Southern Trace Rehabilitation And Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse for 4 (Resident's #4, # 9, #13 and #14) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The lack of effective behavior monitoring resulted in Resident #4 having resident to resident abuse that occurred on [DATE]; Resident #9 having resident to resident abuse that occurred on [DATE] and [DATE]; Resident #13 having resident to resident abuse that occurred on [DATE]; and Resident #14 having resident to resident abuse that occurred on [DATE] and [DATE]. Of these incidents, Resident #5 was the physical aggressor. The findings are: 1. A review of an Incident and Accident report dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 shoved Resident #9 out into the hallway because Resident #9 was in Resident #5's room. The nurse caught Resident #9 to prevent a fall. 2. A review of an Incident and accident report dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was sitting in the dining room and struck Resident #13, who was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the Office of Long-Term Care for one (Resident #1) of one resident with an unknown injury within two hours. The findings include: A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 09/03/2021 with diagnoses which included vascular dementia and contracture of an unspecified joint. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/2026 revealed Resident #1 was comatose. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for care. A review of a Care Plan initiated on 09/05/2021 revealed that Resident #1 required transfer by mechanical lift with two staff. A review of a Care Plan initiated on 11/18/2025 revealed Resident #1 required two staff were required for bed mobility. A review of Hospital Records dated 10/22/2025 revealed that Resident #1 chest X-Ray revealed right second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh rib fractures which are most likely recent. The X-Ray also revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff wore an isolation gown when providing care for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 (Resident #5) sampled residents that were on contact isolation, and the facility failed to ensure a contact isolation sign was put outside the door of 1 (Resident #5) of 1 (Resident #5) sampled resident to alert the staff to apply PPE before providing care. This failed practice had the potential to spread infections throughout the facility. The findings are: A review of Resident #5's Order Summery Report revealed a diagnosis of elevated white blood cell count, sepsis, unspecified open wound to right lower leg, unstageable pressure ulcer of left heel, pressure ulcer of sacral region, bacteremia, and extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/18/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that Resident #5 had a wound and a blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure (1) sanitary procedures were followed when serving food to the residents to prevent a potential foodborne illnesses; failed to ensure food transported to patient in the second dining room which are not adjacent to the main dining room were covered to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 7 residents who received meals in the second dining room; (2) foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of1 kitchen; (3) glasses contained beverages were fully covered to be protected from flies or other contamination, (4) dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 82 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census:87). The findings are: 1. On 05/28/2024 at 12:30 PM, the Surveyor observed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy for 2 (Residents #21, and #57) sampled residents to promote a dignified existence. The findings are: 1. On 05/28/2024 at 10:03 AM, while observing Resident #21's room, a visitor told the Surveyor the door does not stay shut, and staff stick the curtain in the door to keep it closed. The visitor said he visits almost every day. a. On 05/29/2024 at 01:37 PM, the Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 come out of Resident #21's room and pull up on the doorknob and try to get the door to close. After several failed attempts to get the door to close, CNA #5 was observed pulling A-bed's privacy curtain out into the hallway and was able to get the door to stay shut. The Surveyor asked if having a door and a usable privacy curtain was important for privacy. CNA #5 told the Surveyor that they felt that everyone should have a door that closes and a privacy curtain, so yes, you should be able to close the door. CNA #5 said, The privacy curtain is in the door, but is being used right now…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foreign substances were not left in a cup in 1 (Resident #46) sampled resident's room to prevent possible ingestion to prevent injury or harm, and failed to ensure that a licensed nurse placed an eternal feeding pump on hold prior to staff laying the resident flat for 1 (Resident #57) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Review of Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #46 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, and dementia. a. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). b. On 05/28/2024 at 02:20 PM, the Surveyor observed a cup containing a thick orange substance measuring 2 ounces sitting on the right side of the bathroom sink. The Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 to identify the orange substance and asked if it was medication. LPN #11 told the Surveyor it looked like some kind of juice. The Surveyor told LPN #11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 05/30/2024 at 11:29 AM, Dietary Aide #20 used an 8 ounce spoon to place 8 servings of chicken dumpling into a blender, added 2 teaspoons of thickener then added 3 additional teaspoons of thickener and pureed. At 11:38 AM, the puree mixture was poured into a pan and placed in the oven. At 11:53 AM, the pan of pureed chicken and dumplings was placed on the steam table. The consistency was thick and gooey. 2. On 05/30/2024 at 12:21 PM, the Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7, who was assisting residents in the dinner room, to describe the consistency of food items served to the residents on pureed diets. She stirred the cake that had nectar thickened milk at the bottom of it with a fork and stated, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during incontinence care to prevent cross contamination and infection for 1 (Resident #46) of 13 sampled residents that required assistance for incontinence care; ailed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 (Resident #57) sampled resident on enhanced barrier precautions to prevent cross contamination; and failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment. The findings are: 1. Per an Order Summary Report, Resident #46 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, and dementia. a. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). b. A Care Plan for Resident #46, with a revision date of 12/29/2022, indicated the resident had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit, activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #20) sampled resident had an operational air conditioner to promote a comfortable home environment. The findings are: 1. Per the Medical Diagnoses, Resident #20 had diagnoses of cerebral palsy and epilepsy 2. Per the Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/25/2024, Resident #20 scored a 5 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status. 3. On 05/28/2024 at 01:11 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #20's air conditioner unit under the window, and noted the knob to adjust the heat to cool was broken off and sitting in the window. 4. On 05/29/2024 at 01:02 PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #20 adjusting the window blinds and touching the bottom of the window frame while waving hands. The Surveyor saw the knob to adjust the heat to cool was resting in the floor, under the window air conditioning unit. The Surveyor asked Resident #20 if the resident was having a problem with the window unit and Resident #20 waved both hands near his/her face saying,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan addressing diuretic therapy for 1 (Resident #16) sampled resident to ensure the resident received appropriate care. The findings are: 1. Review of Resident #16's Medical Diagnoses revealed diagnoses of cerebral infarction, depressive disorders, and urinary tract infection. a. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/15/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment). b. A Physician Order (Dated 09/08/2020) documented, .Furosemide Tablet 40 MG (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Edema . (Furosemide is a diuretic used to treat fluid retention (edema) and swelling caused by congestive heart failure, liver disease, kidney disease, and other medical conditions.) c. On 05/30/2024 at 02:25 PM, the Surveyor spoke with the MDS Nurse and the MDS Consultant and asked if they could find where diuretics were addressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 (Resident #57) sampled resident to reflect changes with enteral feeding. The findings include: 1. Per an Order Summary Report, Resident #57 had diagnoses of dysphagia oropharyngeal, dysphagia oral phase, and abnormal weight loss. a. Resident #57 had a Physician ' s Order for enteral feed every shift related to abnormal weight loss. b. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set with the Assessment Reference Date of 03/03/2024 documented that Resident #57 was unable to complete the Brief Interview of Mental Status and had a feeding tube (e.g., nasogastric, or abdominal Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG). c. A review of Resident #57's Care Plan revealed the resident required tube feeding via PEG tube with bolus feeding per Medical Doctor (MD) order related to dysphagia and swallowing problem. An intervention dated 03/04/2024 instructed staff to check tube placement prior to any feeding or flushes, to check for gastric contents/residual volume as ordered per physician, and for the head…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,053 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $46,053 — penalty dated 2025-03-05
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-03 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 62% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR