No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Breezy Hills Rehab And Care Center

5245 N Socrum Loop Rd, Lakeland, FL 33809 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (863) 859-1446 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (863) 859-1446 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jul 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Lakeland1.7 mi
5040 US Hwy 98 N.
Pharmacy
5375 N Socrum Loop Rd · (863) 859-6353 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.2 mi
5375 N Socrum Loop Rd · (863) 816-0246 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lakeland Park Lakeland · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5240 N Socrum Loop Rd · (863) 858-5668

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.1%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.4%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.082.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.391.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.3%CMS range 30.8–55.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.7–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.2–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
48.4%
Total nursing turnover
58.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-08)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-08)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not follow professional standards for food service safety related to sanitary practices in one of one facility kitchens. Findings included: On 5/5/25 at 9:35 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager. An observation of the low temperature dish machine was in use by Staff A, Dietary Aide. An observation of Staff A, Dietary Aide revealed she was wearing gloves and putting soiled items with food debris in the machine. She conducted the testing of the sanitizing solution using the same gloves she had on while putting soiled items to be washed. She used two testing strips and one of them fell in the water of the dish machine, while the other was placed on a clean insulated lid. Staff A, Dietary Aide was not observed removing the testing strip from the insulated lid and the lid was not put back to be cleaned. On 5/5/25 at 9:42 a.m., an observation of the reach-in cooler revealed a brown plastic bag on one of the racks labeled [staff member name]. Observations of the brown plastic bag revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #68's Level I PASARR dated 3/19/25, showed the resident had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, and mood disorder. The level I PASARR showed the resident did not have validating documentation to support dementia or a related neurocognitive disorder. The review showed Resident #68 had no diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental Illness or Intellectual Disability and a Level II PASARR evaluation was not submitted for consideration. Review of Resident #68s admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and 9/2/24. The record included the following diagnoses with onset dates: moderate recurrent major depressive disorder (onset 6/14/24), other bipolar disorder (onset 9/2/24), generalized anxiety disorder (onset 9/2/24), and mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features (onset 6/14/24). Review of Resident #68s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident received antianxiety and antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure 1.) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) equipment and maintenance was provided for one resident (#12) out of one resident observed and 2.) Signage for oxygen use for five out of 17 rooms in one hallway ([NAME]) out of 4 hallways for four out of four days observed. Findings included: 1.) On 5/05/2025 at 9:19 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #12 in her room. Resident #12 was observed with a nasal cannula with settings at three liters per minute administered through an oxygen concentrator. Resident #12 stated she requires CPAP at night but stated her mask currently leaks. Resident #12 stated her mask was very old and in need of a replacement but the facility was unable to provide the mask she likes and one which fits her face. Resident #12 stated she has been in the facility for quite some time and an exchange of her CPAP machine occurred by the facility but obtaining a new mask has not occurred.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to honor the choice of one (#58) out of twenty-three sampled residents related to the preferred use of side rails for mobility and the feeling of safety and failed to assist one (#93) of one sampled resident with planning a discharge to another facility closer to family. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 5/5/25 at 10:59 a.m. Resident #58 reported wanting to have bedrails, getting scared when staff roll the resident over, was told it was a [regulating agency] thing not to have siderails. The resident reported they were told by someone at the facility the regulating agency did not allow side rails. The observation revealed the resident lying on a large-sized mattress and without side rails or enablers. Review of Resident #58's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The record showed diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of endometrium, unspecified type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow treatment recommendations related to obtaining weights on a weekly basis for one (#93) out of four residents sampled for weight loss. Findings Included: During an observation on 05/05/2025 at 10:11 a.m., Resident #93 was observed laying in bed noted to be thin in appearance. During an observation on 05/07/2025 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #93 was observed in his room with his bedside table in front of him with his lunch tray. On his tray was a plate with spaghetti, green vegetables, a dinner roll, pudding and a piece of pie. In a follow up interview on 12:43 p.m., Resident #93 stated he ate his dinner roll and something else but could not remember what it was. During an interview on 05/07/2025 at 1:41 p.m., Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated Resident #93 ate about 25% of his meal. He ate his roll and his pudding. Staff E stated his appetite varies, sometimes it is good and sometimes he does not eat much. Staff C stated they are expected to document meal intake. Review of Resident #93's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide optimal nutrition for one (#78) of one resident sampled for enteral feeding. Findings included: An observation was made on 5/5/25 at 11:25 a.m. of Resident #78 lying in bed, non-verbal, with a bottle of Nepro 1.8 enteral nutrition hanging from the bedside pole with pump. The pump and the tubing showed the resident was not receiving nutrition. The observation showed the 1000 milliliters (mls) bottle contained approximately 350 ml of tan-colored liquid, was dated 5/3/24 at 22:04 (10:04 p.m.), and showed the resident was to receive 60 milliliter/hour (ml/hr) (60mL/hr x 20 hours = 1200 mLs). The bottle label instructed Hang product up to 48 hours after initial connection when clean technique and only one new feeding set are used. Otherwise, hang no longer than 24 hours. Review of Resident #78's physician orders revealed an order for Nepro at 60 ml/hr x 20 hours, down at 10:00 a.m. up at 2:00 p.m. to provide a total of 1200 ml's in a 24-hour period. Review of Resident #78's Nutrition Evaluation Initial,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure there was documented communication of coordination of care with the dialysis center for one (#81) of one resident reviewed. Findings included: A review of Resident #81's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 7/23/24 and a re-admission date of 1/24/25. Further review of the admission record revealed diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident #81's physician orders revealed the following to include: - hemodialysis [dialysis center name and address] chair time 0615 Monday, Wednesday, Friday (M/W/F) every night shift, with a start date of 1/27/25. A review of Resident #81's progress notes from 4/8/25 to 5/8/25 revealed no documentation related to communication with the dialysis center. A nurse's progress note on 5/2/25 revealed the following, [Name of dialysis center] Dialysis [telephone #]. A review of Resident #81's electronic medical record revealed dialysis communication notes dated 3/19/25 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to execute physician orders as recommended by the Consulting Pharmacist for two residents (#68 and #81) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1) Review of Resident #68's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses of not limited to not elsewhere classified lymphedema, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, moderate recurrent major depressive disorder, other bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, other seizures, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without Esophagitis, and abdominal distension (gaseous). Review of Resident #68's record showed the resident was on Hospital Paid Leave on 3/23/25, returning to the facility on 3/25/25. On 5/5/25 at 11:37 a.m. Resident #68 was observed sitting upright in bed, wearing a nasal cannula delivering 4 liters per minute (lpm) of oxygen. Review of Resident #68's Medication Regimen Recommendations made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered for one resident (#13) out of five residents sampled for pain management. Findings Included: Review of Resident #13's admission record revealed an admission date of 04/03/2024. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include other sequelae following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness (generalized), sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic dependence, uncomplicated, anxiety disorder, unspecified, Opioid dependence, uncomplicated, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate. Review of Resident #13's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed in Section N- Medications: Anti-Depression, Hypnotic, Anticoagulant, Diuretic, Opioid, and Anticonvulsant. Review of Resident #13's orders revealed: -Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 MG (milligrams)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for one resident (#35) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 10% medication error rate. Findings included: On 5/6/25 at 9:40 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted for Resident #35. Staff H reported the resident's blood pressure of 135/80 and heart rate of 86 had been obtained approximately four minutes prior to the observation. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Carvedilol 3.125 milligram (mg) tablet - Sevelamer 800 mg tablet - Hydralazine 50 mg tablet - Amlodipine 5 mg tablet - Folic acid 1000 microgram (mcg) over-the-counter (OTC) tablet - Aspirin low dose enteric-coated 81 mg OTC tablet (order: chewable 81 mg tablet) - acetaminophen 325 mg - 2 OTC tablets The staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation was in the resident's medical record for two (#93 and #68) out of 23 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an interview on 05/06/2025 at 11:47 a.m., Resident #93's Family Member and Power of Attorney (POA) stated he had received a call from the facility on Friday letting him know they were putting an order for Hospice for Resident #93. He stated he was told it was because Resident #93 had recently declined and there was a change in his appetite. The POA stated he tried calling back a few times to speak with someone in regard to the Hospice Order and had not received a call back. Review of Resident #93's admission Record revealed an initial admission date of 06/28/2024 and a readmission admission date of 11/26/2024 . Resident #93 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Cerebral Infarction Due To Thrombosis Of Bilateral Cerebellar Arteries, Unspecified Cirrhosis Of Liver,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one of three sampled residents (#2) related to assistance with a room change or assistance with a transfer to another facility as requested. Findings included: On 03/27/2025 at 9:30 AM, Resident #2 was observed lying in bed. Resident #2 said she spoke to the Social Service Director (SSD) in the past about a room change. Resident #2 stated she cannot sleep because her roommate talks all night and keeps the lights on. Resident #2 stated she also talked to the SSD about transferring to a rehab in Jacksonville that specialized in Guillain-Barre Syndrome because the rehab could maybe help her get better. A follow-up interview was conducted on 03/27/2025 at 11:30 AM with Resident #2. Resident #2 stated she talked to the SSD a couple of weeks ago about the room change and was told they did not have any room available. Review of Resident #2's admission Record showed she was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility, 1. failed to ensure allegations of neglect were investigated for one (#8) of two residents reviewed for neglect and 2. failed to have evidence that alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for two (#2 and #7) of five residents sampled for alleged violations. Findings included: On 07/02/24 at 12:30 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #8. She was observed in her room laying on her bed. Her Right leg was observed in a cast and was elevated. She stated she was in pain. The resident stated she was involved in a [mechanical lift] accident. She stated she remembered the incident very well. She said two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were transferring her from the bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, the [mechanical lift] tipped when she was in mid-air. She stated the staff put her to the ground, but the metal part of the side table caught her ankle. She said, One of the CNAs was standing away from the lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews, and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall with injury for one (#8) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: On 07/02/24 at 12:30 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #8. She was observed in her room laying on her bed. Her Right leg was observed in a cast and was elevated. She stated she was in pain. The resident stated she was involved in a [mechanical lift] accident. She stated she remembered the incident very well. She said two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were transferring her from the bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, the [mechanical lift] tipped when she was in mid-air. She stated the staff put her to the ground, but the metal part of the side table caught her ankle. She said, One of the CNAs was standing away from the lift holding on to the wheelchair. One CNA was operating the lift. She stated the side table was very close to the lift and it caught the leg of the lift, causing the lift to tip. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assess, care plan and identify triggers related to trauma for one (#10) of two residents reviewed. Findings included: On 7/1/24 at 10:10 a.m., an observation of Resident #10 revealed she was lying in bed watching television. An interview with Resident #10 revealed she was upset by an experience she had on 6/21/24. She stated a nurse, who she could not recall her name, and [Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)] were providing catheter care. Resident #10 stated the door was closed. She stated a female resident entered her room and saw Resident #10 exposed from the waist down. Resident #10 stated, I was spread eagle and she saw me. An observation of Resident #10 revealed she was tearful and stated, I felt violated. She stated the nurse assisting Resident #10 escorted the female resident out of the room and closed the door. Resident #10 stated she reported the experience to another nurse, but she could not recall her name, and the Physician Assistant (PA) who followed her for catheter care at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and photogenic evidence, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to label and date food items and did not ensure the dishwasher temperature log was up to date. The failed practice had the potential to effect more than a limited number of Residents. Findings included: 1. An observation on 02/05/23 at 9:15 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, showed the walk in refrigerator contained food items that were not labeled or dated. The following items were noted with photogenic evidence obtained: A bag of lettuce was not labeled or dated A container of white substance was not labeled or dated A container of chopped meat was not labeled or dated. During an interview 02/05/23 at 9:17 a.m., Staff J, [NAME] confirmed the bag of lettuce should have been labeled and dated. Staff J confirmed the container of white substance that was identified as cottage cheese was not labeled or dated and should have been. Staff J also confirmed the chopped meat identified as chopped chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-08 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement explicitly granted the resident or his or her representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it and the agreement did not explicitly state that neither the resident nor his or her representative was required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility for three (Resident #205, Resident #55, and Resident #293) of the sampled three residents. Findings included: Section G of the admission Agreement included the arbitration agreement and it read the following: G. Disputes. Any controversy, dispute or disagreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the breach thereof, or the subject matter thereof, including Facility's obligation thereof, shall be settled by binding arbitration, which shall be conducted in Jersey City, New Jersey in accordance with the American Health Lawyers Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Service Rules of Procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-08 · tag F0848 — widespread
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties for three (Resident #205, Resident #55, and Resident #293) of three sampled residents. Findings included: Section G of the admission Agreement included the arbitration agreement and it read the following: G. Disputes. Any controversy, dispute or disagreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the breach thereof, or the subject matter thereof, including Facility's obligation thereof, shall be settled by binding arbitration, which shall be conducted in Jersey City, New Jersey in accordance with the American Health Lawyers Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Service Rules of Procedure for Arbitration, and which to the extent of the subject matter of the arbitration, shall be binding not only on all the parties to this Agreement, but on any other entity controlled by, in control of or under common control with the party to the extent that such affiliates joins in the arbitration, and judgement on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-08 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to 1.) complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for two (Residents #3 and #78); and 2.) ensure the accuracy of a PASARR Level I for two (Residents #65 and #143) admitted with mental health diagnoses of four residents sampled for PASARR. Findings included: 1. Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #3 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cirrhosis, benign prostate hypertrophy and hepatitis. Further review revealed additional diagnoses identified after admission to the facility; they included: -schizophrenia, diagnosed 06/09/2015 -major depressive disorder (MDD), diagnosed 07/01/2020 -dementia, diagnosed 10/01/2022 Review of a Psychiatric Note dated 01/06/2023 revealed psychiatric diagnoses and history that included dementia, schizophrenia, MDD and dysphagia. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program as evidence by not ensuring the appropriate hand hygiene was completed after delivering a meal tray to one (Resident #143) of one resident infected with Clostridioides Difficile (C Diff) on one of four units, failed to designate Contact precautions for one (Resident #55) of 35 sampled residents, and failed to ensure that non-dedicated equipment was cleaned in between two (Residents #7 and #145) of five residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #143 was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Enterocolitis due to Clostridium Difficile not specified as recurrent. The Order Summary Report for the resident included a physician order, dated 2/3/23, for Isolation C Diff every shift for isolation and Isolation maintained for shift, activities, and services brought to room C Diff every shift for Isolation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide timely and specific notifications to include the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) Form CMS 10055 to two (Residents #341 and #48) of three sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services but remained in the facility. Findings included: A review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form completed by the Social Services Director (SSD) for Resident #341 indicated Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episode Start Date 11/03 and a last covered date of 12/02. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. The resident remained in the facility but was not provided the SNF ABN, Form CMS-10055. The SSD completed the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form for Resident #48 verbally. The last covered day was 01/12. The facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. The resident remained in the facility but was not provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow the baseline care plan related to the use of oxygen for one (Resident #242) of thirty-five sampled residents. Findings included: On 02/05/23 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #242 was observed sitting on the side of the bed. An oxygen concentrator was next to the bed with oxygen tubing sitting on the top of the concentrator. The machine was not on. The resident was not using the oxygen at this time. On 02/06/23 at 10:14 a.m., the resident was sitting next to the bed. The oxygen concentrator was next to the bed, but the machine was not on. The resident was not using the oxygen at this time. On 02/07/23 at 10:19 a.m., Resident #242 was observed in her room sitting next to the bed. The oxygen concentrator was next to the bed, but the machine was not on. She was not using the oxygen at this time. She reported she did not know the last time she used the oxygen. She stated, I can't keep up with it. A review of the admission Record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#55 and #36) of two residents sampled for pressure ulcers received wound care per the physician orders. Findings included: 1. An observation and interview was conducted, on 2/5/23 at 2:02 p.m., with Resident #55. The resident confirmed the presence of an infection to the right thigh. The resident reported that wound care was supposed to be every day but a couple of them forgot. The observation of the resident identified a double lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) located in the right upper extremity. The review of Resident #55's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included right femur acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), 1/24/23, identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition. The MDS revealed the resident had one stage IV pressure ulcer and required pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pain management services per the physician orders. The facility provided pain medication outside the physician ordered parameters for two (Residents #46 and #30) of two residents reviewed for pain management. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 02/05/23 at 10:25 a.m., Resident #46 stated the facility gave her medications for pain however the pain was always there even after medications were given. A review of Resident #46's medical record showed she had a diagnosis of Paraplegia, unspecified, pain in left leg and other muscle spasms. The care plan showed a focus of Chronic pain due to paraplegia, spinal cord injury and history of meningitis with an intervention to include an intervention to administer analgesia as per orders. A physician order dated 01/18/23 stated, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 5-325- Give tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain severe (7-10) not to exceed 3 grams. The Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-seven medication administration opportunities were observed and three errors were identified for two (Residents #71 and #53) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 11.11% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) obtained, at 8:45 a.m. on 2/7/23, a blood pressure of 147/83 and a pulse of 70 from Resident #71. On 2/7/23 at 8:50 a.m., Staff D dispensed the following medications for Resident #71: -- Carbamazepine Extended Release 100 milligram (mg) - 6 tablets -- Amlodipine 5 mg tablet -- Aspirin 81 mg Enteric Coated tablet -- Calcium Carbonate 500 mg chewable tablet - Vitamin D3 5000 unit tablet -- Citalopram 10 mg tablet -- Lisinopril 10 mg tablet -- Memantine 10 mg tablet -- Daily Vitamin with multimineral tablet -- Pregabalin 50 mg capsule The staff member confirmed 15 tablets/capsules prior to entering Resident #71's room. An interview, on 2/7/23 at 9:14 a.m., after the administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure insulins were removed after expiration date, medications were stored per route and not in same compartment with non-medications in one ([NAME]) of two sampled medication carts, failed to ensure one (Canterbury) of two sampled medication carts were locked while unsupervised, and failed to ensure one ([NAME]/[NAME]) of two medication rooms did not contain expired medications. Findings included: On 2/6/23 at 12:00 p.m., an observation of the [NAME] medication cart was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The observation identified a clear bag containing an Insulin Lispro injection KwikPen. The bag indicated the pen was opened on 1/3/23 and expired on 2/1/23. A pharmacy bag contained 2 vials of Insulin Lispro. The bag identified that the vials were opened on 1/2/23, one of vials was labeled with 1/5. The website, https://www.humalog.com/u100, identified that Opened Humalog vials, prefilled pens, and cartridges…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain drugs and biologicals used in the facility in a safe, secure and orderly manner in three medication carts (Canterbury Hall, [NAME] Hall, and [NAME] Hall) of four medication carts. Findings included: On 5/27/21 at 2:26 p.m. an observation of the medication cart for the Canterbury Hall was conducted. Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was present during the observation. In the third drawer of the cart a loose round yellow pill, one yellow oblong pill, four loose round white pills, and three oblong loose white pills were observed. In the second drawer three half white pills, and one oval white pill were observed loose. In the top drawer, an unopened multidose vial of Humalog was observed stored in a container with no date indicating when it was removed from the refrigerator. A Lantus Pen was observed stored in a bag, with no open or expiration date documented. An Insulin Aspart Prot-Asp pen was observed with no open or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement their quality assessment and assurance measures for corrective action related to deficient practice identified on the annual survey conducted on [DATE]. Findings of deficient practice were identified during the revisit survey for three (F695, F700, and F761) of the seven citations reviewed for correction. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility plan of correction for the recertification survey ending [DATE] revealed the following measures identified by the facility Quality Assurance Committee (QAC), would be taken to correct the deficient practice for F695: The Director of Nursing or designee will perform weekly observational audits for 3 months to verify the facility staff are providing care for tracheostomy patients, following proper procedures and use of personal protective equipment during care and the care of equipment related to respiratory care. Immediate education if required. Audit results will be reviewed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights for a comfortable and homelike environment by not maintaining comfortable sound levels for residents and maintaining the dignity of one resident (#57) related to 1. one resident (#57) of thirty-one sampled residents yelling and calling out loudly and repetitively during four days (5/24/2021, 5/25/2021, 5/26/2021, and 5/27/2021) of four days observed and, 2. the use of mechanical floor cleaning machines by housekeeping staff in three halls ([NAME], Canterbury, and [NAME]) of four halls while residents were still sleeping for two days (5/24/2021 and 5/25/2021) of four days observed, and 3. a loud floor buffing machine by housekeeping staff in one resident's room (#57) of thirty-one sampled residents room, when the resident has agitation and behaviors related to loud noises during two (5/25/2021 and 5/26/2021) of four days observed. Findings included: 1. On 5/24/2021 at 6:45 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 12:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and medical record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for bed rail/bed enablers and failed to implement interventions for bed positioning and reducing loud noises to prevent agitation for one resident (#57) of thirty-one sampled residents for three days (5/24/2021, 5/25/2021, and 5/26/2021) of four days observed. Findings included: A review the Plans of Care policy and procedure, with a last revision date of 9/25/2017, revealed: Policy: An individualized person-centered plan of care will be established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or resident representative(s) to the extent practicable and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Procedure section revealed: Develop and implement an individualized person-centered comprehensive plan of care by interdisciplinary team that includes but not limited to - the attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide wound care in a sanitary manner that would promote healing for two residents (#61 and #26) out of two residents as evidenced by cleaning and dressing three separate wounds at the same time; not completing hand hygiene between the cleaning and dressing of wounds; leaving wounds uncovered; and not wearing personal protective equipment during wound care. Findings included: 1. The policy titled, Dressing Change, effective 11/30/2014 and revised 12/6/2017, identified that a clean dressing would be applied by a nurse to a wound as ordered to promote healing. A review of the admission Record for Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE], 3/22/19, and 4/23/21. The admission Record identified diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and unspecified peripheral vascular disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident scored a 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services, related to oxygen and humidification therapy, consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (#15) of one resident investigated for respiratory care. Findings included: On 5/26/21 at 11:30 a.m. an observation was conducted during tracheostomy care for Resident #15 with Staff O, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was assisted by Staff L, Registered Nurse (RN) unit manager. Resident #15 was observed seated upright in his bed. The tracheostomy site was open to air and had a dressing around the base of the tracheostomy between the device and the neck. There was an oxygen concentrator and humidifier set up in the room. The equipment was not connected to the resident and was not in operation. There was a nebulizer machine noted on a bedside table with the tubing and mask noted to be inside of a plastic wash bin mixed in with personal items for the resident. The tubing and mask were not properly stored in a clean separate bag. Resident #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to did not ensure an assessment for bed rails/enablers, a consent was received for use of bed rails/enablers or a physician order was received for bed rails/enablers for one resident (#57) of thirty-one sampled residents. Findings included: On 5/24/2021 at 6:45 a.m., and 8:30 a.m.; 5/25/2021 at 7:38 a.m., 10:45 a.m., and 11:40 a.m.; and 5/26/2021 at 7:20 a.m., 8:30 a.m.; and 10:00 a.m., Resident #57 was observed in his room, lying either flat on his back with his head on a pillow at twenty to thirty degrees, or seated flat in bed and upright at forty-five degrees. Resident #57 had been observed with calling out and repetitive yelling behaviors throughout the day, each day observed. During each observation, the resident was observed in his bed and both bed rails were observed up and locked into position. Resident #57 was observed and interviews were attempted several times with Resident #57 but he was not able to respond with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a repeated pharmacy recommendation was responded to within a timely manner for one resident (#56) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: The Policy and Procedure titled, Monthly Drug Regimen Review, effective 4/21/2017 and revised 10/10/2018, indicated that the procedure to ensure the requirement was met for monthly drug regimen review the Executive Director (ED)/Director of Nursing (DON) should implement the following processes which included: - Provide the consultant with responses (Consultant Report - Continuous Print) for consultant comments and recommendations from previous visits. - Discuss the recommendations not responded to and develop to plan for completing. - Download of Pharmacist Consultant Reports: -- Consultant Reports - 1 recommendation per page. ---- Non-Urgent: Report provided to the attending physician for timely response: ------ Day 1-14 provide recommendation(s) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ambassador Healthcare At College ParkFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Briarcliff Manor Center For Rehab And Nursing CareBriarcliff Manor, NY 1 of 5Charlotte Bay Rehab And Care CenterPort Charlotte, FL 1 of 5Live Oak Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLive Oak, FL 1 of 5Melbourne Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMelbourne, FL 1 of 5River Front Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPennsauken, NJ 1 of 5Space Coast Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterMerritt Island, FL 1 of 5West Delray Nursing & Rehab CenterDelray Beach, FL 2 of 5Alliance Care Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterIrvington, NJ 2 of 5Azure Shores RehabMiami, FL 2 of 5Beach Breeze Rehab And Care CenterWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Boca Circle Rehabilitation CenterBoca Raton, FL 2 of 5Charming Lakes RehabLakeland, FL 2 of 5Lake City Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterLake City, FL 2 of 5Lake Eustis Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterEustis, FL 2 of 5Seagate Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5West Volusia Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterDeltona, FL 2 of 5Yamato Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBoca Raton, FL 3 of 5Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazlet, NJ 3 of 5Heartland Nursing & Rehab CenterBoynton Beach, FL 3 of 5Nassau Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterHempstead, NY 3 of 5Palm Beach Nursing CenterLake Worth, FL 3 of 5Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterBronx, NY 4 of 5Acclaim Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterJersey City, NJ 4 of 5Adroit Care Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRahway, NJ 4 of 5Anchor Care and Rehabilitation CenterHazlet, NJ 4 of 5Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBrooklyn, NY 4 of 5Isles Of Boynton Nursing And Rehab CenterBoynton Beach, FL 4 of 5Sun Harbor HealthcarePort Charlotte, FL 4 of 5Victoria Crossing Rehabilitation CenterBrandon, FL 5 of 5Cypress Garden Center for Nursing and RehabilitatiFlushing, NY 5 of 5Staten Island Care CenterStaten Island, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAKEVIEW SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/03/2021
SUNSHINE SNF GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/30/2021
LEIFER, JOELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2022
BRADLEY, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 6%Other / private 23%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,562per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$278per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105482. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next