Arbor Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 65.3 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed care planned intervention requiring two staff members to perform mechanical lift transfers to promote resident safety and prevent fall with injury for 1 (Resident #15) of 8 (Residents #3, #6, #10, #15, #20, #26, #33 and #46) sampled residents who required the mechanical lift for transfer. This failed practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #15, who fell and sustained a fracture, and had the potential to cause more than minimal harm for 13 residents who required transfers with a mechanical lift. The facility failed to ensure that chemicals were kept out of reach for 1 (Resident #49) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. The Significant Change in Condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/05/2024 indicated Resident #15 had diagnoses of heart failure, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, and other fracture, and that the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), was dependent for transfers, and had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry storage area were covered; one of two ice scoop holders were maintained in a sanitary manner, expired food items were promptly removed and discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; and that dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment for two of two meals observed. The findings include: On 06/29/25 at 10:15 AM, during an observation, an opened bag of bread was on a rack on top of the food preparation counter, exposing it to air. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated it was supposed to be sealed to prevent something crawling in it. On 06/29/25 at 10:21 AM, during an observation, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 placed a mop in the Janitor's closet, contaminating her hands. Without washing her hands, she picked up the pans to use in transferring cooked food for lunch and placed them on the utility cart by the steam table, with her thumb inside the pan. On 06/29/25 at 10:24 AM, during an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to convey a resident's personal funds to the individual or representative administering the individual's estate within 30 days for two (Resident #212 and Resident #213) of three residents reviewed for whom the facility maintained trust accounts. The findings include: On [DATE] at 10:55 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) provided a document titled [Facility Name] Trust - Current Account Balance as of [DATE]. A review of the [Facility Name] Trust - Current Account Balance as of [DATE] document, indicated a closing trust account balance for Resident #212 of $914.06, and a closing trust account balance for Resident #213 of $893.91. On [DATE] at 12:03 PM, a review of the form titled “Notice of Transfer, indicated that Resident #212 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:05 PM, a review of Resident #212's Nursing Progress Notes dated [DATE], indicated the coroner called to notify the facility of the death of Resident #212, at 1:37AM. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency within the required 2-hour time period for one (Resident #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the Medical Diagnosis portion of Resident #2 ' s electronic health record revealed diagnoses which included right hip fracture, anxiety, and depressive disorder. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/26/24, revealed Resident #2 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status assessment score of 0, which indicated memory was okay, and was independent. The MDS also indicated no behaviors were exhibited, and that Resident #2 was occasionally incontinent of bladder. Review of a, OLTC [Office of Long-Term Care] Incident and Accident Report, dated and with a discovery date of 12/26/2024 at 3:03 AM, and submitted on 12/26/24 at 8:20 AM, indicated Resident #2 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were sealed or covered, food items stored in the storage room were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean dishes or food items; expired products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria, failed to ensure hot foods was maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F.) while awaiting to be served to prevent potential food borne illness, and failed to ensure leftover food items were not used for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen to maintain food quality and prevent the growth of bacteria. These failed practices had the potential to affect 62 residents who received meals from the 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 06/24/24 at 9:40 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen. a. Dietary [NAME] (DC)#1 picked a spatula from the edge of the grill she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required extensive assistance with personal hygiene were regularly offered trimming or shaving of facial hair to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 3 (Resident #23, #49, and #53) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), and the facility failed to provide continent care every 2 hours for 1 (Resident #53) reviewed for continent care. The findings are: 1. Review of the Medical Diagnosis portion of Resident #23 ' s electronic health record revealed diagnoses of legal blindness, obsessive compulsive disorder, and anxiety disorder. a. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/05/2024 documented Resident #23 scored 13 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). b. The Care Plan with revision date of 04/16/2024 indicated that Resident #23 (R #23) will be clean and well-groomed daily. c. On 06/24/2024 at 10:21 AM, surveyor observed R#23 up in wheelchair with 1/4-inch white hair to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 36 residents who received regular diets, 23 mechanical soft diets, and 2 residents who received pureed diets from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. The menu for the 06/24/2024 noon meal documented all diets were to receive cake, residents who received pureed diets were to receive 6 ounces of pureed chicken fajita (2/3 cup) and all residents were to receive sour cream pound cake. 2. On 06/24/2024 at 11:25 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 used a #16 scoop (2 ounces) (1/4 cup) to place 6 servings of chicken fajita into a blender, with no tortilla or bread, (DC)#1 added chicken broth and pureed. At 11:27 AM, DC #1 poured the pureed chicken fajita into a pan and placed it in the oven. 3. On 06/24/2024 at 12:30 PM, DC #1 used a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed chicken fajita with no tortilla or bread to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 2 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 06/24/2024 at 10:36 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC)#1 used a #8 scoop to place 6 servings of refried rice into a blender, added beef broth and pureed. DC #1 poured the pureed refried rice into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency of the pureed refried rice was runny. At 11:35 AM, DC #1 added thickener into a pan of pureed rice that was on the steam table and mixed it with a spoon, which created lumps of thickener that were not completely dissolved in the mixture. 2. On 06/24/24 10:50 AM, DC #1 used a #8 scoop to place 4 servings of refried beans into a blender and pureed. DC #1 poured the pureed refried beans into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency of the pureed refried was thick. 3. On 06/24/2024 at 11:57…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency a fall from the mechanical lift that resulted in major injury for 1 (Resident #15) sampled resident that occurred when a staff member failed to follow care planned intervention requiring two people for lift transfers. The findings are: 1. The Significant Change in Condition Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/5/24 indicated Resident #15 had a diagnoses of heart failure, Diabetes Mellitus, arthritis, and other fracture, the Resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), was dependent for transfers, and had one fall with major injury. a. The Care Plan with a revision date of 04/30/2024 indicated, .Problem: (Resident #15) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit .Approaches/Tasks .Transfer: (Resident) is dependent on total assist via Mechanical Lift with (2) staff assist for transfers with full blue sling . b. The Care Plan with a revision date of 06/03/2024 indicated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure freezer temperature was maintained at 0 degrees Fahrenheit or below and all foods were frozen solid to prevent the potential for food bore illness; foods stored in the freezer were sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 30 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 57) as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor. The findings are: 1. On 07/24/23 at 10:10 AM, in the freezer was a box of Orange Cream Bars and a box of frozen orange/cherry/grape popsicles that were opened and undated. 2. On 07/24/23 at 10:10 AM, the Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was regularly provided to maintain good hygiene and prevent potential injuries or infections for 3 (Residents #13, #30 and #43) of 15 (Residents #2, #4, #8, #9, #13, #18, #30, #31, #36, #37, #38, #43, #44, #49 and #50) sampled residents who required assistance with nail care. This failed practice had the potential to affect 24 residents on the [NAME] Unit who were dependent for nail care as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/26/23 at 11:31 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy. a. A Care Plan with an initiated date of 12/06/21 and a revision date of 06/23/22 documented Resident #13 required maximum assistance with personal hygiene and staff were to keep his nails trimmed and filed. b. On 07/25/23 at 9:41 AM, Resident #13 was lying in bed watching TV. His fingernails were approximately 1/4 inch past his fingertips and uneven. The fingernail on his left little finger…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-26 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES — 35 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 61% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR