No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Green House Cottages Of Walnut Ridge

1500 West Main Street, Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (870) 886-9022 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (870) 886-9022 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026$8,193 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • the CMS record shows $8,193 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-21)
  • about 59% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1198 W Free St · (870) 886-4711 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1600 W Main St · (870) 886-2806 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1000 SW Front St · (870) 886-6442 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1102 NE 2nd St · (870) 886-6638 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.5%1.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.0%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.2%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.0%13.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.1%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%24.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%12.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.782.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.702.131.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.0%CMS range 26.3–54.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.6–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.8–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
47.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 95.5 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-14)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

9 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident with needed medical services for one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to enter a treatment order on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), which resulted in an open wound to Resident #24's chest not being treated or assessed for one month. The findings include: Review of Resident #24's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #24 on 01/19/2026 with diagnoses which included heart failure, muscle weakness, diabetes, protein calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, reduced mobility. Review of Resident #24's Care Plan initiated on 05/11/2026 revealed the resident had a skin tear/potential for skin tear of the right chest and the right elbow. Interventions included if a skin tear occurred to obtain an order, staff were to treat the skin tear as ordered and identify causative factors. Review of an Office of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify staff that a resident who had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in place was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), resulting in a staff member transferring the resident without appropriate Personal Protective Equipment, and to ensure staff followed EBP when the requirement was posted for one (Resident #99) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of Resident #99's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted by the facility on 04/08/2026 with an open wound to the lower left leg. Review of Resident #99's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/09/2026, revealed Resident #99 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, which indicated Resident #99 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed that Resident #99 received intravenous (IV) medications and antibiotics via midline IV access.Review of Resident #99's Care Plan initiated 04/09/2026, revealed Resident #99…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 12/16/24 at 11:20 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 used a 6 ounce spoon to place a serving of chicken and dumplings into a blender, pureed, and poured in a divided plate to serve to residents. The texture of the pureed chicken and dumpling was too thick. 2. On 12/16/24 at 12:26 PM, CNA #2 used a regular spoon to place 2 servings of cut green beans into a blender, pureed and poured it in a divide plate. The texture of the pureed cut green beans was not smooth, not form, water was separated from the vegetables and there were noticeable pieces of stringy beans in the mixture. 3. On 12/16/24 at 11: 35 AM, CNA #2 placed a serving of cornbread into a blender, added milk, and pureed. CNA #2 poured the pureed cornbread into a divided plate. The texture of the pureed cornbread was too thick. 4. On 12/16/24 at 12:28 PM, CNA #2 was interviewed and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure CNAs thoroughly washed their hands before handling clean equipment, and 1 of 1 ice machine in the main building was maintained in clean and sanitary condition for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 12/16/24 at 11:13 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, who was preparing lunch meal in Cottage #1 ' s kitchen, placed a serving of strawberry cake into a blender, added whole milk and two tablespoons of thickener, and pureed. At 11:20 AM, CNA #1 picked up a spatula that was resting on top of a coffee pot inside the dirty side of the food preparation sink waiting to be washed, which had been in contact with food residue, and used it to scrape pureed strawberry cake into a bowl to be served to the resident on the pureed diet, there by contaminating the food. CNA #1 immediately was interviewed and was asked should a spatula in contact with the coffee pot inside the dirty sink be used in food. CNA #1 confirmed she should not have used dirty spatula in food. 2. On 12/16/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure an oxygen cannister was stored securely to prevent accidents and hazards in Cottage One. The failed practice had the ability to affect all 8 residents who reside in the cottage. The findings are: 12/20/23 11:05 AM 9:40 AM, the medication closet in Cottage 1 was observed to contain a small number of supplies. OTC (Over the Counter) meds were observed to be within the use by the window. Tubing and supplies were also observed to be in date. At 9:42 AM, upon opening the double doors to the medication closet, an oxygen cannister was observed standing in the corner. The cannister was not secured in a rack. The Nurse Consultant immediately instructed the nurse to get a holder to secure the oxygen tank.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications in a medication cart was used within date in accordance with accepted principles of pharmacy laws and regulations for 1 med cart. It had the potential to affect 4 Residents (#18, #28, #29, and #43) sampled residents who received insulin, and was stored in the med cart for 100 and 600 hall. The findings are: a. On 12/20/23 at 9:03AM, the medication cart for 100 & 600 halls was checked for expired medications. There were 4 vials of Novolog insulin with written date open on them. Novolog insulin for Resident # 29 had an opened date of 11/17/23. Novolog insulin for Resident #28 had an opened date of 11/12/23, Novolog insulin for Resident #43 had an opened date of 11/10/23 and Novolog insulin for Resident #18 had an opened date of 11/05/23. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was asks how long is insulin good for after being opened? She stated, 4 weeks. b. On 12/20/23 at 9:04 AM, the Surveyor asked LPN #2 how often do you check for expired medications? LPN #2 stated, The night nurses are responsible for checking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program [QAPI] Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to prevent repeated deficiencies for (689) preventing accident and hazards. These failed practices had the potential to affect 8 residents residing in Cottage 1. The findings are: 1. A Recertification survey was conducted on 12/18/23 at the facility. During this survey, F689 was cited for facility failure to ensure an oxygen cannister was stored securely to prevent accidents and hazards in Cottage One. The review of the facility' s Plan of Correction, with a correction date of 12/14/22 indicated: This Plan of Correction and the individual responses are submitted as a Credible Allegation of Compliance solely to meet the requirements of continued certification in the Medicare and Medicaid Programs. These responses do not constitute an admission by the Provider of the truth of the facts alleged or the conclusions set for in the CMS-2567. Step #1: Corrective Action: Upon notification of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one Resident (Resident #73) in cottage 4. This failed practice endangers the health and safety of residents and had the potential to affect 11 residents that utilize call lights. The findings are: a. On 12/18/23 at 2:29 PM, Resident # 73 was lying in a specialty bed in high position. Resident #73 was awake and wearing a neck pillow, and glasses. The Surveyor observed the call light on the floor and under bed out of reach. b. On 12/18/23 at 3:04 PM, the Surveyor observed the call light in Resident #73's room in the same position, on the floor under the bed, and out of reach. The Surveyor asked Resident #73 if he could reach his call light and if he knew where it was. Resident # 73 answered, No to both questions. c. On 12/18/23 at 3:14 PM, the Surveyor asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) if Resident #73's call light was within the Resident's reach. The CNA answered, No it's in the floor. We normally lay it across the bed across his lap because the clip is broken. The Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Bi Pap (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) mask was stored properly to prevent cross contamination for 1 Resident (R #343) of two (#18 and #343) sampled residents who have physician's orders for a Bi pap machine. The findings are: On 12/18/23 at 11:45 AM, Resident #343 mask and bi-pap machine were on top of a hard plastic, 3 drawer storage unit. The mask was observed to be open to air, not stored in a bag to prevent cross contamination. On 12/20/23 at 9:30 AM, Resident #343's bi-pap mask was observed to be lying beside the bi-pap machine on top of the hard plastic, 3 drawer storage unit. The mask is open to air, not stored in a bag to prevent cross contamination. On 12/21/23 at 9:00 AM, Resident #343's bi pap mask was observed to be in the same location, where it had been observed all week. On 12/21/23 at 9:15 AM the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to view the resident's mask laying exposed to air and contaminants. The DON was asked how the Resident's mask should be stored. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,193 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-12-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.7-1.7 vs chain
The other 34 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
2 of 5Des Arc Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterDes Arc, AR 2 of 5The Green House Cottages of Southern HillsRison, AR 3 of 5Arbor Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMalvern, AR 3 of 5Ash Flat Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterAsh Flat, AR 3 of 5Conway Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterConway, AR 3 of 5Encore Healthcare And Rehabi Of MalvernMalvern, AR 3 of 5Lake Village Rehabilitation and Care CenterLake Village, AR 3 of 5Ouachita Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCamden, AR 3 of 5Pocahontas Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterPocahontas, AR 3 of 5River Ridge Rehabilitation And Care CenterWynne, AR 3 of 5Rogers Health And Rehabilitation CenterRogers, AR 3 of 5Sheridan Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterSheridan, AR 3 of 5Southern Trace Rehabilitation And Care CenterBryant, AR 3 of 5The Cottages At TexarkanaTexarkana, AR 3 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Belle MeadeParagould, AR 3 of 5Willowbend Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMarion, AR 4 of 5Brookridge Cove Rehabilitation And Care CenterMorrilton, AR 4 of 5Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation And NursingLittle Rock, AR 4 of 5St Johns Place Of Arkansas, LLCFordyce, AR 4 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Poplar GroveLittle Rock, AR 4 of 5The Pines Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHot Springs, AR 4 of 5Three Rivers Health And Rehabilitation CenterMarked Tree, AR 4 of 5Twin Rivers Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterArkadelphia, AR 4 of 5Valley Springs Rehabilitation And Health CenterVan Buren, AR 5 of 5Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Care CenterMonticello, AR 5 of 5Courtyard Rehabilitation And Health Center, LLCEl Dorado, AR 5 of 5Greenhurst Nursing CenterCharleston, AR 5 of 5Heartland Rehabilitation And Care CenterBenton, AR 5 of 5Highland Court, A Rehabilitation And Resident CareMarshall, AR 5 of 5Ozark Nursing And RehabOzark, AR 5 of 5Summit Health & Rehab CenterTaylor, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of HomewoodMena, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Northwest ArkansasBentonville, AR 5 of 5The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth PlaceMagnolia, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
4P2T1 OPS HOLDING LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2019
ALEXARK1 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2019
JEJ ASSETS LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
PONTHIE, SHARLOTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
EDDINGER, EATHANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/05/2022
PONTHIE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
JEJ MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.0M
Related-party expense59% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 6%Other / private 17%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 59% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$328per resident / day
operating cost
$9,977per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045151. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next