The Blossoms At Oakdale Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 101.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was dated properly, food was sealed properly, drip pans under the stove top were cleaned, and that cross contamination did not occur during 2 of 2 observations in the kitchen. The findings are: On 01/13/2025 at 10:22 am, in the dry storage area a large, opened bag of elbow pasta was not sealed, Dietary Manager confirmed this finding and stated that it is approximately eight pounds of pasta. On 01/13/2025 at 10:26 am, a fifteen-pound box of dinner rolls was not sealed, left opened in the walk-in freezer. The Dietary Manager confirmed the findings. On 01/13/2025 at 10:30 am, a gallon pitcher of reconstituted milk was in the double door fridge with no date. The Dietary Manger verified it was not dated. On 01/13/2025 at 10:32 am, in a two-door cooler, a five-pound bag of shredded mozzarella cheese was observed with no receive date or open date. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the dates are missing and roughly a pound left in the bag. On 01/13/2025 at 10:36 am Dietary Manager pulled out drip…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's Advance Directive was signed by resident or resident's power of attorney regarding the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #49) of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives/ The findings are: Resident #49 ' s Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of [DATE], identified the resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 , a score of 8-12 indicating the resident has moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #49 ' s Care Plan identified the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 9 indicting moderate cognitive impairment on [DATE]. Resident #49 medical diagnoses, as identified on the resident's Order Summary Report , included type 2 diabetes mellitus; hypertension; depression; chronic kidney disease; abdominal pain. On [DATE], at 02:16 PM, a review of Resident #49 ' s Physician Order dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for one out of one resident (Resident #69) and ensuring residents face and nails were cleaned before or after meals for one out of one resident (Resident #76). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/22/2024, revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #69's Care Plan, revised on 11/12/2024, revealed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia left side, strokes, and contractures of his left hand. Intervention initiated 12/06/2023 included assistance by one staff member with personal hygiene. On 1/14/2025 at 1:12 PM, Resident #69's nails were long with a black substance underneath. On 1/14/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled (Resident 47) resident was transferred from the chair to bed appropriately with a lift belt to prevent injury. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled (Resident 62) the resident' environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled (Resident 2) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident 47's Care Plan revealed diagnoses of dementia, depressive disorders, and anxiety. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/17/2024 and Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) suggest long and short-term memory problems. Section GG 0170 shows resident requires moderate assistance transferring from the chair/bed-to-chair. Review of Resident 47's Care Plan revealed Resident 47 has a self-care deficit related to dementia and requires 1 person assistance. On 01/14/2025 at 02:18 PM, the surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program was implemented to prevent the potential spread of Clostridium Difficile (C. diff). for 1 resident (Resident #66) of 1 resident reviewed for isolation precautions, and the facility failed to ensure a gown was worn for 1 (Resident #39) of 1 resident that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The findings are: Upon review of the admission Record, Resident #66 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of cellulitis of left lower limb. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/16/2024 revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (13-15 suggest cognitively intact). On 01/13/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #66 in bed with multiple wounds to their lower extremities. Per review of Resident #66 ' s physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge/transfer information was sent in a timely manner to the Office of the Ombudsman, affecting 1 (Resident 28) of 1 resident sampled for transfers and discharge, and any resident discharged or transferred since the system change. Findings include: A review of the Medical Diagnosis portion of the electronic health record revealed Resident 28 had diagnoses of respiratory failure, heart attack, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 10/15/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (13-15 indicates the resident was cognitively intact). On 01/16/2025 at 09:45 AM, the Administrator was asked for a list of discharge/transfers that were sent to the Ombudsman since October 2024 showing Resident 28's hospitalization on October 6, 2024, and he stated that he will be honest it got behind, and [MDS] is doing them and had to catch them up. On 01/16/2025 at 10:35 AM, the Administrator confirmed he does…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident or their representative received a written notice of the bed hold policy in a language they can understand for 1 of 1 sampled (Resident 28) resident. Findings include: A review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident 28 had diagnoses of respiratory failure, heart attack, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 10/15/2024 revealed Resident 28 received a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). On 01/16/2025 08:33 AM, the Administrator was asked for bed holds for Resident 28 for April and October of 2024. The Administrator revealed that they did not have a business office manager during that time, and he would be reaching out to the person that was doing bed holds to see if Resident 28 had one. On 01/16/2025 at 09:00 AM, Resident 28 was asked if she received a bed hold policy, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the state designated authority was informed when 1 (Resident #39) of 2 (Resident #39 and #41) sampled residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) received a new diagnosis that required evaluation. The findings included: A review of Resident #39's Medical Diagnoses indicated that Resident #39 was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, unspecified on 9/01/2023. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/19/2024, revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 1/16/2025 at 10:22 AM, the state designated authority indicated the last Level 1 application for PASARR for Resident #39 was on 12/20/2021. When contacted by phone, the state designated authority indicated that they were not informed that Resident #39 was a resident at this facility, and they were not aware of his bipolar diagnosis. On 1/16/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed for a dose reduction for 1 (Resident #43) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings are: The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/25/2024, revealed Resident #43 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #43's Care Plan, initiated on 6/07/2024, indicated staff were to administer antidepressant medications as ordered by the physician. A review of an Order Summary Report, revealed Aripiprazole, a medication that is used for depression, was ordered on 4/29/2024 at a dose of 15 milligrams. A review of a form titled Pharmacy MRR (Medication Regimen Review), indicated that the pharmacist made a recommendation to reduce the resident ' s dose of Aripiprazole to 10 milligrams daily on 9/03/2024. The physician agreed with the pharmacist's recommendation on 9/04/2024. The Director of Nursing (DON) or designated nurse did not reduce the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a functional call light, and that call light was kept in reach to prevent accidents and injuries for 1 (Resident 25) of 1 resident sampled for resident communication availability and functionality. A review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident 25 with a diagnoses of dementia, stroke, and heart failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/2024 suggest a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (00-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). Section GG0120 reveals resident uses a walker, and section GG0170 indicates Resident 25 can walk 50 feet with supervision. Findings include: On 01/13/2025 at 11:21 AM, Resident 25 was observed resting in A bed without a call light in reach. There is only one call light, and it is on the unoccupied B bed. The surveyor pulled the bathroom emergency cord and the light did not come on above the outside door. Resident 25 asked what would you do if you needed to call for help, and Resident 25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR