Alliance Care Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 212 beds and averages 204.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-11-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a.) there was no delay in implementing recommendations made by the consulting wound care Nurse Practitioner (NP), b.) care planned interventions to promote wound healing were implemented for a resident who was identified at risk for developing a pressure ulcer (PU) and developed a Stage 2 sacral PU, and c.) a thorough assessment for (PU) risk factors was completed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #49) for PU, who developed a new PU on 10/27/22, and was evidenced by the following: On 11/07/22 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor toured the 300's Unit of the facility and observed Resident #49 in bed with the head of the bed elevated, facing the door, the feet rested on the mattress, and the eyes were closed. When inquired about the resident's status, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed in the room stated, All he/she does is sleep all day. On 11/07/22 at 11:30 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation involving an injury of unknown origin was reported as required for one out of one sampled resident (Resident (R)12) reviewed for reporting requirements. Specifically, R12 was discovered on 06/14/26 with an unwitnessed head injury after being observed attempting to climb back into bed. The facility's failure to report an injury of unknown origin had the potential to delay regulatory review and intervention, which could allow abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation to go unidentified and unaddressed, placing residents at risk for further harm.Findings include: Review of R12's Face Sheet located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an initial admission date of 09/22/25 and the most admission date of 04/21/26. With the following diagnoses: included traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (subsequent encounter), Parkinson's disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide three of three residents (Residents (R)77, R268 and R54) a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when they completed their Medicare A therapy services. This failure to provide the CMS for SNF ABN prevented the resident from knowing they had days remaining under Medicare A. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy, Procedures and Information last reviewed 07/06/24, Policy: Medicare will only pay for services which are determined to be no longer meet skilled nursing or rehab need. The facility's policy fails to direct staff to complete the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) form 10055 for residents at the anticipated end of their Medicare covered stay. 1.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR), under the census tab, for R77 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident abuse on 03/24/23 when Resident (R)54 pushed and hit R411 in the back. This deficiency has the potential to facilitate future resident-to-resident physical altercations resulting in serious injury or serious physical or psychosocial impairment. Findings include: 1. Review of the Census tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R411 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Med Diag [Medical Diagnoses] tab located in the EMR revealed R411 had diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder, and dementia with agitation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/13/23 and located in the EMR revealed R411 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of 10 indicating severe cognitive impairment. R411 exhibited no behaviors as indicated in Section E. Review of the Care Plan (CP) located in the EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJAC 8:39-9.4(f) Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate resident-to-resident abuse incidents for three residents (Residents (R)54, R210, and R411) reviewed for abuse out of a sample size of 31. This failure has the potential for further resident-to-resident abuse occurring and not being investigated so interventions can be put in place. Refer to F600 Findings include: 1. Review of the Census tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident (R)411 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Med Diag [Medical Diagnoses] tab located in the EMR revealed R411 had diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder, and dementia with agitation. Review of the Census tab located in the EMR revealed R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the Med Diag tab located in the EMR revealed R54 had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, vascular dementia, and previous stroke. Review of a Reportable Event…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was appropriately positioned with head elevated while receiving nutrition through a feeding tube for one of one resident (Resident (R) 91) reviewed for tube feeding out of a sample of 31 residents. The lack of head elevation could result in aspiration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Tube Feeding Policy, last reviewed 05/10/24, revealed, All resident [sic] to remain in Semi-Fowler's position [head of the bed elevated between 30 degrees and 45 degrees] during the feeding and for one hour following the feeding to prevent aspiration. Review of R91's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/25/24 and located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), and the staff assessment for cognition indicated severely impaired cognition. R91 had a gastrostomy tube and received over half of his nutrition through tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have medications available to administer as ordered, document why the medications were not given, and maintain accessible records for a controlled medication for three of seven residents (Resident (R) 141, R261, and R366) reviewed for medication administration or pain. This had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Findings include: 1. Review of R366's admission Record under the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R366 had diagnoses which included failure to thrive. Review of R366's Order Summary Report, located in the Orders tab of the EMR revealed orders which included: -magnesium oxide 400mg 1 tablet twice daily as a supplement, ordered 10/08/24, and -dronabinol 2.5mg twice daily for appetite stimulant, ordered 10/08/24 Review of R366's Medication Administration Record (MAR), located in Orders tab of the EMR, revealed the dronabinol and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent during observation of medication administration. The facility had three errors in twenty-five opportunities, which resulted in a 12 percent error rate. This affected one (Resident (R) 366) out of four residents observed. Medication errors have the potential to result in adverse health outcomes. Refer to F755. Findings include: Review of the facility untitled policy regarding medication administration, dated 06/22/24, revealed, Medications are to be administered within a two-hour time frame (i.e. one hour before or after the medication order time. The licensed nurse Immediately notifies nursing supervisor if medication is unavailable for administration and notifies Physician/NP [nurse practitioner] of the same. Contacts pharmacy to obtain medication. The licensed nurse Assures the 5 rights: Compares the medication name, strength, route and dosage schedule on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to utilize the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and failed to perform proper hand hygiene for one of five residents (Resident (R) 91) reviewed for EBP out of a sample of 31 residents. This created a potential for the transmission of infection to staff and other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 04/01/24, revealed it stated: Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing . The use of gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities is indicated, . for nursing home residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization as well as for residents with MDRO infection or colonization. The following situations would warrant Enhanced Barrier Precautions: (EBP) . Wounds and/or indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe clean homelike environment for residents. This involved three resident rooms affecting four (Resident (R) 25, R26, R27, and R19) of 27 sampled residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/18/23 located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Observation on 08/03/23 at 8:50 AM, 1:45 PM and on 08/04/23 at 10:50 AM the floor in R25's room had dirt built up along the walls. A fan was observed in the room with the cover off exposing the blades. On 08/03/23 at 8:50 AM and 1:45 PM the fan was running with the blades exposed and not protected. During each of the observations there was a brown spot on the wall next to the outlet located next to the hand sink in the room. R25 stated she had been in the facility for three weeks and the floor and the spot on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-11-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen, and pantry areas, in a clean and sanitary manner to limit the spread of infection and potential food borne illness by failing to ensure: a.) the environment and kitchen equipment was maintained in a manner to limit the potential for microbial growth, b.) the dish machine was operated within appropriate temperature specifications per the policy, c.) the chlorine test strips were used per manufacturer's directions, and d.) resident food stored in unit refrigerators was labeled and dated. The deficient practice occurred was observed in the main kitchen, and in the second, third and fourth floor resident pantry, and was evidenced by the following: Reference: U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 2017 Food Code, 4-501.110 Mechanical Warewashing Equipment, Wash Solution Temperature (B) The temperature of the wash solution in spray-type warewashers that use chemicals to SANITIZE may not be less than 49…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ