The Blossoms At Prescott Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of care, received prescribed medications. The findings include: A review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/29/2026, with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia. A review of Resident #1's Progress Notes revealed Resident #1 arrived at the facility via the facility transportation van at 6:34 PM on 01/29/2026. A review of Resident #1's Hospital Records revealed that upon discharge from the hospital, the medication list that was current on 01/29/2026 at 11:41 AM, included a generic medication for extrapyramidal and movement disorder, a generic mood stabilizer medication, a generic anti-psychotic medication, a generic thyroid medication, a generic medication for hypertension (high blood pressure), a generic medication for hyponatremia (low sodium in the body), a generic medication for sleep, and a vitamin.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed 1) to ensure food items were labeled with an accurate use by date to ensure food was not used beyond its safety period. 2) to ensure professional standards for sanitary conditions and equipment were maintained to prevent cross-contamination in storage of food and kitchen equipment, and 3) to ensure safe food preparation and identification of potential hazards in food preparation process and adhering to critical control points to reduce the risk of food contamination. The findings are: A. On 10/28/24 at 10:10 AM and 11:25 AM, 31 bowls of dry cereal of various kinds, did not have a use by date on the bowls. The tray the bowls were sitting on contained one label identifying assorted cereal. The label had a prepared date of 10/14/24 with a use by 1/14/25. There were 6 bowls of toasted oats, 21 bowls of cornflakes, 3 Styrofoam bowls of cornflakes, covered with foil and 1 prepackaged bowl of cornflakes. The Dietary Manager (DM) said these cereals came out of large bags of cereal, but she could not tell the surveyor when the individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene and failed use wipes to avoid cross contamination, and the facility failed to follow recommended manufacture guidelines pertaining to the use of one incontinent brief to prevent infections for 1 sampled (Resident #40)) reviewed for female peri care. Findings include: Resident #40 with a diagnoses of stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type II diabetes. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/14/2024 suggest a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment), and Resident #40 requires total care. a. A review of a policy titled Incontinence Protocol, review date 01/2024, did not address hand hygiene, or peri care protocol. b. A review of a policy titled Urinary Catheter Care, review date 01/2024, revealed when providing peri care to a female resident, resident should be washed with a washcloth or disposable wipe one time for each downward stroke.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident that requires total care had a call light within reach to call for assistance. This failed practice affected 1 sampled (Resident #40) reviewed for call light. Findings include: A review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #40 with a diagnoses of stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type II diabetes. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/14/2024 suggest a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment), and Resident #40 required total care. a. A review of an In Service dated 09/30/2024 revealed staff is to ensure a call light is always in reach of residents. b. On 10/29/2024 at 1:50 PM, Surveyor asked Resident #40 if resident can use the call light. Resident #40 stated, No, because I cannot get to it, because it is clipped to that curtain at the foot of my bed. c. On 10/29/2024 at 1:55 PM, Resident #40 asked CNA #3 for her call light, but CNA #3 said she needed to wash her hands first. CNA #4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that an Annual Minimum Data (MDS) Assessment was coded correctly to document a resident had a serious mental illness and or intellectual disability or related condition requiring level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) to ensure continuity of care for 2 (Resident #5, and Resident #14) sampled residents with a diagnosis of serious mental illness. The findings are: 1. The Order Summary Report dated 10/29/2024 indicated Resident #5 had diagnoses of delusional disorders, psychotic disorder, dementia with mood disorder. The (MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/24/2024 indicated Resident #5 scored 10 (8-12 indicates moderate impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and took an antianxiety medication. a. MDS with an ARD of 8/24/2024 indicated, A 1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review .Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0622 — pattern
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident was able to return to the facility following a hospitalization. The findings are: Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 with a diagnosis of Autistic Disorder. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/2024 revealed Resident #1's cognitive skills for decision making were severely impaired according to the Staff Assessment for Mental Status. A review of a Care Plan with a target date of 11/29/2023 indicated Resident #1 and/or his family will receive the support needed for successful transition into long term care. A review of a Progress Note dated 02/09/2024 indicated Resident #1 was being transferred by ambulance to a psychiatric unit for behaviors. A review of a late entry note dated 02/12/2024 indicated The facility contacted the hospital and informed the hospital that they would not be taking Resident #1 back into the facility. On 6/05/24 at 11:31 AM, the Operational Manager indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff distributed and served food in a safe and sanitary manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect 15 sampled Residents (Residents #4, #18, #21, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #33, #34, #35, #38, #39, #40 and #41) with the potential to affect 40 residents that eat food prepared from the kitchen. The findings are: a. On 11/21/23 at 10:04 AM, Dietary #1 placed 7 rolls with milk in the food blender and pureed. Dietary #1 opened the lid with the left gloved hand, picked up the spatula with the right gloved hand and stirred the rolls then picked up the milk lid with the right gloved hand and screwed it back onto the milk. The Surveyor observed Dietary #1 reach into the dinner roll bag, grab three rolls and throw them into the blender without performing hand hygiene, or changing gloves. b. On 11/21/23 at 10:06 AM, the Surveyor asked what process is used when adding rolls to the blender. Dietary #1 said, Oh, I should have changed my gloves before I reached in the bag for more rolls. c. On 11/21/2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's urinary catheter drainage bags were kept in a privacy bag from view of other residents/visitors to promote dignity for 2 (Residents #21 and #34) of 2 sampled residents who had an indwelling catheter. The findings are: 1. a. According to Resident #21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/29/2023, under section H0100, Appliances, resident has an indwelling catheter. A Physicians Order dated 08/23/2023 stated, Suprapubic catheter (24 French with 30cc [cubic centimeters] bulb) Change monthly on the 15th and PRN [as needed] . b. A Care Plan with a revision date of 08/18/2023 stated, Catheter: The resident has suprapubic catheter. Position catheter bag and tubing . away from entrance room door . c. On 11/20/23 at 09:40 AM, Resident #21 had a catheter drainage bag hanging on a wheelchair wheel beside the bed with no privacy cover. The urine in the drainage bag was visible for visitors and other residents. d. On 11/20/23 at 12:44 PM, Resident #21 had a catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident use glucometer was disinfected after use to prevent potential spread of infection for 8 (Residents #8, #5, #23, #24, #25, #33, #36 and #39) sampled residents who had physician orders for capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring and the potential to affect 17 residents who had physicians orders for CBG and the facility failed to ensure clean lift pads were stored in a sanitary manner in the laundry with the potential to affect 4 sampled residents (Residents #1, #18, #34 and #40) with the potential to affect 11 residents who used a lift pad. The findings are: 1. On 11/21/23 at 11:06 AM, during a medication administration observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 performed a glucose finger stick to Resident #24. LPN #1 took a (Brand Name) bleach wipe and cleaned the glucometer for approximately 7 seconds then placed the glucometer on the medication cart. LPN #1 after cleaning the glucometer for 7 seconds stated, I just have to wait 4 minutes before using it on anyone else. a. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 of 7 residents receiving therapy treatments and 3 sampled residents with the potential to affect 4 residents residing on the 300 Hall. The facility failed to ensure safe, functioning equipment affecting all 40 residents that get laundry done at the facility. The findings are: 1. On 11/20/23 at 09:30 AM, Resident #23 stated that the facility has been saying they are going to paint for 2 months, tape is on everything, and they are not going to do anything. Resident #23 said, They been saying that [expletive] for 2 months now. a. On 11/20/23 at 10:25 AM, Resident #27 complained that the base boards in her restroom looked like termites had eaten at them. b. On 11/21/23 at 10:52 AM, observed Therapy providing stand by assist to a resident walking away from the Therapy Room on the roped off section on 300 Hall. c. On 11/21/23 at 02:17 PM, the Surveyor walked the hall and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR