The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 96.6 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve three (Resident #56, #30, and #68) of three residents ordered fortified foods, reviewed for diet orders. The findings include: Resident #56 A review of Resident #56's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 06/28/2024, with diagnoses which included dementia. A review of Resident #56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/2025, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #56's Care Plan revised on 07/14/2025, revealed the resident had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to a history of dysphagia and poor by mouth intake. Resident #56's Care Plan also included interventions, which directed staff to provide and serve diet as ordered. A review of Resident #56's Diet Type Report revealed the resident had a diet order for fortified food with lunch. A review of Resident #56's Order Summary revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to assess for, obtain physician's order for, and care plan for self-administration of medications for 2 (Resident #41 and Resident #73) of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Medication, Self-Administration of Policy and Procedure, provided 08/15/2024 indicated, the purpose is to provide patient with right to self-administer medication when deemed safe and In order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. 2. Review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #73 on 08/31/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, age-related physical debility, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an unattended medication cart was not left unlocked and keys unattended. The findings include: On 08/15/24 at 9:35 AM, the Surveyor observed an unattended medication cart in the hallway on the secured unit unlocked with the keys in the lock. On 08/15/24 at 9:41 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 confirmed the unattended medication cart was unlocked with keys inside lock. LPN #9 stated anyone could have gotten anything, any of the drugs or narcotics, and a resident could get a medication that could harm or kill them. On 08/15/24 at 10:54 AM, the Administrator confirmed an unattended medication cart should not be unlocked with the keys in the lock. The Administrator stated there was access to the medications, the residents can take the medications, and/or harm themselves. On 08/15/24 at 12:22 PM, the Surveyor was informed there was not a policy on accidents and hazards.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Through observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food brought in for residents was properly labeled, food items received had both open and expiration dates, and food serving items were properly stored. The findings are as follows: 1. On 8/14/2024 at 5:46 AM, three drink pitchers were laying on their side with the opening not properly covered to prevent foreign substances from entering the pitchers used for resident's drinks. 2. On 8/14/2024 at 5:47 AM, four cups were laying on their side with the opening not properly stored to prevent foreign substances from entering the cups used for resident's drinks. 3.On 8/14/2024 at 5:51 AM, four food dome covers were sitting on the counter, by the serving window, with the inside facing the ceiling, not covered. 4. On 8/14/2024 at 5:57 AM, a container with pureed breadcrumbs was not completely sealed. 5. On 8/14/2024 at 7:29 AM, the nourishment room refrigerator contained the following items: a. one plastic bag that contained one open bottle of thousand island dressing, one open bag of yellow cheese squares, one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration, failed to ensure drinking cups did not become contaminated while preparing for medication administration, and failed to follow procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a feeding tube for 2 (Resident #92 and Resident #67) of 2 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control and hand hygiene; and failed to provide proper storage for oxygen tubing and updraft tubing and apparatus at bedside for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 reviewed for infection prevention and control measures. Findings include: A review of an undated facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure, supplied 08/14/2024, indicated the process and purpose was to cleanse the hands between resident direct contact and to prevent spread of infection. 1(e) before and after entering isolation precaution settings. 1(j) before and after handling peripheral vascular catheters and other invasive devices. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, These failed practices had the potential to affect 103 residents who received meals from the kitchen, (total census: 104 ) as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor #1 on 11/02/23 at The findings are: 1. On 11/01/23 10:26 AM Dietary Employee (DE) #1 opened the refrigerator door, removed a bag of shredded cheese, and placed it on the food preparation counter. At 10:27 AM DE #1 removed gloves from the glove box and held it while he picked up the empty glove box and threw it into the trash. Without washing his hands, he placed gloves on his hands, contaminated the gloves, he then used the same contaminated gloved hand to remove shredded cheese from the bag and sprinkled them on top of macaroni with kidney beans and meat sauce. He placed the pan in the oven to be baked and served it to the residents for lunch meal. 2. On 11/01/23 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who reside on the secure unit were fed in a manner that provided dignity to each resident. This included standing over residents while feeding and calling residents honey, sweetie, mama, baby and granny. This failed practice had the ability to affect 24 residents residing on the secured unit as documented on the resident list by hall that was provided by the Administrator on 10/30/23. a. On 10/31/23 at 12:27 PM Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was observed standing over residents feeding them. CNA #1 walked to the opposite end of the table and stood over the resident assisting them with feeding. CNA#1 was calling resident's honey, swettie, mama, and sugar. b. On 10/31/23 12:31 PM CNA #1 was observed leaving that end of the table and went to another resident to assist her with feeding standing over her the entire time. c. On 11/01/23 at 12:26 PM CNA#1 was observed in dining room at the end of the table standing in between two residents assisting them both with feeding. d. On 11/01/18 at 12:34 PM CNA #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an individual financial record statement quarterly for 1 (Resident #18) of 82 residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 82 residents that had resident trusts managed by the facility. The findings are: 1. On 10/31/23 at 3:47 PM, the Surveyor asked the Business Office Manager (BOM) how often statements are provided. The BOM stated, Quarterly. The Surveyor asked how they were issued. The BOM stated, Through the mail. We do have some that we hand out here. 2. On 10/31/23 at 3:47 PM, the Surveyor asked the BOM for documentation that a statement was provided to R#18. The BOM stated, I do not have documentation. I mailed [R#18's] out to [the resident's] daughter per daughter's request. The Surveyor asked BOM to look in the computer to see if daughter was Resident #18 financial POA. BOM stated, no [the daughter] is not, [the daughter] is only POA for [R#18's] care not for finances. The Surveyor asked so should you have sent his quarterly statement to [the resident's] daughter. BOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F569 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid recipient residents and/or their responsible parties were notified when their resident trust balance was within $200 of the maximum Medicaid recipient cash assets for 1 (Resident #18,) of 82 residents who were dependent on Medicaid for services and had trust funds managed by the facility. The findings are: 1. On 10/31/23 at 11:48 AM, The surveyor asked for October Trust account balances, and Business Office Manager (BOM) told surveyor they had not closed out the month of October yet. Surveyor then asked for the most recent month of statements she had closed out. BOM then provided surveyor with the month of September account balances. 2. On 10/31/23 at 12:25 PM, the Surveyor asked BOM manager to provide a letter for R #18 who had a balance of $3267.42. BOM provided copy of the letter that she stated she had given to Resident #18. The Surveyor went to resident #18 room to discuss the letter and the amount he had in his trust fund. Resident #18 informed the surveyor that he had never received a letter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure state survey results, and contact information for the ombudsman, and the Office of Long-Term Care [OLTC] was readily available for residents, family members, and staff in the locked unit. This failed practice affected 1 resident (R#2) of 4 sampled residents (R#2, R#74, R#90, R#100) and had the potential to affect 24 residents residing in the locked unit. The findings are: a. Resident #2 with a diagnosis of EPILEPSY, UNSPECIFIED, NOT INTRACTABLE, WITHOUT STATUS EPILEPTICUS, BRIEF PSYCHOTIC DISORDER, and ANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED. The Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an assessment reference date [ARD]s of 09/11/2023, and a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIM]s of 7 (0-7 means severely impaired cognition). b. On 11/01/2023 at 10:40 AM, Resident #2 asked Surveyors for the contact information of the OLTC. The Surveyors looked around the locked unit and were unable to find contact information for the OLTC, and ombudsman. c. On 11/01/2023 at 10:50 AM, the surveyors left the unit and asked the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR