The Blossoms At White River Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 74.5 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent elopement, and failed to ensure staff responded promptly to an exit door alarm and thoroughly check the area outside the building after a door alarm sounded for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, and #5) who were at risk for elopement. Consequently, Resident #1 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge, traveled across rough ground, and was found by law enforcement in a dehydrated state. It was determined the facility's past non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, S483.25 (Quality of Care) at a scope and severity of J. The IJ began on 06/15/2025 at approximately 4:15 PM. The facility did not have camera surveillance, but staff suspect Resident #1 who resided on the secured 300 Hall followed a visitor to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that items were dated properly, items were sealed/closed properly, and cross contamination in the kitchen did not occur during meal service in one of one kitchen observed. The findings include: A review of the facility policy and procedure Avoiding Cross Contamination indicated that store food at least six inches above the floor. A review of the facility policy Labeling and Date Marking Policy indicated, Labeling and dating food products helps you identify what they are, when they were prepared, and how long they can be safely stored. This way, you can ensure that you use the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, which means that you use the oldest products first and the newest ones last. Labeling and dating also helps you avoid cross-contamination, which occurs when harmful bacteria or allergens are transferred from one food to another. A review of the facility policy FIFO (First in, first out) Facts indicates FIFO stock rotation helps prevent unnecessary food waste' Store items in order of their use-by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene, put on proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and follow standard infection control procedures for two (Resident #5, Resident #33) of five residents reviewed for isolation precautions. The findings are: 1. A review of the admission Record noted Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction. a. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/2025, revealed Resident #5 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Resident #5 had active diagnoses, which included: aphasia, which meant the resident was unable to speak. Section GG indicated Resident #5 was dependent on staff for all care and was transferred via a lift device, such as a sit to stand lift. Resident #5 used a wheelchair for mobility. b. A review of the Physician Order Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility staff certifications, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff met Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification requirements before providing CPR to residents in need, affecting1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for resident/patient/client neglect. The findings include: Resident #1 had medical diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, heart failure, chronic embolism, and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremities. A review of Resident #1 ' s progress notes on [DATE] at 5:00 AM revealed LPN#1 was called to the resident ' s room by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2. Resident #1 was found to have no pulse. A code was called, and CPR was initiated and performed by LPN #1. Ambulance was called. A review of a facility policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Policy, effective [DATE] and revised [DATE] indicated staff were to, Obtain and/or maintain American Heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure spices stored in the cabinet or on a shelf in the storage room were dated for first-in-first out spice rotation; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 50 residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen (Total Census:53). The findings are: 1. On 03/06/2024 at 08:06 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen: a. A pan of green beans is noted sitting on the stove top uncovered. The green beans were never covered while the initial tour was conducted, exposing it to possible cross-commination. b. The floors were dirty with food crumbs. The bottom shelf of the table which housed the rice, sugar, and flour containers was stained. The containers had dry, brown, spilled substances running down them on the outside. 2. On 03/06/2024 at 08:13 AM, Dietary Employee (DE) #1 had a tissue in his/her hand, they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trays were passed table by table to 3 residents (Resident #11, #35, and #47) out of 18 residents who receive trays in the secured unit dining room. The findings are as follows: 1. Resident #11 had diagnoses of Dementia and Schizophrenia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/08/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 (0-7 indicates severe impairment). Resident #11 is independent for meals. a. On 03/04/2024 at 12:35 PM, Surveyor observed Resident #10, and Resident #38 received lunch trays. Resident #11, seated at the same table, did not receive a tray. Resident #11 was observed looking around as Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) passed trays before asking about Resident #11's tray after five minutes of waiting. Resident #11 received a tray at 12:48 PM, by which time Resident #10 had finished eating, while Resident #38 was halfway done with lunch service. 2. Resident #35 had diagnoses of Transient cerebral ischemic attack, Dementia, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike manner for 13 (Rooms 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 411, 412, 414, 415) resident rooms, the dining area, and the activity area. The findings are: On 03/06/2024 at 10:22 AM, the following observations were made in the Secure Unit: a. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Above the sink is a ceiling tile that is bowed with the vent placed in the middle. The Surveyor asked the Maintenance Supervisor what could happen to a resident while using the sink. The Maintenance Supervisor said that it could fall. b. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Above the toilet in the bathroom the vent is separating from the ceiling tile. c. room [ROOM NUMBER]: In the corner by the closet, the baseboard has come off the wall exposing sheet rock. The paint is chipped off and part of the area has been re-plastered. The Maintenance Supervisor said approximately 4 inches of it has been re-plastered. The baseboard on the side next to the bathroom door is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure toenails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 (Resident #47) sampled resident out of 18 residents who require assistance with daily living on the Secure Unit. 1. Resident #47 had diagnoses of Dementia and Paranoid personality disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/17/24 the resident received a score of 3 (0-7 indicates severe impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Per care plan with a targeted completion date of 04/17/24 Resident requires assistance with ADL [activities of daily living] functions, Grooming: Someone must assist the resident to groom self. a. On 03/04/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident #47's left shoe had the top ripped off. The Surveyor asked Resident #47 what happened to their shoe. Resident #47 said that they had ripped it off because his/her toes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from hazards by having a vent area in the room with exposed wiring and by having no light in the bathroom for 1 (Resident #38) of 17 mobile residents on the Secure Unit. The findings are: 1. Resident #38 had medical diagnoses of Unspecified dementia and Altered mental status. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 01/02/24 the Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) documented Resident #38 had short-term and long-term memory loss. a. The Care Plan with a target completion date of 3/28/24 documented, Resident #38 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes. b. On 03/04/2024 at 11:05 AM, in Resident #38's Room a metal vent area was left open and exposed. The inside of the area contained a light socket without a bulb and wiring was exposed, dirt and debris were noted on the bottom of the vent area. In the bathroom, the light was not functional. Above the mirror on the right hand wall in the bathroom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with activities of daily living were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 resident (Resident #47) out of 18 residents who require assistance with daily living on the secure unit. The findings are: 1. Resident #47 had diagnoses of Dementia and Paranoid personality disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/17/24 the resident received a score of 3 (0-7 indicates severe impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Per care plan with a targeted completion date of 04/17/24 Resident requires assistance with ADL [activities of daily living] functions, Grooming: Someone must assist the resident to groom self. a. On 03/04/2024 at 10:40 AM, the Surveyor observed that Resident #47's fingernail on the right index finger was chipped off and comes to a point, the rest of the nails were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a positioning device was utilized to decrease the potential for further decline in range of motion (ROM) for 1 (Resident #13) out of 3 residents who are dependent for positioning on the secured unit. The findings are as follows: 1. Resident #13 had diagnoses of Muscle weakness, generalized, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Alzheimer's Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/29/23 documented the resident received a score of 00 (0-7 indicates severely cognitively impaired) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. The Care Plan with a target completion date of 4/16/2024 documented, Requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) function .Mobility: Occasional physical assistance required. b. On 03/04/2024 at 10:40 AM, Resident #13 was in the activity area of the Secure Unit leaning on his/her left side with their arm resting on the top of the wheel of the wheelchair. c. On 03/05/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident #13 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,316 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,316 — penalty dated 2025-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $301K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR