Highland Park Health Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 75.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 03/20/25 related to the facility's failure to ensure Resident #1 was not physically or psychosocially abused. On 03/26/25, the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were not physically or psychosocially abused. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 03/20/25 after the facility performed one on one inservices for all staff regarding abuse on 03/20/25. On 03/20/25 employee #1 was suspended then terminated on 03/25/25. On 03/20/25 at 3:26 p.m., a quality assurance meeting was held via conference call. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically or psychosocially abused for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 81 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation and Misappropriations of Resident Property. dated 06/23/17, read in part,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled appropriately and failed to ensure leftovers were discarded according to the facility's procedures. The failures had the potential to affect all of the residents who received nourishment from the kitchen.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Food Storage, revised 02/06/2024, indicated, Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food is stored, prepared, and transported at an appropriate temperature and by methods designed to prevent contamination. The policy revealed, 2. Refrigerator, which included, All foods are covered, labeled and dated. A facility policy titled, Nutrition/Dietary Services, revised 01/16/2025, indicated, The staff will utilize the Nutrition Services Guidelines and standard practice guidelines. The policy revealed the Procedure included C. Food must be obtained from sources that comply with all laws relating to food and food labeling. If food, subject to spoilage, is removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right of a dignified existence for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity issues. Specifically, the staff failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage bag was covered in order to protect the resident's dignity. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 08/14/2022, indicated, The staff will abide by and protect resident rights in accordance with state and federal guidelines. An undated facility document titled, [Name of the facility] Resident & Family Handbook indicated, 6. Every resident shall receive respect and privacy in the medical care program of the resident. Case discussion, consultation, examination and treatment shall remain confidential andshall be conducted discreetly. The document further indicated, 11. Every resident shall have the right to receive courteous and respectful care and treatment and a written statement of the services provided by the facility, including those required to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to communicate with one resident prior to changing the resident's code status (designation to indicate life-saving interventions) for 1 (Resident #3) of twenty-two residents reviewed for advance directives. Specifically, the Director of Nursing (DON) changed Resident #3's code status to DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) without consulting with the resident. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Advanced Directives, revised 02/12/2022, in the section, Advanced Care Planning indicated, 1) In order for the resident to exercise his or her right to make informed choices about care and treatment in preparation for a time when the resident may not be able to make decisions, designated personnel and/or physician will assist with defining and clarifying medical issues and presenting the information regarding relevant health care issues to the resident or his/her legal representative, in a language that the resident can understand, as appropriate. A Record of Admission revealed the facility admitted Resident #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop/implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan addressing a respiratory condition or the use of a nebulizer breathing treatment for 1 (Resident #72) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plan-Process, last reviewed 03/27/2023, indicated, The interdisciplinary teal will coordinate with the resident and their legal representative an appropriate care plan for the resident's needs or wishes based on the assessment and reassessment process within the required timeframes. The policy revealed, 4. Interdisciplinary Team meets & reviews the care plan as follows, which included With any change of condition. The policy revealed, 6. The Plan of Care identifies the, which included Problem; Goals, measurable and realistic; Interventions, discipline specific services, and frequency; and Resolution/Goal analysis. A Record of Admission revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 03/11/2024. According to the Record of Admission, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident in a memory care unit was supervised during a nebulizer treatment (the delivery of medication directly to the lungs) for 1 (Resident #72) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Medication Administration Nebulizers, dated 01/2023, indicated, Remain with the resident for the treatment unless the resident has been assessed and authorized to self-administer.A Record of Admission revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 03/11/2024. According to the Record of Admission, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified dementia and unspecified lack of coordination. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/22/2026, revealed Resident #72 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #72's Plan of Care-Current, did not include a focus area for nebulizer use or care, treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, manufacturer instructions review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 medication errors out of 31 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.45%, which affected 1 (Residents #2) of 5 residents reviewed during the medication administration task.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/2024, indicated, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. The policy further indicated, Medication Administration included 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. A Record of Admission, indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 on 01/29/2025. According to the Record of Admission, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (the body's inability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate code status was reflected throughout the medical record for 1 (Resident #3) of 22 residents reviewed for advance directives.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Advanced Directives, revised 02/12/2022, indicated, 5) Resident wishes will be communicated to the staff via the care plan.6) The resident's physician will be notified of the resident's advance directive decisions.7) During the quarterly Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process and with any significant changes of condition, facility staff will:a) Identify, clarify and review the existing care instructions and whether the resident wishes to change or continue instructions from the advance directiveb) Define and clarify medical issue, review the resident's condition and existing choices and present information regarding relevant health care issues to the resident or resident representative as appropriate to determine continuation or modification of choices of care, ande) Changes to the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, facility document review, a review of a sit-to-stand mechanical lift manufacturer's manual, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 mechanical lifts at the facility were maintained in safe working condition and stored according to manufacturer instructions.Findings included: An undated policy titled, Maintenance Service, revealed Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The policy revealed, 1. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. An undated facility document titled, Emergency Procedures Lock-Out/Tag-Out revealed, Goal is to 'lock-out' machinery and equipment from its power source prior to maintenance to avoid accidents that occur from start-up or release of stored energy. The document revealed, Lock-out devices and tags should only be removed by the person who applied them or the person servicing them. The Owner's Operator and Maintenance Manual for the facility's sit-to-stand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. store clean dishware inverted and on sanitary surfaces, b. maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, and c. label, date, and cover food items in the refrigerators during one of two kitchen observations. The DON identified 77 residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: The facility's Employee Infection Control policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, All local, state, and federal standards and regulations are followed to ensure a safe and sanitary Nutrition Services Department. The policy also read, Store clean dishes inverted or in enclosed or covered storage units. The facility's Food Storage policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, All foods are covered, labeled and dated. Defrosting meat, eggs, and milk shakes are labeled with date pulled for thawing. The facility's Use of Left Overs policy, dated 08/01/18, read in part, Leftovers should be covered, labeled, dated and stored appropriately. On 08/20/24 at 7:00 a.m., the Initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician for out of parameters blood sugars for one (#41) of two sampled residents reviewed for insulin. The DON identified 31 residents who received insulin. Findings: The Bedside Blood Glucose Monitoring policy, revised on 02/12/20, read in part, If the glucose level is out of the established ranges ordered by the physician .The physician is contacted. Res #41 had diagnoses which included diabetes. The June physician's orders documented the physician was to be called for a blood sugar greater than 350. On the following dates in June, Res #41's blood sugar was above 350 with no documentation the physician was notified. 06/02/24 at 11:00 a.m., the blood sugar was 420. 06/10/24 at 11:00 a.m., the blood sugar was 368. 06/20/24 at 4:00 p.m., the blood sugar was 379. 06/24/24 at 11:00 a.m., the blood sugar was 484. 06/26/24 at 11:00 a.m. the blood sugar was 361. 06/28/24 at 4:00 p.m., the blood sugar was 544. The July physician's orders documented the physician was to be called for a blood sugar greater than 350…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-03-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK