The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect one (Resident #85) of two residents from physical abuse during a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident #85 and Resident #86 after the secured unit was left unsupervised by LPN #2 and CNA #5, staff who were assigned to the secured unit. The findings include: Resident #85 Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #85 on 03/28/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, falls, panic disorders, heart conditions, anxiety, a pacemaker, a defibrillator, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, mild cognitive impairment, and insomnia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/30/2025, revealed Resident #85 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #85 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as determined necessary by the comprehensive care plan, during a mechanical lift transfer of 1 (Resident #1), which resulted in a fall with the resident sent to the emergency room for evaluation of complaint of pain to touch of right hip. This failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who require a mechanical lift for transfers. The findings are: Review of Resident #1's comprehensive plan of care dated [DATE], showed the resident was a potential risk for falls, had contractures to bilateral hips and legs, was non ambulatory, and required a mechanical lift x 2 staff for all transfers with a bariatric lift #13 pad. Review of Resident #1 ' s nurses note dated [DATE] at 7:29 AM, showed the nurse was called into Resident #1's room by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who reported the resident fell and landed on the floor during a mechanical lift transfer. During post fall assessment, the resident complained of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent the potential for cross contamination when providing direct, high contact care to a resident that had a feeding tube for one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for infection control. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #34 on 06/24/2025, with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement, balance and posture); lennox-gastaut syndrome (severe form of seizures), and dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort when swallowing). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/26/2026, revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #34 had a feeding tube while a resident. Review of Resident #34's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated and before handling food and clean equipment when contaminated; food items stored in the refrigerator, freezer and dry storage area were covered or sealed. expired food items and spices were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; 1 of 1 ice machine and 1 of 1 scoop holder were maintained in a sanitary condition for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 11/4/24 at 9:57 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 pulled her hair net down. Without washing her hands, DA #1 picked up clean plates and stacked them on the cart with her fingers inside of them. 2. On 11/4/24 at 9:59 AM, the ice machine in the kitchen had wet mixture of colors on the panel where ice touched before dropping into the ice collector. The Surveyor asked Dietary Manager if she could wipe the area in the ice machine that had wet mixture of colors on it. She did, and residue easily transferred to the tissue, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determine the facility failed to ensure written information regarding the right to formulate an advanced directive was provided to residents or their responsible parties, to enable them to make informed decisions regarding which measures would be provided or withheld at end of life for 02 (Resident #62, #2) of 2 sample mix residents reviewed for Advance Directive. The findings are: Review of Resident #62's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of August 12, 2024, noted a score of 6 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and noted a diagnosis of paralysis (quadriplegia), traumatic brain injury, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of Resident #62's electronic medical record contained a Physician Ordered Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form with advance directive selected that indicates it is available to review and signed on 5/9/24. No advance directive was located. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 2 (Resident #54, #72) of 2 sample mix residents reviewed for care plan. The Findings are: 1. During an interview with Resident #54 on 11/04/24 at 11:54 AM, the resident said I fell here in my room trying to use the urinal. My chair went out from under me, hit my head on the wall and ended up on my left side. My ribs are still sore. I got sent for x-rays. I've fallen twice and didn't have my brakes locked. Review of Resident #54's Care Plan with an initiated date of 2/5/2024 did not note an intervention for the residents fall on 9/27/2024. Review of Resident #54's Progress Notes dated 9/27/2024 at 1:35 PM, noted Resident #54 fell out wheelchair onto the floor and complained of head and left rib pain. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called. Review of Resident #54's Progress Notes dated 9/27/2024 at 1:46 PM, noted Resident #54 had a transfer/…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure female residents had hair removed from their face for 1 (Resident #46) of 1 sample mix resident to promote good hygiene; ensure residents clothing was changed when stained or dirty for 2 (Resident #24, #52) of 2 sample mix residents to promote good hygiene; to ensure residents fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for 3 (Resident #2, #179, #52) of 3 sample mix residents to promote good hygiene. The findings are: 3. On 11/4/24 at 11:30 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #2's fingernails untrimmed with a brown/ black substance underneath the nails. Review of Resident #2's admission Record with an admission date of 3/21/2016 revealed the resident has a need for assistance with personal care, Rheumatoid Polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many nerves throughout the body) with Rheumatoid Arthritis, and lack of coordination. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan with an initiated date of 7/6/2023 noted check the resident's fingernail…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clean linen carts were properly covered and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), were implemented for 1 (Resident #279) of 1 sampled resident to prevent potential infection and/or the spread of infections. The findings are: During observation on 11/4/2024 at 10:18 AM, the clean linen carts had the front flap completely open on halls 100, 200, 300. 400, and 500. During observation on 11/5/2024 at 4:32 AM, the clean linen carts had the front flap completely open on halls 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500. 11/7/2024 at 3:24 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the clean linen carts should be covered because it is clean linen. Review of a facility policy provided by the (DON) titled Policy and Procedures with subject being Enhanced Barrier Precautions had a revised date of 03/12/2024, indicated that residents with indwelling medical devices such as a central line, catheter or feeding tube should be placed on EBP to prevent the spread of infections. The policy indicated staff should wear correct…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were dressed appropriately for the day for 1 (Resident #179) of 1 sample mix residents. The findings are: On 11/4/2024 at 11:01 AM, Surveyor observed Resident #179 lying in bed in a hospital gown. Review of Resident #179's admission Record with an admission date of 10/18/2024 revealed the resident has a need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #179's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/22/2024 noted a score of 10 (8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a diagnosis of symptoms and signs involving the Musculoskeletal system, and revealed the resident requires partial assistance with dressing upper body and dependent for dressing the lower body. Review of Resident #179's Care plan with an initiated date of 10/25/2024 noted the resident requires partial assist to dress upper and lower body. On 11/5/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for wound care treatment for 1(Resident #24) of 1 sample mix residents reviewed for pressure ulcer that was acquired within the facility. Findings include: A review of an admission Record noted Resident #24 was admitted to facility on 4/12/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (Disease that destroys memory and mental functions). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/14/2024, revealed Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicates the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. Section M subsection M0300 part F revealed that there was one (1) unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of Resident 24's Care Plan, with an initiated date of 7/19/2024, revealed Resident #24 has an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx (small triangular bone at lower back); unstable pressure injury coccyx with interventions that include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to ensure that nutritionally balanced meals were provided for the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are. 1. On 11/04//2024, the menu for noon meal documented residents on pureed diets were to receive ¾ cup of pureed spaghetti. a. On 11/04/24 at 11:34 AM, DC #2 used a 4-ounce ladle spoon (1/2 cup) to place 4 servings of spaghetti with meat sauce into a blender and pureed, instead of ¾ cup. At 11:35 AM, DC #2 poured the pureed spaghetti into a pan, covered it with foil and placed it in the oven. 2. On 11/04/24 at 12:20 PM, DC #2 used a #10 scoop (1/3 cup) to serve a single portion of pureed spaghetti with meat sauce to the residents who required pureed diets, instead of ¾ cup. 3. On 11/04/24 at 12:50 PM, DC #2 when asked during an interview what spoon size she had used when portioning spaghetti with meat sauce into a blender to be pureed. DC #2 stated she used 4-ounce ladle spoon when putting it into a blender to puree and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 11/04/24 at 11:34 AM, during the noon meal preparation. The DC #2 used a 4-ounce ladle spoon to place 4 servings of spaghetti with meat sauce into a blender and pureed. At 11:35 AM, DC #2 poured the pureed spaghetti into a pan, covered it with foil and placed in the oven. The consistency was chunky and was not smooth. There were chunks of noodle visible in the mixture. 2. On 11/04/24 at 12:20 PM, the following observations were made during the noon meal service in the kitchen. a. The residents on the pureed diets were served pureed spaghetti. The consistency was lumpy and was not smooth. There were pieces of noodles in the mixture. b. Pureed bread consistency was runny. c. At 12:47 PM, DA #1 confirmed the consistency of the pureed bread was runny because she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,823 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-05-07
• $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-09-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $481K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR