Yamato Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 172.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation , interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for the food service safety. The findings included; 1. During the initial kitchen / food service sanitation tour conducted in the main kitchen on 04/16/23 at 9 AM and accompanied with the Morning Cook, the following was noted: (a) Observation of the cooks 2-compartment preparation sink noted that the left side sink contained 6-5 pound cook portions of Pot Roast. Further observation noted that a small stream of warm water was running onto 2 portions of the beef. The right sink was noted to contained approximately 40 portions of commercially packaged raw fish. Further observation noted the fish was not being covered in cold running water. An interview conducted with the lunch cook at the time of the observation noted the surveyor to state the roast and fish were not being thawed according to regulation. It was discussed with staff that both the beef and fish need to be resting in cold water with run-over drain and also cold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 4 of 4 residential living areas (Williamsburg, [NAME], Cambridge, and [NAME]); and failed to ensure it stored and processed linens in the laundry area in a proper manner. The findings included: During the resident screenings conducted on 04/16-17/23 and the environment tour conducted on 04/19/23 at 10 AM, accompanied with the Director of Maintenance and Corporate Director of Maintenance, the following was noted: 1. Williamsburg Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Peeling room wallpaper, and damage and disrepair to room walls. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Exterior of room entry door in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Exterior of entry door damaged and in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Peeling room wallpaper, and damage and disrepair to room walls. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Peeling room wallpaper, and damage and disrepair to room walls. room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medications in an unlocked Wound treatment cart; ointment in an unoccupied resident room; medications at the bedside for Resident #126, Resident #305, Resident #9, Resident #122; loose tablet on a medication cart; one (1) tablet disposed of into a garbage can; two (2) loose tablets in two (2) medication carts; and one (1) expired medication in a medication refrigerator. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on [DATE] at 1:30 PM, titled, Medication Storage, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed 2022, documented in part, in the Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu for Pureed Diets that included 16 of 16 aampled residents, Residents #10, #16 #18, #29, #31, #37, #63, #69, #72, #99, #121, #132, #137, #202, #212, and #299. The findings included: 1. During the review of the approved menu for the lunch meal of 04/16/23, the following documentation was noted: *Regular Diets - Fresh Potatoes and Onion (4 ounce serving portion) *Pureed Diet - Pureed Fresh Potatoes and Onions (#10 scoop portion) During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 04/16/23 at 11:30 AM, it was noted that the Fresh Potatoes and Onions were prepared and located on the steam table for Regular Diet. Further observation noted that Pureed Fresh Potatoes and Onions were not prepared. Further observation noted that instant Mashed Potatoes were prepared for Pureed Diet. Interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and facility's Registered Dietitan (RD) at the time of the observation noted that staff failed to review the approved menu for pureed diet. It was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings included: During observation of the facility's dumpster / refuse area on 04/16/23 at 10:30 AM, it was noted that there were 2 commercial dumpster's (1-garbage / refuse and 1 cardboard / paper waste) located in the courtyard outside of the dietary department. Further observation of the garbage / refuse dumpster noted that door to the unit was not closed and the interior of the dumpster was filled with open bags (10) and exposed garbage food/trash waste. The unit was noted to be full of flying insects and the smell was overwhelming. Photographic Evidence Obtained. Observation of the cardboard / paper dumpster also noted that the the unit was full of open garage and expose garbage waste. The administrator and Director of Maintenance were notified that the garbage storage area was not being maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and the feeding of pests. Photographic Evidence Obtained. It was also discussed that there was the potential health threat from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program, as evidenced by observations of live and dead roaches in multiple areas of the facility. The findings included: During an observation on 04/16/23 at 10:37 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER], a Germán roach-like insect ran across the floor towards the underside of the resident's bed with Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), present. During an interview conducted on 04/16/23 at 10:40 AM with Staff I, he acknowledged an insect ran across the floor towards the underside of resident's bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. When asked how or who does he reports the bug sighting incident, he stated he would tell the nurse or the Administrator. On 04/16/23 at 2:14 PM, during an interview with the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER], when asked about the presence of pests, the resident replied, roaches the size of elephants in the closet. At the conclusion of the interview, with Resident #13's permission to tour her room, live…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity equally for 21 of 34 sampled residents reviewed for dignity, as evidenced by: utilizing a gown as a clothing protector (Resident #58), lack of personal care request related to hair (Resident #97), not providing proper clothing (Resident #32), and for placing meal tray trash on residents' beds for resident rooms #100 through #119, which affected 19 randomly observed facility residents during meals (that included sampled Residents #32 #66, #202 and #205). The census at the time of the survey was 165. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Resident Rights, with no date implemented and no revised date documented, in part: The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the [NAME] in the facility. All residents will be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for social services (Resident #80). The findings included: Resident #80 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #80 had a medical history significant for a Stroke, Heart Failure, Muscle Weakness, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Insomnia, Major Depressive Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Dementia, Blood Clot, Anxiety, and Chronic Pain. Review of Resident #80's Physician Orders revealed an initial order for a Psychiatric Consult was written on 12/28/22, despite Resident #80 being admitted in November 2022 with a significant psychiatric history. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) of 11/17/22, documented in part: Under Section A for Identification Information, this MDS documented Resident #80 was not currently considered by the state Level II Preadmission Screening and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be free of a medication error rate of 5% or more, and the medication error rate was 9.68 %. Three (3) medication errors were identified [NAME] observing a total of 31 opportunities, affecting Resdient #42 and a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The findings included: 1. A medication administration observation was conducted on 04/17/23 at 9:15 AM with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) for a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff A gathered and administered the following medications: a. Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) 1 tablet given b. Docusate 100mg 1 capsule given c. Eliquis 5mg 1 tablet given d. Valsartan 80mg 1 tablet given e. Vitamin C 500mg 1 tablet given f. Vitamin D3 1000 international unit (iU) 1 tablet given. Review of the resident's physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident should have received 2 tablets each for the Vitamin C 500mg and Vitamin D3 1000IU. 2. A medication administration observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to screen for eligibility to receive pneumococcal immunization and failed to offer pneumococcal immunization for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations, Resident #300. The findings included: Record review for Resident #300 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no Pneumococcal screening for Resident #300. There was no documentation of the Pneumococcal vaccine offered to Resident #300. During an interview conducted on 04/19/23 at 11:00 AM with the Infection Preventionist revealed she started working at the facility during the end of November 2022 as the Infection Preventionist. When asked about immunizations being offered to residents, she stated all residents are screened on admission and readmission for Pneumococcal, Influenza and Covid immunization, and based on the screening, the immunizations are then offered to each resident if applicable.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL