Ash Flat Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 57.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated; expired food items were promptly removed /discarded on or before the expiration or use by dates; failed to follow their policy on food storage dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination; and failed to ensure leftover food items were used properly to maintain food quality; meat items stored in the refrigerator were covered or sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 68 residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 03/18/24 10:50 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor. The following observations were made in the refrigerator. a. Two boxes of Angel food cake were stored on a shelf. The boxes had a best by date of 8-13- 21. b. A box of spice cake was stored on a shelf. The box had a best by date of 8-5-23. c. A container of regular chicken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide meal service to an entire table before serving the next table. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 10 residents who dine in the dining room on the 500 Hall. The findings are: On 03/18/24 at 12:36 PM, the Surveyor observed lunch service on the 500 Hall. There were 3 tables and 10 residents in the dining room. The residents did not receive fluids prior to the meal trays being served. The 1st table had 3 residents and the 1st tray was served at 12:36 p.m. On 03/18/24 at 12:39 PM, the Surveyor observed the 1st tray served to the 2nd table (there were 4 Residents at the table). On 03/18/24 at 12:40 PM, the Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 take a meal tray from the cart and deliver it to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B. On 03/18/24 at 12:43 PM, the Surveyor observed the 1st tray served to the 3rd table (there were 3 Residents at the 3rd table). On 03/18/24 at 12:44 PM, the Surveyor observed the 2nd tray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0575 — pattern
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to all residents, contact information for pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups for 13 residents residing in the men's secure unit (500 Hall). The findings are: On 03/18/24 at 11:51 AM, the Surveyor observed no Ombudsman or state contact information was located on the men's secure unit (500 Hall). On 03/18/24 at 12:01 PM, the Surveyor observed a resident, in the dining room on the 500 Hall, answering and making personal phone calls. On 03/19/24 at 12:36 PM, the Surveyor observed no ombudsman or state contact information was located on the 500 Hall. On 03/20/24 at 02:05 PM, the Surveyor observed no ombudsman or state contact information was located on the 500 Hall. On 03/21/24 at 08:53 AM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator, Can you show me where the Ombudsman and State contact information is located on the men's secure unit? The Administrator confirmed there was no posting for the State agencies, and that it was required to be posted. On 03/21/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately to reflect the resident's dental status for 1 sampled resident (R#36). This failed practice had the potential to affect 65 residents who required MDS assessments. The findings are: 1. A MDS for Resident #36 dated 12/27/2024 did not document in section L00200 F that there was mouth or facial pain while chewing. 2. On 03/18/24 at 12:23 PM Resident #36 sitting in the dining room and was not eating. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 was attempting to assist resident to eat. 3. On 3/19/24 at 08:36 AM Resident #36 in a geriatric chair in the dining room. The Surveyor asked CNA #1 why Resident #36 wasn't eating. CNA#1 stated, He has bad teeth. 4. On 3/20/24 at 12:50 PM, the Surveyor asked the Social Director (SD) if Resident #36 had attended any dental appointments. The SD stated, the Dentist saw Resident in February. The SD looked on the Dental form and stated, the 2nd. 5. On 12/26/2023 at 12:23 PM, a Progress Note documented . {named} continues to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #53) resident of 14 sample mixed residents received a shave. The findings are: Resident # 53 diagnoses showed a lack of coordination, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitive intactness). The resident requires substantial/maximum assistance with personal hygiene. The care plan showed the resident has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to weakness, COPD, and heart failure. The resident requires extensive assistance with personal hygiene. On 03/18/24 at 11:13 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #53 facial hair was 1 to 1 1/2 inches long. On 03/19/24 at 09:33 AM, the Surveyor observed the Resident's facial whiskers were 1 to 1 1/2 inch long. On 03/20/24 at 09:51 AM, the Surveyor observed the Resident's facial whiskers were 1 inch long. On 03/18/24 at 11:13 AM, the Surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to minimize the potential for further decline in range of motion (ROM) for 1 (Resident #51) sampled residents who had limited range of motion. The findings are: 1. Resident #51 had diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side. 2. On 03/18/24 at 11:43 AM, Resident was in the recliner. His right hand was drawn in a a fist like contracture. Resident #51 did not have a hand roll in place. 3. On 03/19/24 at 08:12 AM, there was not a hand roll in place to a contracted right hand. 4. On 03/20/24 at 2:01 PM, Resident #51 did not have a hand roll in right hand. Unable to completely open the hand. 5. On 03/20/24 at 2:59 PM, Resident #51 was in bed and the right hand was closed and could not open it when asked by this surveyor. CNA # 4 was in room and witnessed the inability for the resident to open the right hand. There was no hand roll in the hand. CNA # 4 was asked, what Resident #51 should have in his hand. CNA #4 stated, A hand roll or a brace so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and hazard-free environment was provided. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 (Residents #10, #15, #52) sample mix residents that reside on the 500 Hall. The findings are: On 03/18/24 at 12:24 PM, the Surveyor observed a cabinet with a hinge lock and an unlocked master lock on the 500 Hall dining room. The cabinet contained 2 packs of open cigarettes and a bottle of cleaner. On 03/18/24 at 12:32 PM, while the Surveyor was looking at the contents of the unlocked cabinet, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 said those doors are supposed to be locked all the time, but I don't keep them locked because I have to get their cigarettes out every 2 hours. None of my residents bother them anyway. On 03/18/24 at 12:51 PM, the Surveyor observed the Director of Nursing (DON) lock the open cabinet on the 500 Hall. On 03/20/24 at 09:33 AM, the Surveyor asked CNA #3 Should the cabinet with the cigarettes always be locked? CNA #3 said yes, it should be. I have to be in it all the time and I'm so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was followed for 1 (Resident #53) of 6 sample mixed residents who have an oxygen order. The findings are: Resident #53 diagnoses showed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation; acute and chronic respiratory failure, whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia; and pneumonia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/1/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitive intactness). The resident is on oxygen therapy. The Physician's Order Summary showed the resident may have oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC) as needed every shift for oxygen therapy with a start date of 1/26/24. On 03/18/24 at 11:13 AM, the Surveyor observed the resident receiving oxygen at 3.5L via NC. On 03/19/24 at 09:34 AM, the Surveyor observed the resident receiving oxygen at 3.5L via NC. On 03/20/24 at 09:50 AM, the Surveyor observed the resident receiving oxygen at 3.5L via NC. On 03/19/24 at 09:34 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure regular dental services were provided to 1 (Resident #36) of 1 sampled resident with painful teeth. The findings are: On 03/18/24 at 12:23 PM, Resident #36 sitting in the dining room not eating. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 was attempting to assist resident to eat. On 3/19/24 at 08:36 AM, Resident #36 was seated in a geriatric chair in the dining room. The Surveyor asked CNA #1 why Resident #36 wasn't eating. CNA#1 stated, He/she has bad teeth and no money. On 3/20/24 at 12:50 PM, the Surveyor asked the Social Director if Resident #36 had attended any dental appointments. The Social Director (SD) stated, the Dentist saw Resident #36 on February 2nd. On 12/26/23 at 12:23 PM, a Progress Note documented . {named} continues to have his own teeth in poor condition. Author: Social Services. On 1/30/24 at 08:30 AM, a progress note documented, Resident is pocketing food. This nurse messaged, APRN (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) to see if we can switch him back to the pureed diet. Author: Named Nurse.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 1 meal observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 03/20/24 at 08:08 AM, the following pureed food items served to the residents on pureed diets for breakfast were: a. Pureed biscuit and the consistency was lumpy and not smooth. b. Pureed sausage was a gritty and not smooth. There were pieces of sausage still visible in the mixture. c. A high calorie sauce consisted of cinnamon, brown sugar, butter and half and half was a little congealed, and was not properly mixed. 2. On 03/20/24 at 08:21 AM, the surveyor asked Dietary Employee DE #2 to describe the consistency of the pureed food items served to the residents on pureed diets for breakfast. She stated, Pureed biscuit was lumpy. Pureed sausage was gritty and not smooth, and high calorie sauce was gooey. 3. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 53% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR