Pocahontas Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff responded appropriately to an unwitnessed fall, specifically failing to notify the appropriate parties and initiate neurological checks for an unwitnessed fall for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for falls. Following the incident and prior to the surveyors entry into the facility, the facility terminated LPN #1 and initiated and completed a corrective action plan, thus these findings indicate past non-compliance. The findings include: A review of the admission Record indicated that Resident #1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive encephalopathy (brain dysfunction) and hypertensive emergency. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/14/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #1 required partial or moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen cylinder was secured to prevent an accident or injury. The findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Accident Hazards prevention indicated The environment will be free from an accident hazards as is possible .An effective way for the facility to avoid accidents is to develop a culture of safety and commit to implementing systems that address resident risk and environmental hazards to minimize the likelihood of accidents . A review of the facility's undated policy titled Handling of oxygen and flammable gas, indicated Oxygen cylinders will be stored in a designated ventilated area and stored in a safe manner to prevent cylinder from fall over. During an observation on 12/31/2024 at 2:04 PM, an unsecured portable oxygen cylinder was standing in front of the nursing station with residents and staff present. Two nurses were sitting behind the nursing station documenting. Three staff members were standing on the opposite side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to promote the dignity of a resident who was observed with staff shaving in the dining room for 1 (Resident #6) 1 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled resident rights and responsibility indicated The nursing facility protects and promotes the rights of each Resident/Elder admitted in order to provide a dignified existence, self-determination and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the nursing facility. A review of the facility's undated policy titled accident hazard prevention indicated .The facility is responsible for providing care to residents in a manner that helps promote quality of life. This includes respecting residents' rights to privacy, dignity and self-determination, and their right to make choices about significant aspects of their life in the facility. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) in a contact isolation room for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 resident reviewed for infection control. The findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Transmission based precautions categories, indicated Contact precaution: a. Personal protective equipment: Gloves and gown. B. Wear PPE [personal protective equipment] for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or potentially contaminated areas in the patient's environment. C. Donning PPE upon room entry and discarding before exiting the patient room is done to contain pathogens. A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident #7 with diagnosis that included extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance (an enzyme that some bacteria produce to break down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure cross contamination during lunch service did not occur for one of one kitchen. The findings are: On 08/20/2024 at 12:05 PM, the surveyor observed Dietary Aide #6 take a stack of plates to put inside the lunch cart for 100 Hall. Dietary Aide #6 had their hand on top of the stack as they slid it on a tray inside the cart. On 08/20/2024 at 12:08 PM, the surveyor observed Dietary Aide #6 touch the inside of a divided plate intended to serve the puree diet for the 100 Hall. On 08/20/2024 at 12:09 PM, Surveyor observed Dietary Aide #6 picked up a bowl, put their finger inside of the bowl where food would rest and serve gravy for 100 Hall. On 08/20/2024 at 12:15 PM, Surveyor observed Dietary Aide #6 removing the aluminum foil off the regular meatloaf, when a piece fell onto the steam table pan. Dietary Aide #6 then reached in with bare hands to grab the piece of aluminum foil touching the regular meatloaf. On 08/21/2024 at 3:00 PM, during an interview the Dietary Manager confirmed they are not supposed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of the resident's quality of life, denying self-determination, and adequate communication for 1 (Resident #29) of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. The findings are: On 08/19/24 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor attempted to interview Resident #29. Resident #29 spoke a few words in English but responded to the majority of the surveyor's inquiries by smiling and nodding their head. Review of the Care Plan dated 6/17/2024 revealed Resident #29 has an impaired cognitive function related to a language barrier. The intervention was to observe/report as needed any changes in cognitive function. Noted food preferences were not listed. On 8/21/2024 at 9:30 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was asked to identify Resident #29's native language. CNA #1 was unsure. CNA #1 stated the resident can understand some things and understands how to use his/her call light, but there are some language barriers. CNA #1 states she points to things to determine what the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, homelike environment was provided for the 100-hall secured unit. On 08/19/2024 at 11:28 AM, the surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], on side B, the wall was scratched with paint removed exposing bare drywall. The baseboard by the bathroom was coming away from the wall and was warped, and right above the baseboard paint was peeling back. In the shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], to the right and behind the toilet the baseboard was coming away from the wall and warped. In the right-hand corner, the paint was peeling, and the drywall was crumbling. On the baseboard right behind the toilet is what appears to be a black substance, and the surveyor noted the bathroom had a musty, stagnant odor. On 08/19/2024 at 11:34 AM, Surveyor noted in room [ROOM NUMBER] the baseboard next the bed on side B had indentions in the wall with the paint peeling and bare drywall exposed. On 08/21/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to a smoking apron was utilized for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #20 had diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/07/2024 revealed Resident #20 scored a 13 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Care Plan reveals Approaches/Tasks: Resident #20 requires a smoking apron while smoking. A review of the Smoking Safety Screen completed on 05/31/2024, reveals that Resident #20 required adaptive equipment in the form of a smoking apron. On 08/21/2024 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #20 going outside off the end of the 100-Hall secured unit with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 to smoke. The surveyor observed Resident #20 was not wearing a smoking apron. On 08/21/2024 at 11:45 AM, during an interview CNA #2 stated they did not know…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure refrigerated narcotics were stored in a permanently affixed storage box to ensure no misappropriation of resident medications affecting all 51 residents in the facility. The findings are: On 8/20/2024 at 9:30 AM, during an observation of the medication storage area inside the medication refrigerator, observed a small (approximately 4x 6), clear, medication box with a red temporary cable tie lock. The box contained a controlled medication (lorazepam) and was not secured inside the refrigerator. On 8/20/2024 at 11:45 AM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse #7 was asked why it is important to secure the box inside the refrigerator and stated, Because of the size, it would be very easy to remove the box with the medication. On 8/20/2024 at 11:45 AM, during an interview the Administrator confirmed the controlled medication box should be affixed inside the refrigerator. Reviewed the facility's undated policy (received on 8/20/24 PM from Administrator) on Pharmaceutical Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure mechanical soft diets and puree diets were in the proper form for 2 of 2 observed meals provided by the facility kitchen. The findings are: On 08/19/2024 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed lunch service on the 100-hall unit, it is done in family style where the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) serve lunch for the residents according to the Dietary Manager. CNA #5 began serving the residents, the surveyor observed both regular and mechanical soft diets were getting diced ham and beans. Surveyor observed Resident #40 was spitting out the ham and laying it on a napkin. A review of the menu card revealed Resident #40's diet was Mechanical Soft, thin liquids, Supercal/High kcal. Surveyor observed Resident #39 was spitting ham out and putting it on the table. A review of the menu card revealed that Resident #39's diet was Mechanical Soft, regular diet, thin liquids. On 08/19/2024 at 12:15 PM, Resident #36's family member stated this is not an unusual occurrence they get food they cannot chew often.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures, including hand hygiene, were implemented during incontinent care for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident to prevent potential infection and or the spread of infections. The findings are: 1. Review of a procedure guide titled, PERI-CARE PROCEDURE, updated 04/29/2024 and provided by the Director of Nursing on 08/20/2024, indicated, Pat dry using clean, dry wash cloth, remove gloves, place in trash bag, put on clean gloves, apply sin barrier as needed. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #5 with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) that included emphysema. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/06/2023 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated the resident was severely impaired for their daily decision making. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan, revised on 10/11/2023, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,307 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,307 — penalty dated 2025-06-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 54% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR