No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Blossoms at Cumberland Rehab & Nursing Center

1516 Cumberland St, Little Rock, AR 72202 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (501) 374-7565 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$37,403 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,403 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-04)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1000 Main Street
Pharmacy
1601 Main St · (501) 371-9229 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1701 Main St · (501) 376-3473 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Pettaway0.4 mi
Pettaway Park, 2101 Commerce St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.8%13.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%10.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.6%24.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.7%12.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.462.011.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.302.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.3–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.0–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
70.1%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-04)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent staff to resident abuse for one (Resident #76) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #76 with diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with mixed disturbances of emotions and conduct, mood affective disorder, bipolar disorder, nicotine dependence, problem related to social environment, intellectual disabilities, symptoms and signs involving appearance and behavior and traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/02/2026, revealed Resident #76 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #76's Resident Mood Interview was scored 0 for any negative symptoms. The assessment identified no behavioral symptoms towards others or rejection of care. Review of Resident #76's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent resident abuse for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 04/2021, indicated, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: c. be free from abuse, neglect. g. exercise his or her rights as a citizen of the facility. h. be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights; A review of a facility policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights for Nursing Home Residents, dated 07/12/1988, indicated, 2. The right to a safe and clean environment. 10. The right to be free from physical or mental abuse A review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, indicated It is the policy of this facility to prevent resident abuse .VI. Protection of Residents. Residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written bed hold notification to a resident or the resident's representative upon transfer to the hospital for two (Resident #3 and Resident #71) of two residents who were reviewed for transfers. The findings include: Resident #3 Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety disorder. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/23/2026, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #3's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 02/13/2026 to transfer to the emergency room (ER) for further evaluation and treatment. Review of the MDS tab in Resident #3's electronic health record revealed a Discharge, Return anticipated MDS was coded on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility inappropriately discharged one Resident (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #76 with diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with mixed disturbances of emotions and conduct, mood affective disorder, bipolar disorder, nicotine dependence, problem related to social environment, intellectual disabilities, symptoms and signs involving appearance and behavior and traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/02/2026, revealed Resident #76 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #76's Resident Mood Interview score was 0 for any negative symptoms. The assessment identified no behavioral symptoms towards others or rejection of care. Review of Resident #76's Care Plan Report initiated on 07/04/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform blood sugar testing as ordered by a Physician for one (Resident #74) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #74 on 04/21/2025 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood.) and hypoglycemia (level of sugar in the blood drops below what is healthy for the person) with an onset date of 06/06/2025. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/25/2025, revealed Resident #74 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #74 had an order dated 06/08/2025 to check blood glucose every morning. If greater than 250 notify Medical Doctor (MD). Review of a June 2025 Medical Administration Record (MAR) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment for one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #38 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lung), allergic rhinitis (allergies) and housing instability (homeless in the last 12 months). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/26/2026, revealed Resident #38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #38 identified as sometimes feeling lonely or isolated from those around, the resident required a walker for mobility, and experienced shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion, when lying flat, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to support resident's rights to accommodate a sexual relationship between consenting adults for two (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for resident rights. The findings include: Resident #3 Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/01/2026, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #3 exhibited physical, verbal, and other behaviors not directed towards others one to three days in the look back period and had no issues with mood during the look back period. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 was independent for mobility. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan Report updated 03/11/2026, revealed Resident #3 had inappropriate seeking of other individual's attention. Care Plan interventions included to separate individuals and redirect. Review of Resident #3's Order Summary, revealed no orders for birth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to Care Plan for residents' sexual health and relationship for two (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for revised Care Plans. The findings include: Resident #3 Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, bipolar disorder, mood disorder, and an unspecified mental disorder. Resident #3 was their own person for all legal and medical decisions. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/01/2026, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #3 exhibited physical, verbal, and other behaviors not directed towards others one to three days and had no issues with mood during the look back period. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 was independent for mobility. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan Report updated 03/11/2026, revealed Resident #3 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dented cans were promptly removed from stock; leftover meat products were used in a manner to maintain food quality; surfaces were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation, floors, dish washer and kitchen walls, door and frames were free of, debris, dirt, grease, rust, stains, wall tiles were replaced; food items stored in the freezer were covered or sealed properly; expired food items were promptly removed from stock; ice machine was maintained in clean and sanitary condition; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment for 1 of 1 meal observed. The Findings are: 1. On 1/13/2025 at 1:05 PM, this surveyor observed a shelf on the bottom next to the two-door freezer in the pantry. The shelf had a sign that indicated dented cans go on that shelf. Other food product cans were stored above on different shelves in the pantry. The Dietary Manager (DM) was interviewed and was asked what she does if she had a dented can of food, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care as per Physician's orders for 2 (Resident #2 and #48) of 2 sampled residents who were reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The findings include: 1.Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/20/2024, indicated Resident #2 had diagnoses of cancer, anoxic brain injury, and pressure ulcer stage 3, scored 3 (indicating severe impairment) on the Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), and had one stage 3 pressure ulcer. a. Review of a Care Plan that was updated 09/16/2024, indicated Resident #2 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right heel and the goal of care was the resident would develop clean and intact skin by the review date. b. Review of a form titled Order Recap Report, dated Jan. 15, 2025, indicated Resident #2 had an order with a start date of 09/11/2024, and an end date of 01/08/2025, to cleanse pressure ulcer to right heel with [Name brand antiseptic] solution (topical antiseptic), apply [Narcotic pain medication]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. The [DATE] lunch menu documented the residents who received pureed diets were to receive a #10 scoop (3 ounces) of oven herb roasted turkey, a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of candied sweet potatoes, a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of seasoned mixed vegetables and a #16 (1/4 cup ) of pureed dinner roll and for the residents on mechanical soft diets were to receive one dinner roll, a #8 scoop (4 ounces) which ground turkey would be 3 ounces plus one ounce of gravy for total of 4 ounces, and the residents on regular diets were to receive one dinner roll each. 2. On [DATE] 12:30 PM, the following observations were made during the noon meal service. a. On [DATE] at 12:30 PM, dietary cook (DC) #1 served no dinner roll or bread to the residents who received regular diets with their lunch meal,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' decisions as to whether they desired to have, or did have, an advance directive, were documented in a prominent part of the clinical record, to ensure their wishes were known regarding acceptance or rejection of any life-sustaining treatments in the event of their incapacitation for 1 (Resident # 30) of 1 sampled resident whose clinical records were reviewed for advance directive information. The findings are: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and emphysema. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/2024 documented the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates intact cognation) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. On 01/15/2025 at 9:45 AM, the Administrator (AD) provided a 2-page form for Resident #30, titled Physician Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) program by obtaining a copy of the completed Level II PASARR, so any recommendations could be incorporated into the resident's assessment, care planning and transition of care for 1 (Resident #7) of 1sample resident reviewed for PASARR. These are the findings: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, auditory hallucinations, delusional disorders, unspecified mood [affective] disorder and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 12/17/2024, documented that the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicating cognitively intact). a. Resident #7 ' s Care Plan with an initiated date of 9/19/2024, documented, Focus: Resident expresses maladaptive behavioral symptoms related to: A diagnosis of chronic mental illness (schizophrenia). The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident received a bath/shower per the schedule to promote good hygiene for 1 (Resident #44) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for assisting residents to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2024, revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Diagnoses on the MDS included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar), seizure disorder (neurological condition), obesity, and an ulcer on the lower extremity. The resident was observed, and records were reviewed, for ADLs being completed. 1) On 01/14/2025 at 9:35 AM, Resident #44 stated that some residents were not getting showers frequently enough. Resident #44 stated residents needed a shower three times per week and it was only carried out once or twice per week. Resident #44 stated [pronoun] needed minimal assistance but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored the skin and applied ointment as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin issues. The findings are: 1. Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident # 36 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis, coronary artery disease (CAD), neurogenic bladder, acute kidney failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/2024 documented that the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. On 01/15/2025 at 7:15 PM, review of a Physician's Order, dated 3/08/2024, stated: [brand name] external ointment (Emollient) Apply to bilateral lower extremities (BLE) topically one time a day for dry skin and apply to BLE topically as needed for dry skin. b. On 01/15/2025 at 7:30 PM, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) report for January 2025 showed 3 missed days of [brand name] ointment not applied as ordered 01/7/2025, 01/11/2025 and 01/13/2025. c. On 01/16/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to provide safety during the process of medication administration for one (Resident #44) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for being free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The findings include: Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2024, revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Diagnoses on the MDS included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar), seizure disorder (neurological condition), obesity, and an ulcer on the lower extremity. The resident was observed, and their record reviewed, for safe medication practices. 1) On 01/05/2025 at 7:50 AM the medication pass process was observed for Resident #44: a. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 had a cup with two medications in the cup. LPN #3 stated the medicines were [name brand anticonvulsant and nerve pain treatment medication] 50 mg and [Name brand combination pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to have a medication as ordered for treatment available for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 sample resident who was reviewed for pain control. The findings are: 1.Review of an Order Summary revealed Resident #36 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis, coronary artery disease (CAD), and acute kidney failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/2024, indicated the resident scored 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and took opioid (pain) medications. a. On 01/15/25 at 2:15 PM, review of Progress Notes on 12/15/2024 10:33, - Medication Administration Note Text: [Narcotic pain medication] Oral Tablet 5-325 milligrams (MG) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for pain awaiting delivery from pharmacy. On 12/14/2024 09:24, Medication Administration Note Text: [Narcotic pain medication] Oral Tablet 5-325 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for pain awaiting delivery from pharmacy. On 12/12/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene when changing gloves when contaminated during indwelling urinary irrigation catheter care for 1 (Resident #36) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for catheter care and failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when changing gloves during wound care for 1 (Resident #48) of 2 sampled residents observed for wound care. 1. Review of Resident # 36 ' s Order Summary revealed had diagnoses of coronary artery disease (CAD), neurogenic bladder, acute kidney failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/24, indicated that the resident scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (13-15 indicates cognitively intact), and Resident #36 had a catheter (indwelling). a. On 01/15/2025 at 9:00 AM, this surveyor observed the Treatment Nurse irrigate indwelling urinary catheter with 60 cubic centimeters (cc) of normal saline. Gloves were changed correctly. Hand hygiene was not performed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents skin treatments were completed to promote healing per physician's orders for 3 (Residents #2, #3, and #4) of 4 sampled residents. The findings are: Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #2 had a diagnosis of veinous insufficiency and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/07/2024 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitive) and had two venous ulcers. Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #2 had an order dated 08/02/2024 that indicated, Wound Care: wash all wounds on entire bi-lateral lower legs and feet with (antibacterial, antimicrobial skin cleanser), apply a thin layer of collagen gel to wounds, cover with pad and secure with woven gauze wrap, tape to secure and compression stockings to bilateral legs under (hook and loop) wrap every other day on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Resident #2's Care Plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were completing treatments per physician's orders for 3 (Residents #2, #3, and #4) of 4 sampled residents. The findings are: 1. Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #2 had diagnoses of veinous insufficiency and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/07/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitive) and had 2 venous ulcers. Review of an Order Summary Report revealed Resident #2 had an August 2024 Physician's order that read, Wound Care: wash all wounds on entire bi-lateral lower legs and feet with (antibacterial, antimicrobial skin cleanser), apply a thin layer of collagen gel to wounds, cover with pad and secure with woven gauze wrap, tape to secure and compression stockings to bilateral legs under (hook and loop) wrap every other day on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Resident #2's Care Plan, initiated 05/14/2024, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean environment on 5 (100 Hall, 300 Hall, 500 Hall, 600 Hall, and 700 Hall) halls of 6 halls where residents resided. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 68 residents who reside in the facility. The findings are: On 04/30/2024 at 9:10 AM, during rounds the following observations were made in the resident rooms: A dark brown build up with a thick black substance was noted along the baseboards, and debris behind the door of resident rooms: 107, 109, 305, 508, 509, 601, 602, 607, 610, 707 and 711. The floors were sticky in Resident Rooms: 106, 108 and 712. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large amount of dark brown substance covering the bowl in the toilet and a wad of toilet tissue soaked in a yellow substance in the sink. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a spot of dark brown substance on floor 1 inch in diameter and a one foot area of a smeared brown substance was noted next to where a resident was sitting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff demonstrated competency in the care of a resident who required weekly body audits, as evidenced by failure to accurately perform weekly body audits resulting in the resident developing gangrene in the 4th and 5th toes on the left foot, which resulted in surgical amputations of the 4th and 5th toes on the (L) foot for 1 (Resident #323) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: 1. Resident #323 had diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and Need for Personal Care. a. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/13/24 documented the resident had no venous or arterial ulcers, no other ulcers, wounds and skin problems, and no skin and ulcer/injury treatments. b. A Care Plan initiated on 02/15/22 documented the resident had a focus problem of Diabetes Mellitus and an approach was inspect feet daily for open areas, sores, pressure areas, blisters, edema or redness . Refer to podiatrist/foot care nurse to monitor/document foot care needs and to cut…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer had an open date to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who receive meals from the facility kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect 73 residents (total census: 74) who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 01/29/24 at 10:40 AM, the following observations were made in the three-door freezer in the kitchen area, referred to as the meat freezer: a. One half case (1 bag) of chicken breast nuggets that had been opened, did not have an open date. b. The Dietary Manager (DM) was asked how many nuggets were in the bag. The DM said, Approximately seventy. c. An opened bag of cheese manicotti with a received date of 12/18/23, did not have an open date. d. The DM was asked how many cheese manicotti were in the bag? The DM stated, About twenty.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #23 and #66) of 14 residents who were dependent or required assistance of staff to perform facial hair removal to promote good hygiene and cleanliness. The findings are: 1. On 01/29/24 at 10:32 AM, Resident #23 was sitting in a wheelchair. Resident #23 had facial hair one inch long. Resident #23 was asked if she liked facial hair. She replied, No. a. On 01/30/24 at 08:12 AM, Resident #23 was in bed with one-inch-long facial hair noted. b. On 01/30/24 at 03:14 PM, Resident #23 was sitting in the Dayroom, one inch long facial hair was noted to the chin area. c. A Care Plan with an initiated date of 04/25/22 noted Resident #23 required cueing and supervision with possible assistance by (1) staff with bathing, personal hygiene, and oral care. d. On 1/30/24 at 3:15 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was asked to accompany the Surveyor to Resident #23's room and look at her face and explain what she sees. CNA #1 stated, Its hairy. That's embarrassing for her. CNA#1 was asked should facial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances remaining count was accurate and drug records of controlled substances were maintained. The findings are: 1. On 01/30/2024 at 04:06 PM, during observation of the medication cart for the 500 Hall with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5, Page 56 of the Controlled Substance Logbook documented an ending balance of 16 tablets of Lacosamide 100 mg (milligram) for Resident #41. Resident #41's bubble pack card of Lacosamide 100 mg tablets showed a remaining balance of 14. There were 2 tablets not accounted for at that time. 2. On 01/30/2024 at 04:11 PM, Page #61 of the Controlled Substance Logbook documented an ending balance of 52 tablets of Clonazepam 0.5 mg for Resident #51. Resident #51's bubble pack card showed a remaining balance of 51. There was 1 tablet not accounted for at that time. 3. On 01/30/2024 at 04:07 PM, the Surveyor observed LPN #5 sign out Lacosamide 100 mg tablet on two different lines, correcting the count for Resident #41's Lacosamide. LPN # 5 stated, I did not sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to maintain a medication error rate was less than 5%, for 3 (Resident #33 #69 and #323 ) of 7 (Residents #9, #12, #33, #49, #62, #63 and #323) sampled residents observed during the medication pass. The medication error rate was 21.43%, based on observations of 28 medications administered for a total of 6 errors detected. The findings are: 1. Resident #33 a. A Physicians Order dated 12/5/23 documented Resident #33 was to receive Albuterol Sulfate HFA (hydrofluoroalkane) Aerosol Solution 2 puffs, inhale orally three times/day. b. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the Albuterol Inhaler was to be administered at 4:00 to 6:00 AM; 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM; and 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM. c. On 1/29/24 at 11:54 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepared Resident #33's medication. The Albuterol Sulfate Inhaler was omitted from the medication pass. d. On 2/1/24 at 09:13 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was asked if she gave Albuterol Sulfate 2 puffs to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that expired insulin vials were removed from the medication cart once the expiration date has been reached, the facility failed to ensure that controlled substances were properly removed once the seal to the medication had been broke to prevent the possible misappropriation of medication, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored on the medication cart in original packaging to show the medication identifiers and expiration date. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 03:52 PM, observed a medication cart for the 500 Hall with LPN #5. In the top drawer of the medication cart was a medication cup of 12 white tablets, circular in shape. The tablets had an imprint of 44 137 and the medication cup was labeled Gas X. LPN #5 was unable to verify the identity of the pills. The medications were discarded by the Administrator. 2. On [DATE] at 04:03 PM, during reconciliation of controlled substances on the 500 Hall medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident use glucometer was disinfected after use to prevent potential spread of infection for 17 residents who had physician orders for capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring. On 1/29/23 at 11:54 AM, LPN #1 performed a glucose finger stick to Resident # 33. LPN #1 took an alcohol wipe and cleaned the glucose machine for approximately 1 minute then placed the machine in the 600-medication cart drawer. LPN #1 performed a glucose finger stick on Resident #62, then cleaned the glucose machine with an alcohol wipe for approximately 25 seconds then returned the machine to the 700-medication cart drawer. On 1/29/24 at 12:24 PM, LPN #1 performed a glucose finger stick on Resident #9. LPN #1 cleaned the glucose machine for 8 seconds then returned the machine to the 700-medication cart drawer. Resident #33 had a Physicians order dated 12/5/23 documented accuchecks BID notify MD [Medical Doctor] if less than 60 or greater than 250 two times a day. Resident #62 had a Physicians Orders dated 8/7/23 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the opportunity to formulate Advance Directives other than code status, to enable them to make advance decisions regarding which measures should be provided or withheld in the event of their incapacitation for 1 (Resident #34) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. On 01/30/24 at 3:54 PM, the clinical records for Resident #34 contained no documentation to indicate Advance Directive information was provided allowing Resident #34 the opportunity to formulate an advance directive other than making decisions regarding code status. 2. A Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 08/19/2023 noted a family member was Resident #34's legal representative, and an Advance Directive was discussed and available and reviewed with the legal representative. No date for the Advance Directive was documented on the POLST. 3. On 02/02/24 at 11:17 AM, the Surveyor asked the Administrator and the Regional Manager if they had an Advance Directive for Resident #34 as indicated on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of resident records on the secured unit, were kept private by not closing the electronic medication administration record when not in use. The findings are: 1. On 1/31/2024 at 08:46 AM, upon entering the 600 Hall a medication cart was in the hall. There was not a nurse around. The electronic Medication Administration Record was open on top of the medication cart with a resident's private information visible to anyone passing by. At 08:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 opened a door and walked out of a resident's room. 2. On 1/31/2024 at 08:53 AM, LPN #1 was asked, What should you do prior to leaving the medication cart? LPN #1 stated, Close the medication administration record. LPN #1 was asked, Why should the medication administration record be closed before leaving the medication cart? LPN #1 replied, The medication administration record should be closed because its HIPPA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act]. LPN #1 was then asked, What could happen if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified in writing of the resident's transfer to the hospital and/or discharge as required for 1 (Resident #323) of 10 (Residents #5, #8, #19, #30, #33, #37, 47, #68, #66 and #323) sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital from [DATE] to 2/2/24. The findings are: 1. Resident #323 had diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. a. A Health Status note dated 1/12/24 at 12:32 PM documented, .Assessed left foot, top half of foot at an[sic] horizontal angle noted extremely dark in color, faint papable [palpable] pulses. The fourth, and fifth metatarsals are necrotic in color, scant amount of red drainage moted to 5th toe with less than an size opening at site. Provider nurse in facility . b. A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/12/24 at 13:28 (1:28) PM documented, .[Provider Name] in the facility, and made aware of, stated to send resident to ED [Emergency Department]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66 had an order for a treatment to the left wrist area and the bandage was changed to prevent infection. This failed practice had the potential to affect 14 residents who resided on 600 Hall. The findings are: 1. On 01/29/24 at 02:43 PM, Resident #66 had a bandage to the left lower arm dated 1/24 with initials. The bandage had a dark red substance the size of a half dollar dried on it. On 01/30/24 at 08:08 AM, Resident #66 was in the Dayroom, the bandage was still on left arm dated 1/24. On 01/31/24 at 08:53 AM, the Surveyor accompanied Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 room. LPN #1 was asked to look at the bandage on Resident #66's left wrist. LPN #1 stated, We had a treatment nurse yesterday and it was changed. The Surveyor asked about the date of 1/24 on the bandage. The LPN #1 stated, That is letting you know that it was done in January of 24. LPN #1 was asked how often the dressing is changed. LPN #1 stated, Every shift and when soiled. On 1/31/24 at 10:08 AM, LPN #3 was asked if she performed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Physician Ordered nutritional diet was served and the interdisciplinary team met timely for appropriate interventions and initiated new interventions when the resident's weight continued to decline in order to minimize further weight loss and maintain nutritional status to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #62) sampled resident. The findings are: 1.Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] weighing 181.3 lbs (pounds). 2. On 10/20/2022, a Physicians Order documented general diet, regular texture, thin liquids consistency and fortified oatmeal. 3. On 01/29/24 at 12:17 PM, Resident #62 did not have any fortified foods or milk on his lunch tray. The tray card called for both. 4. 01/30/24 08:42 AM, Resident #62 received a pancake, oatmeal, and sausage. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) #2 and #3 were asked what the fortified food was for this meal. Neither CNA knew. CNA #3 went to the kitchen, came back and stated, It was oatmeal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication and flushes via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were given via gravity for 1 (Resident #12) sampled resident who had a PEG tube. The findings are: 1. On 01/31/24 at 08:16 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 prepared the following medications for Resident #12: Citalopram 20 milligrams (MG) 1 tablet, Gabapentin capsule 300 mg 1 capsule, ASA (aspirin) 81 mg chewable 1 tablet, Carboxymethyl cellulose sodium 0.5% 1 drop both eyes, Docusate Sodium Liquid 50 mg/5 ml (milliliters) give 10 millimeters, flush with 50 ml water AC (before meals) & PC (after meals). LPN #2 took the syringe and drew up 50 milliliters. LPN #2 used a syringe and pushed the water through the tube. LPN #2 drew up the diluted medications and pushed the medications through the tube. LPN #2 drew up 50 ml of water in the syringe and pushed the water through the tube. a. A Physicians order dated 6/6/2003 documented, Celexa Oral Tablet 20 MG (Citalopram Hydrobromide) Give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube in the morning. b. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,403 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-06-04
  • $23,023 — penalty dated 2025-01-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5The Blossoms At Conway Rehab & Nursing CenterConway, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Eureka Springs Rehab & Nursing CenEureka Springs, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing CenterFort Smith, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Midtown Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms At Van Buren Rehab And Nursing CenterVan Buren, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Berryville Rehab & Nursing CenterBerryville, AR 1 of 5The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing CenLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At Oakdale Rehab & Nursing CenterJudsonia, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At West Dixon Rehab & Nursing CenterLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms At White River Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing CenterNewport, AR 2 of 5The Blossoms at White Hall Rehab & Nursing CenterWhite Hall, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At North Little Rock Rehab & NursingNorth Little Rock, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms At Star City Rehab & Nursing CenterStar City, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at Nashville Rehab and Nursing CenterNashville, AR 3 of 5The Blossoms at the Village Rehab & Nursing CenterHot Springs, AR 4 of 5The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing CenMountain View, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Hot Springs Rehab And Nursing CentHot Springs, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Prescott Rehab & Nursing CenterPrescott, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Rogers Rehab & Nursing CenterRogers, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms At Stamps Rehab & Nursing CenterStamps, AR 5 of 5The Blossoms at Dierks Rehab and Nursing CenterDierks, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PINE TREE HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/05/2021
MH AR OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
HERZKA, MATISYOHUIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
SCHREIBER, MORRISIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/05/2021
ADAMS, KATHERINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/05/2021

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$383K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 3%Other / private 3%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $383K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,766per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$298per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045359. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next