Sheridan Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 59.1 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the minimum requirements were addressed in the facility assessment, as evidenced by, the medical director was not actively involved in the organization of the facility assessment for 1 of 1 facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility (total census: 69). The findings are: On 04/04/2025, the Facility Assessment, dated as approved on 08/01/24 and reviewed with the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee on 08/28/24, was reviewed and no signature page included. The revision history page was blank. On 04/04/205, the Administrator provided a copy of the QA & (and) A Committee Agenda/Minutes, dated 08/28/24, and no signature was observed for the Nurse Practitioner or Medical Director. The following words were written on the bottom of the minutes, Reviewed new F/A [facility assessment] plan. On 04/04/2025 at 2:46 PM, the Administrator was interviewed and stated the Medical Director was not a part of the completion of the facility assessment, but the Advanced Practice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility digital thermometer readings, the facility failed to maintain rehab resident rooms and the rehab hallway at a comfortable temperature level for residents in 1 of 5 hallways in the facility. The findings include: On 03/31/25 at 11:07 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #221 in their room, sitting in a wheelchair next to the bed. The resident stated the room was cold. On 03/31/25 at 01:39 PM, this surveyor observed Resident # 221 in their room, sitting in a wheelchair in the middle of the room. The resident stated it was still cold in the room and even the quilts were cold. This surveyor obtained a digital thermometer temperature reading of 68.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F), at resident sitting height. On 04/01/25 at 10:34 AM, Resident #221 stated it felt better in here [resident ' s room] last night. They [facility staff] shut my vent. This surveyor observed that the vent was closed at this time. Resident #221 stated it was still cold in the room. This surveyor obtained a digital thermometer temperature reading of 66.9 degrees F, near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of residents transferred from the facility and send a copy of the transfer of notification for 2 (Residents #15 and #63) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings are: 1. Review of Nursing Note dated 12/25/2024 at 3:17 PM, indicated Resident #15 had confusion, that was gradually progressing during the shift. At 2:10 PM, the resident's blood pressure (BP) measured 110/60, heart rate (HR) 58, and was receiving oxygen (O2) at a flow rate of 2 liters, through a nasal cannula (NC). Resident #15 was given a breathing treatment (updraft) and the amount of oxygen in the resident's blood continued to stay at 88%. The on-call provider was called, and an order was given to send the resident to the hospital, for evaluation. Review of a Notice of Transfer/Discharge/LOA (leave of absence) with Bed Hold Policy form dated 12/25/2024, revealed Resident #15 was transferred to [hospital name], due to increase in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident ' s property, as evidenced by a medication card of [Compound Narcotic Pain Medication], 5 milligrams (mg)/325 mg which contained 43 pills, was taken from a medication cart and the empty card was located in a dumpster behind the facility, for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for misappropriation of property. The findings are: Review of an OLTC (Office of Long-Term Care) Incident and Accident Report (I&A), with discovery date and time of 07/12/2024 at 6:45 PM revealed during the count of the [NAME] medication cart on Friday, 07/12/24 around 6:15 PM, between former Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 [outgoing nurse] and former Registered Nurse (RN) #6 [incoming nurse], there was a discrepancy in the narcotic book count and the number of actual 5 mg [Brand name Opioid] for Resident #8. During the investigation, former LPN #5 admitted to the Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator and former Assistant Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-26 · tag F0576 — widespread
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received personal mail on Saturdays. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents who resided in the facility, as documented on the Midnight Census provided by the Administrator on 1/22/2024 at 1:52 PM. The findings are: a. On 01/24/2024 at 02:50 PM, a resident council meeting was held with 6 residents. The Surveyors asked, Do you receive personal mail unopened and on Saturdays? The residents present replied, No we do not receive our mail on Saturdays, we receive it Monday through Friday. b. On 01/24/2024 at 04:07 PM, the Surveyor asked the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Do residents receive their mail on Saturdays? The ADON stated, Yes, the weekend supervisor Registered Nurse (RN) receives the mail and delivers to the residents. c. On 01/24/2024 at 04:09 PM, the Surveyor asked the Business Office Manager (BOM), Do residents receive their mail on Saturday? The BOM replied, No, the mail comes late in the evening on Saturdays, so we deliver it to the residents on Monday. d. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure potential frozen meat items were not stored above frozen packages of food items; cartons of pasteurized eggs were not stored above butter logs; foods stored in the refrigerator, and dry storage area were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, foods were dated the day received or opened to assure first in, first out usage to prevent potential for food bone illness, the dining floor was free of stains; door frames were free of rotten wood; the kitchen vent over the dish washing machine was free of rust stains, the clean dish machine counter was replaced, the dish washer and kitchen walls were free of paint peeling; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; the ice machine was maintained in clean and sanitary conditions; and expired beverages were promptly removed from refrigerator. The failed practices had the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene when assisting resident during meal service; laundry staff were properly trained to process contaminated linen; the folding table was free from contamination and to establish/implement a plan for Legionella to prevent the spread waterborne pathogens to reduce the potential for infections. This failed practice had the potential to affect 60 residents residing in the facility based on a list provided by the Administrator on 01/22/24 at 1:52 PM. The findings are: 1. On 01/22/24 at 02:15 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 removed soiled gloves and donned clean gloves without sanitizing her hands, while providing care to a resident. CNA #1 with ungloved hands assisted the resident with turning, tucked a soiled incontinent pad, and place a clean incontinent pad under the resident during care. CNA #1 then placed the soiled incontinent pad in a clear bag that was on the floor next to a trash container. a. On 01/22/24 at 02:15 PM, the Surveyor asked CNA #1 if it was standard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised at least quarterly and/or when residents' care needs changed, as evidence by failure to revise the plan of care to address the use of an antidepressant, an anticoagulant and insulin injections to ensure staff were aware of the necessary care, assessments and services required for 1 (Resident #43) of 17 (Residents #6, #8, #11, #17, #18, #19, #23, #26, #27, #29, #31, #32, #43, #52, #53, #54 and #58) sampled residents who had orders for an antidepressant, 1 (Resident #43) of 6 (Residents #25, #27, #32, #43, #270 and #271) sampled residents who had orders for an anticoagulant and 1 (Residents #17) of 6 (Residents #8, #9, #17, #19, #29 and #32) sampled residents who had orders for insulin, as documented on lists provided by the Director of Nursing on 01/26/24 at 11:56 AM, and 1 (Resident #6) of 1 (Resident #6) sampled residents who had orders for an opioid. The findings are: 1. Resident #43 had diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets, as documented on the list provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 01/25/2024 The findings are: 1. On 01/24/24 at 11:19 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #2 placed 6 servings of breaded chicken fried steak into a blender, added ½ cup of beef broth, thickener and pureed. She poured the pureed mixture into a pan. The mixture was not smooth and there were pieces of meat visible in the mixture. 2. On 01/24/24 at 12:25 PM, the pureed bread served to the residents on pureed diets, did not have a smooth consistency and had pieces of bread that were not completely pureed. At 12:31 PM, the Surveyor asked the Dietary Supervisor to describe the consistency of the pureed food items served to the residents on pureed diets. She stated, Pureed chicken fried steak…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff complied with a resident's request to use the bathroom to promote dignity for 1 (Resident #6) of 13 (Residents #6, #8, #11, #17, #23, #25, #26, #29, #31, #43, #53, #54, and #270) sampled residents who required staff assistance for toileting, as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing on 1/26/24 at 11:56 am. The findings are: 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses of Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Cognitive Communication Deficit. a. A Care Plan with a review date of 12/28/23 documented Resident #6 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility and dependent assistance on one staff for toilet use. b. On 01/23/24 at 9:42 AM, Resident #6 had her call light on and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 entered the room. The resident asked to go to the bathroom and CNA #6 told her she could not get up and that she had a brief on and she could go ahead and use it in her brief and they would change her later. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 55% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR