No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth Place

26 Warnock Springs Road, Magnolia, AR 71753 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 126 certified beds · (870) 234-1361 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (870) 234-1361 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • about 70% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1701 E North St · (870) 234-3802 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
60 Highway 79 N · (870) 234-5421 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
108 N Cordelia St · (870) 234-2972 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1513 Pittman · (870) 234-1375 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.9%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.6%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.6%21.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.1%13.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.5%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.6%24.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%12.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.242.011.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.822.131.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.5%CMS range 41.3–55.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 5.8–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified65.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.7–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
29.9%
Total nursing turnover
15.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.35 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to notify and provide a copy of the written notice to the long-term care ombudsman when a resident was transferred to the hospital for 3 (Resident #88, #85, and # 212) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings are: 1. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/16/24 indicated Resident #88 had diagnoses of dementia, history of falling, personal history of healed traumatic fracture, muscle weakness. The MDS indicated Resident #88 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 (0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment). a. A Progress Note for 8/23/2024 at 09:38 AM read, This nurse called and notified elder's daughter of elder's condition. Daughter stated that she was not feeling well herself and that she was afraid she had got [Resident #88] sick. The Daughter was notified of [Resident #88] being sent out to (Name of Hospital) for further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the lift pad was free of fraying and holes for 1 (Resident #54) sampled resident reviewed for accidents and injuries, and to ensure a resident was not allowed to smoke outside without supervision affecting 1 (Resident #59) sampled resident of 2 Sampled (Resident #24, #59) residents reviewed for smoking. Findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnoses, revealed Resident #54 with a diagnoses of Huntington's disease, stroke, and major depressive disorders. a. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARDs) of 01/22/2024 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 03 (0-7 suggest severely impaired). Section GG0130 indicated Resident #54 is totally dependent on staff for meals, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. b. A review of Resident #54's Care Plan, revised on 07/18/2024, revealed that Resident #54 is totally dependent on staff and requires a lift with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the meals were prepared in a method that maintained nutritive value and taste that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. A review of document titled, Quantified Recipe .Breaded Chicken On Bun, initiated for 3/20/2024 and provided by the Dietary Manager on 9/18/2024 at 12:14 PM, indicated for 5 residents placed 5 sandwiches use 1.75 cup plus 2 tablespoons of water or stock. a. On 9/17/24 at 4:09 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 placed 5 servings of fried chicken breast into a blade, added 4 cups of hot water from the sink and stated they used 5 chicken breasts, and the same amount of water to help maintain the consistency, instead of 1.75 cup plus 2 tablespoon of water or stock. 2. A review of a document titled, Quantified Recipe .Vegetable Blend, initiated 3/20/2024 and provided by the Dietary Manager on 9/18/2024 at 12:14 PM, indicated for 5 residents use 5.5 cups of vegetable blend of choice and 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 9/17/24 at 5:17 PM, during observation of supper meal in [NAME] House, the following pureed food items were in a crock pot awaiting service: a. Pureed fried chicken breast. The consistency was chunky. There were pieces of chicken visible in the mixture. b. Pureed mixed vegetables. The consistency of the pureed was lumpy and not smooth. There were pieces of vegetables and stems visible in the mixture. c. Pureed tarter tots. The consistency was lumpy and not smooth. There were pieces of potatoes still in the mixture. 2. On 9/17/24 at 6:01 PM, the Dietary Manager stated the consistency pureed fried chicken breast was chunky, there were still pieces of chicken in the mixture. It is supposed to be pudding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff and Shahbaz thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated and before handling food and clean equipment to decrease the potential for food borne illness for residents receiving meals from 2(Pavilion House and [NAME] House) kitchens; expired food items and spices were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 4 A(Pavilion House, [NAME] House, [NAME] House and [NAME] House) kitchens; hot food items were maintained at the required temperatures on the mini crock pots to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1(Brown House) kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect residents who received meals from the kitchen (with a total census of), according to the list provided by the Dietary Manager. The findings are. Pavilion House: 1. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for oxygen therapy for 1(Resident #212) of 3 (Resident #59, #212 and #366) sampled residents that were reviewed for respiratory care. The findings are: 1. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/27/2024 indicated Resident #212 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, and sleep apnea, and scored 12(13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status). a Review of Resident #212's Order Summary Report for September 2024 did not show that the resident had an order for oxygen therapy. b. On 09/16/2024 at 12:13 PM, Resident #212 was sitting up in a recliner, eyes closed, with oxygen in use per nasal cannula at 1.5 liters. c. On 09/16/2024 at 02:44 PM, Resident #212 was sitting up in chair watching television, with oxygen in use at 1.5 liters per nasal cannula. The resident was unsure if they used oxygen continuously but knew it was always available. d. On 09/17/2024 at 03:20 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident medications were stored behind a lock to prevent unauthorized staff or resident access. This failed practice had the potential to affect 1 (Resident #32) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. A review of a policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, revealed that medications should be stored behind locks, and be accessible to licensed and pharmacy personnel. Medication rooms and carts are to be locked up when not being attended by authorized personnel. 2. A review of Medical Diagnoses for Resident #32 revealed diagnoses of stroke, dementia, and diabetes mellitus. 3. On 09/17/2024 at 12:58 PM, the surveyor walked in Resident #32's room and the door to the bottom drug cabinet near the doorway fell open. The Surveyor pulled on the knob of the upper drug cabinet, and the door swung open easily revealing: a. Jardiance 25 mg (milligram) tablet, 1 tab b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen/nebulizer tubing and masks where changed every week in a timely manner to prevent respiratory infections affecting 1(Resident #59) of 3 sampled (Resident #59, #212, #366) residents reviewed for respiratory. Findings include: 1. A review of the Medical Diagnoses, revealed Resident #59 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea, and left foot contracture. a. A review of the Physicians Order, dated 06/29/2023, revealed Resident #59 gets albuterol updrafts three times a day. b. A review of Resident #59's Care Plan, revised on 07/21/2024, revealed Resident #59 has COPD and obstructive sleep apnea and to give medications as ordered. c. On 09/16/2024 at 10:24 AM, a storage bag and nebulizer mask on Resident #59's bedside table was dated 09/05/2024. d. On 09/17/2024 at 10:15 PM, a stored nebulizer mask with 09/5/2024 written on the side was stored on the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dented food cans were promptly removed/ discarded; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed, and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 2 ([NAME] House and [NAME] House) kitchens; dietary staff wore hairnets to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 2 ([NAME] House and [NAME] House) kitchens; dietary staff handled glassware items properly to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 ([NAME] House) of 7 (Pavilion, [NAME] House, [NAME] House, [NAME] House, [NAME] House, [NAME] House and [NAME] House) kitchens. The failed practices had the potential to affect 104 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 107). The findings are: 1. [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside and controlled substances were properly stored behind two secured locks, and access only permitted by authorized, licensed personnel to prevent misappropriation of resident medications in [NAME] House; insulin bottles were dated after opening in [NAME] House; and medications were not left with and administered by residents without self-administration rights in [NAME] House. The findings are: 1. [NAME] House: On 10/10/23 at 8:22 AM, Resident #206 was lying in bed. An unopened vial of Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution (breathing medication) was lying on the bedside table. On 10/10/23 at 2:02 PM, the Surveyor asked LPN #1 about the unopened vial on Resident #206's bedside table. LPN #1 stated, Medication should not be left in a resident's room. On 10/10/23 at 1:50 PM, the Surveyor accompanied Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 to the Laundry Room where the narcotics were stored. Observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff and proper handling of filling up water bottles to prevent the potential spread of infection to other residents. The failed practices had the potential to affect all 107 residents who resided in the facility. The findings are: On 10/09/23 at 1:45 PM, Shahbaz #1 came out of a resident room that had a resident who was on isolation precautions with a lunch tray with a glass plate, glass bowl, utensils, and napkins on it. Shahbaz #1 carried the tray to the kitchen and placed it on the counter. At 1:52 PM, Shahbaz #1 gathered the utensils from the dirty trays including the tray from the isolation room and placed them in the sink and placed the bowls, plates, and glasses all together. On 10/09/23 at 2:51 PM, without washing her hands, Shahbaz #3 placed ice into two water bottles for a resident and used her hand/fingers to guide the ice into the bottles. On 10/11/23 at 8:25 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 donned a gown, gloves, mask, and face shield to enter Resident #87's isolation room. CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance, and temperature that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 11 residents who resided in [NAME] House. The findings are: On 10/09/23 at 12:17 PM, observed the lunch meal at [NAME] House. A pan of ham was sitting on the kitchen island uncovered. The ham was dark brown and/or pink, and dry. The temperature of the food taken by Dietary #1 was as follows: a. Mashed Potatoes - 165 degrees Fahrenheit. b. Ham - 87 degrees Fahrenheit. On 10/09/23 at 12:25 PM, Dietary #1 said the crock pots were keeping the mashed potatoes warm. The Surveyor asked what their process was to keep meat warm after it is cooked. Dietary #1 said, We have a warmer. On 10/11/23 at 7:52 AM, the Surveyor asked the Dietary Manager (DM) the process for keeping meat at the proper temperature.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for two (Resident #11, Resident #66) of three residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure information regarding Resident #66's use of tobacco was accurately completed on the MDS and Residents #11's Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs were accurately completed in the MDS. The findings include:Resident #66Review of Resident #66's Medical Diagnosis Report revealed, Resident #66 had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Asthma, Dementia, Cerebral Ischemic Attack, Vitamin D deficiency, Heart Failure, Respiratory Failure.Review of Resident #66's Care Plan dated 02/16/2026 revealed, Resident #66 smoked with smoking safety care planned.Review of Resident #66's admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/2024 identified Resident #66 as a current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · No revisit needed

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
2 of 5Des Arc Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDes Arc, AR 2 of 5The Green House Cottages of Southern HillsRison, AR 3 of 5Arbor Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMalvern, AR 3 of 5Ash Flat Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterAsh Flat, AR 3 of 5Conway Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterConway, AR 3 of 5Encore Healthcare And Rehabi Of MalvernMalvern, AR 3 of 5Lake Village Rehabilitation and Care CenterLake Village, AR 3 of 5Ouachita Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCamden, AR 3 of 5Pocahontas Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterPocahontas, AR 3 of 5River Ridge Rehabilitation And Care CenterWynne, AR 3 of 5Rogers Health And Rehabilitation CenterRogers, AR 3 of 5Sheridan Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSheridan, AR 3 of 5Southern Trace Rehabilitation And Care CenterBryant, AR 3 of 5The Cottages At TexarkanaTexarkana, AR 3 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Belle MeadeParagould, AR 3 of 5Willowbend Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMarion, AR 4 of 5Brookridge Cove Rehabilitation And Care CenterMorrilton, AR 4 of 5Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation And NursingLittle Rock, AR 4 of 5St Johns Place Of Arkansas, LLCFordyce, AR 4 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Poplar GroveLittle Rock, AR 4 of 5The Pines Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHot Springs, AR 4 of 5Three Rivers Health And Rehabilitation CenterMarked Tree, AR 4 of 5Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterArkadelphia, AR 4 of 5Valley Springs Rehabilitation And Health CenterVan Buren, AR 5 of 5Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Care CenterMonticello, AR 5 of 5Courtyard Rehabilitation And Health Center, LLCEl Dorado, AR 5 of 5Greenhurst Nursing CenterCharleston, AR 5 of 5Heartland Rehabilitation And Care CenterBenton, AR 5 of 5Highland Court, A Rehabilitation And Resident CareMarshall, AR 5 of 5Ozark Nursing And RehabOzark, AR 5 of 5Summit Health & Rehab CenterTaylor, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of HomewoodMena, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Northwest ArkansasBentonville, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Walnut RidgeWalnut Ridge, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
4P2T1 OPS HOLDING LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2019
JEJ ASSETS LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
JEJ MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
PONTHIE, SHARLOTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
WILLIS, CHRISTOPHERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022
PONTHIE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
ALEXARK1 LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$8.6M
Related-party expense70% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 12%Other / private 16%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $8.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 70% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,514per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045187. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next