Conway Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 69.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  According to observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse with continuous altercations of verbal abuse and physical abuse between two residents (Resident #47 and Resident #54). This failed practice had the potential to affect all 66 residents currently in the facility to psychosocial harm from repeated resident to resident abuse altercations. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (Quality of Care) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 03/12/2024 at 12:30 PM, when Resident #47 and Resident #54 had an altercation in the dining room. The altercation from witness statements began when Resident #54 was impatient at the coffee area and rammed into Resident #47, which caused an argument between the two residents. A few minutes later after separation Resident #47 bumped into Resident #54's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care was provided to two of two (Resident #8 and Resident #69) sampled residents dependent on staff for care based on one of one observation to ensure residents physical and psychosocial needs were met. Specifically, staff did not respond to a feeding tube alarm in a timely manner, a call light was placed out of the reach of a resident, and pain was not addressed in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #8: During an observation on 08/18/2025 at 2:13 PM, this surveyor observed Resident #8 resting with their eyes closed, their tube feed was beeping, and the pump was not running. The resident's feeding pump said, tube slip detected, remove and reload cassette. This surveyor observed the resident's feeding supplement of 1.5 calories was hanging on a pump, and 60 milliliters (mL) an hour was written on the bottle. Resident #8 was not responding verbally and was not able to demonstrate use of the call light to report continuous beeping. The resident's bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during perineal care to prevent cross contamination for two (Resident #69 and Resident #74) of two sampled residents observed for bowel and bladder care. The findings include: Resident #69: During an observation on 08/18/2025 at 2:54 PM, this surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 and CNA #5 assist Resident #69 to bed and inform the resident that their brief would be checked, without further instruction. Then this surveyor observed CNA #5 pull down Resident #69's wet brief. CNA #4 used wipes to clean Resident #69's front perineal area and placed the wipes in a trash bag. CNA #5 rolled the resident onto their right side and CNA #4 wiped Resident #69's buttocks using one wipe in one direction. Resident #69 complained of buttocks pain. CNA #4 inspected Resident #69's buttocks, then opened the resident's bedside drawer, without changing gloves, and found a non-prescription ointment to use on Resident #69's buttocks. CNA #4 informed Resident #69…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility document review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to not discharge on e (Resident #81) of one sampled resident after an appeal was filed. The findings include: A review of Resident #81’s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/23/2024, with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #81’s discharge Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/24/2025, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #81’s Care Plan Report, revised on 12/26/2024, revealed there were no discharge plans anticipated. Resident #81’s Care Plan Report indicated plans for the resident to remain in the facility for long-term care. Resident #81’s Care Plan did not indicate that the resident smoked. A review of a Discharge Notice, dated 07/23/2025 and signed by the Administrator, indicated that a decision had been made to discharge Resident #81 effective 30-days from 07/23/2025. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%, to prevent potential complications for two (Residents #35 and #76) of two sampled residents observed during the medication pass. The medication error rate was 6.67%, based on observations of 30 medications administered. The findings include: A review of Resident #35's Order Summary Report revealed an order for [Brand Name] eye drops for dry eyes, with the order to instill two drops in both eyes twice a day for dry eyes. The eye drops started on 11/18/2024. A review of Resident #76's Order Summary Report indicated an order for 80 milligrams (mg) of an anti-flatulent medication twice a day for gas. During an observation on 08/19/2025 at 8:14 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 administer Resident #35 one drop of [Other Brand Name] eye drops in each eye, for dry eyes. During an observation on 08/19/2025 at 8:57 AM, this surveyor observed Medication Assistant Certified (MAC) #11 administer one 125mg chewable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #52) of one sampled resident was free of a significant medication error, which caused Resident #52 to be hospitalized for acute toxic encephalopathy. The findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 3:23 PM, Resident #52 revealed they went to the hospital around [DATE], due to being given the wrong medications. Resident #52 said they spent the night at the hospital and almost died, because the medicine they were given was not theirs, but belonged to a resident who lived down the hall. A review of Resident #52's Medical Diagnosis revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses which included high blood pressure, reflux, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, constipation, history of falling, sleep apnea, and insomnia. A review of Resident #52's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of four medication carts were always locked to prevent accidents. The findings include:During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 10:18 AM, this surveyor observed a medication cart was parked in front of the nurse's station, unlocked.During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 10:21 AM, the Director of Nursing walked by the medication cart and locked it. She confirmed medication carts should be locked, to prevent the residents from going into the carts.During an observation on 08/20/2025 at 10:28 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 walk to the unlocked medication cart. She indicated the cart was for the residents on the 200 and 300-halls. LPN #12 stated she did not realize the medication cart was unlocked and confirmed the cart should always be locked for the safety of the residents.During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 4:33 PM, the Administrator revealed the medication carts should be always locked to keep the residents safe.A review of a policy titled, Medications Storage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment, ensuring safety from floor clutter, detached wall vinyl, and detached wall rails posing potential hazards for falls. The findings are: 1. Review of an undated policy titled, Accidents, Hazard Prevention, specified, the frailty of some residents increases their vulnerability to hazards in the resident environment and can result in life-threatening injuries. It is important that all facility staff understand the facility's responsibility, as well as their own, to ensure the safest environment possible for residents. 2. On 10/30/2023, at 9:15 AM, environmental rounds were made in the facility, the following were observed: a. Standing at the front of the 100 Hall, and facing room [ROOM NUMBER], in the middle of the room, on the floor, between Bed A, located horizontal on the left side of the room, against the wall and Bed B, located vertical under the wall light, on the right side of the room, were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were utilized to prevent worsening of contractures for 2 (Residents #40 and #66) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. A review of the Order Summary indicated Resident #40 had diagnoses of abnormal posture, stiffness of left shoulder, and stiffness of left elbow. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/29/2024 indicated Resident #40 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) completed with a memory problem for short-term and long-term and has impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. A review of the Care Plan with an initiated date of 01/10/2024, indicated Resident #40 required, Problem: .is receiving a restorative program . Goal: Will maintain a ROM (range of motion), balance in order to reduce risk for contractures and skin breakdown by next review .Approaches/Tasks Left Elbow Extension [NAME] up to 4 hours . Further review indicates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishes/utensils were stored under sanitary conditions and food preparation equipment was cleaned properly in the kitchen. These are the findings: A review of the Cleaning Schedule indicated the following were to be completed weekly: ovens inside and outside, Aide tables/microwave area, Outside of the refrigerator, Refrigerator inside cleaning, plate warmer, under cooks table, fryer-cleaning inside and outside, dish machine-cleaning on top of dish machine, steam table under, coffee pots and tea pots, carts-daily. The Dietary Manager stated on 05/01/24 at 3:30 PM, that this is the only cleaning schedule they use. On 04/30/24 at 9:10 AM, the Surveyor observed the hand washing station in the kitchen, the hot water side had water coming from the base, creating a red brown stain inside of the sink. The Surveyor then observed the eye wash station was covered in red/brown spots, and that the left cover was missing with debris on the inside of the gray plastic piece. On 04/30/24 at 9:18 AM, the Surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed between resident rooms while delivering clean laundry. This failed practice had the potential to affect 14 residents residing on the secure unit, and the facility failed to keep a trash barrel covered to prevent residents from digging through trash on the secure unit for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 sampled resident observed. This failed practice had the ability to affect 14 residents residing on the secure unit. Findings include: A review of a document to Environmental Services Account Managers and Laundry Employees on 05/02/2024 at 09:40 AM regarding Reminder - Handling, Transport and Storage of Laundry, with a revised date of 10/2023, indicated, Page 2 Transport of Laundry indicates laundry will be handled and transported with appropriate measures to prevent cross-contamination and prevent the spread of infection. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,483 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,483 — penalty dated 2024-05-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 56% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR