Briarcliff Manor Center For Rehab And Nursing Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 269 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00324542), the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for anti-seizure medications. Specifically, Resident #1 had a physician's order for Vimpat (controlled antiseizure medication) 200 milligrams (mg) 1 tab every 12 hours at 9AM and 9PM daily, and over three days in 08/2023 and four days in 09/2023. A total of 12 doses of Vimpat were not administered to Resident #1. Resident #2 had a physician's order for Keppra (anti-seizure medication) 1000 mg 1 tab every 12 hours at 9AM and 9PM daily, and over six dates a total of 7 doses of Keppra were not administered to Resident #2. Subsequently, Resident #1 suffered a seizure on 9/17/23 at 3:45 PM and was transferred to the hospital. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #1 which was Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of care with the likelihood of risk for harm to the health and safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00383393), the facility did not ensure a resident remained free from physical abuse. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #1) of four (4) total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #1 reported they were hit in their groin by Certified Nurse Aide #3 on 6/11/2025 at approximately 1:30 AM. This resulted in psychosocial harm that did not rise to level of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention & Reporting, dated 1/3/2025, documented any employee involved in abuse will be disciplined appropriately. Resident #1 had diagnoses of hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain) and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment (an assessment tool) dated 5/16/2025 documented Resident #1 presented with mild cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15. The Comprehensive Care Plan related to victimization, initiated 5/10/2025 and last reviewed on 6/16/2025, documented Resident #1 would verbalize feeling safe.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified experience for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for dignity. Specifically, Resident #24 was observed multiple times after meals with food/crumbs on their chin and their gown. The findings include: Resident #24 had diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia affecting left non dominant side, and dementia. A Resident Care Plan dated 3/30/21 titled Activities of Daily Living documented the resident required a one person assist with bathing, partial/moderate assistance for upper body dressing, and supervision or touching assistance for eating and personal /general hygiene. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/26/24 documented Resident #24 had moderate cognitive impairment, upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and required supervision/touching assistance with eating and hygiene. During an observation on 3/05/25 at 10:35 AM, Resident #24 was observed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey from 03/05/2025 to 03/12/2025, the facility did not ensure that the residents' advance directives were accurate for 1 (Resident # 82) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #82's Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment form was changed from Do Not Resuscitate (allow a natural death if the heart stops beating or resident stops breathing) to Full Code (perform Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation) and the physician orders and facility identifiers (system used to alert staff the resident's code status) were not updated to reflect the resident's wishes. The findings include: The facility policy, Advanced Directives, with a 12/13/2024 review date, documented the individual's wishes on advance directives will be identified and honored by the facility. All Do Not Resuscitate orders must align with the corresponding Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment documentation to maintain accuracy in the resident's care preferences. A Do Not Resuscitate alert will be placed in the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview conducted during the recertification survey conducted from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure that a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was provided. Specifically, room C-19-B had broken window clips, room C-9-B had a broken radiator cover, a window shade that was stained, and black scuff marks on the wall between the window and resident dresser, room A-17 had a faulty window unit and faulty sealed Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner unit which allowed cold outside air to enter the room. The findings include: The facility policy titled Maintenance/Engineering policy dated 7/24/24 documented provide a safe, functional and effective environment for residents, staff and all individuals who provide care to residents and all individuals who visit the facility. During an observation on 03/06/25 at 12:08 PM of room C-19-B, a hand-written sign was observed on the lower left side of the window stating Do not open this window. A piece of the broken window opening latch was observed on the windowsill. During an observation on 03/06/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during a recertification survey from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25 it was determined that for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for skin conditions the facility did not ensure that injuries of unknown origin were reported to the state agency. Specifically, the state department was not notified after the 3/4/25 Accident/Incident Report documented Resident #10 was observed with discoloration that suddenly appeared on the right side of the resident's face. The findings include: Resident #10 was admitted with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Seizure Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, required partial to moderate assist for bed mobility and transfer; it further documented and had no falls. The 2/18/25 Accident/Incident report documented the resident was being given care by the certified nurse aide when the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 3/5/25-3/12/25, the facility did not ensure each Resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for 2 (Residents #52 and #57) of 3 Residents reviewed for Activities of a Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #52 and #57 who required dependent assistance with Activities of Daily Living, were observed during multiple observations with fingernails that were long and ungroomed. The findings include: The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, reviewed 7/28/24, documented: It is the policy of this center to provide activity of daily living care to all Residents based on assessment of needs. 1) Resident #52 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and major depressive disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 1/2/25 documented Resident #52…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure appropriate care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for Skin Conditions. Specifically, on 2/18/25 the registered nurse was not made aware, and there was no documented evidence that a registered nurse assessment was conducted after Resident #10 was hit in the face with the bed control while cares were being provided by Certified Nurse Aide #7. The findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Seizure Disorder. The 2/18/25 Accident/Incident Report documented Resident #10 was being given care by the Certified Nurse Aide when the resident was playing/fidgeting with the bed controls, and it suddenly swung into the resident's face. It further documented a nurse was notified and no injury was noted. Resident #10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/5/2025 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 2 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for Respiratory Care was provided with such care, consistent with the professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #34, had a physician's order for oxygen to be administered via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute, and was observed multiple times with the oxygen rate not consistent with the physicians' order. Additionally, there was no signage present indicating oxygen was being utilized in Resident #34's room. The findings include: The facility policy titled Oxygen Administration last revised on 10/29/24 documented to verify that there is a physician's order; place an oxygen in use sign on the outside of the room entrance door; and turn on the oxygen on at the prescribed rate. Resident #34 had diagnoses including shortness of breath, depression, acute and chronic respiratory infarction. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 12/19/24 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review conducted during a recertification survey from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure that sufficient staff was available to meet the needs of all residents on 30 days reviewed. Specifically, actual staffing levels were below minimum levels on the following dates (2/2/2/25, 2/3/25, 2/4/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/10/25, 2/12/25, 2/16/25, 2/17/25, 2/24/25, 2/25/25, 3/1/25, and 3/3/25). The findings include: The Minimum Par Levels for Nursing Sheets documented the 7AM -3PM shift for unit A should have at least 4 Certified Nurse Aides, Unit B should have at least 3 Certified Nurse Aides, and unit C should have at least 3 Certified Nurse Aides, the 3PM-11PM shift for unit A should have at least 3 Certified Nurse Aides, unit B should have at 3 Certified Nurse Aides, and unit C should have at least 2 Certified Nurse Aides, and the 11PM-7AM shift for unit A, unit B and unit C should have at least 2 Certified Nurse Aides. The February 2025 daily staffing sheets documented 2/2/25 11AM - 7PM 1 Certified Nurse Aides on Unit B when the minimum requirement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review during a recertification survey from 3/5/25 to 3/12/25, the facility did not ensure that 5 of 5 randomly selected Certified Nurse Aides (Certified Nurse Aides #17, 18, 19, 20 and 21) received at least 12 hours per year of in-service education. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aides #17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 received only 10 of the 12-hours mandatory in-service training. The findings include: During an interview on 3/11/25 at 3:33 PM, the Director of Nursing was requested to provide the training records of 5 Certified Nurse Aides. Certified Nurse Aide #17 was hired 3/15/23 and received 10 of the 12 hours of required annual in servicing, that did not include abuse or resident's rights. Certified Nurse Aide #18 was hired 8/5/14 and received 10 of the 12 hours of required annual in servicing, that did not include abuse or resident's rights. Certified Nurse Aide #19 was hired 3/17/09 and received 10 of the 12 hours of required annual in servicing, that did not include abuse or resident's rights. Certified Nurse Aide #20 was hired 10/24/23 and received 10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 03/05/25-03/12/25, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #24) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident's #1 and #24 were offered, declined, or received education regarding the pneumococcal immunization. The findings include: The facility policy titled Pneumococcal vaccinations (last reviewed 7/3/24) documented: In order to prevent the spread of infectious disease and to mitigate the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with pneumococcal pneumonia, the facility will offer pneumococcal vaccinations to all residents and staff. Resident #1 had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, osteoporosis, and heart disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 1/2/25 documented Resident #1 had intact cognition. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$97,282 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $37,076 — penalty dated 2025-06-20
• $60,206 — penalty dated 2023-09-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY