The Blossoms At Midtown Rehab & Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 85.7 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comfortable homelike environment for Rooms #430, #428, and #433 occupied by residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The findings include: During an observation on 08/25/2025 at 12:34 PM, the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have an unidentified brownish/black residue on the walls of the shower stall walls, floors, and shower curtain. This surveyor observed a basin with brownish/black residue noted sitting on the floor of the shower stall. The bathroom smelled of urine. A urinal was observed sitting on the nightstand with toothbrushes beside it. During an observation on 08/25/2025 at 12:46 PM, a shower chair in room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a brownish residue on the bars of the shower chair and the mesh-like backing. This surveyor observed in the same bathroom missing and cracked tiles on the floor. The wall was noted to have scrape marks towards the bottom of the wall near the floor and there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess and complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two (Resident #71 and Resident #48) of two residents reviewed. The findings include: Resident #71Review of an admission Record indicated Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and presence of a surgically created opening through the neck into the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #71 indicated to change tracheostomy collar and to perform tracheostomy care daily. The Physician Orders also included to check oxygen saturation daily and to give oxygen via trach cuff at 5 liters as needed. Review of the quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/05/2025 incorrectly indicated that Resident #71 did not require tracheostomy care, did not use oxygen and did not require suctioning, which are needed when a resident has a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure chemicals were properly stored away from residents to prevent accidents and injuries. Specifically, the storage room door, directly across the hall from the elevator door on 300 hall was left unlocked and unsecured. The room had chemicals, biohazard waste, a housekeeper's cart, and equipment stored inside. The Administrator provided a list of 55 ambulatory residents who could have been potentially affected. The facility failed to ensure razors were properly stored to prevent accidents and injury for one (Resident #57) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Facility On 08/26/2025 at 11:06 AM, this surveyor observed a set of keys hanging from the doorknob of the soiled room directly across the hall from the elevator on 300-Hall. This surveyor turned the key and the door opened. This surveyor observed an unlocked housekeeping cart with a mop and water in a bucket on the cart, sitting just inside the door; a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the ice scoop holder was maintained in a sanitary manner; food items stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage area were covered or sealed; expired food items were promptly discarded on or before the expiration or use by-date; that dietary staff washed their hands between handling dirty and clean equipment; and hot food items were maintained at required temperature for one of one meal observed. The findings include: During an observation and interview on 08/26/2025 at 12:41 PM, this surveyor observed the ice scoop holder, on the wall by the ice machine, had an accumulation of wet black residue at the bottom of it, and the ice scoop was resting on the residue. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the scoop holder was dirty and had mold-like residue at the bottom of it and should be cleaned daily. During an observation and interview on 08/26/2025 at 12:46 PM, this surveyor observed a box of alfredo sauce on a shelf in the refrigerator, the manufacturer's instructions specified that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure isolation practices were being followed by housekeeping staff to prevent the possible spread of infectious disease on one (Fourth) floor of the nursing facility. The findings include: On 08/25/2025, a contact isolation sign was observed on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 08/26/2025 at 11:00 AM, Housekeeper (HSK) #9 was observed on west 400 hall pushing the housekeeping cart with gloved hands. HSK #9, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, nor donning an isolation gown, was observed going into room [ROOM NUMBER] with a broom and dustpan. HSK #9 came out of the room and placed a small bag of trash in the trash compartment of the housekeeping cart. HSK #9 was observed, through the open room door, to move dirty linen and a trash container from room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom to the room,. HSK #9 then came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] and picked up a bottle of spray and a toilet brush and went back into room [ROOM NUMBER]. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for 2 (Residents #2 and #4) of 3 residents reviewed for correct medication administration as ordered by the physician. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Policies and Procedures: Subject: Medication Administration, revised on 11/25/2022, indicated that medications were to be administered as ordered, including the required time frame. 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/10/2025, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 was marked as taking antipsychotic and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 4 (Resident #3, #4, #5, #7) of 15 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised on 01/01/2024, indicated, Policy Statement: We are committed to the safety and well-being of all our residents. We believe that the resident has the right to be free from .misappropriation of property .The facility considers all the above to be abuse and uses the general term abuse to specify all .Investigation: 3. In the event of misappropriation, a thorough search of the building is conducted to determine possible misallocation of missing items. A Missing Item Form is completed, and missing items are analyzed for patterns, location and care givers . A review of a facility policy titled, Controlled Substances, revised on 01/31/2023, indicated, .Schedule II, III, IV, and V medications remaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation of property were reported to the State Agency for 15 Resident, with 3 residents remaining on medications, (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7) of 15 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure alleged misappropriations of Resident #4, #5, #7 medications were reported. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised on 01/01/2024, indicated, Policy Statement: We are committed to the safety and well-being of all our residents. We believe that the resident has the right to be free from .misappropriation of property .The facility considers all the above to be abuse and uses the general term abuse to specify all .Reporting .3. The facility will report all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse to the Office of Long-Term Care, Family, Police, and MD [medical doctor]. Suspicion or allegation of abuse shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator, freezer and storage room were covered, and sealed to maintain freshness and decrease the potential for cross contamination; the ice machine and ice scoop holder were maintained in clean condition to prevent potential contamination of residents' food and beverages; dietary employees washed their hands or changed gloves before handling clean equipment or food items to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 main kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 20 residents who received meals from the kitchen on the 200 Hall; 30 residents who received meals from the kitchen on the 300 Hall; and 39 residents who received meals from the kitchen on the 400 Hall (total census of 97), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 05/06/24 at 12:34 PM. The findings are: 1. On 05/05/2024 09:08 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen area: a. There was water standing on the floor between the hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to prevent respiratory complications for 2 (Residents #71 and #248) sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 57 residents that had physician orders for oxygen therapy. The findings are: 1. Resident #71 had diagnoses of stroke, end stage renal disease and coronary artery disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/12/2024 documented the resident scored 00 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a. A Physicians Order dated 05/01/2024 documented, .Oxygen at (3) L/Min (Liters per minute) per Nasal Cannula as needed for Shortness of Breath maintain O2 [oxygen] sats [Saturations] above ( ) . b. On 05/05/2024 at 12:01 PM, Resident #71 was lying in bed with oxygen in use at 2.5 liters via nasal cannula. c. On 05/06/2024 at 08:41 AM, Resident #71 was lying in bed with eyes closed. Oxygen was in use at 2.5 liters per nasal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $607K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR