No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colonial Pines Healthcare Center

1203 Fm 1277, San Augustine, TX 75972 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (936) 275-3412 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (936) 275-3412 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
904 Columbia Street · (936) 275-1303 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
705 W Columbia St · (936) 275-9060 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
103 N El Camino Xing · (936) 275-1997 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1013 FM 1277 · (936) 275-3322

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.2%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.102.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.262.061.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.7%CMS range 45.7–72.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.9–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.4–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.26
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 41.5 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 66 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-21)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #5, #6, #17, and #35) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #17 and Resident #35's medical records were accurate when staff did not document meal intake for evening meal for dates of January 1, 2026 thru January 20, 2026. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of improper care and monitoring due to inaccurate medical records.Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 1/21/2026, indicated an [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety (fear characterized by behavioral disturbances), and schizophrenia (a severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves, often leading to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure the dining room remained free from roaches on 01/19/2026, during the lunch meal, when observed crawling on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life and poor sanitary environment. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 01/19/2026 at 11:45 a.m., a live roach was seen crawling on the floor underneath a dining table while residents were eating the lunch meal. The Medical Records Director walked over and stepped on the roach and killed it. The Medical Records Director said that roaches were a problem in the dining area and on hallway A. During an interview on 01/21/2026 at 8:45 a.m., the Floor Tech said they had a problem with a resident hoarding food in their room on the A hallway, but the facility cleaned everything out of the room and treated the area. The Floor Tech said that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for 1 of 8 (Resident #41 residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #41 had a wheelchair that was not soiled with old food particles on 01/19/2026 and 01/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk infections and dignity issues.Findings included:Record review of Resident #41's facility face sheet, dated 1/20/2026, indicated Resident #41 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnos es of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/18/2025, indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS of 00 indicating severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for assistance with all ADLs , required a mechanically altered diet, received hospice care, used a wheelchair, and had functional limitation of range of motion to both upper and lower extremities.Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident quarterly, once every three months, using the quarterly review instrument specified by the state and approved by CMS for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 41) reviewed for quarterly assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents # 41 had a quarterly MDS assessment completed within three months from the previous assessment.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving inappropriate care for their conditions.Findings included:Record review of Resident #41's facility face sheet, dated 1/20/2026, indicated Resident #41 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnos es of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review on (date record review conducted) of Resident #41's medical record revealed a quarterly MDS was completed on 09/19/2025 and subsequent quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was not completed until 01/06/2026, 17 days overdue.During an attempted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review , the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address medical needs for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect current transfer status of requiring a mechanical lift, hospice services, swallowing difficulties that required an altered diet and a contracture with mobility limitations.This failure could place residents at increased risk of falls, injuries, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record review of Resident #41's facility face sheet, dated 1/20/2026, indicated Resident #41 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/18/2025, indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS of 00 indicating severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review , the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility was demonstrably unavoidable for 1 of 4 (Resident #41) residents reviewed for mobility services.The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #41's contracture to her left hand and lower extremities on 01/19/2026 and 01/20/2026.This could affect residents with contractures and mobility limitations and could result in a decrease in mobility.Findings included:Record review of Resident #41's facility face sheet, dated 1/20/2026, indicated Resident #41 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/18/2025, indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS of 00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #41)The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service for Resident's #41.This failure could result in a loss of quality of life due to injuries.Findings included:Record review of Resident #41's facility face sheet, dated 1/20/2026, indicated Resident #41 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/18/2025, indicated Resident #41 had a BIMS of 00 indicating severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for assistance with all ADLs, required a mechanically altered diet, received hospice care, used a wheelchair, and had functional limitation of range of motion to both upper and lower extremities.Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #26) and 2 of 5 staff (CNA A and CNA B) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B followed EBP for Resident #26 when providing care on 1/19/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases.Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's admission Record, dated 1/20/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity (extremely overweight), and dementia. Record review of Resident #26's active physician orders, dated 1/20/2026, indicated he had an order for EBP every shift that started on 12/23/2025. Record review of Resident #26's care plan, dated 11/12/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests for 2 of 4 hallways, (hallway 200 and 400), 2 resident rooms (Resident #33 and Resident #15 rooms) and two of two dining areas (main and locked unit dining areas) reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure hallways, resident rooms and dining rooms were free of flies. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to an unsanitary environment. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 10/28/2024 for Resident #33 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (inability to maintain adequate oxygen exchange in the blood), vitamin deficiency, lack of coordination, and anxiety disorder (excessive worry about everyday issues and situation). Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #33 dated 9/30/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerators reviewed for temperature controls and storage. The facility failed to log and monitor medication refrigerator temperatures for AM and PM as required per facility policy (24-hour periods of time) on 10/02/24 and 10/03/24 for medication storage. The facility failed to log and monitor temperatures twice daily, as required per facility policy, for the month of October 2024 (10/08/24, 10/21/24 and 10/22/24 were the only days logged for the required notations of twice daily medication refrigerator temperature checks for vaccine storage). This failure could place residents at risk of harm by not maintaining proper controlled temperatures for medications, vaccines, and biologicals. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 10/28/24 at 10:28 AM revealed a log was posted on the medication refrigerator that contained vials of flu vaccine, 2 vials of tuberculin skin testing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 3 of 3 (Residents #4, Resident #13, and Resident #22) residents reviewed for puree diets. The facility failed to prepare the pureed diet to the consistency required for Resident #4, Resident #13 and Resident #22. This failure could place residents who received pureed meat and vegetables at risk of not having nutritional needs met by consuming foods that could cause choking and decreased meal intakes. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 10/29/24 for Resident #4 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), dementia unspecified (decline in cognitive abilities), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 2 dining rooms (400 hall Dining Room), 1 of 4 halls (400 hall) and 1 of 6 (Resident #33) residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure that the 400-hall dining room and floors and walls were clean and maintained in good repair on 10/27/24. The facility failed to ensure the 400 hall walls and floors were maintained in good repair on 10/27/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's box fan was free of dust and debris on 10/27/24. These failures could affect residents and the staff by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life and injury due to lack of a sanitary and well-kept environment. Findings: 1.During an observation on 10/27/24 at 9:09 am revealed the dining room floors located on hall 400 were dirty with a sticky substance and dark colored grime. There was a dark, black, thick buildup around the edges of all the walls. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed provide sufficient support personnel to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively for 1 out of 8 dietary staff. The facility did not ensure Dietary Aide H had a current food handler permit. This failure could place residents who consumed food prepared from the kitchen at-risk of foodborne illness or nutritional deficiencies. Findings included : During an observation of the kitchen on 10/27/24 at 9:30 a.m. revealed Dietary Aide H was working in the kitchen as a dietary aide. Review of the food handler's certificates of completion provided by the facility on 10/28/2024, revealed Dietary Aide H did not have a food handler's certificate. An attempted telephone interview on 10/28/2024 at 2:25 p.m. with Dietary Aide H was unsuccessful. During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 9:42 a.m., the Dietary Manager said she was responsible for ensuring staff completed their food handler certification training upon hire and every 2 years. The Dietary Manager said she was unsure why Dietary Aide H had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all foods stored in the refrigerator were not kept past their expiration dates. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination. Findings included: During an observation of the cooler/refrigerator on 10/27/2024 at 9:30am, the following items were observed: (2) 32-ounce containers of vanilla Greek yogurt with the expiration date on 10/22/24. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 9:05 a.m. [NAME] E said it was everyone's responsibility to check for expired foods in the fridge. He said they threw away expired foods. He said the Dietary Manager check ed for expired foods in the separate storage area. He said he had checked the refrigerator Thursday 10/24/24 for expired food and did not see the expired food. He said he did not have time to look at every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all essential equipment in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 stove in the kitchen reviewed for food service in that: The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in working order. One of six gas stove burners (right back) did not light automatically, when the knob was turned, and all 6 burners had carbon buildup. This failure could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk for injury and under cooked food. Findings include: During an observation on 10/27/24 at 9:30 a.m., revealed the gas stove had six burners and one burner located in the right back had excess carbon buildup. The right back burner would not light automatically. During an interview on 10/27/24 09:30 a.m. [NAME] F said that the burner would not light last week. She said the Maintenance Director fixed the oven about 1-2 months ago and the burner had been working up until last week. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 8:25 a.m., the Maintenance Director said he had worked at the facility for 6-7 years. He said no one had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policy regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for the 1 of 1 facility . The facility failed to ensure the staff were smoking in the designated smoking area and disposing of smoking materials properly on 10/27/24. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm and lead to an unsafe smoking environment. Findings: During an observation on 10/27/24 at 9:40 AM revealed cigarette butts were observed in a plastic cup on the ground outside the exit door located on 400 hall and there were four cigarette butts sitting on the outside keypad next to the door. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 9:42 AM LVN C said there were no residents that smoked on the 400 hall and the cigarette butts belonged to the staff. She said there was a smoking area out back and the area outside the exit door was not a designated area to smoke. She said if smoking occurred in undesignated areas there could be risk of fires. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 9:44 AM CNA D said she worked on 400…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident # 3) observed for care in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's urinary drainage bag had a privacy cover on 10/22/2024. This failure could affect residents in the facility who received care and could result in residents not being treated with dignity and respect. Findings included: Record review of a Face Sheet for Resident #3 dated 10/22/2024 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of intellectual disabilities (a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts the ability to live independently), anemia (low red blood cells that affect oxygen delivery to the body), and retention of urine (bladder not able to empty urine). Record review of a care plan for Resident #3 dated 9/18/2024 indicated he was at risk for problems with elimination related to retention of urine. He had a urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 Resident's (Resident #3) reviewed for catheter and incontinence care. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A maintained the urine catheter drainage bag below Resident #3's bladder on 10/22/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care appropriate to address their incontinence and could increase the risk of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of a Face Sheet for Resident #3 dated 10/22/2024 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of intellectual disabilities (a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts the ability to live independently), anemia (low red blood cells that affect oxygen delivery to the body), and retention of urine (bladder not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for one of twelve residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for Resident #1 witnessed by CNA A and CNA B to have been told to shut up and you are the one who shit on yourself by CNA C on 03/26/2024 at approximately 1:00 p.m. during incontinence care. The noncompliance was identified as PNC that began on 03/26/2024 and ended on 04/02/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm and further abuse. Findings included: Review of a face sheet for Resident #1, dated 04/24/2024, revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood pressure), non-ketotic hyperglycinemia (metabolic accumulation of large amounts of glycine in blood, urine, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for one of twelve residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for Resident #1 witnessed by CNA A and CNA B to have been told to shut up and you are the one who shit on yourself by CNA C on 03/26/2024 at approximately 1:00 p.m. during incontinence care. The noncompliance was identified as PNC that began on 03/26/2024 and ended on 04/02/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm and further abuse. Findings included: Review of a face sheet for Resident #1, dated 04/24/2024, revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood pressure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen in that: The facility failed to ensure opened items in the dry storage were labeled and dated correctly. The facility failed to ensure all food items were discarded by the expiration date. The facility failed to ensure there was soap at the handwashing sink. This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 9/5/23 beginning at 10:48 am it was observed that there was no soap at the handwashing sink. The DM said that she was not responsible for the soap, that it had been out about a day and that staff were washing hands in the dish sink using the hose that has hot water and soap mixed together. The ish sink observed with dirty dishes in it, there was a hose on the left side that had a button to push and hot water mixed with soap would come out of the hose while the button…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 14 of 14 employees (Administrator, DON, ADON, DM, AD, LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, Rehab Director, CNA D, CNA E, MA F, CNA G, AND CNA H) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to the Administrator, DON, ADON, DM, AD, LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, Rehab Director, CNA D, CNA E, MA F, CNA G, and CNA H. This failure could place staff and residents at risk for not being aware of facility programs, implementation and monitoring. Findings: Record review of personnel files indicated: the Administrator was hired 2/08/2023, the DON was hired 02/06/2023, the ADON was hired on 11/07/2022, DM was hired 6/02/2023, AD was hired 04/01/2010, LVN A was hired 9/14/2022, LVN B was hired on 5/30/2023, LVN C was hired 3/11/2019, Rehab Director was hired 12/01/2001, CNA D was hired 8/15/2019, CNA E was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required compliance and ethics training for 11 of 14 employees (Administrator, DON, ADON, DM, AD, LVN A, Rehab Director, CNA D, CNA E, CNA G, AND CNA H) reviewed for training requirements, in that: The facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was provided to the Administrator, DON, ADON, DM, AD, LVN A, Rehab Director, CNA D, CNA E, CNA G, AND CNA H. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings: Record review of personnel file indicated: the Administrator was hired 2/08/2023, the DON was hired 02/06/2023, the ADON was hired on 11/07/2022, DM was hired 6/02/2023, AD was hired 04/01/2010, LVN A was hired 9/14/2022, Rehab Director was hired 12/01/2001, CNA D was hired 8/15/2019, CNA E was hired 5/30/2023, CNA G was 12/19/2022, AND CNA H was hired on 3/22/2022. Record review of training report indicated the Compliance and Ethics required training was not completed on hire for the Administrator, DON, ADON, DM, LVN A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for them in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to treat Resident #6 with respect and dignity when she had to ask staff where her food was three times while the other residents seated with her in the dining room were already eating. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increase anxiety. Findings: Record review of facility face sheet dated 09/06/2023 indicated Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision and setup with eating. During an observation on 09/05/23 at 12:33 pm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility did not notify Resident #43's physician (Physician M) for a significant change in weekly weight indicating a gain of 5-pound gain or greater as ordered (weight gain of 59.1 pounds.) This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician notified of changes resulting in a delay in continuity of care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #43's face sheet, dated 09/06/23, revealed Resident #43 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease), coronary artery disease (blockage of the coronary arteries), anxiety (feeling anxious) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Further record review of this document revealed Resident #43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #259) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #259 addressing oxygen use. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings: Record review of facility face sheet dated 9/06/2023 indicated Resident #259 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atrial flutter (irregular heartbeat), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (impaired lung function). Record review of facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's care plan was revised to reflected current orders for monitoring weekly weights and reporting greater than 5-pound weight gain. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet for Resident #43 dated 6/20/23 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), depression, and hypertension. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #43 indicated that he had a BIMS score of 15, indicating that he was cognitively intact. Record review of comprehensive care plan revision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the person-centered care plan, and residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #259) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #259 had an order for oxygen therapy and the correct liter flow was administered to the resident. This failure could place residents requiring O2 therapy at risk of hypoxia and not receiving prescribed care and services. Findings: Record review of facility face sheet dated 9/06/2023 indicated Resident #259 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of atrial flutter (irregular heartbeat), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (impaired lung function). Record review of facility admission data report dated 08/20/2023 indicated Resident #259 was receiving continuous oxygen. Record review of admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to properly date Tubersol Purified Protein Derivative (Mantoux Tuberculosis skin testing solution) in the medication storage refrigerator with an open date. The facility failed to remove 2 vials of Flucelvax from the medication storage room refrigerator that had expired on 06/30/2023. The facility failed to monitor and log the temperatures of the medication storage refrigerator twice daily as indicated by policy. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: During an observation on 09/06/23 at 7:30 AM with LVN J the medication room refrigerator had 1 opened vial of Tubersol Purified Protein Derivative prescription date filled 6/23 with no open date and instructions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control prevention and practices for medication administration of eye drops by 1 of 4 staff reviewed for infection control. (MA F) * The facility failed to ensure MA F washed her hands, gloved, and followed policy for administration of eye drops. This failure could place residents at risk of bacterial and viral infections or other diseases from pathogens contracted through contamination of mucosa. Findings included: Record Review of an order summary dated 09/06/23 for Resident #1 indicated she was [AGE] years old admitted [DATE] and with a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Resident had a current order for Artificial Tears 1 %-0.2 %-0.2 % eye drops for diagnosis of dry eyes- 1 drops instill in both eyes 2 times per day Wait 5 min between of additional eye drops. During an observation and interview on 09/06/23 at 08:30 AM MA F stated that she worked as a MA for many years. She gathered a tissue and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIBERTY COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2017
UMB BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 09/23/2021
STRATTON, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2005
PF COLONIAL SNF OPS, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING, LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2022
TOUSHA, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2023
CAMPBELL, SCOTTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
CHANCE, JAMESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
FISHER, JAMESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
LANGDON, THOMASIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
MCGEHEE, WILLIAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
TAYLOR, JOHNIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2025
LIFETIME WELLNESS, LTD.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
MARTUS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2023
PHARMERICA DRUG SYSTEMS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/27/2017
PRESERVATION FREEHOLD COMPANYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
REHAB PRO LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
SANCTUARY LTC, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2021
GOVATHOTI, DEEPTIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WALLER, AMBERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/25/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 8%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,164per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$201per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675358. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next