, 5) The facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a sanitary manner, 6) The facility failed to ensure Dietary staff used good hygienic practices, 7) The facility failed to ensure there were no unauthorized personnel in food areas, and 8) The facility failed to ensure the temperature of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 7 of 29 residents ( Resident #9, #11, #14, #33, #92, #250 and #303) reviewed for resident rights . 1. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available for Residents #9, #14, #92, #250 and #303 prior to administering melatonin (sleep aide). 2. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available for Residents #11 prior to administering Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication). 3. The facility failed to obtain a signed informed consent based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record, review the facility, failed to ensure sure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 4 of 4 common baths (100, 200, 300 and 400), resident transport van and 19 of 29 resident rooms (101, 102, 109, 110, 112, 113, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 216) reviewed for environment, The facility failed to ensure resident that use common areas and rooms were clean, safe and did not need repair. These failures could place residents at risk for living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Observation on 8/23/23 at 5:08 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], the laminated areas were missing on two of two chests of drawers, ranging from 1 x 12 strips and 1 x 1 areas.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications had an approved diagnosis and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed, and documented, that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, for 4 of 29 residents (Resident #11, Resident #38, Resident #92 and Resident #250): Resident #11 continued to have a PRN order for Lorazepam 0.25mL after 14 days without an evaluation by the physician for continued treatment. Resident #38 was receiving Klonopin 0.5mg and Olanzapine 2.5mg without an adequate diagnosis. Resident #92 continued to have a PRN order for Hydroxyzine 25mg after 14 days without an evaluation by the physician for continued treatment. Resident #250 was receiving Sertraline 100 mg and Remeron 15 mg without an adequate diagnosis. These failures could result in residents receiving psychotropic and antipsychotic medications when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 1 of 3 food forms (puree) for 5 residents (Residents #1, 2, 32, 33 and 38) reviewed during mealtime. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, 2, 32, 33 and 38 received their meals according to the menu. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted, weight loss and hunger. The findings included: Resident #1 Record review of the Resident Consolidated Orders dated 8/24/23 for female Resident #1 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. The resident had diagnoses listed as other cerebral palsy (motor disability), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia (blood sugar disorder) and dysphasia (swallowing disorder). Further record review of the orders revealed that the resident had a diet order dated 3/17/21 of Consistency Purée - Level 4. Resident #2 Record review of the current Resident Consolidated Orders for female Resident #2 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 nonsmoking facility observed for safety and cleanliness in that: The facility failed to ensure that the facility was non-smoking and that staff adhered to the facility policy. The facility failed to dispose of cigarette butts safely. These failures place residents, staff, and visitors at risk of being in an unsafe environment. Findings included: On 08/23/23 at 3:53 PM, an observation of six cigarette butts on the ground on the facility's north side. No cigarette receptacle was observed at this time. On 08/23/23 at 3:57 PM, an observation of 3 cigarette butts along the northeast corner alongside the facility. No cigarette receptacle was observed at this time. On 08/23/23 at 4:00 PM, an observation of ten cigarette butts along the front of the facility near the front entrance. No cigarette receptacle was observed at this time. During an interview on 08/24/23 at 12:11 PM, the ADM said that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident for 1 of 29 (Resident #2) residents in that: Hospice CNA A provided Resident #2 personal care (bathing and brief change) with the privacy curtain not pulled, door open, and window blinds open. This could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: A record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 08/24/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paraplegia (paralysis in the legs) and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 resident with a urinary catheter (Resident #55 and #304); in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure catheter drainage bag was covered for privacy. 2. The facility failed to position the catheter tubing in a manner to prevent infections. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. The findings included: Resident #55 Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, dated 08/24/23, revealed aan [AGE] year-old-male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke, diabetes (high blood sugar), congestive heart failure (fluid around heart), kidney failure and muscle weakness. Record review of comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had a BIMS of 11 which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly in 1 of 1 refuse disposal areas which included 1 dumpster and 1 grease disposal container, in that: The facility failed to maintain the dumpster and the grease disposal container in a manner that effectively prevented the harborage and attraction of pest. These failures could result in providing harborage and breeding areas for insects, rodents and other pests which could infest the facility. The findings included: On 8/22/23 at 10:05 AM an observation was made of the dumpster area. The dumpster had one of two side doors open and was empty. The used grease bin, placed in the parking lot, was leaking from the bottom and the top lid was open. There was pooling grease on the ground that covered an approximate area of 1' x 1', 2' x 3' and 6 x 3'. On 8/22/23 at 12:48 PM and 8/23/23 at 12:01PM the grease bin was observed open, and the grease was pooling on the ground and was leaking from the unit. On 8/23/23 at 7:00 PM an observation was made of the dumpster and one of two side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure the kitchen steamtable was maintained in safe operating condition. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving cold meals and at risk for fire emergencies. The findings included: On 8/22/23 at 10:54 AM the surveyor observed a bright flash at the steam table (electrical flash) and the lights on the steam table heating unit went out. During an interview with Dietary staff C on 8/22/23 at 10:54 AM, she stated this situation with the steam table had just now happened today (8/22/23). During an interview with Dietary staff F on 8/22/23 at 5:01 PM, she stated a repairman had replaced the steam table electrical plug last month when the steam table did the same thing (electrical flash) as it did today (8/22/23). Observation of the evening meal service on 8/22/23, beginning at 5:00 PM revealed the steam table was not operational and the stove and steamer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$38,594 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-01-24
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
- $13,621 — penalty dated 2024-09-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-25 for 3 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HANSFORD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/27/2015 |
| UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| BAILEY, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2010 |
| PF LUBBOCK SNF OPS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| MAGNESS, KATHERINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/04/2023 |
| CAMPBELL, SCOTT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| CHANCE, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| FISHER, JAMES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| LANGDON, THOMAS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| MCGEHEE, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| TAYLOR, JOHN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/05/2025 |
| LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2023 |
| PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2017 |
| PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| REHAB PRO LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| SANCTUARY LTC, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2021 |
| CORNETT, MELISSA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/21/2024 |
| SKINNER, DEREK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.