The Blossoms At West Dixon Rehab & Nursing Center
2821 W Dixon Rd, Little Rock, AR 72206 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 127 certified beds · (501) 888-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 9.5% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 4.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 1.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 10.1% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 21.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.2% | 13.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.5% | 10.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.2% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.7% | 24.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.0% | 12.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 2.01 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 5.7–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.9–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 81.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were addressed for two (Resident #4 and Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #4 had pharmacist recommendations to decrease an antidepressant and change an insulin order that were not followed. Resident #19 had a pharmacist recommendation to have a laboratory blood draw for an anti-seizure medication that was not completed. The findings include: Resident #4 A review of the Resident #4's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and a long-term use of insulin. A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/23/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #4's Care Plan Report, initiated on 04/07/2025, revealed the resident had diabetes with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the water temperature in a resident's room was maintained in a comfortable temperature for use for one (Resident #78) of two resident's rooms located on the secured unit and failed to ensure three (100-Hall, 300-Hall, and 600-Hall, across the hall from room [ROOM NUMBER]) of six hall showers were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The findings include: Resident #78 During an observation on 01/12/2026 at 10:37 AM, this surveyor entered the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] and turned on the hot water at the faucet and allowed the water to run. At 10:41 AM, this surveyor placed fingers from the right hand under the running water from the hot faucet and the water was cold to touch. At 10:43 AM, this surveyor again placed the fingers from the right hand under the water from the hot faucet and the water was still cold to touch. During an observation on 01/12/2026 at 3:39 PM, Resident #78 was sitting up in their chair, with their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was promptly notified of a significant change in a resident's condition, for one (Resident #4) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #4 was receiving insulin with physician orders for blood glucose monitoring, the facility failed to obtain physician orders identifying parameters for blood glucose values requiring notification. As a result, when the resident's blood glucose level exceeded 500 mg/dL, staff failed to notify the physician of this significant change in condition, placing the resident at risk for adverse outcomes related to uncontrolled hyperglycemia. The findings include: A review of Resident #4's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and a long-term use of insulin. A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/23/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were protected for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right of dignity and quality of life was maintained regarding activities of daily living care resulting in psychosocial distress; and failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from reprisal after the resident made a grievance. The findings include: A review of Resident #7’s admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/27/2024, with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness/paralysis of the left side, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and history of homelessness. A review of Resident #7’s quarterly Minimum Data Set, with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/01/2025, revealed Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure unrestricted visitation for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for visitation rights. Specifically, a health care liaison was interrupted by the Director of Nursing (DON) and not allowed to complete an assessment of Resident #7 following a received transfer referral to an outside facility.The findings include: A review of Resident #7’s admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/27/2024, with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness/paralysis of the left side, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and a history of homelessness. A review of Resident #7’s quarterly Minimum Data Set, with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/01/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of a Progress Note, dated 02/18/2025, revealed Resident #7 had a BIMS of 15, completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu and the facility recipe to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. A facility recipe for the fortified oatmeal indicated, for 24 resident's use: 8 cups =2 quarts of water. Whole milk 6 ounces. Rolled oats 6-1/2 cup. Non-fat dry milk 2-1/4 cup. Margarine 3/4 cup. [NAME] sugar 1-1/4 cup. Granulated sugar 1-1/4 cup. Whole milk 6 ounces. 2. On 8/19/24 at 8:10 AM, during the breakfast meal service. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 was asked how he prepared oatmeal. DC #1 stated, I used a bag of brown sugar and 2 sticks of butter. 3. On 8/19/2024, a facility breakfast menu indicated residents on pureed diets were to receive 1/2 cup of pureed grits, and a #16 scoop (1/4) cup of pureed coffee cake. a. On 8/19/24 at 8:49 AM, DC #1 served regular grits to the residents on pureed diets, instead of pureed grits. b. There was no pureed coffee cake served to the residents on pureed diets. d. On 8/19/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the meals were prepared in a method that maintained nutritive value and taste that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal preparation observed. The findings are: 1. A facility titled recipe for pureed sausage not dated and provided by the Dietary Manager on 8/19/2024 at 11:30 AM, indicated for 7 residents, place 7 portions of prepared sausage in food processor with hot broth and blend to a smooth consistency. On 8/19/24 at 8:12 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 placed 12 servings of sausage into a blender, added 2 cups of hot water from the coffee maker, instead of hot broth, added 6 tablespoons of thickener and pureed. 2. A facility titled recipe for pureed scrambled eggs not dated and provided by the Dietary Manager on 8/19/2024 at 11:30 AM, indicated for 7 residents, place four #8 scoop (1/2 cup) prepared scrambled eggs in food processor with hot milk and blend to a smooth consistency, adding a small amount of hot milk as needed. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen air vent was cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; the dish washer, and kitchen walls, the door frames and baseboards were free of chipped, debris, dirt, rust, stains, and wall tiles were replaced; leftover food items were used in manner to maintain food quality; food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen; the ice machine on the 300 Hall was maintained in clean and sanitary condition; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen; and manufacturer's instructions were followed to prevent potential for food spoilage and or bacteria growth. The failed practices had the potential to affect residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen (total census: 85), as indicated on a list provided by the Dietary Manager. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to practice hand hygiene during meal service between 2 of 21 sampled residents. (Residents #76 and #83); failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during perineal care to prevent cross contamination for 1 (Resident #81) of 2 (Residents #34 and #81) sampled residents who were observed for bowel and bladder care during 1 of 1 observation; failed to ensure the tubing of an indwelling urinary catheter bag was not directly on the floor and the catheter bag drainage valve was in the protective plastic sleeve on the bag to decrease the potential for contamination for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for an indwelling catheter; and the facility failed to ensure the water management program was consistently implemented to monitor for legionella and other water-borne pathogens in 1 of 1 facility. The findings include: On 08/19/2024 at 09:35 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 was observed feeding Resident #76, and handling used napkins then walked over to Resident #83, picked up a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a call light for 1 of 2 residents in a shared room, and failed to ensure a call light was in reach of 2 (Residents #40 and #66); failed to ensure the call light was in safe working condition for 1 (Resident 76) to ensure residents could communicate with staff, and prevent accidents, or injury during 1 of 1 observation. Findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #40 had diagnoses of Alzheimer ' s, left eye blindness, and failure to thrive. A review of the Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #66 diagnoses of schizophrenia, dementia, and anxiety. a. A review of a policy titled, Answer the Call light, (Revised, 10/2010) revealed the call light should be within easy reach of the resident. b. Review of an in-service Answering Call lights, dated 08/21/23, indicated, call lights must be on residents when they are in their room or lying in bed, and to ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner. c. Review of an in-service titled Call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter bag was covered to promote dignity for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 sampled resident who was reviewed for an indwelling catheter. The findings are: Resident #42's Order Summary dated 08/19/2024 was reviewed and indicated the resident had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and an obstruction in urine flow. The Order Summary indicated an order dated 07/24/2024 to change the [brand name] catheter tubing and bag as needed. An admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/31/2024 was reviewed and indicated Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, which indicated moderate confusion and for bladder and bowel appliances an indwelling catheter. A Care Plan dated 08/01/2024 was reviewed and indicated Resident #42 required a [brand name] catheter and a privacy bag. On 08/19/2024 at 8:53 AM, Resident #42 was sitting in a chair in the hallway with a catheter bag hooked on the right side of the chair. The contents of the catheter bag were visible,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected on section O0110, Special Treatment, Procedures, and Programs the resident received dialysis on admission or while a resident for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 sampled resident. This failed practice had the potential to inaccurately represent Resident #31's health status, impacting his care plan, reimbursement levels, and the ability to properly identify necessary interventions. Findings include: Review of the Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #31 had diagnoses of end stage renal disease, right lower lobe cancer, and type II diabetes mellitus. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/16/2024 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 06 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired). Section I8000 revealed an active diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis. a. A review of the Progress Notes, dated 07/08/2024 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an uncapped razor was not left unattended in a resident's room to prevent accidents or injuries for 1 (Resident #44) of 1 sampled resident reviewed. to prevent accidents or injuries. The findings are: Review of the Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #44 with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and stroke. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 0f 02/28/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 4 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). Section GG 0130 indicated the resident was dependent for personal hygiene, and Section B1000 indicated the resident had impaired vision. a. Review of a facility policy titled, Shaving the Resident, (revised, October 2010) indicated after a resident is shaved the razor should be discarded in a designated sharps container labeled For Disposable Razors Only, located outside the resident rooms. b. Review of Resident 44's Care Plan, dated 03/28/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the physician ordered rate for 1 (Resident #67) of 1 sampled resident with oxygen orders to prevent the potential for respiratory complications. Findings include: Review of Medical Diagnoses revealed Resident #67 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure, and pulmonary emphysema. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/24/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (7-12 indicates moderately impaired). Section 0110 C1 indicates Resident #67 has been on oxygen while a resident. a. A review of Physician Order, dated, 07/03/2024, indicated Resident #67 receives oxygen at 2 liters as needed for shortness of breath. b. A review of the Care Plan, dated 06/08/2023, showed Resident #67 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to give aerosol, bronchodilators, and oxygen 2 liters as needed per physician orders. c. On 08/19/24 at 07:43 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical soft diet was provided during the lunch meal service for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a therapeutic diet. The findings are: Resident #7's Order Summary dated 08/21/2024 was reviewed and indicated a diagnosis of type two diabetes and an order dated 05/21/2024 for a mechanical soft texture diet. A quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/14/2024 was reviewed and indicated Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, which indicated moderately confused. A Care Plan dated 06/27/2024 was reviewed and had no indication that Resident #7 required a mechanical soft texture diet, or the resident did not have upper teeth or dentures. A Dietary Progress Note dated 05/20/2024 was reviewed and indicated Resident #7 was recommended to be offered a mechanical soft diet related to difficulty chewing. On 08/19/2024 at 10:26 AM, Resident #7 was observed lying in bed awake and stated, I need my top teeth fixed. Resident #7 stated the breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pneumococcal vaccine was provided for 1 (Resident #44) of 5 (Resident's #11, #44, #48, #80 and #81) sampled residents. reviewed for immunizations. The findings are: Resident #44's Order Summary dated 08/22/2024 was reviewed and indicated the resident had diagnoses of dementia and an irregular heartbeat. An order dated 02/23/2024 indicated Resident #44 could receive Pneumovax (a pneumonia vaccine) unless contraindicated. An order dated 08/20/2024 indicated, may give pneumococcal vaccine unless contraindicated or refused, and one dose of Prevnar 20 - 0.5 milliliters (ml) was ordered to be administered intramuscular (IM). On 08/22/2024, Resident #44's immunization screen was reviewed and Prevnar 20 was listed as an immunization required under consent status. On 08/22/24 at 1:21 PM, the Infection Preventionist was interviewed and provided a copy of an immunization record from a website. The document was reviewed and did not indicate if the pneumonia vaccine was administered to Resident #44. She was unable to explain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
illness, failed to ensure 1 of 2 ice machines, 2 of 2 ice chests were maintained in clean and sanitary condition. These failed practices had the potential to affect 18 residents who received ice on 300 hall and 31 who received ice 600 hall and 84 residents who received meals from the kitchen, as documented on a list provided by the Assistant Dietary Supervisor on 08/29 /2023 at 12:43 p.m. The findings are: 1. On 08/28/23 at 09:09 AM, the following observations were made on the food preparation counter. a. A can opener attached at the end of the food preparation counter had dried black matter on the blade. b. An opened box of cream of wheat was on the counter. The box was not covered. 2. On 08/28/23 at 09:12 AM, the following observations were made on a shelf in the refrigerator: a. An opened box of sausage. The box was not covered or sealed. b. An opened bag of lunch meat. The bag was not sealed. c. An opened packet of cheese slices. it was not sealed. 3. On 08/28/23 at 09:16 AM. The following observations were made on a shelf in the freezer. a. An opened box of chicken breasts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident rooms, hallways, dining room, and bathrooms were maintained for 5 of 5 rooms observed (room [ROOM NUMBER], 109, 102, 300 and 302). The findings include: On 8/28/23 at 9:41 AM observed a ceiling tile in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom above the toilet that was bulging and had brown water spots extending one fourth of the length of the tile extending into corner of air vent. On 8/28/23 at 10:29 AM observed the door frame in the bathroom shared by room [ROOM NUMBER] and 109 was rusted with sharp jagged edges at the bottom where the frame meets the floor. There was paint peeling off the door frame at the bottom and the paint was bubbled about one fourth of the way up the door frame. On 8/28/23 at 12:34 PM observed the bathroom light switch was not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 08/28/23 at 12:41 PM observed the dresser drawers in room [ROOM NUMBER] were crooked, and the top right drawer was missing. There were no personal items on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of daily Living (ADL) care including was provided regularly for 5 (Resident #20, #28 #36, #65 & #72) of 17 (Residents #1,#2,#4,#8, #10, #13, #14 R#19, R#20, R#25, R#28, R#36, R#48, R#63, R#67, R#72, & R#74) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/20/23 noted a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) showed memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance for hygiene with 1-person physical assist. a. On 8/28/23 at 9:39 AM observed Resident #36 fingernails were uneven in length and jagged, with sharp edges on the corners of the nails on both hands. Nails varied in length from approximately 1/4 - 1/2 inches or more in length past the tips of fingers. b. On 8/29/23 at 2:38 PM observed Resident #36 fingernails remained long and uneven. The Surveyor asked Resident #36 if she would like to have the nails trimmed. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for 1 (Resident #28) of 3 (Resident #68, #4, and #28) sampled residents who had an intervention for anti- rolled backs to wheelchair after a fall, and the facility failed to ensure a gait belt was used in a 2 person transfer for 1 (Resident #21) of 6 (Resident #11, #15, #20, #21, #49, and #76) sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Review of a care plan for Resident #28 for fall risk showed an intervention of anti-roll backs to the wheelchair initiated on 7/27/23. a. A review of an incident report dated 7/26/23 indicated that Resident #28 was found lying on the floor with feet under bed and head under wheelchair. Under the immediate action taken section the document showed, Antiroll back applied to wheelchair. b. On 8/30/23 at 11:59 AM there was no anti-roll back device observed on Resident #28 wheelchair. c. During an interview on 9/01/23 at 9:41 AM LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #3, stated, when a resident falls, interventions are put in place immediately and stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% to prevent potential complications during the medication pass. The findings are: The facility had 36 opportunities for medication errors, with 2 errors. The team medication error rate was 5.56%. On 8/30/23 at 8:00 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 did not administer Florastor 250mg to Resident #48. Review of August 2023 physician order for Resident #48 showed an order for Florastor 250 mg two times a day. On 8/31/23 at 2:35 PM LPN #3 was asked, Can you tell me why you didn't administer Florastor 250 mg when you did the medication pass on yesterday morning? She stated, I didn't know it was an over-the-counter medication. I was looking for a card. On 8/30/23 at 9:53 AM observed LPN #2 administer Resident #11's Advair 250/50 disc inhaler. LPN #2 then gave the rest of Resident #11's medications. LPN #2 did not have Resident #11 rinse her mouth after the Advair inhaler. On 8/30/23 at 9:53 AM LPN #2, said she was not aware the resident was supposed to rinse after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 7 residents who received pureed diets from 1 of 1 kitchen, according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 08/29/2023 The findings are: 1. The menu for lunch showed that the residents who received pureed diets were to receive a #6 scoop (2/3 cup) of noodles, a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of pureed vegetable blend, a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of pureed meat sauce and a #16 scoop of pureed bread. 2. On 08/29 /23 at 01:17 PM, the following observations were made during the noon meal service. a. Dietary Employee (DE) #3 used #16 scoop (1/4 cup) to serve a single portion of noodles to the residents on pureed diets, instead of a #6 scoop (2/3 cup) of pureed spaghetti. b. DE #3 used a #12 scoop (1/3 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed vegetable blend, instead of a #8 scoop (1/2 cup). c. DE #3 used #12 scoop (1/3 cup)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 7 residents who received pureed diets and 2 residents who received pureed meat only, as documented on the list Dietary Supervisor provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 08/29/2023 The findings are: 1. 08/28/23 at 12:12 PM Dietary Employee (DE) #3 used 4 oz spoon to place 9 servings of meat sauce into a blender and pureed. At 12:15 PM DE #3 poured the pureed meat sauce into a pan and placed it on the steam table. The consistency of the pureed meat sauce was gritty and was not smooth. There were pieces of meat visible in the mixture. 2. 08/28/23 12:19 PM DE #3 used a tong to place 9 servings of noodles into a blender and pureed. At 12:24 PM DE #3 placed the pureed noodles on the steam table. The consistency of the pureed noodles was thick. 3. On 08/28/2023 at 01:17 PM The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination in the facility laundry processing area. This failed practice had the potential to affect 84 residents who have their laundry done in the facility based on a list provided by the Nurse Consultant #1 on 9/1/23 at 07:54 AM. The findings are: During an interview on 8/31/23 at 1:47 PM with the Laundry Aide who stated after loading the contaminated laundry in the washing machine, she removes the gown and hangs it over the edge of one of the laundry containers. Observed the Laundry Aide pick up the dirty gown and moved it to the sink. The Laundry Aide confirmed the staff washed hands in the sink and stated there is not a special container to place the contaminated gown, it would go in the trash. On 8/31/23 at 1:50 PM observed the following in the laundry room: a wet blanket on the floor in the dirty area soaked with water that had been leaking from the washing machine. Observed a drink sitting on the table in the clean side of the laundry room, and an open coffee cup with lipstick marks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the State agency that 1 (Resident #2) of 1 (Resident #2) sampled residents with unknown injuries were reported to the Office of Long-term Care immediately or within 2 hours. The findings include: Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 8/08/23/23 indicated that Resident #2 Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making was Severely Impaired. Review of a care plan initiated on 8/29/23 showed, the Resident was noted to have an injury to the eye and was unable to give details of incident. A witness statement dated 8/30/23 indicated that on Sunday 8/27/23 a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) informed the nurse that Resident #2 eye was black. An incident report dated 8/28/23 indicated that the Office of Long-Term Care was notified on 8/28/23 at approximately 9:45 AM. It stated, resident noted to have dark area under left eye, cause unknown. Resident takes daily aspirin. On 9/01/23 at 9:56 AM the surveyor asked the DON (Director of Nurses), When should injuries of unknown source…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments and whirlpool baths were being performed according to physician orders for 1 (Resident #45) of 5 sampled residents (R#45, R#49, R#65, R#66, R# 76). The findings include: During an interview on 8/28/23 at 11:45 AM Resident #45 said, the wound dressings are not getting changed on the weekend and the wound will sometimes leak. The resident stated he does not always get the ordered whirlpool baths three times a week. Review of the physician's orders for wound care are as follows: a. whirlpool bath to be given every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday on the day shift with a start date of 7/31/23. b. Mupirocin ointment to the wound bed one time a day with a start date of 8/24/23. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated August 2023, showed on Saturday August 26, 2023, the Mupirocin ointment was not applied to the wound bed. Review of the TAR dated August 2023 showed an order to cleanse the wound and provided orders for the dressing to be completed one time a day with a start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #4, #15, #72, and #75) sampled residents oxygen tubing was kept in a storage bag when not in use. The findings were: A physician order for resident #4 dated 1/27/22 showed an order for oxygen at 2 liters by nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. A care plan for resident #4, initiated 7/13/20 showed, change oxygen tubing weekly on Sunday night shift, date and initial tubing and bag. On 8/28/23 02:45 PM observed the oxygen concentrator had oxygen tubing attached dated 8/28/23. The tubing was not on the resident, and it was not in a storage bag. On 8/29/23 at 1:34 PM observed the oxygen tubing on the oxygen concentrator. It was not in a storage bag. On 9/01/23 at 9:41 AM the surveyor asked LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #3 Where should oxygen tubing be stored if it's not being used? She stated, In a plastic bag on the oxygen tank. On 9/01/23 at 9:56 AM the surveyor asked the DON (Director of Nurse), Where should oxygen tubing be stored if it's not being used? She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left in a resident's room for 1 resident (Resident #57) of 18 residents living in the 300 unit according to a list provided by the Social Services Manager on 08/28/2023 at 10:54 AM. The findings are: 1. On 8/28/23 at 1:03 PM observed a large, pink pill on the bedside table in resident #57 room. Resident #57 said, I couldn't swallow it, when asked where the pill came from. 2. On 8/28/23 at 1:10 PM the surveyor asked if Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 could identify the large pink pill on resident #57's bedside table and explain their process for giving medications. LPN #1 said, that is Depakote. I will go get him another one. During the interview LPN #1 said, our process is to give residents their pill and to make sure they swallow them. Anyone could walk in here and take that pill. We have a few wanderers in the 300 unit. They can all come out of their room. 3. On 08/31/2023 at 03:25 PM Nurse Consultant #3 said, We do not have a medication storage, or medication administration policy. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerated narcotic medications were stored in a permanently affixed compartment to prevent the potential of misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 1 medication room observed. The findings are: 1. On 8/28/23 at 8:27 AM observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 remove a small gray lock box from the refrigerator in the medication room. The locked narcotic box contained a lorazepam 2mg/ml (milligram per milliliter), 22ml multi- dose vial, and 3 Ativan 2 mg/ml vials. 2. On 8/28/23 at 8:29 AM during an interview LPN #1, confirmed the narcotic box was not permanently affixed in the refrigerator. 4. On 8/31/2023 at 4:01 PM during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the narcotic box should be permanently affixed.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure they had a current Clinical laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certification. This failed practice affected 84 residents according to an alphabetical list of residents provided by the Social Manager on [DATE] at 10:40 AM. The findings are: 1. Review of the CLIA certification in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] showed the certification expired on [DATE]. 2. On [DATE] at 10:12 AM the Nurse Consultant provided a receipt showing that she paid CLIA laboratory fees on [DATE] at 10:06 AM. During the interview the nurse consultant said, I just went online and paid the fee. We are supposed to have it for the facility. 3. On [DATE] at 4:01 PM during an interview the DON said, It is not acceptable for the CLIA certification to not be current. It is DON's responsibility to make sure that it is current.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were functioning. This failed practice affected 2 (Resident #57, and #68) of 18 residents living on the 300 unit according to a list provided by the Social Manager on 08/28/2023 at 10:54. The findings are: On 08/28/23 at 12:24 PM observed the light above the door in resident #68's room, and the wall did not come on when the call light was pushed. There was no response from the staff. On 8/28/2023 at 12:49 PM the surveyor pushed the call light button firmly, three times and observed the light outside resident #68's door, and the wall did not come on. There was no alarm, and no response from staff. On 8/29/2023 at 9:36 AM the call light clamped to resident #68's bed, and the light above the door, and at the wall did not come on when the call light buttons were firmly pressed for the A and B bed. No alarm was heard, and staff did not respond. On 8/28/2023 at 1:03 PM observed the call light outside resident #57's door, and at the wall did not come on when pressing the call light button. Staff did not respond.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINE TREE HOLDING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/05/2021 |
| MH AR OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| HERZKA, MATISYOHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| MCMILLAN, CYNTHIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/05/2021 |
| SCHEINBAUM, SHLOMO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/05/2021 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $426K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in AR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045446. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.