The Blossoms at Nashville Rehab and Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 44.2 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent the potential for cross contamination when administrating medications through a feeding tube for one (Resident #5) of three residents observed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/25/2026 revealed Resident #5 had diagnoses which included stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), critical illness myopathy. The MDS revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8, which indicated Resident #5 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #5 had a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG)–feeding tube). Review of Resident #5's Order Summary Report dated 04/29/2026, revealed the resident had an order with a start date of 03/18/2026 for EBP related to the PEG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and update a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three (Resident #1, #2, and #4) of four residents whose care plans were reviewed. The findings include: Resident #1 A review of Resident #1 ' s admission Record, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/15/2024, with diagnoses which included alcohol use, liver disease linked to alcohol abuse, psychoactive substance abuse, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of Resident #1 ' s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/05/2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #1 had intact cognition. A review of Resident #1 ' s Care Plan Report, revised on 01/15/2025, revealed the facility failed to address concerns for the resident ' s diagnoses of alcohol use with intoxication, psychoactive substance abuse, liver disease linked to alcohol abuse, and PTSD. A review of Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure room deodorizer spray, disinfectant wipes, and medications were not stored at the bedside of an empty room to prevent diversion, accidents and injuries. The facility failed to ensure medications were not stored in reach of residents, on the counter of the nursing station, to prevent accidents or injuries of 2 sampled (Residents 4, and Resident #15) residents sitting near the nurse ' s station. Findings include: 1. a. On 11/12/24 at 10:27 AM, the Surveyor observed room deodorizer spray, antifungal powder and 4 Vitamin A&D ointment packets on top of a shelf, to the left of the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER], one 2 oz. zinc oxide ointment and disinfectant wipes were on the second shelf, and on the bottom shelf was a bottle of rapid release pain reliever, and two 3.75oz tubes of 2% antifungal cream. b. During an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/13/24 at 12:52 PM, the DON was asked if any residents have administrative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed 1) to ensure food items were labeled with an accurate use by date to ensure food was not used beyond its safety period, 2) to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The findings are: 1. On 11/12/24 at 10:10 AM, three bags of coleslaw mix, dated 10/24/24, did not have a use by date on the packages, one bag of lettuce, dated 11/8/24, did not have a use by date on the package, and one bag of lettuce, dated 10/28/24, did not have a use by date on the package, all were in the refrigerator of the kitchen. 2. On 11/12/24 at 10:15 AM, a box of biscuits dated 11/1/24, was sitting in the freezer with the bag opened, exposing the biscuits to the elements of the freezer. 3. The Dietary Manager (DM) said it was important to ensure a use by date was on food items so the staff will know when to discard the item and not prepare it for the residents. The DM said a food item used after the use by date could make a resident sick. The DM said it was important to ensure food items were sealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during peri-care to reduce the risk of cross contamination and infection for 1 sampled (Resident #15) resident of 2 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program was implemented to prevent the potential spread of infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure proper signage was posted on residents' doors to indicate which personal protective equipment (PPE) should be in utilized in the rooms of 1 (Residents #26) of 2 residents reviewed for precautions. Findings include: 1. On 11/14/24 at 5:17 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 performed hand hygiene then was observed wiping Residents #15's peri area, and buttocks with one wipe in multiple directions. Resident #15 rolled onto a clean brief and CNA #2 assisted in changing clothes without performing hand hygiene. Surveyor asked what process was used to maintain hand hygiene during peri care. CNA #2 revealed they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was not served carrots from a resident ' s dislike list to prevent weight loss and ensure proper nutrition for 1 (Resident #16) resident of 1 sampled resident reviewed for choices. Findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnoses, revealed Resident #16 with diagnoses of left sided weakness, type II diabetes, and depressive disorders. a. Review of Resident #16 ' sAannual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (13-15 indicate cognitively intact). Review of MDS section K0520 indicated no special diet. b. Review of Resident #16's Care Plan, dated 09/18/2024, revealed Resident #16 required set up assistance from staff during meal service. c. On 11/12/24 at 2:53 PM, Resident #16 told the Surveyor dietary has repeatedly been told that Resident #16 does not like carrots, but they keep serving them. Surveyor observed soft carrots and mashed potatoes resting on Resident #16's plate. Resident #16 ' s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that resident ' s personal information was protected according to policy to prevent others from having access and provide a dignified existence for 1 (Resident #4) resident of 1 sampled (Resident #4) resident reviewed for privacy. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4 ' s Order Summary Report revealed diagnoses of lung disease, type II diabetes, and osteoarthritis. a. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/14/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 (0-7 indicate severe cognitive impairment). b. On 11/12/2024 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the Privacy section of the admission packet which revealed all residents will be treated with respect and dignity, and private information will not be shared with people not involved in a residents care. c. On 11/14/24 at 7:59 AM, an open computer screen resting on a medication cart was observed on 300 hall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled narcotics were properly stored in the medication room refrigerator, in the locked narcotic box separate from other medications to prevent misappropriation of resident owned medications. Findings include: 1.a. On 11/13/24 at 2:25 PM, the Surveyor asked to see what was in the narcotic box in the medication refrigerator and LPN #4 handed the surveyor two 30ml vials of anti-anxiety medication that were sitting outside the narcotic box. The Surveyor asked the process for storing narcotics in the refrigerator. LPN #4 stated narcotics should be in a cool place and locked in the black narcotic box located in the medication room refrigerator. LPN #4 confirmed that she counted refrigerated narcotics this morning, and told the Director of Nursing (DON) another nurse placed the anti-anxiety medication back in the refrigerator. b. On 11/13/24 at 2:27 PM, the DON was asked what process nursing were expected to use for storing refrigerated narcotics. The DON stated narcotics were to be stored in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required extensive assistance with personal hygiene was regularly offered trimming of their nails to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Nail Care Policy and Procedure, reviewed 08/06/2024, indicated, Purpose: 1. To provide cleanliness. Policy: All residents will have nails cleaned and trimmed once weekly or as needed per resident request. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/19/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 10 which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Diagnosis form indicated Resident #1 had a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. A review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised on 04/30/2024, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure personal drinks were not stored with resident food, and the facility failed to ensure staff distributed and served food in a safe and sanitary manner. This failed practice had the potential to affect 10 sampled (Residents #14, #27, #28, #30, #31, #98, #99, #148, #149, and #150) that eat food from the kitchen. The findings are: On 12/11/23 at 10:01 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) opened the right freezer door and a 1/2 filled, 20 oz. bottle of soda was resting inside the freezer, beside 2 cases of frozen sausage patties. The Dietary manager was asked what their procedure for refrigerating personal drinks was. The DM said, It is not our normal procedure to have drinks in the resident refrigerators. That's a no, no. On 12/11/23 at 12:18 PM, The Surveyor observed certified nursing assistant [CNA] #5 serve Resident #37 a small bowl of fruit with fingers resting on the rim of the bowl, and palm over the bowel. The Surveyor asked CNA #5 the procedure for serving cups and bowls to residents and CNA #5 said, I usually grab the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR