No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Blossoms At Van Buren Rehab And Nursing Center

2010 Main Street, Van Buren, AR 72956 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 129 certified beds · (479) 474-6885 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (479) 474-6885 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 48 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2020 Chestnut St · (479) 471-4587 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1609 Main St · (479) 474-1193 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2519 Alma Hwy · (479) 471-3030 · Call to confirm hours
Park
833 Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%1.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.5%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.2%13.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.7%10.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.2%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.4%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%24.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.9%12.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.432.011.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.982.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.7%CMS range 37.6–68.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.5–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay6.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 5.4–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
63.3%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 104.5 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-02)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored unlocked at the residents ' bedside, and failed to ensure medication treatment carts were locked to three (Resident #37, Resident #71, Resident #72) of 11 sampled residents, to prevent accidents and injuries. The findings include: 1. A review of a policy titled Medication Administration, revised 11/25/2022, revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) directs and supervises staff that administer medications, and they were to be done in a safe, timely manner. Medication carts were to be closed and locked, when out of sight of the medication nurse. Topical medications were to be documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), when used. Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Item 1. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administrate and document the administration of medications may do so. Item 21. Topical medications used in treatments must be recorded on the resident's treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed while assisting with wound care, to prevent the risk for infection for one (Resident #71) of three sampled residents observed for wound care. The facility also failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed during flushing of a feeding tube, for one of one observation for one (Resident #4) of one sampled resident observed for feeding tube care, to prevent infections and cross contamination. The findings include: 1. A review of Diagnosis Report for Resident #71 revealed diagnoses which included frostbite with necrosis, gangrene, and vascular disease. a. A review of Resident #71 ' s Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/04/2025, suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Section M0300, of the MDS, revealed Resident #71 had four Stage IV pressure ulcers and had one Stage IV pressure ulcer on admission. b. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge was coded to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a timely manner for one (Resident #65) of one sampled resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments to accurately capture a residents health status at the time of discharge. The findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #65 had diagnoses that included vertebra and humerus fracture and malnutrition. Review of Progress Note dated 12/02/2024 at 3:10 PM, revealed Resident #65 was transported from the facility to [Local Hospital] via ambulance. Review of the Discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/02/2024, revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) of short-term memory problems, and moderate cognitive skills for daily living. Section A2000 indicated a discharge date of 12/02/2024 to a short-term general hospital. Section Z revealed completion date: signed 04/30/2025 and RN Assessment Coordinator signed assessment as complete: 04/30/2025. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the State Designated Agency was notified that one (Resident #6) of two residents, reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), had been admitted to the facility. The findings are: A review of Resident #6's Diagnosis Record revealed a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, with an onset date of 04/12/2025. There was no PASSAR noted in the electronic record. During a phone interview on 04/30/2025 at 9:59 AM, an employee at the State Designated Agency indicated Resident #6 had a level II PASARR in 2022. She indicated that Resident #6 had a review at a local facility in 09/2024. The State Designated Agency indicated the review was still open, because they had never been notified that Resident #6 had been admitted into any facility. The State Designated Agency indicated, Resident #6's new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type that was diagnosed on [DATE], would not make the Preadmission Screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left in resident rooms unattended for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #6) of 2 residents and failed to ensure medication was not left on the floor of a resident's room for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 resident family interviewed for unattended medications. Findings include: 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the tongue, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/27/2024 revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 which indicated the resident required moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #3 required supervision to moderate assistance with activities of daily living. A review of Resident #3's Care Plan, initiated on 10/13/2023, revealed the resident had a history of malignant neoplasm of the tongue, was dependent on staff for activities related to cognition deficit, had short- and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was concealed in a privacy bag when visible to promote dignity and privacy for 1 (Resident #31) of 3 (Residents #1, #31, and #428) sampled residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings are: Resident #31's diagnoses showed neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and vascular dementia. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/27/24 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 04 (0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment) and had an indwelling catheter. The care plan showed position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Place in privacy bag when up in wheelchair or geriatric chair. The Physician's Order Summary showed, active 7/14/23, Resident #31 was to have an indwelling urinary catheter for neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. On 02/12/24 at 01:34 PM, observed Resident #31's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag with no cover and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 2 (Residents #11, and #128) of 15 (Residents #1, #10, #11, #16, #20, #23, #26, #29, Resident #31, #42, #53, #65, #278, #428, and #429) sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #128 had diagnoses of Need for assistance with personal care, Unspecified lack of coordination, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Muscle weakness (generalized), Spinal stenosis, cervical region, and Dehydration. A Care Plan initiated on 2/12/24 documented, .Access ability to use call light and bed controls on regular basis . Ensure that the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance . Need a safe environment with . a working and reachable call light . Ensure call light within easy reach . On 02/13/24 at 08:24 AM, Resident #128 was in bed. His call light was on the floor and not within reach. On 02/13/24 at 09:40 AM, Resident #128 was in bed. His call light was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #278) of 1 sampled resident was taken to a scheduled appointment. The findings are: 1. On 2/12/24 at 1:13 pm, Resident #278 informed the Surveyor that an orthopedic follow up appointment was missed earlier that day. Resident #278 said the facility had rescheduled it for Wednesday 2/14/24 at 8:00 am. 2. On 2/13/24 at 09:12 am, the Surveyor asked the Social Worker, who was responsible for getting residents to their scheduled appointments? The Social Worker confirmed the van driver was. The Van Driver schedules all of the appointments. 3. On 2/13/24 at 9:21 am, the Surveyor asked the Van Driver, who was responsible for resident appointments? The Van Driver confirmed I am. The Surveyor asked, do you schedule all the appointments? The Van Driver confirmed, yes, I do. The Surveyor asked, can you explain why Resident #278 missed her follow up orthopedic appointment? The Van Driver confirmed, the appointment wasn't given to me until mid-morning on Monday after (Resident #278) had already missed it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the 2023 survey results were located in the State Inspection Book made accessible to residents and family members. The findings are: On 2/14/24 at 10:35 AM, the Resident Council was asked if they were familiar with the State Inspections Book and where it was located in the facility if they wanted to read it. All 3 Residents (Resident #2, #48, and #60) that were in the meeting stated that they were not aware of the State Inspections Book, or where it was located. On 2/14/24 at 11:10 AM, a binder titled, State survey book, was located on the bottom shelf of a table by the entrance door. The 2023 survey results were not in the binder. On 2/14/24 at 11:15 AM, the Administrator was asked where the 2023 survey results were located. The Administrator looked in the state survey binder then stated, They were in here when I started last year in December. I remember because they got 16 tags. On 2/1/24 at 1:47 PM, a policy titled, Resident Rights, was received from Nurse Consultant #2. It documented, .Federal and state laws…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for Rooms #103B and #108, and the floor in front of the 300 hall shower. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 out of 31 residents that reside on 100 hall and 15 residents that reside on 300 hall and walk past the shower room. The findings are: 1. On 2/12/24 at 11:56 AM, food particles and a white pill were on the floor behind bed 103B. On 2/12/24 at 1:13 PM, brown spots were on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 2/12/24 at 2:35 PM, food particles and a white pill were on the floor behind bed 103B. On 2/12/24 at 2:41 PM, brown spots were on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 2/14/24 at 3:25 PM, brown spots were on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER], and trash was on the floor. On 2/14/24 at 3:44 PM, the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) was asked to identify the substance on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The HS looked at the wall, and stated, [The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]] dips and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing services were regularly provided to maintain good hygiene for 4 (Residents #28, #69, #128, and #331) sampled residents who were dependent on staff for bathing/showers, and nail care was provided for 1 (Resident #20), and oral care was provided for 1 (Resident #28) to promote good personal hygiene and grooming. The findings are: 1. An Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted Resident #128 was admitted on [DATE]. On 2/12/24 at 1:23 PM, Resident #128's fingernails were long and jagged. There was a black substance under the nails. The Surveyor asked when was the last time the staff had trimmed and cleaned the fingernails. Resident #128 stated, They haven't been cleaned since I've been here. I've been here almost a week. The Surveyor asked, When was the last time you had a shower? Resident #128 stated, I haven't had one since I've been here. On 2/12/24 at 2:55 PM, Resident #128's fingernails were long and jagged. There was a black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete the required quarterly assessments for 2 (Residents # 6, and #278) of 2 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses of Heart failure, Gout; unspecified, and Vascular dementia. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/22/2024 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] of 11 (8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment), weight 209, weight loss: No/Unknown. a. On 02/12/24 at 01:54 PM, Resident #6 reported not caring for the food, it was often cold when served and alternatives were not offered. Resident #6 confirmed that an alternate meal is never offered. b. A Physician's Order for Resident #6 documented .No Added Salt diet, Regular texture, Thin Liquids consistency . c. A care plan for Resident #6 documented .Has a diagnosis of gout and is medicated and is at risk for the problems relate to this .Avoid food high in purine, such as: red meats, gravy, broth, poultry,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the water temperature was maintained at a safe level to prevent burns on the 200 Hall, and failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for 1 (Resident #278) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. On 02/12/2024 at 01:13 PM, a resident reported that the water was scalding hot on the unit on which the resident resided, the 200 Hall. The Surveyor turned the hot water on in the resident's bathroom and was only able to tolerate touching the water momentarily. On 02/13/2024 at 01:16 PM, the Surveyor requested the Maintenance Supervisor test the water temperature on the 200 Hall using the facility's test equipment. The Maintenance Supervisor reported the water temperature was 125 degrees Fahrenheit. The Surveyor asked the Maintenance Supervisor which water heaters were supplying hot water to the 200 Hall and was shown a Maintenance Room at the end of the hallway containing two water heaters. The Surveyor asked if the restrooms that were open to the residents on the 200 Unit received water from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the head of the bed was elevated appropriately to decrease the potential of aspiration for 1 (Resident #53) of 1 sampled resident who required a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube passed into the stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate). The findings are: Resident #53 had diagnoses of Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Gastrostomy malfunction, and Gastrostomy. The Order Summary with an order date of 11/09/2023, showed the resident's diet was nothing by mouth; Enteral Feeding Order (Nutritional Supplement) at 60 milliliter per hour with a 30 milliliter water flush every hour. No order was found for positioning the head of the bed. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 12/11/2023, showed the resident required tube feedings for nutrition and hydration. The resident needs the head of bed (HOB) elevated 45 degrees during tube feedings. On 02/12/24 at 11:18 AM, Resident #53 was lying in bed and the head of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #428) of 10 sampled residents who had a physician's orders for oxygen; the facility failed to ensure a (portable ventilator) filter and tubing was changed weekly and dated for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 sampled resident who required the use of a (portable ventilator); the facility failed to ensure a tracheostomy collar was changed for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 sampled resident who required the use of a ventilator. The findings are: Resident # 23 diagnoses included Muscular dystrophy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/23 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). The MDS indicated the resident is dependent for all activities of daily living. The Physician's Order with an active date of 10/16/22, documented .change filter to the [portable ventilator] on day shift every Saturday; Clean the [portable ventilator], change the filter and tubing, date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week. The findings are: 1. Review of staffing for 8 consecutive hour work shifts showed the following: a. On 01/14/24 and 01/20/24, there was no documentation that an RN was on duty. b. On 01/21/24, there was no documentation that an RN was on duty. c. On 02/16/24 at 11:16 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked, have you had any RN shortages where there is not an RN here? The DON said, no, a weekend supervisor has been hired and I have been working weekends.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) were performed for 2 (Residents #10 and #28) of 5 (Residents #10, #26, #28, #65, and #128) sampled residents who were selected for unnecessary medication review. The findings are: 1. Resident (R) #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Surveyor was unable to locate MRRs for R #10 in the resident's electronic health record. On 02/14/2024 at 02:00 PM, Nurse Consultant #1 provided documentation related to MRR's for R #10. R #10 did not have an MRR performed for the months of October, November, and December. Nurse Consultant #1 reported that R #1 had been hospitalized on two occasions, preventing an MRR from being performed. On 02/15/2024 at 02:45 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed an MRR should be performed monthly for each resident to improve resident outcomes. On 02/15/2024 at 02:55 PM, the Administrator confirmed MRR's were to be performed on a monthly basis. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI) Committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to prevent repeated deficiencies for (561) Self Determination (677) failed to ensure bathing services, nail care and oral care were provided for residents dependent on staff, (684) Quality of Care (695) Physician Order (PO) was followed for Use of Oxygen (O2), (727) failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN), worked 8 consecutive hours a day seven days a week, (847) Arbitration Agreement was explained to resident/representative. These failed practices had the potential to affect 79 residents. The findings are: 1. A Recertification survey was conducted on 02/16/24 at the facility. During this survey, F561 was cited for failure to ensure a resident got to a scheduled appointment. A review of the facility' s Plan of Correction, with a correction date of 01/27/23 indicated: a. Based on interview and record review 1/23/2023 to 1/25/2023, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff washed their hands in between residents when administering medication for 1 (Resident #53) sampled resident, failed to ensure an uncapped feeding tip was not connected to the percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) for 1 (Resident #53) sampled resident, and failed to ensure that dirty linen did not touch employee clothing. The findings are: 1. On 2/14/24 at 08:02 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3), went into Resident (R) #22's room to obtain vitals then returned to the medication cart without sanitizing hands before preparing medications for R #53. 2. On 2/14/24 at 08:28 AM, LPN#3 administered medication to R #53 then removed the tube feeding line hanging from the pole which was uncapped and connected to the PEG. 3. On 2/14/24 at 08:45 AM, LPN#3 was asked, What should you do after coming out of one resident room before going into another resident room to give medications? LPN#3 stated, Wash my hands. LPN #3 was asked,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment on the 100 Hall. This potential failed practice had the potential to affect 7 (Residents # 6, #8, 17, #51, #55, 72, and #284) sampled residents who could independently locomote. The findings are: On 02/13/24 at 02:18 PM, the 100 Hall shower room door was left half-way open with a black mesh basket hanging on the inside of the door and keys left in the doorknob for 5 minutes with staff walking around the open door and not shutting it. On 02/13/24 at 02:23 PM, the black mesh bag contained the following items four 4-ounce bottles of aftershave with aloe vera, one 4-ounce bottle of baby oil, three 1.5-ounce bottles of anti-perspirant, two 4-ounce bottles of moisturizing lotion, and 3 disposable razors. All bottles showed caution external use only, avoid contact with eyes, keep out of reach of children. The anti-perspirant label documented instructions to contact poison control if accidentally swallowed. On 02/13/24 at 02:31 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 was asked, Should the shower door be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative about change of services. This failed practice had the potential to affect 1 (Resident #53) of 1 sampled resident who are receiving therapy and have a power of attorney (POA). The findings are: Resident #53 had diagnoses of Muscle weakness and Lack of coordination. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/2/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). The Physician order summary for Resident #53 documented an order for Occupational Therapy to treat five times a week for four weeks, active 2/1/24, Physical Therapy to treat five times a week for four weeks, active 1/31/24, Speech Therapy to treat three times a week for eight weeks, active 2/2/24. On 2/13/24 at 9:14 AM, the resident's POA voiced frustration about resident not being placed on therapy. On 2/14/23 at 2:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 was asked, Who notifies families of new orders and changes of condition? LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice for 1 (resident #53) of 6 sampled residents who were sent to the hospital in the last month. The findings are: Resident #53 had diagnoses of Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, Gastro-Intestinal bleed, and Gastrostomy malfunction. The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/2/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (0 to 7 points indicates severe cognitive impairment). On 2/13/24 at 3:00 PM, a written Bed Hold notice required to be sent to the family was not found in the resident's chart. On 2/13/24 at 4:00 PM, a written Bed Hold notice that was required to be sent to the family for the hospitalization dated 1/21/24 through 1/27/24 was requested. On 2/13/24 at 4:21PM, Nurse Consultant #1 confirmed the facility did not have the written Bed Hold notice for Resident #53.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Sets were performed for 1 (Resident #55) of 25 sampled residents. The findings are: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/11/2023 documented that Resident (R) #55 was taking an anticoagulant. The Surveyor was unable to locate a physician's order for R#55 that included an anticoagulant. On 02/14/2024 at 03:12 PM, the MDS Coordinator was asked if R#55 had been ordered an anticoagulant, and if the MDS for the resident had been coded to include an anticoagulant. The MDS Coordinator stated, Yeah, [R#55] is getting an antiplatelet. I believe the anticoagulant may have been selected by mistake. Both are selected. I'll fix that now. On 02/15/2024 at 02:45 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the importance of accurate assessments to resident care. On 02/15/2024 at 02:55 PM, the Administrator acknowledged that the MDS assessment for R#55 was performed inaccurately. On 02/16/2024 at 08:58 AM, Nurse Consultant 2 reported the facility followed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to form a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 (Resident #67) of 25 sampled residents. The findings are: An admission Summary Progress Note for Resident (R) #67 dated 9/26/2023 at 09:46 PM documented, .Resident admitted 1450 [2:50 PM] 9/26/2023 . The Care Plan for R#67 was initiated 09/29/2023. No baseline care plan was found in the chart of R#67. On 02/14/2024 at 02:15 PM, the MDS Coordinator was asked if they were able to locate a baseline care plan for R#67. The MDS Coordinator stated, No, doesn't look like we have anything for them. They must have missed that one. On 02/15/2024 at 02:45 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that no baseline care plan had been completed for R#67, and that it was required for a resident to have a care plan in place within 48 hours of admission. On 02/15/2024 at 02:55 PM, the Administrator confirmed that a baseline care plan should have been implemented for R#67 within 48 hours of admission. On 02/16/2024 at 08:54 AM, Nurse Consultant 2 reported the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #128) of 17 sampled residents who depended on staff for bed mobility was repositioned in bed. The findings are: Resident #128 had diagnoses of Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region, Need for assistance with personal care, Unspecified lack of coordination, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Muscle weakness (generalized), and Unspecified spinal stenosis, cervical region. A care plan initiated 2/12/24 documented, .I require extensive assist x2 staff with bed mobility .Please turn and reposition me [every] 2 hours and [as needed] . On 2/13/24 at 1:37 PM, Resident #128 was in bed leaning to the left side while eating lunch. The Resident had a bowl in the bed and was having trouble eating. On 2/13/24 at 1:38 PM, Resident #128 was asked if they were comfortable. The Resident He stated, No, I can't get to my food. On 2/13/24 at 2:10 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was asked, Did you give Resident #128 a meal tray for lunch? CNA #1 stated, No I didn't. CNA #1 was asked, Can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted 1 (Resident #128) of 5 sampled residents that depended on staff for assistance with meals. The findings are: Resident #128 had diagnoses of Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region, Need for assistance with personal care, Unspecified lack of coordination, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, Muscle weakness (generalized), and Unspecified spinal stenosis, cervical region. A care plan initiated 2/12/24 documented, .I require extensive assist X 1 staff with eating . On 2/13/24 at 1:37 PM, Resident #128 was in bed having trouble eating lunch from a bowl of food. On 2/13/24 at 1:38 PM, Resident #128 was asked if they were comfortable. The Resident stated, No, I can't get to my food. On 2/13/24 at 2:07 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was asked, How much assistance does [Resident #128] require with meals? CNA #1 stated, Starting today, he is one hundred percent. He was feeding himself, but today he was leaning. CNA #1 was asked, Did the care plan indicate that he could feed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #69) of 25 sampled residents who received medications from staff in the facility. The findings are: Resident (R) #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/12/2024 at 03:54 PM, the ordered medications were approved by R#69's physician. On 02/15/2024 at 09:58 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided a document titled, Packing Slip Proof of Delivery. It documented that R#69's prescribed medications were delivered to the facility on [DATE] at 06:33 PM. A Physician's Order documented, Fluticasone Propionate Suspension 50 MCG/ACT [micrograms per actuation] 2 spray in each nostril in the afternoon related to Allergic rhinitis, unspecified . with a start date of 01/12/2024. R#69 did not receive the medication on 01/12/2024, 01/13/2024, 01/14/2024, 01/16/2024. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R#69 documented 9=Other / See Nurse Notes Effective for these days. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement was explained in a manner that the residents or resident's representatives fully understood for 2 (Residents #42, and #278) of 3 sampled residents who signed a binding arbitration agreement upon admission. This failed practice had the potential to affect 191 residents who signed binding arbitration agreements since September 16, 2019. The findings are: 1. On 02/13/24 at 09:00 AM, the Administrator provided the facility's arbitration agreement and a list of residents that signed an arbitration agreement since September 16, 2019. 2. On 2/14/24 at 2:18 PM, Resident (R) #278 was asked, Were you aware that you signed an arbitration agreement when you admitted ? R#278 stated, No, what is an arbitration agreement? R#278 stated, I was told just to sign the admission paperwork I didn't have anything explained to me. I would have never signed something like that. R#278 and the family member voiced intent to have Admissions revoke it this day. 3. On 2/14/24 at 2:33 PM, R#42 was asked, Were you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the proper smoking equipment was available in the designated smoking area. This had the ability to affect 8 (Residents #21, #27, #32, #36, #37, #43, #50, #52) sampled residents who use the smoking area. The findings are: 1. On 2/13/24 at 3:54 PM, there was no smoking blanket or smoke apron available in the designated smoking area. 2. On 2/14/24 at 2:53 PM, the Administrator was asked, What equipment should be in the designated smoking area? The Administrator stated, A smoke apron and fire extinguisher. The Administrator was asked, What negative outcome could happen if a resident cigarette fell in their lap? The Administrator confirmed they could burn themselves, catch on fire. What equipment should be available to use to assist with putting out a fire. Administrator confirmed, smoke blanket. 3. On 2/14/24 at 2:57pm the administrator provided a policy titled, Resident Smoking, documented, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .2) a. The smoking area will be equipped with a fire extinguisher,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure Home Health was provided at the time 1 (Resident #283) resident was discharged back to the community from the facility. The findings are: Resident (R) #283 had diagnoses of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Dysphagia and hemiparesis following hypertension, Hemiplegia following other cerebrovascular disease, Muscle wasting atrophy, Other cervical disc degeneration, Atherosclerotic heart disease, Cerebral infarction, and Cognitive communication deficit. On 11/01/23 R #283 was admitted to nursing facility. On 12/02/23 R #283 was discharged back to the community. On 2/14/24 at 11:36 AM, the Social Worker (SW) was asked, Who is responsible for making sure a resident that discharges back to the community has the services needed in their home? The SW stated, I do all the discharges and referrals. The SW was asked, Do you remember R #283 discharging? The SW stated, Yes I do. The SW was asked, Do you remember setting up home health for R #283? The SW stated, Yes, I made a referral to [a home health agency], however they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect for 1 (R4) of 5 (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) Case mix residents reviewed. The Finding include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. 2. Care Plan Focus: Resident has potential for UTI due to indwelling catheter related to Neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder Date Initiated: 04/29/2023.Intervention: Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Ensure privacy bag in place. 3. On 10/30/23 at 9:45 AM during observation rounds the resident catheter bag was not in a privacy bag and the resident tube feeding pump had dried formula on it and on the stand and pedestal legs. 4. On 10/30/23 at 11:26 AM the administrator gave the facility policies and procedures for Dignity. Policy statement: Each resident shall be care for in a manner that promotes and enhances…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a feeding tube (g-tube) received care and services for the feeding tube to meet the resident's needs for 1 (R4) of 5 (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) Case mix residents. The facility also failed to ensure liquid feeding formula was not expired and safe to administer. This had the potential to affect 1 resident in the facility with a feeding tube. The Finding include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Gastrostomy. 2. The care plan documented: Focus: The resident requires tube feeding related to Swallowing deficits which was Date Initiated: [DATE] Section: Intervention: The resident is dependent with tube feeding and water flushes. See physician orders for current feeding orders. Date Initiated: [DATE]. 3. Physician ordered dated [DATE] Enteral Feeding every shift (Nutritional Supplement)1.5 Calorie Continuous 75ml/hr. with 30 ml water flush. 4. On [DATE] at 9:45 AM during observation rounds the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week. The findings are: 1. On 01/25/23 at 2:30 PM, the Surveyor asked the Human Resource (HR) Coordinator to provide the license for the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The HR Coordinator stated, We do not currently have a DON or ADON. The Surveyor requested the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator's license and the other RN's license who were at the facility when the MDS Coordinator was not. The HR Coordinator went into the Administrator's Office to ask the Administrator who the RN was when the MDS Coordinator was not at the facility. The HR Coordinator returned and provided the license for the weekend supervisor RN. The Surveyor requested documentation for RN coverage and weekend staffing for October, November, and December 2022 from the HR Coordinator. 2. On 01/26/23 at 11:30 AM, the HR Coordinator provided the October, November, and December 2022 staffing documentation which showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing schedules for Nursing staff and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were posted in a prominent area that was readily accessible to residents and visitors in 1 of 1 facility. The findings are: 1. On 01/23/23 at 7:50 PM, a sign in a case on the wall on the 200 Hall documented, Schedule is now posted in the Battery Room!!! 2. On 01/25/23 at 3:20 PM, the Social Service Director informed the Surveyor where the Battery Room was located. The signage on the door stated, Therapy Tub, and the door was locked. Upon entry, the staff schedule for the Nurses and CNAs was on the wall inside. 3. On 01/25/23 at 3:30 PM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator who was responsible for posting the required staff information. The Administrator stated, My staffing coordinator is, but she quit and is just PRN [as needed] now. My Activities Director is now responsible. The Surveyor asked what was required to be posted on the staff schedule. The Administrator stated, It just has to have who works what shift and what hall for the CNAs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the kitchen area and in the freezer were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; failed to ensure 1 of 1 ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential contamination of residents' beverages and failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 55 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 57), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 01/25/23 at 8:22 AM. The findings are: 1. On 1/23/23 at 6:11 PM, the following observations were made in the kitchen area: a. An opened box of tea was stored below the counter. The box was not covered or sealed. b. 25 loose tea bags with stains on them. c. 30 loose tea filters in a box below the counter. The box was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were provided with the required in-service training to ensure they were prepared and competent with the skills required to meet the needs of the residents of 1 of 1 facility. The findings are:. 1. On 01/25/23 at 2:30 PM, the Human Resource (HR) Coordinator informed the Surveyor that the CNAs were provided a minimum of 12 units of in-service training annually by the facility. 2. On 01/25/23 at 4:00 PM, the Surveyor requested the in-service training for Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, Resident Rights, Dementia Care, Infection Control, Communication, Behavioral Health, and Special Resident Needs such as Pain, Trach Care, Medication Side Effects, Hospice, and Changes in Condition. The Administrator provided a binder to the Surveyor and stated, I have had to redo all of the in-services because the staff that was no longer there, had taken the training documentation when she left. 3. On 01/26/23 at 8:38 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the In-Service binder documentation and none of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive visitors of their choice in their home for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 sampled resident who desired to have their visitors come indoors for visits. The findings are: 1. Resident #36 had diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Acquired Absence of Left and Right Leg Above the Knees. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required one person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing and personal hygiene. a. The Care Plan with a revision date of [DATE] documented, .Little involvement in formal activities related to personal choice - does self initiated activities in room at this time. Reads, watches TV and does puzzles, etc. [etcetera]. Receives one on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of interventions, and review and revise the Care Plan for 3 (Residents #18, #43 and #55) of 15 (#3, #9, #10, #13, #16, #18, #19, #31, #34, #36, #43, #45, #55, #67 and #219) residents whose Care Plans were reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility as documented on the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents provided by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 01/23/23 at 8:39 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #18 had diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebrovascular Disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/22 documented the resident scored 0 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required Supervision with setup help only with eating and had no weight loss or weight gain in the last 6 months. a. The Medical Record documented Resident #18 weighed 145.2 pounds on 06/20/2022 and 126.4 pounds on 12/30/22 for a weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were cleaned and trimmed for 1 (Resident #219) of 1 (Resident #219) sampled resident who was dependent or required assistance with nail care. The findings are: 1. Resident #219 had a diagnosis of Unspecified Intercranial Injury with Loss of Consciousness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 10/31/22 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required extensive physical assistance from one person for personal hygiene. a. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 10/11/21 documented, .Needs assist of staff for basic needs including: dressing, incontinent care, bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, feeding, locomotion, etc. [etcetera] . BATHING/GROOMING/PERSONAL HYGIENE/ORAL CARE: requires Extensive assist *1 staff for personal hygiene and oral care. Ensure is neatly cleaned and groomed with acceptable appearance daily and PRN [as needed]: hair, clothing, shave (if needed), oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received all of their physician ordered medications in a timely manner after admission for 1 (Resident #67) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction, Vitamin Deficiency, Hypomagnesemia, and Rosacea. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/28/22 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). 2. The Progress Notes in the electronic records documented Resident #67 left AMA (Against Medical Advice) 0n 10/29/22. The following six medications were either, awaiting arrival from supplier or supplement not available, in a 5-day period in Resident #67's progress notes. During a telephone interview with Resident #67's family member, the Surveyor asked about the resident's discharge. The Family Member stated Resident #67 was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide specialized care needs for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice by administering oxygen at the prescribed rate for 3 (Residents #16, #45 and #219) and failed to date the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle for 1 (Resident #55) of 14 (Residents #3, #9, #12, #16, #22, #31, #34, #36, #39, #45, #53, #55, #58, and #219) sampled residents who had a Physician's Order for oxygen as documented on a list provided by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator on 01/25/23 at 10:00 a.m. The findings are: 1. Resident #16 had a diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy. The admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/22 documented the resident scored 0 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and received oxygen therapy while a resident. a. The Physician's Orders dated 05/29/20 documented, .O2 [oxygen] at 2 L/M [liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula] at HS [hour of sleep] at bedtime related to SOB…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 residents who received pureed diets, as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 01/25/23 at 8:22 AM. The findings are: 1. On 01/24/23 at 7:22 AM, the following were on the steam table: a. A pan of pureed blueberry muffins, the consistency of the pureed blueberry muffins was not smooth, the consistency was lumpy. b. A pan of pureed sausage, the consistency of the puree sausage was not smooth, the consistency was lumpy. c. On 01/24/23 at 11:19 AM, the Surveyor asked the Dietary Supervisor to describe the consistency of the pureed foods served to the residents at breakfast. She stated, The pureed muffins were gritty. It had lumps of blueberries in it and was sticky. The pureed sausage was gritty. 2. On 01/24/23 at 11:01 AM, the Dietary Supervisor used a 4 ounce spoon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-27 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement stated the resident and/or the resident's representative were not required to sign the agreement, allowed the resident and/or the representative to communicate with the Office Long Term Care (OLTC) Ombudsman, and was not required as part of the admission process for 3 (Residents #8, #23 and #45) of 3 sampled residents who were contacted regarding their Binding Arbitration Agreement signed upon admission since September 16, 2019. This failed practice had the potential to affect 39 residents who signed Binding Arbitration Agreements upon admission since September 16, 2019. The findings are: 1. On 01/23/23 at 7:20 PM, the Administrator provided the Arbitration Agreement in the admission packet. 2. On 01/24/23 at 9:29 AM, the Administrator provided a list of residents that signed an arbitration agreement. a. On 01/26/23 at 10:09 AM, the Administrator provided a corrected list of residents that signed an arbitration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-27 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator and a venue convenient to both parties for 3 (Residents #8, #23, and #45) of 3 sampled residents who signed Binding Arbitration Agreements upon admission since September 16, 2019. This failed practice had the potential to affect 39 residents who signed Binding Arbitration Agreements upon admission since September 16, 2019. The findings are: 1. On 01/23/23 at 7:20 PM, the Administrator provided the Arbitration Agreement in the admission packet. 2. On 01/24/23 at 9:29 AM, the Administrator provided a list of residents that signed an Arbitration Agreement. a. On 01/26/23 at 10:09 AM, the Administrator provided a corrected list of residents that signed an Arbitration Agreement after September 16, 2019. 3. On 01/24/23 at 8:20 PM, the Surveyor reviewed the facility's Arbitration Agreement and was unable to find a statement which allowed for a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and/or a venue convenient to both parties. 4. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan addressed the use of oxygen therapy to assure necessary information was available to provide care for 1 (Resident #55) of 14 (Resident #3, #9, #12, #16, #22, #31, #34, #36, #39, #45, #53, #55, #58 and #219) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for oxygen therapy as documented on a list provided by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 01/25/23 at 10:00 a.m. The findings are: 1. Resident #55 had a diagnosis of Heart Failure. The admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/09/23 documented the resident scored 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and did not receive oxygen therapy while a resident. a. The Physician's Order dated 02/07/22 documented, .O2 [oxygen] @ [at] 2-4 L/M [liters per minute] VIA NC [nasal cannula] every shift . b. The Care Plan with a revision date of 01/16/2023 did not address the use of oxygen therapy. c. On 01/23/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) after a decline in two or more activities of daily living (ADL) for 1 (Resident #16) of 15 (Resident #3, #9, #10, #13, #16, #18, #19, #31, #34, #36, #43, #45, #55, #67 and #219) residents whose MDS was reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility as documented on the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents provided by the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 01/23/23 at 8:39 PM. The findings are: 1. Resident #16 had diagnoses of Spastic Hemiplegia affecting Left Dominant Side and Muscle Weakness. The admission MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/22 documented the resident scored 0 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required extensive two plus person physical assistance with bed mobility and toilet use, was totally dependent on two plus persons for transfers and was totally dependent on one person's physical assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Options Counseling referrals were submitted and the Notice of admission process was completed for residents and resident representatives who wished to receive information about returning to the community for 1 (Resident #67) of 1 sampled resident closed record review. This failed practice had the potential to affect 13 residents who were discharged home from the facility since 06/30/22 as documented on the Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months worksheets provided by the Administrator on 01/24/23 at 7:47 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #67 had a diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/28/22 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). 2. On 01/25/23 at 11:00 AM, the Notice of admission form DHS (Department of Human Services)-9571 documented Options Counseling for community resources was not declined by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-27 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure required notices were provided to the resident/resident representatives when Medicare Part A services were no longer covered for 2 (Residents #68 and #69) of 2 sampled residents whose Beneficiary Notices were reviewed. The findings are: 1. On 01/24/23 at 7:47 AM, the Administrator provided the Beneficiary Notice - Resident discharged worksheets for the last six months. 2. On 01/24/23 at 7:49 AM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator if any of the residents had remained in the facility in the last six months. The Administrator stated, None since I have been here, but that has only been for the last 3 months. 3. On 01/24/23 at 11:05 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) provided the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms for Resident #68 and Resident #69. a. Resident #68's last day covered was documented as 11/11/22. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was signed by Resident #68 and dated 11/10/22. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) box was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5The Blossoms At Conway Rehab & Nursing CenterConway, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Eureka Springs Rehab & Nursing CenEureka Springs, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing CenterFort Smith, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Midtown Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Berryville Rehab & Nursing CenterBerryville, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Cumberland Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing CenLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At Oakdale Rehab & Nursing CenterJudsonia, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At West Dixon Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At White River Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at White Hall Rehab & Nursing CenterWhite Hall, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At North Little Rock Rehab & NursingNorth Little Rock, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At Star City Rehab & Nursing CenterStar City, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at Nashville Rehab and Nursing CenterNashville, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing CenterHot Springs, AR 4 of 5The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing CenMountain View, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing CentHot Springs, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Prescott Rehab & Nursing CenterPrescott, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Rogers Rehab & Nursing CenterRogers, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Stamps Rehab & Nursing CenterStamps, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms at Dierks Rehab and Nursing CenterDierks, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIAMOND OPCO HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/05/2023
AKS AR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2023
MH AR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2023
HERZKA, MATISYOHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2023
SCHREIBER, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2023
OASIS HEALTH CARE GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
SISAH STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
GOMEZ, ENRIQUEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/06/2024
SCHEINBAUM, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
MISSOURI LTC PHARMACY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
ELANGWE, PHILIPIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$462K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 5%Other / private 35%

This home reported $462K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,657per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045326. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next