Rogers Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the rear casters on the mechanical lift remained unlocked during lifting a resident to allow for stabilization, and to prevent injuries or tipping affecting 1 (Resident #41) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for lift. The findings include: A review of Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #41 had diagnoses of stroke, diabetes, and kidney disease. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/2024 suggested a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) indicated short- and long-term memory problems. Section H0400 indicated the resident was always incontinent of stool, and section H0100 indicated Resident #41 had a catheter. a. On 01/21/2025 at 02:12 PM, Resident #41 returned to the room to be transferred to the bed using a mechanical lift. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 placed the open mechanical lift legs around Resident #41's chair with the rear casters in the locked position. The resident was raised using a purple lift pad and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walls, tiles, air vents, and door frames were maintained in good repair and were free of chips, stains and rust; baseboards were secured and were maintained in clean sanitary conditions; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 1/21/25 at11:51 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen areas: a. The florescent light above the steam table had no cover over it, electrical wires were exposed. b. The ceiling tiles around the emergency window by the steam table had brown stains on it. c. The kitchen floor by the steam table was chipped, in three (3) different areas exposing the concrete. d. The baseboard tile below the steam table was missing. e. The wall by the pipe connected to the switch attached to the plate warmer was cracked and the concrete was exposed. f. The wall leading to the Dietary Manager's office from the kitchen was cracked and the concrete was exposed. g. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive documents were maintained in a section of the resident's medical record readily retrievable by facility staff for 4 (Residents #9, #26, #27 and #32) of 18 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. On 11/28/23 at 9:45 AM, a review of Resident #9's medical record revealed there was no advance directive in the clinical record. On 11/28/23 at 03:20 PM, the Surveyor asked the Marketing Director, Does [Resident #9] have an advance directive? She looked in the electronic system for Resident #9's advance directive. She stated, I don't see one. 2. On 11/28/23 at 9:19 AM, a review of Resident #26's medical record revealed there was no advance directive in the clinical record. On 11/28/23 at 3:16 PM, the Surveyor asked the Marketing Director, Does Resident #26 have an advance directive? She looked in the electronic system for Resident #26 advance directive. She stated, I don't see it unless I'm overlooking it. On 11/28/23 at 1:10 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked, When should an advance directive be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of 2 (Residents #12 and #32) of 8 (Residents #1, #12, #18, #27, #32, #39, #43 and #46) sampled residents who resided on C Hall. The findings are: 1. On 11/28/2023 at 11:31 AM, a medication cart was observed positioned against a wall in the hallway on the C Unit with no nurse present. The laptop on the medication cart was open and unlocked. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #12 was opened and easily visible on the screen. There were two staff members and one resident present in the hallway on C Unit and were able to see the personal health information (PHI) of Resident #12. On 11/28/2023 at 11:39 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 said she should have locked the laptop to protect the PHI of Resident #12 before leaving the medication cart unattended. On 11/30/2023 at 09:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said that laptops with PHI should be locked or closed when a nurse is not actively using it to protect resident privacy. On 11/30/2023 at 09:31 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) of 12 rooms on the E Hall were free of damage. The findings are: 1. On 11/27/23 at 1:08 PM, the sheetrock on the wall behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. Splashes of brown spots were observed on the wall behind the bed. On 11/29/23 at 3:02 PM, the sheetrock on the wall behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. Splashes of brown spots were observed on the wall behind the bed. On 11/30/23 at 3:30 PM, the sheetrock on the wall behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. Splashes of brown spots were observed on the wall behind the bed. 2. On 11/29/23 at 8:14 AM, the sheetrock behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. On 11/30/23 at 8:55 AM, the sheetrock behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. On 11/30/23 at 3:50 PM, the sheetrock behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was peeling. 3. On11/28/23 at 9:39 AM, the sheetrock was peeling on the wall behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were maintained to promote good hygiene for 1 (Resident #22) of 15 (Residents #1, #7, #9, #12, #22, #26, #27, #32, #33, #35, #36, #46, #47, #52 and #211) sample mixed residents. The findings are: Resident #22 had diagnoses of unspecified lack of coordination; chronic respiratory failure and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/29/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact); required supervision with personal hygiene and one-person physical assistance with bathing. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 02/23/21 and a revision date of 09/13/23 noted Resident #22 had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit and was to have nail length checked and trimmed and cleaned as necessary. The Care Plan with initiated date of 02/23/21 and a revision date of 02/24/21 noted Resident #22 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed when administering medication and enteral nutrition for 1 (Resident #32) of 2 (Residents #32 and #47) sampled residents with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes, and failed to ensure medications were given in the recommended time frame for 2 (Residents #29 and #37) of 31 residents that had medications administered by Licensed Practical Nurse #3. The findings are: 1. On 11/28/2023 at 11:34 AM, LPN #2 administered to Resident #32 - one medication, Oxybutynin Chloride (overactive bladder medication) Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) and provided enteral nutrition. The enteral feeding order dated 10/20/23 documented Enteral feed order noted Resident #32 was to receive bolus tube feedings four times a day of TwoCal HN (a nutritionally complete, high-calorie formula) 1 can (8 ounces) with 60 milliliters water flush before and after feedings. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 did not incline the head of Resident #32's bed before administering the medication and enteral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was consistently administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to minimize the potential for hypoxia or other respiratory complications for 1 (Resident #22) of 9 (Residents #1, #6, #8, #20, #21, #22, #27, #39 and #52) sample residents according to a list provided by the Administrator on 11/30/23 at 10:52 AM. The findings are: Resident #22 had diagnoses of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and shortness of breath. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/29/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (13-15 indicate cognitively intact) and received oxygen therapy. A Physician's Order dated 04/06/23 documented Resident #22 may have O2 (Oxygen) at 2 LPM (liters per minute) via N/C (nasal cannula) as needed for shortness of breath every shift. Review of the Care Plan with a revision date of 08/01/22 revealed Resident #22 had COPD and receives oxygen via nasal prongs at 2 Liters as needed to keep sats (oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available at all times to meet the needs of the residents in a timely manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 58 Residents. The findings are: On 11/27/23 at 12:30 PM, the Surveyor asked Resident #211's family how they felt about the care the resident was receiving. The family member said the resident came the last part of September, and the care was great. Then there seemed to be a big turnover right after they got here. The family member said the resident said that they will push and push the call light to be changed and nobody would show up. This happened a lot at night. On 11/27/23 at 01:09 PM, the Surveyor asked Resident #6, How would you describe the care you are receiving? Resident #6 said part of care is not very good. The Surveyor asked, Could you explain in depth? Resident #6 said making sure that we get changed. I know they're shorthanded, but I've gone hours and hours without being changed. The Surveyor asked, Is there any specific shift that is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure full-time nursing assistants have become certified within 4 months of nurse aide training. The findings are: On 11/30/23 at 2:47 PM, a document provided by the Administrator on 11/29/23 at 3:54 PM revealed, Nurse's Aide (NA) #1's hire date was 4/3/2023 and NA class was completed on 8/4/23. On 11/30/23 at 2:00 PM, a document provided by Human Resources (HR) revealed NA #3 attended class from 7/11/23 to 8/4/23 and graduated. A second document provided at the same time revealed a Job Title dated 11/30/23, Nurse Aide in Training. On 11/30/23 at 03:05 PM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) when does a Nurses Aide start working on the floor? The DON said that varies because they have to do a lot of onboarding and they don't always start immediately. The Surveyor asked how long is an NA allowed to work from their hire date until Certified by the State? The DON said, Four months, I believe. The Surveyor asked if they get to the 4-month mark before testing, what do they do? The DON said, they are usually put to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 66% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR