The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2026-04-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a urine sample in a timely manner to rule out a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for Resident #1 and failure to order an antibiotic in a timely manner for Resident #1 to treat a UTIIt was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to eCFR S483.12(Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of K.The IJ began on [DATE] at 6:02 PM, when Resident #1 had a written physician order to obtain a Urinary Analysis (UA) to rule out a UTI. On [DATE] at 6:06 PM, according to a lab report, resident's urine sample was obtained. On [DATE] at 11:46 AM, the lab report contained a critical result which required antibiotic treatment that was not received. The Administrator and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) held an active and unencumbered license while working in the facility as an LPN. Based on interviews, facility document review, and facility policy reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) held an active and unencumbered license while working in the facility as an LPN. The findings include: During an interview on [DATE] at 1:29 PM, the Administrator indicated the facility does utilize agency nurses. She reported that the agency hires the nurses, verifies the nurse's credentials and that the facility does not verify the nurse's credentials. She stated, We do not have a policy for hiring agency nurses. She indicated the facility does not keep an employee record for agency nurses. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:07 PM, the Administrator indicated LPN #10 worked at the facility through an agency starting in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for nail care, and to ensure staff answered one (Resident #8) of four resident ' s call lights in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #6 ' s Order Summary Report indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/22/2024, with diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Resident #6 ' s Order Summary Report also indicated the resident should be evaluated by a podiatrist and treated as needed. A review of Resident #6 ' s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/30/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #6 ' s Care Plan initiated 12/03/2024, revealed the resident was independent with all activities of daily living, but required cueing at times. The Care Plan had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that cross contamination did not occur during lunch service for one of one kitchen observed. The findings include: On 04/02/2025 at 11:07 AM, this surveyor observed Dietary Aide (DA) #4 using bare hands to place four slices of cake in bags. DA #4 then placed the bagged cake slices in a stainless-steel bin. The Dietary Manager requested five (5) slices of cake for purees. With bare hands, DA #4 added 5 slices of cake to the stainless-steel container for puree. DA #4 was observed with cake coated on all ten fingertips. The Dietary Manager proceeded to use the cake for puree diets in the building. This surveyor observed the cake being served for all diets in the facility, during the lunch meal service. On 04/02/2025 at 11:10 AM, during an interview, DA #4 stated that this was their first time on days, and you do not touch food with bare hands. DA #4 stated they were unsure why. On 04/02/2025 at 11:45 AM, this surveyor observed the blade from the food processor fall into the pureed pasta. The Dietary Manager removed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were living a dignified existence for two residents (Resident #6 and Resident #67) of two sampled residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: A review of the facility policy Resident Dignity effective on 04/2021, indicated that Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. A review of the facility policy Resident Rights effective on 04/2021, indicated that, These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence. 1. A review of an admission Record indicated that Resident #67 was admitted with diagnoses that included stroke, cognitive communication deficit, and mood disorder. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/20/2025, revealed Resident #67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicated resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the Care Plan initiated on 01/29/2025, indicated Resident #67…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care such as facial hair removal, and nail care were completed for two (Resident #6 and Resident #67) of five sampled residents reviewed for ADL care. The findings include: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, dementia, depressive disorder, and heart failure. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of March 10, 2025, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A review of a Care Plan initiated on 03/24/2025, indicated that Resident #6 required cuing and supervision with all activities of daily living related to cognitive loss. Interventions indicated the resident was able to choose clothing for the day and to assist/cue as needed. A review of the Document Survey Report used to track behaviors, indicated Resident #6, for the month of March had one documented day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure cigarettes and lighters were properly stored, to prevent residents from having and using cigarettes and lighters without staff knowledge, on 1 of 1 observation, to prevent accidental burns and injury. This failed practice had the potential to affect 4 (Resident #29, #40, #61, and #84) of 18 sampled residents, reviewed for smoking tobacco or nicotine use to ensure safe interventions were in place. The facility also failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #59) of 1 sampled resident was not in the smoking area with cigarettes and lighter stored in a personal cigarette case to prevent possible injury. The findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #84 had diagnoses that included seizure disorder and aphasia. Review of Resident #84 ' s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #84 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure three (3) syringes of [Name Brand Anti-anxiety medication] were documented in a narcotic book to maintain receipt and accounting of a narcotic during 1 of 1 observation to prevent diversion for 1 (Resident #71) resident. The findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #71 had diagnoses of dementia, schizophrenia, and urinary retention. Review of Care Plan for Resident #71 dated 12/09/2024, indicated Resident #71 used antianxiety medication related to an agitation disorder. On 04/02/2025 3:15 PM, this surveyor accompanied the Unit Manager to the medication room outside the unit. The narcotic box was permanently affixed and contained antianxiety medication 2mg/ml (milligram/milliliter) x2 syringes and there was a bag labeled Resident #71 containing antianxiety medication 2mg/ml x3 syringes, dated 12/06/2024. The Unit Manager was asked to show where Resident #71's antianxiety medication was documented in the narcotic book. The Unit Manager was unable to locate the requested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were locked away and stored in a manner that prevented resident access for 1 of 1 observation of the central supply room. Specifically, a box of medications was found resting on a pallet in central supply and the doorknob was broken. The door was ajar and could not be closed. The facility failed to ensure 13 bottles of expired [name brand] supplemental feeding were removed from the supply shelf to prevent nursing staff from using them on residents with feeding tubes for 1 of 1 observation. The findings include: On [DATE] at 6:34 AM, the central supply door was observed as being propped open 4-6 inches by a broken inner doorknob. Paint outside the door appeared scuffed off in the area of the doorknob. In central supply an open box was observed resting on a pallet containing: a. Clear lax 17.9oz (ounce) bottles x5 b. Sleep aid 3mg (milligram) x3 250ct (count) c. Sleep aid 5mg x3 90ct d. Zinc 50mg x3 100ct e. Aspirin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of 4 sampled residents reviewed of physical environment. The findings are: 1) On 12/3/24 at 8:54 AM, the Surveyor observed the community shower room with one (1) door on E Hall, which had been left open. The surveyor entered the shower and observed the following: a. Several areas of the shower floors, walls, and edges with broken and/or missing tiles, with rough edges. b. The doorframe of the bathroom, in the shower room, was rusted out on both sides of the frame. It is not secured to the wall on either side. The frame moved back and forth. Rust was on the floor at the base of the frame, on both sides. c. Several holes in the tile baseboards around the showers with broken tiles, leaving large holes in the walls. d. The grout was black and brown between the tiles. 2) The Surveyor asked Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen ceiling tiles, air vents, walls, storage racks, exhaustion fan, and garbage disposal were cleaned, door frames were free of chips, and dietary staff thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated, before handling food and clean equipment for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 12/02/2024 at 9: 58 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen: a. The ceiling vent, close to a rack where clean pans were stored, had rust and black stains on it. b. The ceiling tile between the steam table and the 3- compartment sink had rust over it. c. The metal support bracket, attached to the pole across the ceiling tiles from the area where a rack that contained clean pans were stored extending to the area leading to the dish machine room, had accumulations of sage and black colors on them. On 12/04/2024 8:35 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor was interviewed and asked to describe the appearance of the ceiling tiles he stated ceiling tiles had sage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$136,696 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $136,696 — penalty dated 2026-04-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $421K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR