No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Front Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

5101 North Park Drive, Pennsauken, NJ 08109 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (856) 665-8844 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (856) 665-8844 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6650 Browning Rd · (856) 406-6955 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5115 Kaighns Ave · (856) 500-9350 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
5300 N Park Dr · (856) 216-2122 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6530 Caroline Ave · (856) 662-1201

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms25.4%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.4%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.6%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.9%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.2%8.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.482.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.701.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.6%CMS range 35.6–55.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.5–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.5–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.371.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
55.9%
Total nursing turnover
70.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 153.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer three of eight residents (Residents (R) 80, R17, and R86) reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations, and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the residents to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards out of 61 residents sampled. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for residents to contract pneumonia. In addition, the facility policy did not reflect current CDC recommendations. 1. Review of R80's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the facility admitted the resident on 02/21/22. The resident was over the age of 65 at the time of his/her admission. Review of R80's EMR titled Immunization located under the Immun (Immunization) tab, indicated that the resident received the Pneumovax 23 vaccine on 09/05/23. There was no evidence in the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Residents (R) 17), out of a survey sample of 61, was afforded the right to participate in their care planning process. This failure placed the residents at risk of not being aware of the goals and outcomes of their care and for their care plan not to be person centered.Findings include:Review of R17's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/13/19.Review of R17's EMR titled social services Progress Notes dated 05/23/25, located under the Prog (Progress) Notes tab, revealed that the resident attended a care conference. There was no further evidence in the clinical record that indicated the resident was invited to subsequent care conferences after this date.Review of a document provided by the facility titled IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] Meeting Information, dated 08/20/25, failed to show that R17 was invited to his/her care conference. Review of R17's EMR titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 42 sampled residents (Resident # 62) was free from resident-to-resident abuse from Resident # 52. This resulted in harm when Resident # 52 hit Resident # 62 causing a swollen lip and two teeth being knocked out. Findings include: 1.Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) identified Resident # 62 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle wasting and atrophy; other specified mental disorder due to known physiological condition; generalized anxiety disorder; and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/07/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating Resident # 62 was moderately cognitively impaired.2.Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident (Resident (R) 41) reviewed for vision out of a total sample of 61 residents had an appointment made for cataract removal. This failure had the potential for the resident's vision to decline. Findings include:Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/21/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 14 out of 15 indicating R41 was cognitively intact. Review of R41's Physician Orders located in the EMR under the Orders tab revealed R41 was seen on 05/27/25, by an Optometrist and an order was written to schedule R41 for Cataract surgery at an outside facility.Review of R41's Progress Notes located in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed the Unit Secretary had documented a phone call on 06/01/25, to an outside facility to schedule a cataract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # : 185875 Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that resident rights were respected for residents who smoke and/or desire to go outside the facility. Findings include:1. Review of the 01/2025 policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents revealed This facility has established and maintains safe resident smoking practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Prior to, and upon admission, residents are informed of the facility's smoking policy, including designated smoking areas, and the extent to which the facility can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences.2. Smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building.Electronic cigarettes are permitted in designated areas only. Smoking is not allowed inside the facility under any circumstances.3. Oxygen use is prohibited in smoking areas.4. Metal containers, with self-closing cover devices, are available in smoking areas.5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 185875 and 182189Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained clean, comfortable, and homelike for three of the three floors (first, second, and third floors). Specifically, the facility failed to provide overall facility cleanliness; clean and repair resident wheelchairs, electric wheelchairs, and geri chairs; repair scraped and scuffed air conditioning units; clean ceiling vents; clean and repair rusty and dirty door jams; provide ceiling vent covers in the shower rooms; and provide window screens that were without rips and tears. Findings include:Review of the facility's 11/2024 Maintenance Rounds Policy and Procedure, provided by the MD, read It is the policy of this facility to utilize a maintenance inspection checklist in order to assure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. l. The Director of Maintenance Services will perform routine inspections of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # : 178254 and 179036 Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the ceiling vents, ice machine vent, and equipment were kept clean and/or in good repair. The failure had the potential to affect 149 of 153 residents who received meals prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include:During an inspection of the kitchen on 09/04/25 at 8:45 AM, along with the Dietary Director (DD), the following was observed:a. Three of the insulated food carts were checked for door closure. Two failed to latch and a third cart had no latch on one of the doors.b. The ceiling vent located at the end of the prep table, next to the oven/stove, had a heavy buildup of a black substance.c. The ceiling vent above the prep table had a heavy buildup of a black substance.d. The vent on the outside of the ice machine had a black substance that came off one. The vent on outside of ice machine had black substance that came off on my finger when touched.f. The tray line table, equipped with rollers to allow the trays to move easily, had missing rollers. The table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # : 185875 Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program within the facility. Flies were observed in multiple areas of the building during the complaint investigation process. This failure created the potential for cross contamination related to the fly infestation. A total of 34 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:Review of the facility's Pest Control Policy dated 11/2024 revealed, Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. 1. This facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Review of the facility's pest control logs, dated 06/01/25 through 09/05/25, revealed multiple entries indicating flies and/or cockroaches/water bugs had been reported on all three of the facility units during that time period. During the initial tour of the facility on 09/02/25 from 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM, at least 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 2587860 and 187900Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of allegations of potential exploitation and/or abuse to the State Agency for four Sampled Residents (Resident (R ) R1, R2, R15 and R16) out of a total sample of 34 residents. This failure created the potential for this and other residents to experience further exploitation and/or abuse. Findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy dated most recently reviewed in 09/2024 read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to encourage and support all residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers and resident representatives in reporting any suspected acts of abuse, neglect, exploitation, involuntary seclusion misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation; and G. Reporting and Response: The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # : 2587860 and 187900 Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed related to allegations of potential exploitation and/or abuse two sampled residents (Resident (R) R1and R2) out of a total sample of 34 residents. This failure created the potential for these and other residents to experience further exploitation and/or abuse.Findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy dated most recently reviewed in 09/2024 read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to encourage and support all residents, staff, families, visitors, volunteers and resident representatives in reporting any suspected acts of abuse, neglect, exploitation, involuntary seclusion misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation; and E. Investigation: When an incident or suspected incident of abuse is reported, the Administrator or designee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 179036Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of two residents (Resident (R) 8) sampled for the use of a Life Vest, (a wearable defibrillator). Findings include: Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R8 was initially admitted on [DATE] and discharged to home on [DATE]. R8 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, unspecified, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in the EMR revealed R8 received an order for a Life Vest on 09/19/24. The order noted Change life vest battery every day shift. Life vest manufacturer [NAME] 1-8005433267serial # 58020305. Check [NAME] monitor for function and placement. Review of the 09/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ180849 Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation on 2/10/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for the residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 units, (Pavilion 2 and Pavilion 3) and was evidenced by the following: During a tour of the 2nd floor unit (Pavilion 2) on 2/10/2025 at 10:08 AM, the surveyor observed the following: 1.) Inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], a brown stain on the ceiling tile and a build-up of dust and unknown debris in the heater vent. 2.) Inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], four small holes in the wall behind the television for Bed-B and chipped paint on the walls. 3.) Inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], two holes in the wall next to the bathroom door, a build-up of unknown debris in the heater vent, and chipped paint on the heater. 4.) Inside resident room [ROOM NUMBER], two holes in the wall behind the television for Bed B, a build-up of unknown debris in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # NJ 158956, 166158, 170632 Based on interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to the residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the provided Facility Assessment dated March 2024 included .our approach to ensure adequate staff based on our resident population and their needs for care . for Certified Nurse Aides 1:8 Residents for days, 1:10 evenings, 1:14 nights, one Restorative Aide day shift weekdays and one Restorative Aide Day shift weekends. During resident Council meeting on 08/08/2024 at 11:00 AM, a resident stated nights are short staffed, and wait time is long. Only two were on 2nd floor last night. 2 of 5 residents stated they have waited 4 to 5 hours for an aide. A review of New Jersey Department of Health Long Term Care Assessment and Survey Program Nurse Staffing Report for the following weeks weeks revealed the facility was deficient in CNA staffing for residents as follows: 1. For the 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of pertinent facility records it was determined that the facility failed to follow through on recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist (CP) during their monthly medication regimen review (MRR) in a consistent and timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident #55 and Resident #89) and was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the facility policy on 08/13/2024 at 10:45 AM, titled Medication Regimen Review Policy NO: ROP-32, Reviewed: 6/2/2024. The following was revealed under POLICY: It is the facilities policy to provide a Medication regimen review (MRR) for all residents admitted to the nursing facility. The following was revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed a facility policy on 08/05/2024 at 12:02 PM, titled [company name] Dining Services Food Storage, undated. The following was revealed under Canned Fruits: Dented or bulging cans shall be placed on Damaged Goods Shelf and returned for credit. The following was revealed under Canned Vegetables: Dented or bulging cans shall be placed on Damaged Goods Shelf and returned for credit. The surveyor reviewed a facility policy on 08/05/2024 at 12:02 PM, titled [facility name] Dining Services Pots and Pans - Sanitizing Solution, undated. The following was revealed under the heading SANITATION OF EQUIPMENT: NOTE: Allow all items to air dry. Towels shall never be used for drying. When items are dry, store in proper storage area. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the transport of a non-ambulatory resident was provided in a manner to promote the dignity and respect of the resident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for dignity, (Resident #27) and was evidenced by the following: A review of a facility policy titled Resident Rights, Created: 2/2024, revealed the following under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 10. All residents will be treated equally regardless of age, race, ethnicity, religion, culture, language, physical or mental disability, socioeconomic status, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression. 11. The facility will ensure that all staff members are educated on the rights of residents and the responsibility of the facility to properly care for its residents. The following was revealed under the heading Resident rights: The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C/O # NJ 156940 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 units, (Pavilion 2 and Pavilion 3) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 08/13/2024 at 10:40 AM, a review of a facility policy titled Complete Room Cleaning dated 06/2024, revealed under the purpose section; The complete room cleaning schedule insures {sic} (ensures)that each resident room is discharge-cleaned on a monthly basis. Under the Patient Room section 3. Starting in a clockwise rotation from patient room door; clean polish, scrub, scrape, dust, disinfect, sweep, wipe and mop everything in the room including: . Check all the corners, ceiling and floors, Remove buildup on floor, dust mop and damp mop entire room. Under the Bathrooms section: . Toilet: scrub and disinfect toilet bowl. Use cleanser on interior of bowl only. Remove all stains and buildup.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives, timelines, and interventions to meet resident's medical and nursing needs for 1 out of 4 residents investigated for Respiratory Care. A review of a facility policy reviewed on 08/08/2024 at 11:05 AM, titled, Care Plan, dated June 2024, revealed the following statement, It is the policy of [facility name] that all residents admitted to the facility will have adequate person-centered care plans that provide for all their needs in a timely manner. Under Procedures, #1. Baseline Care Plans for all new admissions will be initiated within 48 hours of admission. Under #2. They will include initial goals, MD orders, medications, treatments, dietary orders, therapy orders, social service and PASARR recommendations. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/05/2024 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #372 in his/her room, lying in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident had a Physician Order (PO) for transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident # 126 and Resident # 137) and was evidenced by the following: On 08/14/2024 at 9:52 AM, a review of the facility's Transfer or Discharge, Emergency policy dated revised June 2024, included, Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital . Notify the resident's attending physician; place order for transfer per attending physician/NP (nurse practitioner)/PA .(physician assistant) On 08/06/2024 at 11:42 AM, a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: 1. A review of the admission record revealed Resident #126 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Conversion Disorder with Seizures or Convulsions. A review of a facility progress note (PN) dated 11/5/2023 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders specifically to change the piston set (a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger) every 24 hours for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Tube Feeding, (Resident #54). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/12/2024 at 12:10 PM, a review of a facility policy titled Enteral Tubes with a last revised date of 06/3/2024, revealed under the Procedure section: 16. Rinse Thoroughly with tap water and place in a labeled dry plastic bag to remain at bedside. *Change syringe and bag every 24 hours. During the initial tour of Pavilion 2 on 08/05/2024 at 10:58 AM, Resident # 54's piston set was observed on the bed side table. The bottled had the residents name and was dated 8/3/24. A review of the Electronic Medical Record on 08/06/2024 at 09:29 AM, revealed the following: Resident #54 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to: Multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who used Oxygen therapy at night, had a Physician Order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident #117) and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 08/05/2024 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed oxygen tubing next to the resident in bed. The tubing was not dated. Resident #117 said he/she uses it at night. There was no observed oxygen sign outside the room. On 08/08/2024 at 01:10 PM, a review of a facility policy titled Oxygen Administration with a revised date of January 2024, revealed under the Policy section: Oxygen administration will be carried out only with a physician order. A review of the EMR on 08/05/2024 at 12:00 PM, revealed the following: According to the admission Record Resident #117 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Hypertensive heart Disease. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the dialysis communication book for a resident on dialysis (Resident #94). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. The evidence was as follows: On 8/16/2024 at 12:00 PM the surveyor reviewed the facility's Dialysis Management (Hemodialysis) policy with a revised date of 6/2024 included . If Dialysis is provided at off-site Dialysis Center .Assure facility completed Dialysis communication form accompanies resident to dialysis on treatment days, to communicate resident information and coordinate care between Dialysis center and facility .Dialysis center personnel to complete Dialysis communication form and return and return to the facility . Upon return from Dialysis Center, review information provided on Dialysis communication form . On 8/7/24 at 11:18 AM the surveyor observed the Resident #94 in a wheelchair in their room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Cross Reference F867 Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) a discontinued and expired medication (pantoprazole, used to treat gastroesophogeal reflux disease /GERD, a condition in which stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach) was removed from active inventory b) maintain an accurate accountability for controlled substances within the medication administration cart c) a controlled medication that was expired was removed from an automated medication dispensing system. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 medication carts, and 1 of 1 automated medication dispensing system reviewed during the medication storage task. A review of the facility policy, Medication Administration (Reviewed 06/24) revealed the following: .Check the expiration date on medication label. A review of an undated facility policy, 6.0 Inventory Control of Drugs revealed the following: Controlled drugs are inventoried and documented under proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Cross Reference F755 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility records, it was determined that the facility Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to utilize the Facility Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to follow the facility process to measure and utilize data for checking medication carts three times weekly for expired medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/13/2024 at 09:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, Date Reviewed/Revised: 9/14/23. The following was revealed under Purpose: Our Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) represent our facility's commitment to continuous quality improvement. The program ensures a systematic performance evaluation, problem analysis, and implementation of improvement strategies to achieve our performance goals. The following was revealed at II. Guidelines for Governance and Leadership: a. Nursing and Facility Administration are responsible and accountable for developing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.)properly store and maintain both sterile and non-sterile medical supplies in a safe and sanitary manner and b.) ensure that laundry staff used the appropriate personal protective equipment while handling items that were likely contaminated with infectious bodily fluids. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for the medication storage task and 1 of 1 laundry staff and was evidenced by the following: On 08/07/2024 at 9:41 AM, during the inspection of the Pavilion Three Medication Storage Room, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN/UM #1) the surveyor observed: three enema kits, two packages of heel booties, and a box of wound treatment supplies which included: a half filled box of fifty count 4 x 4 gauze pads, a fifteen count box of border gauze dressings, two rolls of gauze, and a roll of paper tape that were stored beneath the handwashing sink. LPN/UM #1 stated that Central Supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility who had been in an active COVID-19 outbreak since 11/18/22, failed to: a) follow the facility policy and conduct complete and thorough contact tracing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (a potentially, deadly virus) and b) implement measures to prevent the growth of Legionella (bacterium that causes legionnaires' disease, a type of pneumonia caused by legionella bacteria that spreads through mist such as through air conditioning units and can also occur in potable water) and other waterborne pathogens in the facility's water systems. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 1 (one) sampled COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #107) and a review of 1 (one) of 1(one) COVID-19 positive staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Contact Tracing for COVID-19 Centers for Disease Control: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/contact-tracing-plan/contact-tracing.html. Reference F886 a) On 12/07/22 at 9:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-16 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) conduct immediate, comprehensive resident and staff COVID-19 (a potentially, deadly virus) testing upon the identification of a single positive resident or staff member in accordance with the facility policy b) ensure that comprehensive COVID-19 testing was completed and accurately documented during a COVID-19 outbreak that began on 11/18/22, in accordance with current Federal, State and Centers for Disease Control guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 1 (one) COVID-19 positive resident (Resident #107), 1 (one) of 1 (one) COVID-19 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #4) on 3 (three) of 3 (three) nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Interim Final Rule (IFC), CMS-3401-IFC, Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency related to Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Testing Requirements (Ref: QSO-20-38-NH)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to update the resident's comprehensive care plan in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 34 residents (Residents #119 and #141) reviewed for care plans and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/07/22 at 12:00 PM, 12/08/22 at 10:14 AM and 12/09/22 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor observed the resident seated at a table in the dayroom. The surveyor observed that Resident #119 had a palm guard applied to the left hand at the time of each observation. According to the admission Record, Resident #119 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, contracture of the muscle to the left hand. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care, dated 09/12/22, reflected that Resident #119 was cognitively intact, required supervision with dressing including how the resident puts on, fastens, and takes off all items of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) accurately identify a wound type from first identification of the wound on 09/07/22 until 12/15/22 and b.) clarify the implementation of a diagnostic study recommended by a wound care consultant. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: On 12/07/22 at 10:54 AM, during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #15 sitting in a chair at his/her bedside. The resident was observed with an anti-pressure cushion on the wheelchair and an anti-pressure mattress on the bed. The surveyor interviewed the resident at that time and Resident #15 stated that he/she had a sore on the right foot and pointed to the planter (the arch of the foot) area of the right foot. The resident was washed and dressed and had socks on both feet. Review of the resident medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor the target behaviors for the use of psychotropic medications (mood altering medications) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #86 and #115) reviewed for mood/behavior. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/08/22 at 11:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #86 seated in a wheelchair in the dayroom while an activity was being held. On 12/08/22 at 12:23 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #86's electronic medical record (eMR). A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. A review of Resident #86's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/16/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of the medical record, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to verify and accurately transcribe readmission medications. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #80 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, psychosis, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #80's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 09/10/22, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident received antidepressant medication for the last 7 days. Review of the 07/28/22 psychiatric consult (psych consult) indicated to continue all current medications as prescribed, which included Duloxetine 90 mg daily for depression. The benefits outweigh the risk. Review of the Progress Notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/07/22 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. A stack of 18-inch sheet pans was stored on a multi-tiered cart. The surveyor observed the top sheet pans were wetnesting. When interviewed, the FSD stated the sheet pan should not have been stacked while wet. 2. In the dry storage room, an opened, undated container of beef base wrapped in plastic was stored on a shelf. When interviewed, the FSD stated the container should have been dated when opened. 3. In the dry storage room, a dented can with no labeled was stored on a shelf alongside undented cans. When interviewed, the surveyor observed the FSD remove the dented can from the rack and placed it on the shelve designated for the dented cans. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a resident assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status. This was identified during a review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool to facilitate the management of care, for 1 of 31 residents reviewed (Resident #15). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/07/22 at 10:54 AM, during tour, the surveyor observed Resident #15 sitting in a chair at bedside. The resident was observed with an anti-pressure cushion on the wheelchair and an anti-pressure mattress on the bed. The surveyor interviewed the resident at that time and Resident #15 stated that he/she had a sore on the right foot and pointed to the planter area of the right foot. The resident was washed and dressed and had socks on both feet. Review of the resident medical record revealed the following: Review of the admission Record (AR) reflected that Resident #15 was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) accurately document neuro checks (a nurse assessment to document an individual's neurological functions, motor and sensory response and level of consciousness) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident who sustained a fall b.) follow physician orders for the application of compression stockings. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for hospitalizations and 1 of 1 (Resident #15) reviewed for edema (swelling) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The nurse practice act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide finger nail care to a resident that was dependent on the staff for hygiene for (one)1 of 31 residents (Residents #64). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #64 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to: vascular dementia, neuropathy, depression, and glaucoma. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used facilitate the management of a resident's care, dated 09/13/22, indicated that Resident #64 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and total dependence on staff for bathing. On 12/07/22 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #64 sitting up in a chair in the resident's room and the surveyor observed that the resident's finger nails on bilateral hands were long, broken, and jagged. The resident was pleasant, however confused and unable to participate in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff and the public by failing to keep the garbage compacter area free of garbage and debris and failed to have the doors to the trash compactor closed for 1 of 1 trash compactor. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/07/22 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) and requested to see the outside garbage receptacle area. The surveyor observed a trash compactor (TC) on a cement pad. The surveyor further observed that both the left-side and right-side doors of the TC open exposing multiple trash bags inside. The surveyor further observed that the outside garbage receptacle area was littered with leaves, debris, used gloves, cans, cardboard boxes, milk and juice cartons. When interviewed at that time, the FSD stated that everyone was responsible for cleaning the garbage receptacle area and the lids and doors of the TC should be closed when not in use. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-12-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment included the resources required to establish policies and procedures for the management of an active COVID-19 (a potentially deadly virus) outbreak. This deficient practice was identified by the following. Reference F880, F886 On 12/07/22 at 9:30 AM during the entrance conference, both the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility was in an active outbreak of COVID-19 and confirmed that there were no active cases of COVID-19, or persons under investigation (PUI) for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. At that time, the DON stated that those staff who were not up to date with their COVID-19 vaccinations (unvaccinated, exempt employees) were tested twice weekly and both residents and staff were tested on ce weekly. On 12/12/22 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor interviewed Infection Control Practitioner (ICP #1) in the presence of the survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ambassador Healthcare At College ParkFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Briarcliff Manor Center For Rehab And Nursing CareBriarcliff Manor, NY 1 of 5Charlotte Bay Rehab And Care CenterPort Charlotte, FL 1 of 5Live Oak Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLive Oak, FL 1 of 5Melbourne Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMelbourne, FL 1 of 5Space Coast Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMerritt Island, FL 1 of 5West Delray Nursing & Rehab CenterDelray Beach, FL 2 of 5Alliance Care Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterIrvington, NJ 2 of 5Azure Shores RehabMiami, FL 2 of 5Beach Breeze Rehab And Care CenterWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Boca Circle Rehabilitation CenterBoca Raton, FL 2 of 5Breezy Hills Rehab And Care CenterLakeland, FL 2 of 5Charming Lakes RehabLakeland, FL 2 of 5Lake City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Lake Eustis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterEustis, FL 2 of 5Seagate Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5West Volusia Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDeltona, FL 2 of 5Yamato Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazlet, NJ 3 of 5Heartland Nursing & Rehab CenterBoynton Beach, FL 3 of 5Nassau Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterHempstead, NY 3 of 5Palm Beach Nursing CenterLake Worth, FL 3 of 5Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterBronx, NY 4 of 5Acclaim Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterJersey City, NJ 4 of 5Adroit Care Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRahway, NJ 4 of 5Anchor Care and Rehabilitation CenterHazlet, NJ 4 of 5Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 4 of 5Isles Of Boynton Nursing And Rehab CenterBoynton Beach, FL 4 of 5Sun Harbor HealthcarePort Charlotte, FL 4 of 5Victoria Crossing Rehabilitation CenterBrandon, FL 5 of 5Cypress Garden Center for Nursing and RehabilitatiFlushing, NY 5 of 5Staten Island Care CenterStaten Island, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COOPER CARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2022
RIBIAT, YITZCHOKIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2022
STERN, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2022

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.6M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 13%Other / private 7%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,356per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315225. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next