No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Blossoms At Conway Rehab & Nursing Center

3501 College Avenue, Conway, AR 72034 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (501) 329-9879 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$8,021 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
495 Hogan Ln · (501) 327-5850 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
815 Hogan Ln · (501) 328-3282 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3865 Prince St · (501) 358-6292 · Call to confirm hours
Park
The Tucker Creek Bike Trail · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.0%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%4.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.8%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.7%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.6%13.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.2%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.3%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.8%24.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.6%12.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.272.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.272.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 7.1–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
71.3%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-21)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and/or increased supervision was provided by staff during periods of increased exit-seeking and aggressive behaviors for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The lack of effective supervision resulted in Resident #4 eloping from the facility and facility staff being unaware of the resident's whereabouts for approximately one hour before the resident walked back into the facility. At the time of the survey, there were nine residents residing in the facility who were identified as at risk for elopement. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (Quality of Care) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 08/19/2024 at 6:24 PM, when Resident #4 began to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 ice machine was maintained in a sanitary condition; dietary staff washed their hands between clean tasks when contaminated; food stored in the freezer was covered; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; food items were free of discoloration, and hot food items were maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above on the steam table while awaiting service for 1 of the 2 meals observed. The findings are: On 5/18/25 at10:17 AM, there was a piece of hair inside the lid of the ice machine in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager was asked to describe what was observed inside the lid of the ice machine. She stated it was hair. The left corner of the gasket above the ice machine panel had a sage color residue on it, and there was an orange wet residue below on the right corner of the ice machine panel. The areas were pointed out to the Dietary Manager during an interview, she was asked if the residue buildup could be wiped off and who used the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a wheelchair was clean and sanitized for one (Resident #6) of one resident and failed to maintain and ensure clean shower rooms for residents in two (200 hall and 100 hall) of three shower rooms in the facility, to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment. The findings are: 1. During an observation on 05/18/2025 at 1:53 PM, Resident #6 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, eating lunch in the dining area, and the black spokes of the wheelchair were coated in a tan/brown colored substance. Resident #6 described the substance on the wheelchair wheels as dirt or dust. a. During a concurrent interview and observation on 05/21/2025 at 11:35 AM, this surveyor went to Resident #6's room and asked to look at their anti-tippers, equipment designed to keep the wheelchair from turning over. This surveyor observed a visitor bend down, look at the right side of the wheelchair, and commented she knows one thing, it is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the menu, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to ensure nutritionally balanced meals were provided for the residents for 2 of the 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. A review of the 5/18/2025 noon meal menu indicated the residents on a pureed diet were to receive a #8 scoop equal to 4 ounces, or 1/2 cup of pureed meat sauce and a #6 scoop, equal to 2/3 cup, of pureed spaghetti noodles. a. On 5/18/25 at 12:45 PM, during the noon meal preparation, the Dietary Manager (DM) used a 6-ounce ladle spoon equal to 3/4 cup to place 3 servings of plain cooked spaghetti into a blender added 2 servings of plain tomato sauce, and pureed. At 12:50 PM, she added 2 more servings of spaghetti into blender to puree. b. At 12:52 PM, she poured pureed spaghetti with plain tomato sauce into a pan, then placed it on the steam table to be served to the residents who required pureed diets. c. On 5/18/2025 at 2:02 PM, during the noon meal service the DM, used #8 scoop, or 1/2 cup,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the mealtime schedule, the facility failed to ensure all residents who received meals from the kitchen were consistently being served at regularly scheduled times and failed to provide the residents with a dependable eating schedule for 2 of 2 meal services observed. The findings are: 1. On 05/18/25, a document titled, Meal Times, was provided and revealed mealtimes in the facility were 7:30 AM for breakfast, 12:00 PM for lunch, and 5:00 PM for dinner. 2. On 5/18/2025 at 1:30 PM, the first food cart for Hulan hall was pushed into the dining room by Dietary Aide (DA) #5. At 2:02 PM, the first resident received a meal tray in the dining room. a. During an interview on 5/18/25 at 2:10 PM, Resident #36 stated lunch had not been served on their hall yet, and sometimes it was late. They do not let us know why it is late. b. The last noon tray was served on the 200 Hall at 2:30 PM, 2 hours and 30 minutes after the scheduled mealtime. 3. On 5/18/25 at 6:11 PM, the first supper meal food cart for Hulan hall was pushed into the dining room by DA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during tracheostomy care for one (Resident #29) of 2 residents sampled for infection control. The findings are: A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #29 with diagnoses that included aftercare following surgery for tracheostomy and a disorder that makes it difficult to move food from the mouth into the throat and esophagus. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/31/2025, revealed Resident #29 had a Staff Interview for Mental Status (SAMS) score of 3 which indicated the resident was severely impaired, and never/rarely made decisions. A review of Resident #29's Care Plan, initiated on 02/23/2025, revealed the resident required enhance barrier precautions due to have a feeding tube and tracheostomy. Staff were required to wear gloves, gown, and face protection if there is a risk for splash or spray. Resident #29 was at risk for complications related to the tracheostomy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility in-services, the facility failed to ensure privacy for 1 (Resident #4) sampled resident, to promote a dignified existence based on 1 of 1 observation. The findings include: During an observation and interview on 05/18/2025 at 11:41 AM, this surveyor observed a medication cart resting against the wall of 200 hall, with the screen facing out toward anyone who walked at the end of the hallway, for several minutes. This surveyor walked down the hall and noted the computer screen was pulled up with Resident #4's picture, vital signs, medication, date of birth , room number, and allergies facing out toward anyone that was in the hallway. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 was found in Resident #4's room, starting an intravenous antibiotic. This surveyor and LPN #18 walked out of the room and saw an unidentified young man in the hallway, facing the medication cart and unlocked computer, turn and walk away. LPN #18 was asked about the normal procedure before leaving a medication cart unattended in the hallway. LPN #18 said we lock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for resident behaviors for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 sample mixed resident. The findings are: A review of an admission Record, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of alcohol abuse, altered mental status, encephalopathy, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/5/2024 revealed Resident #4 scored a 02 (indicates cognitively moderately impaired for daily decision making) on a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS). A review of the nursing Progress Notes dated 8/17/2024 at 5:18 PM, revealed Resident #4 was in a wheelchair in the common area under staff supervision due to attempting to enter other resident's rooms. Resident #4 had multiple family members visiting throughout the day. A review of nursing Progress Notes dated 8/18/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to promote a healthy comfortable environment to support a safe living, healthy homelike and comfortable environment. The findings include: 1. On 07/01/2023, at 2:22 PM, environmental rounds were made in the facility, during which the following were observed: a. Upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER], standing at the entrance, on the left side of the middle to the wall, has 4 pieces of sheetrock two inches by three inches missing from the wall, as well as one gouge measuring six inches. b. Upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER], standing at the entrance, to the far left of the room on the ceiling, are white patches of white, caked in appearance with dark discoloration on a slightly bowed surface. c. Upon entering room [ROOM NUMBER], standing at the front entrance, on the immediate left, past the bathroom, the edge of the left corner wall between the built-in chest of draws, is exposed metal edges mid-way with sheet rock and tape. d. Next to the storage room on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was utilized prior to the expiration date, that equipment was clean to prevent potential cross contamination, and that hands were washed between clean and dirty tasks. These failed practices had the ability to affect all 47 residents who receive their meals from one of one kitchen according to a list provided by the administrator on 3/7/23 at 9:15 AM. The findings are: On 03/04/2024 at 09:55 AM, the kitchen floor is observed to be worn through revealing the concrete underneath and missing in places. The Dietary Manager (DM) reported being told multiple times that the floor is going to be replaced. The floor is discolored in the corners with debris under several appliances, worktables, and cabinets. On 03/04/2024 at 09:58 AM, a box containing seventeen 4 ounce servings of prune juice was located on the bottom shelf in the dry storage area. The use-by date for the juice was 08/03/2023. Located on the middle shelf in the right rear of the room was a 50 lb. (pound) bag of powdered milk. The date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call light was within reach for 1 (Resident #32) of 8 sampled residents who utilize their call light on Hall 100; failed to maintain resident rooms in good condition for 1 (Resident #35) sampled resident; and failed to ensure a sufficient amount of bed linen was available to maintain a homelike environment for all 47 residents who reside in the facility. The findings are: Resident #32 had a diagnosis of Fracture of right acetabulum. On the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/26/2024, the resident received a score of 13 (13-15 cognition intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. On 03/04/24 at 11:17 AM, Resident #32 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The call light was lying on the bed. Resident #32 was asked if he/she could reach the call light if needed. Resident #32 said, The call light is worthless and needs to be thrown away. Resident #32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were showered/bathed as scheduled to promote good personal hygiene for 01 (Resident R #35); ensure residents fingernails were kept clean and free of debris for 01 (Resident #13) sample mix residents who require assistance with showering/bathing. The findings are: 1. On 03/04/24 at 10:27 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #35 lying in bed with greasy hair. a. On 03/04/24 at 10:28 AM, Resident #35 was asked, How long has it been since you've had a shower/bath? Resident #35 stated, Last shower was last week. b. On 03/06/24 at 08:24 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #03 confirmed the resident's hair was greasy and that he needed a shower. c. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/23/2023 documented, Self-Care E. Shower/ bathe self: The ability to bathe self, including washing, rinsing, and drying self (excludes washing of back and hair) . Partial/ moderate assistance . d. On 03/06/24 at 09:04 AM, the care plan dated 02/24/2024 documented, . Please…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure thickened liquids were within reach and that the cooler was maintained with cold ice packs to promote adequate hydration for 01 (Resident #22) sample mix resident and the facility failed to provide services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 01 (Resident #37) of 7 sampled residents who have a physician's order to receive fortified foods. The findings are: On 03/05/24 at 10:09 AM, the Surveyor observed no thickened liquid drinks in Resident #22 room's or the resident's cooler. The ice packs in the cooler were thawed. No fluids were present in the resident's room. On 03/05/24 at 02:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #03 confirmed there were no fluids at Resident #22's bedside or in the room. LPN #03 also confirmed the ice packs were thawed and no drinks were in the cooler. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/02/2024 noted in section K- Swallowing/ Nutritional Status the resident is on a mechanically altered diet that required a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure nursing staff possessed the skill sets necessary to provide nursing services to meet the resident's needs safely and in a manner that promoted each resident's physical well-being, as evidenced by hand hygiene not being performed before putting on gloves during wound care to prevent the spread of infection for 2 (Residents #5, and #18), and the use of a mechanical lift as a care plan documented to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #22) sampled resident. The findings are: a. On 03/05/2024 at 10:35 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, who reported they filled the roles of Treatment Nurse and Infection Preventionist [IP], gathered supplies and placed on bedside table in Resident #5's room. The nurse pulled gloves from uniform pocket, donned (applied) them, and proceeded to clean a pressure ulcer. LPN #1 took a collagen sheet from bedside table, tore it into small pieces placing some inside the wound bed, then laid the remaining collagen sheet back on the bedside table. LPN #1 then touched a different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all pharmaceuticals were available for the residents during medication administration. The findings are: 1. On 03/05/2024 at 08:13 AM, during observation of medication administration for 200 Hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #03, Resident #24 did not receive their ordered dose of Lactulose Oral Solution. LPN #3 said she would obtain the lactulose and notify the Surveyor to come back and observe her administer it. a. The Physician Orders dated 03/05/2024 documented, Lactulose Oral Solution 10 GM [gram]/15 ML [milliliter] (Lactulose) 30 ML by mouth every 12 hours as needed for constipation. b. On 03/05/2024 at 11:36 AM, LPN #3 confirmed that the facility does not have Resident #24 ' s Lactulose Oral Solution. c. Resident #24 ' s Nursing Progress note dated 3/5/2024 documented, Medication Administration Note Text: Lactulose Oral Solution 10 GM/15ML Give 30 ml by mouth two times a day related to CONSTIPATION, UNSPECIFIED Give 30ml to =20gm med not available . d. On 03/06/2024 at 12:39 PM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication rate of less than 5% to prevent complications for 2 (Residents #18 and #24) of 3 residents observed during medication pass resulting in medication errors. The findings are: 1. On 03/05/2024 at 08:13 AM, during observation of medication administration for the 200 Hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, Resident #24 did not receive Lactulose (a medication used to treat constipation). LPN #3 said they would obtain the lactulose and notify the Surveyor to come back and observe its administration. a. The Physician Order dated 03/05/2024 documented, Lactulose Oral Solution 10 GM (gram)/15ML (milliliter) (Lactulose) 30 ml by mouth every 12 hours as needed for constipation. b. On 03/05/2024 at 11:36 AM, LPN #3 confirmed that the facility does not have Resident #24's Lactulose. c. A Nursing Progress note dated 03/05/2024 documented, Medication Administration Note Text: Lactulose Oral Solution 10 GM/15ML Give 30 ml by mouth two times a day related to CONSTIPATION,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that garbage receptacles were maintained in a manner to minimize pests. The failed practice had the ability to affect all 47 residents who reside in the facility. The findings are: On 03/04/2024 at 10:27 AM, the dumpster to the left of the back door which was designated for recycling is observed to have the lid open. To the far right, located on the edge of the back parking lot were two trash dumpsters. The lids/doors of each dumpster were open. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated, They must have emptied them this morning because they were overflowing yesterday. There have been some issues with getting someone to pick them up, like maybe we switched companies. On 03/06/2024 at 12:00 PM, the dumpster found to the left after exiting the back kitchen door is observed to have the lid open, exposing the contents and providing an opening for pests. To the right, the two dumpsters at the back of the parking lot are observed to have a lid and a sliding door open. On 03/07/2024 at 12:30 PM, the DM was asked how the dumpsters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves/washed hands when contaminated before, during and after wound care in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice, to prevent the potential spread of infection for 3 (Resident #5, #15 and #18) of 4 (Residents #5, #15, #18 and #24) sampled residents who had Physicians Orders for wound dressings changes. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received wound care treatment /dressings changes. The findings are: 1. Resident #5 had diagnoses of Paraplegia, Pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4 (a stage 4 pressure injury indicates the wound has extended to muscle, tendon, or bone), and Pressure ulcer of left hip, stage 4. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact), and that the resident had pressure injuries to include a stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided consistent access to personal property for 1 (Resident #46) sampled resident. The findings are: Resident #46 was admitted on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/15/2024 documented a score of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) On 03/05/2024 at 08:43 AM, the Surveyor observed a cell phone in the narcotic box of 100 Hall cart. Complaint stated that Resident #46 had their cellphone taken away by the Director of Nursing (DON) and placed on the med cart. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 stated was made aware by other staff that the DON removed the residents cell phone from them and put on the med cart. On 03/05/2024 at 01:30 PM, the DON was asked, On Friday February 23, 2024, did you remove Resident #46's cell phone and lock it up in the 100 hallway medication cart? The DON stated, No. The Surveyor took the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that before a resident was allowed to self-administer nasal spray, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) conducted an assessment to determine if this practice was safe, obtain a physician order for self-administration, and develop a care plan to address educating the resident on self-administration, to prevent potential errors in administration for 1 (Resident #35) sampled resident. The findings are: On 03/04/2024 at 10:17 AM, the Surveyor observed a bottle of nasal spray lying in Resident (R) #35's windowsill next to the bed. The Surveyor asked the resident how long he/she had the nasal spray and they stated, Long enough for it to be empty. When asked, Were you assessed to be able to self-administer your own medications? R #35 stated, I don't think so. The physician order dated 11/27/2023 noted saline nasal solution (Saline) 1 spray in both nostrils every 4 hours as needed for dry nares. There was no order related to the self-administration of medication. The care plan date 11/20/2023 does not document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are care planned for mechanical lift transfers were transferred by the mechanical lift, and that they were assessed for usage of the mechanical lift in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident # 22) sample mix resident. The finding are: On 03/04/24 at 02:34 PM, the Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #01 and CNA #02 give the resident the option of standing or using the mechanical lift to transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. Resident #22 chose to stand and was grasping the grab bar multiple times and rocking trying to get into a standing position. Both CNAs grasped the back of the Resident ' s pants and their brief, no gait belt observed, and assisted the resident into bed by swinging them from wheelchair to bed. On 03/04/24 at 02:39 PM, CNA #01 was asked, Is the resident to be transferred with a [mechanical lift]? CNA #01 stated, Ya, but they've been allowing [the resident] to do [themselves]. When asked, Who instructed you that it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a deep freezer was maintained in a manner to ensure frozen food was maintained at the appropriate temperature to minimize the potential for food borne illness who could affect all 47 residents who receive their meals from one of one kitchen. The findings are: On 03/04/2025 at 10:25 AM, a large deep freezer is observed in the emergency storage room. The lid of the freezer is observed to protrude up from the bottom, failing to seal around the top. The front edge of the freezer and the edge of the lid failed to join by 2-2.5 inches. The Dietary Manager (DM) raises the lid to display a thick layer of ice (2 inches), which extended down the inside of the freezer and over the top edge. Standing at the end of the freezer the lid can be seen to extend toward the back, as opposed to forming a closure against the bottom. The rubber seal around the top of the freezer is loose preventing the formation of a seal. On 03/06/2024 at 09:05 AM, the Maintenance Director was asked if he was aware of the issues related to the deep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 2 (Residents #1 and #3) of 3 (Residents #1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 10/10/23 noted Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. a. On 10/10/2023 at 3:43 PM, a review of Resident #1's Care Plan with an initiated date of 09/09/23 did not document any Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. 2. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 10/11/23 noted Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. a. On 10/10/23 at 4:13 PM, a review of Resident #3's Care Plan did not document any ADL assistance. 3. On 10/11/23 at 10:45 AM, during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed Resident #1's and Resident #3's care plans did not contain the ADL care plans. 4. On 10/11/23 at 10:56 AM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed Resident #1 and Resident #3 should have their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible to allow residents to summon for assistance to accommodate their individual needs for 1 (Residents #7) and failed to provide therapy recommended adaptive eating utensils to accommodate resident needs for 1 (Resident #13) of 23 (Residents #1, #7, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, # 21, #22, #26, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #34, #37, #38, #41, #92, #192, #243 and #244) sampled residents who used the call light system to summon for assistance and 1 sampled resident who required adapted eating utensils. The findings are: 1.Resident #7 had diagnoses of Dementia with Agitation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/25/22 documented the resident scored 8 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required extensive physical assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, transfer, dressing and toilet use, and extensive physical assistance of one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status to reflect current services for 2 (Residents #21 and #31) of 6 (Residents #7, #12, #15, #21, #26 and #31) sampled residents who had physician orders for oxygen therapy. The findings are: 1. Resident #21 had a diagnosis of Shortness of Breath. The Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/22 documented the resident scored 12 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had no shortness of breath upon exertion, sitting at rest or lying flat and did not receive oxygen therapy. a. The December 2022 Physician Orders documented, .Keep O2 [oxygen] within reach of resident at all times. Keep O2 concentrator close to bed. Check every shift every shift related to SHORTNESS OF BREATH . Order Date 10/30/2022 . O2 @ [at] 2LPM [liters per minute] via Nasal Cannula for SOB [shortness of breath] as needed . Order Date 08/31/2022 .'' b. On 12/06/22 at 1:38 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurately developed to address current services for oxygen therapy for 2 (Residents #21 and #31) of 6 (Residents #7, #12, #15, #21, #26 and #31) sampled residents who had physician orders for oxygen therapy. The findings are: 1. Resident #21 had a diagnosis of Shortness of Breath. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/03/22 documented the resident scored 12 (8-12 indicates moderately cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had no shortness of breath upon exertion, sitting at rest or lying flat and did not receive oxygen therapy. a. The Care Plan with a revision date of 10/24/22 did not address oxygen therapy. b. The December 2022 Physician Orders documented, .Keep O2 [oxygen] within reach of resident at all times. Keep O2 concentrator close to bed. Check every shift related to SHORTNESS OF BREATH . Order Date 10/30/2022 . O2 @ [at] 2LPM [liters per minute] via Nasal Cannula for SOB [shortness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care in the care and storage of respiratory and/or nebulizer equipment was maintained for 2 (Residents #8 and #26); oxygen was ordered and administered at prescribed flow rate for 1 (Resident #31) and signage indicating No Smoking was posted on the door for 2 (Residents #21and #31) of 6 (Residents #7, #12, #15, #21, #26 and #31) sampled residents who received oxygen therapy and 11 (Residents #7, #8, #13, #15, #21, #26, #27, #31, #32, #38 and #244) nebulizer treatments. The findings are: 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses of Hypoxia, Chronic Pulmonary Edema, Chronic Combined Systolic and Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure and Pneumonia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/22 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and did not receive oxygen therapy. a. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 05/13/22 documented, .has altered respiratory status/difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets, 9 residents who received mechanical soft diets, 2 residents who received chopped diets and 20 residents who received regular diets (total census: 38) from1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 12/6/2022. The findings are: 1. On 12/6/2022, the menu for the supper meal documented residents who received regular diets were to receive 8 oz (ounces) of chicken stuffing casserole; residents who received mechanical soft diets were to receive ground chicken stuffing casserole and residents on pureed diets were to receive two # 8 scoops of pureed chicken stuffing casserole (1 cup). 2. On 12/6/2022 at 5:15 PM, the following observations were made during the supper meal service: a. Dietary Employee (DE) #1 used a #8 scoop which is equivalent ½ cup (4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a meal tray was not left to sit in a resident's room while they were out of the facility for an appointment and a new meal tray was provided instead of the residents eating the food to prevent the potential for food borne illness for 2 (Residents #27 and #243) of 2 residents who received dialysis and failed to ensure meals were served at temperatures that were acceptable to the residents, to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 7 residents who received meal trays in their rooms on Hulan Hall as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor on 12/6/2022 and 2 residents who received dialysis as documented on the Resident Matrix provided by the Minimum Data Set Coordinator on 12/6/22. The findings are: 1. Resident #27 had diagnoses of Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Renal Failure (Dialysis) Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 5 residents who received pureed diets as documented on the Diet List provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 12/6/2022. The findings are: 1. On 12/06/22 at 3:24 PM, DE #1 placed 12 slices of bread into a blender, added warm milk and pureed. She poured the pureed bread with milk into a pan, covered the pan with foil and placed it in the oven to be served to the residents on pureed diets for supper. The consistency of the pureed bread was thick, not smooth. 2. On 12/06/22 at 3:46 PM, DE #1 used a #8 scoop to placed 6 servings of chicken/corn stuffing into a blender. He added gravy and pureed. He poured the pureed chicken/corn stuffing in a pan. He covered the pan with foil and placed it in the oven to be served to the residents on pureed diets. The consistency of the pureed stuffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that chipped areas in the kitchen floors tiles were not covered with a black residue; failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator were covered, sealed and dated; ceiling vents were maintained in clean, sanitary conditions for food preparation to prevent the potential food borne illnesses for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; foods were dated when received to assure first in, first out usage to prevent the potential for food bone illness; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items; and hot foods were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 36 residents who received meals from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement was explained in a manner understood by residents and representatives, explicitly granted the right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing, allowed the resident or representative to communicate with federal, state or local officials or Office of Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman, and was not required as part of the admission process for 3 (Residents #14, #38 and #192) of 3 sampled residents who signed Binding Arbitration Agreements upon admission since September 16, 2019. This failed practice had the potential to affect 121 residents admitted since the facility's last annual survey on 9/3/21. The findings are: 1. On 12/06/22 at 2:38 PM, the Administrator provided a copy of the facility's Arbitration Agreement. 2. On 12/06/22 at 9:38 PM, there was no reference to the 30-day right to rescind the agreement or allow residents/representatives to speak to federal, state, or local officials or the LTC (Long Term Care) Ombudsman. 3. On 12/08/22 at 9:28 AM, Resident #38's family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator or a venue was convenient to both parties for 3 (Residents #14, #38 and #192) of 3 sampled residents who signed Binding Arbitration Agreements upon admission since September 16, 2019. This failed practice had the potential to affect 121 residents admitted since the facility's last annual survey on 09/03/21. The findings are: 1. On 12/06/22 at 2:38 PM, the Administrator provided a copy of the facility's Arbitration Agreement. 2. On 12/06/22 at 9:38 PM, there was no reference to venue selection or neutral arbitrator. 3. On 12/08/22 at 10:03AM, the Surveyor asked the Social Service Director (SSD), Are you responsible for the Arbitration Agreements? The SSD stated, Yes. The Surveyor asked, Does your facility's arbitration agreement state the venue must be agreeable to both parties? The SSD stated, No, it doesn't. The Surveyor asked, Does the facility's arbitration agreement state the neutral arbitrator must be agreed upon by both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident rights to visual privacy were maintained for 1 (Resident #38) of 23 (Residents #1, #7, #8, #12, #13, #14, #15, #21, #22, #26, #27, #28, #30, #31, #32, #34, #37, #38, #41, #92, #192, #243 and #244) sampled residents who was dressed in a hospital gown and the door was open. The findings are: 1. Resident #38 had diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident Affecting Left Dominant Side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebrovascular Disease Affecting Left Dominant Side. The 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/26/22 documented the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making per a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) and was totally dependent of two plus persons physical assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, and toilet use and one person for personal hygiene and eating. a. The Care Plan with a revision date of 11/29/22 does not address behaviors. b. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was as free from accident hazards as possible, as evidenced by failure to ensure a heating pad was not used by a resident without supervision and/or facility knowledge for 1 (Resident#244) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Resident #244 had diagnoses of Age-Related Physical Debility and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. The Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required extensive physical assistance of two plus persons with transfers, extensive physical assistance of one person with dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. a. On 12/06/22 at 3:05 PM, Resident #244 was lying in bed with eyes closed. A heating pad was over her chest area. b. On 12/07/22 at 10:38 AM, Resident #244 was in her room, sitting up in a wheelchair. The heating pad was draped over the headboard of her bed. c. On 12/07/22 at 3:45 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-12-09 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required notices were provided to resident/resident representatives when Medicare Part A services were no longer covered for 2 (Residents #8 and #28) of 3 (Residents #8, #28, and #92) sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 136 residents discharged since the facility's last survey per the Discharge list provided by the Consultant on 12/08/22. The findings are: 1. On 12/06/22 at 4:45 PM, the Social Service Director (SSD) provided the completed Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). 2. On 12/06/22 at 5:45 PM, review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms and NOMNC showed the following: a. Resident #8's last day of coverage was 09/08/22. The NOMNC documented it was completed via phone with the POA [Power of Attorney] on 09/06/22. b. Resident #28's last day covered was 10/01/22. The NOMNC documented it was completed via phone with the POA on 10/01/22 and contained the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5The Blossoms At Eureka Springs Rehab & Nursing CenEureka Springs, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing CenterFort Smith, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Midtown Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Van Buren Rehab And Nursing CenterVan Buren, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Berryville Rehab & Nursing CenterBerryville, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Cumberland Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing CenLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At Oakdale Rehab & Nursing CenterJudsonia, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At West Dixon Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At White River Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at White Hall Rehab & Nursing CenterWhite Hall, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At North Little Rock Rehab & NursingNorth Little Rock, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At Star City Rehab & Nursing CenterStar City, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at Nashville Rehab and Nursing CenterNashville, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing CenterHot Springs, AR 4 of 5The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing CenMountain View, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing CentHot Springs, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Prescott Rehab & Nursing CenterPrescott, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Rogers Rehab & Nursing CenterRogers, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Stamps Rehab & Nursing CenterStamps, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms at Dierks Rehab and Nursing CenterDierks, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIAMOND OPCO HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2023
AKS AR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/05/2023
MH AR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/05/2023
HERZKA, MATISYOHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/05/2023
SCHREIBER, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/05/2023
SCHEINBAUM, SHLOMOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
OASIS HEALTH CARE GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
SISAH STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
ROMERO, TAMMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2025
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2021
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
LUSTER, STACYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
RAINOSEK, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023
ROUDACHEVSKI, EVGUENIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2021
SADIQ, BILALIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$300K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 4%Other / private 28%

This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,813per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045313. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next