The Blossoms at Berryville Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 66.9 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · H2026-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure significant medication errors did not occur for two (Resident #1 and Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 03/09/2026 with diagnoses that included pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cognitive communication deficit, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and aortic valve stenosis. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/2026, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was on medications that included a hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, and antiplatelet. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement effective nurse training to ensure education of new nursing staff for two (LPN #1 and LPN #3) of two nurses reviewed. The findings include: Review of a facility undated New Trainee Folder provided by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) contained the following: -Licensed Nurse Competency Skills Check-off-Gait Belt Technique, Mechanical Lift Technique-Nurse Report Sheet blank-24-Hour Report Sheet-Standing Orders-Incontinent & Catheter Care Observation Checklist-Fluid Restriction Instruction Sheet-Med-Pass Best Practices MAR (Medication Administration Record) Marker-Med-Pass Quick References-Fall Intervention Strategies-Shift Trade Agreement-On-call Process & Contact Information-Physician Order Sheet blank-Falling Leave Fall Prevention-Welcome letter -Policy and Procedures including: Resident Rights, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, and Elopements. Review of the undated Licensed Nurse Competency Skills Check-off revealed the preceptor should initial and signify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure that the food preparation equipment and environment were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent contamination and the potential development of foodborne pathogens, specifically, not cleaning the drip pans and fish fryer. The findings include: During an observation on 12/01/2025 at 11:20 AM, during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen, this surveyor observed the drip pans were covered with aluminum foil, approximately two feet long, by two feet wide. The foil was completely covered in a brown and black substance, with visible charred curly noodles. During an observation on 12/01/2025 at 11:23 AM, this surveyor observed the grease in the fish fryer to be mostly covered with a layer of floating brown particles. The grease that was visible through the floating debris was cloudy. During an interview on 12/01/2025 at 11:20 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) #2 confirmed that the drip pans had not been cleaned or checked by her personally, since she started her employment in September.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet residents' needs for timely assistance, call-light response, and water pass for one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed, according to the facility assessment. The findings include: A review of the facility assessment revised 07/11//2025, documented required direct-care staffing levels for an average daily census of 64 residents as follows: Dayshift- 6 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)/3 nursesEvening shift- 4 CNAs/3 nursesNightshift- 4 CNAs/2 nurses. A review of facility daily staffing records from 04/05/2025 through 11/23/2025, revealed multiple dates in which the required staffing levels were not met across day, evening, and night shifts, which included: -04/05/2025 with day shift staffing of 6 CNAs/1 nurse and night shift staffing of 3 CNAs/2 nurses for a census of 64 residents-04/12/2025 with day shift staffing of 4 CNAs/2 nurses for a census of 65 residents-04/19/2025 with day shift staffing of 4 CNAs/3 nurses for a census of 66…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the following: foods stored in walk in refrigerator was stored off the ground for 1 of 1 kitchen, that beneath the dishwasher was clean for 1 of 1 kitchen, standing water in front of the refrigerator in kitchen and in walk in refrigerator with towels/sheet in floor absorbing water in 1 of 1 kitchen, drinks in the unit refrigerator was labeled, dated and covered for 1 of 3 dining rooms, foods on the unit was dated and used by expiration/best by date 1 of 3 dining rooms, resident's and employee foods not stored in the same refrigerator in 1 of 3 dining rooms and the refrigerator was clean and in sanitary condition for 1 of 3 dining rooms in order to prevent cross contamination and foodborne illnesses. These failed practices have the potential to affect 72 residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen and potential to affect 72 residents who reside in facility and potential to have food in unit refrigerator. Findings included: 1. The Surveyor observed on 08/05/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during meal service for 3 (Resident #15, #34, and #55) residents of 13 residents observed during meal service. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assistance with Meals, with an effective date of April 2021, indicated residents would be assisted with dignity and without staff standing over them while providing dining assistance. A review of a document titled, The Blossoms Employee Handbook, indicated the care of facility residents was guided by respect and dignity of human life. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #15 with diagnoses that included difficulty swallowing, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/03/2024, revealed Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicated the resident had sever cognitive impairment and required assistance with eating. A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bath or shower for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Showering Residents, dated April 2021, indicated the purpose was to promote resident cleanliness and included a procedure only and did not address missed bathing or showers. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #65 with diagnoses that included a disorder that affected a person's ability to think, a mood disorder, anxiety disorder, pain, and dizziness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/12/2024, revealed Resident #65 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and an assessment to determine resident's ability to shower/bathe themselves was not attempted. The accompanying Care Area Assessment (CAA) Worksheet indicated the resident may have care needs or problems…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while serving meals and providing assistance to 6 (Resident #11, #15, #25, #28, #34, and #55) of 13 residents observed, specifically, staff moved from one resident to the next while feeding the residents, and touching other high contact areas, without performing hand hygiene; and failed to ensure that enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were worn while performing indwelling catheter care to 1(Resident #31) of 3 sampled residents who had orders for indwelling catheter. Findings include: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated April 2021, indicated hand hygiene was considered the primary means in preventing the spread of infections and staff should follow handwashing and hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infections to residents. a. A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Assistance with Meals, dated April 2021, indicated residents who were unable to feed themselves would be fed with attention to safety. b.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, document review and interviews the facility failed to ensure bleach wipes and disinfectant wipes were not left at bedside for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/26/2024 showed Resident #42 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which suggests moderate cognitive impairment. On 08/05/2024 at 1:24 PM, the surveyor observed a container of bleach wet wipes and disinfectant wipes sitting on Resident #42's table next to bed. On 08/05/2024 at 3:26 the surveyor observed a container of bleach wet wipes and a container of disinfectant wet wipes on Resident #42's table next to bed. On 08/06/2024 at 10:17 AM, the surveyor observed a container of bleach wet wipes and a container of disinfectant wet wipes on Resident #42's table next to bed. On 08/07/2024 at 2:09 PM, the surveyor observed a container of bleach wipes and a container of disinfectant wet wipes on Resident #42's table next to bed. On 08/07/2024 at 2:09 PM, an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0557 — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was concealed in a privacy bag to promote dignity and privacy for 1 (Resident #40) of 2 (Residents #40 and #46) sample mix residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings included: The following observations were made concerning Resident #40: a. On 09/11/2023 at 3:44 PM, the urinary catheter drainage bag was hooked to the side of the bed touching the floor with no privacy cover. b. On 09/12/2023 at 9:26 AM, no privacy cover was covering the catheter drainage bag. c. On 09/13/2023 at 9:42 AM, no privacy cover was covering the catheter drainage bag. During interview on 09/12/2023 at 9:26 AM, the Surveyor asked Resident #40, how do you feel about people being able to see your catheter bag that is hanging on the side of your bed? Resident #40 stated, I don't like people being able to see it. It embarrasses me. During interview on 09/14/2023 at 2:28 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), said a resident's catheter bag should be covered. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was correctly labeled with the date, time, initials, and type of nutrition for 1of 1 (Resident #50) on tube feedings. The findings included: During observation on 09/11/2023 at 3:02 PM, Resident #50 was being administered a nutrition tube feeding with an unlabeled bag. On 09/13/23 at 9:52 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #50 being administered a nutrition tube feeding with the type of nutrition not noted on the bag, but dated 09/13/2023 0000 with the initials CA. Review of the physician's Order Summary Report with an order start date of 07/19/2023 showed, change feeding administration set daily, and label the formula container and administration set with resident's name, date, time, and nurse's initials. During interview on 09/14/2023 at 2:26 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed Resident #50's bag was not labeled, and it should include the date, initials, time, and type of feeding. On 09/14/2023 at 2:48 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), said tube feeding bags should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,880 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $6,545 — penalty dated 2026-04-23
• $16,335 — penalty dated 2026-04-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $360K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR