Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 267 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 298 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 380 beds and averages 369.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the residents' needs in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, 1). review of the actual staffing schedules dated from 06/01/2024 to 09/30/2024 revealed that staffing assignments were consistently less than the projected staffing needs specified in the Facility Assessment for Licensed Practical Nurses, 2). the facility Payroll Based Journal (Quarter 4 2024 (June 1 - September 30) and Quarter 1 2025 (October 1 - December 30) also revealed an excessively low weekend staffing, 3). Residents and staff reported that the facility was short of Certified Nursing Assistants, Licensed Practical Nurse, and Registered Nurses especially on weekends, evenings and nights, which resulted in a lack of timely staff response to call bells,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0560 — isolated
  Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification/Complaint Survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident had the right to refuse a room transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #125) of 2 residents reviewed for Notification of Change out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #125 was transferred from the 3rd Floor to the 1st Floor without their consent. The findings are: The facility policy titled Room Change with effective date 10/1/20 and last review date 8/3/24 stated that room changes in the facility may be undertaken to accommodate the needs of the residents. The policy did not document that a resident has the right to refuse a transfer to another room. Resident #125 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #125 was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Complaint (NY00365250) survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents' right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. Specifically, multiple resident rooms were observed with water damage on walls, ceiling tiles, and in resident hallways. This was evident on 1 (7th Floor) of 5 resident units observed during the Environment Task. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy titled Nursing Home Maintenance Program Policy reviewed on 10/18/2024 stated that the nursing home is committed to maintaining a safe, clean and well-functioning environment for residents, staff and visitors. During multiple observations from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the following were observed: a). In room [ROOM NUMBER] there were black colored stained on the ceiling tile, and there was a crack along the wall edge by the entrance door and by the wall near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #98) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, and 1 (Resident #125) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1). the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment for Resident #98 did not accurately reflect the resident's bowel and bladder status, and 2). the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment for Resident #125 did not accurately reflect a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. The findings are: The facility policy titled MDS (Minimum Data Set) RAI Process/ Minimum Data Set, dated last revised 3/6/2025 stated that by implementing the policy, the facility demonstrates its commitment to accurately and timely Minimum Data Set assessments, ensuring high quality care and compliance with regulatory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification/Complaint Survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident and/or their representative were provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan and the baseline care plan assessment was completed within 48 hours. This was evident for 1 (Resident #364) of 1 resident reviewed for Care Planning out of 38 sampled residents. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident's Baseline Care Plan with an effective date of 10/2/17 and last review date 7/2/2024 documented that all the sections in the Baseline care plan should be completed within 48 hours of admission. The policy also documented the nursing department was responsible to provide written copy of the Baseline care plan to resident and/or their designated representative. The policy further documented the nursing department had to obtain signatures of resident and/or their designated representative to confirm receipt of Baseline care plan.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/02/2025 through 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 6 residents observed during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, Resident #19 did not receive Cyanocobalamin Injection Solution, 1000 Microgram Intramuscular, daily for 7 days until 01/21/2025 as per hospital discharge instruction. The medication order contained conflicting routes within one order, and nursing staff continued to administer Cyanocobalamin 1000 Microgram 1 tablet sublingually every week for 8 weeks, without a physician order directing them to continue to administer the medication for longer than one week. The findings are: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, which include Dementia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, and End-Stage Renal Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 56) of 2 resident reviewed for Position/Mobility out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, there were multiple observations of Resident #56 without the right-hand roll in place as per Occupational Therapy recommendation and physician orders. The findings are: The facility policy titled Issue of AFO's (ankle-foot orthosis) and other uncovered hard plastic splints/orthoses/prostheses last reviewed 10/2024 documented that the nursing department will take responsibility for daily applications/removal of device and Nursing Manager will be responsible to ensure that the information is entered in the Certified Nursing Assistant accountability record. The Adaptive Equipment/Assistive Feeding Devices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the attending physician document review and action, if any, to address pharmacy reported irregularities. This was evident for 1 (Resident #19) of 6 residents observed during the Medication Administration. Specifically, pharmacy recommendation to correct Cyanocobalamin (vit B-12) 1,000 mcg tablet with directions to inject 1 milliliter by intramuscular route every week was not addressed by the Attending Physician. The findings are: The facility policy titled Drug Regimen Review - Monthly dated 07/03/24 documented all pharmacy recommendations will be submitted monthly for the prescriber's review and response. The prescriber shall act upon the recommendations within 30 days or less and document a clinical rationale if no change is to be made. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, which include Dementia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, and End-Stage Renal Disease The Physician's Order dated 01/22/2025 documented cyanocobalamin (vit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was not less than 5 percent. This was evident for 3 of 27 medications observed during the Medication Administration task. Specifically, Resident #298 did not receive three (Norvasc 5 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth daily, Folic acid 18 milligrams/0.4 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth daily and Cholecalciferol (vitamin d3) 25 microgram (1,000 unit) tablet by mouth daily) of their prescribed medications because those medications were not available, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11%. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Administration and Documentation dated 7/2/2024 documented the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure all medications are administered correctly and on a timely manner. The policy also documented that medication nurses are responsible to notify the nursing supervisor if medication is not available for administration and notify the medical provider.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey, from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and stored under proper temperature controls per manufacturer's recommendations. Specifically, 1.) two opened insulin pens (Humalog and Novolog) currently being use were not dated when opened, and 2). One opened Lantus insulin pen was not dated and discarded with 28 days. This was evident for 1 (Unit 6) of 7 medication carts observed during the Medication Storage task. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Storage Policy dated 07/02/24 stated that the facility must store medication in accordance with manufacturer's specifications, such as labeling dates and expirations. The policy also stated that the facility will store medications in a manner that maintains the integrity of the product, ensure the safety of the residents, and in accordance with professional standards. On 03/03/2025 at 11:08 AM, a medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $10.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY