Azure Shores Rehab
800 NW 95th Street, Miami, FL 33150 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (305) 836-1550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.3% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.4% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.62 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.97 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
24.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 24.6%CMS range 13.4–41.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.0–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed it was determined that the facility did not appropriately maintain the Advance Directives for one (101) out of four sampled residents receiving hospice services. Resident # 101's medical record included a signed Do Not Resuscitate form, a physician's order for Full Code and a signed Advanced Directive Acknowledgment form indicating Full Code. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 04/06/2026 at 11:34 AM Resident #101 was observed in bed, no apparent distress noted.Record review of Resident #101's face sheet revealed the residents was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia.Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set reference dated 02/10/2026 indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment and receiving hospice care.Record review of Resident #101's care plan initiated on 10/09/2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure privacy of confidential information on two (medication carts 400/500 and 100) out of five medication carts and during medication administration for one (Resident #32) out of five sampled residents as evidenced by staff left medication bingo card with resident's medical information visible unattended on top of the unattended 400/500 medication cart. Paper census with residents' pictures and medical information visible left unattended on the 100-medication cart and Staff observed administering medications to Resident #32 in the hallway in front of the nursing station. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.The findings included:Observation on 04/06/2026 at 12:33 PM revealed a bingo card with resident's name and medical information visible on top of the unattended 400/500 medication cart. (photo evidence). On 04/06/2026 at 12:42 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility inaccurately coded the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #128) out of three residents closed records reviewed. Staff coded Resident #128, who had expired at the facility, as having been hospitalized in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). At the time of the survey, 119 residents resided in the facility. The findings included. Record review of Resident # 128 clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and expired at the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD), Record review of the Death in Facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section A (Identification Information) dated [DATE] documented Resident #128 was discharged to a short-term general hospital.During an interview on [DATE] at 11:50 AM, the MDS Director revealed she had intended to record the resident as deceased , but the system registered the entry under code 4, which is designated for short term general…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility's staff failed to implement an oxygen care plan for two (Resident #124 and Resident #13) out of two sampled oxygen dependent residents. Resident #124 and Resident #13 oxygen was being delivered above the prescribed rate. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include:Resident #124On 04/06/2026 at 9:48 AM Resident #124 was observed in bed with oxygen in progress via nasal cannula at 3.25 Liters Per Minute (LPM). No humidification was observed.Record review of Resident #124's clinical records revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Pneumonia, and Dependence on supplemental oxygen.Record review of a physician's order sheet revealed Resident #124 had an order dated 03/6/2026 for oxygen Inhalation via nasal cannula at 2 LPM as tolerated every shift for shortness of breath (SOB) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility did not update the Advanced Directive Care Plan for one (Resident #101) out of four sampled residents who were receiving hospice services. Resident #101's current care plan did not reflect the resident's Advanced Directive for Full Code documented on the Advance Directive form signed by Resident 101 upon reentry to facility. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.The findings included:On 04/06/2026 at 11:34 AM Resident #101 was observed in bed, no apparent distress and voiced no complaints.Record review of clinical records revealed Resident #101 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia.Record review of a Quarterly minimum data set reference dated 02/10/2026 indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment and receiving hospice care.Record review of a March care plan initiated on 10/09/2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility did not consistently maintain an environment free of accident hazards in one of two soiled utility rooms and one of three housekeeping carts. Staff were observed on two occasions failing to secure the soiled utility room door, which housed biohazardous and sharp materials. Additionally, staff were observed twice leaving a housekeeping cart open, with chemicals visible and accessible. These practices presented potential risks to the 119 residents residing in the facility. The findings included:On 04/06/2026 at 10:19 AM an observation was made of an unlocked Soiled Utility room door on the second floor (photo).On 04/06/2026 at 10:27 AM Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant was observed exiting the Soiled Utility room on the second floor leaving the door unlocked (photo).On 04/06/2026 at 10:28 AM Staff J, Housekeeping observed exiting The Soiled utility room on the second floor second floor and the door remained unlocked.On 04/06/2026 at 10:35 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews the facility staff did not properly position an indwelling urinary tubing to facilitate the flow of urine for one (Resident #101) out of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. Loops in Resident #101's indwelling catheter tubing prevented urine from flowing freely, which increased the resident's risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues. At the time of the survey, four residents with indwelling urinary catheters resided in the facilityThe findings included:Resident #101 Observation on 04/06/2026 at 11:34 AM revealed Resident #101 in bed, the indwelling urinary catheter tubing was looped and contained urine (photo).On 04/06/2026 at 12:05 PM Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) was made aware of the identified concern and observed the Resident #101's indwelling urinary catheter tubing with surveyor. Staff D, RN stated, I will change the position to allow urine to flow to prevent infection. At that time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was delivered at the prescribed rate for two (Resident #124 and Resident #13) out of two sampled oxygen dependent residents. The oxygen flowmeters indicated Resident #124 and Resident #13 oxygen was being administered above the prescribed level. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include:Resident #124 On 04/06/2026 at 9:48 AM Resident #124 was observed in bed with oxygen in progress via nasal cannula at 3.25 Liters Per Minute (LPM). No humidification was observed.Record review of Resident #124's clinical records revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Pneumonia, and Dependence on supplemental oxygen.Record review of a physician's order sheet revealed Resident #124 had an order dated 03/6/2026 for oxygen Inhalation via nasal cannula at 2 LPM as tolerated every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to properly store medications and biologics for two (#132, #116) out of seven sampled residents as evidenced by 1. an observation of two medicated inhalers on the side table of Resident#132. 2. Two observations of a medicated lotion on the nightstand of Resident#116. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Resident #132On 04/06/2026 at 11:37 AM Resident #132 was observed in bed with no apparent distress. Two medicated inhalers were observed inside a plastic bag on the side table next to Resident #132 (photo).On 04/06/2026 at 11:45 AM Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, Medications are not allowed to be in the rooms. We keep medications in the medication cart. Surveyor notified Staff D, RN of the identified concern and Staff D, RN removed both inhalers from Resident #132's bedside; and S further revealed: There are no physician orders for inhalers. Rounds are made every two hours and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for two (Resident #8 and Resident #101) out of two sampled residents. 1) Resident #8 medical record contained documentation that an ordered medication was not administered and facility had documentation that the medication was administered. 2) Resident #101's medical record contained a signed DNR form and care plan. However, upon reentry the signed Advance Directive acknowledgment form indicated Resident #101 expressed wishes to be full code. There were 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Resident # 8On 04/09/2026 at 10:32 AM Resident # 8 was observed receiving left heel wound treatment conducted by the wound care Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN).Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE], clinical diagnosis included but not limited to: Sepsis, Streptococcus, and Bacteremia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate and coordinate with hospice representative for one (Resident #101) out of one sampled resident receiving hospice services as evidenced by: facility staff failed to obtain and keep hospice nursing notes in the hospice folder for Resident #101 since March 2026 when Resident #101 received a physician order for hospice services. There were four residents receiving hospice care residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:On 04/06/2026 at 11:34 AM Resident #101 was observed in bed, call light in reach, no apparent distress and voiced no complaints. Record review of Resident #101's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia. Record review of a Quarterly minimum data set reference dated 02/10/2026 indicated Resident #101 had moderate cognitive impairment and was receiving hospice care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action to correct repeated deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F761; failed to properly store and label medications during medication administration, F689; failed to prevent accident hazards, F690; failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received care to prevent infection and F867; QAPI/QAA improvement activities. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect the 119 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Record review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited for F761, F690, F689, and F867 during the recertification and Relicensure survey with an exit date of 09/26/2024. Record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan revealed revised January 20, 2026 revealed Purpose: The purpose of QAPI in our organization is to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance service to maintain a sanitary, safe, orderly, and comfortable interior for the first and second (2/2/) residential living floors. The findings included: During the resident screenings performed by the surveyors on 09/23-24/25, and environment tours conducted on 09/25-26/24 accompanied with the facility's Administrator, Infection Control Preventionist, Corporate Housekeeping Director. and Corporate Registered Nurse, the following were noted: The findings included: FIRST FLOOR: room [ROOM NUMBER] - Room windows screens (2) heavily torn and in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Exterior of room chair was stained, worn, and torn. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Fall mat (A-bed) soiled and stained, exterior of over-bed table damaged and in disrepair, bathroom floor soiled and large black stains, and exterior of night-stand (B-bed) damaged and in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Exteriors of over-bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility's menu failed to meet the nutritional needs for 28 facility residents (included Sampled Resident's #21, #57, #65, #69, #76, #97, #102 and #140) residents with physician ordered Dysphagia Advanced/Dysphagia Mechanical Soft, and 9 facility resident's (included Sampled Resident's #53, #58, #59, and #95) with physician ordered Dysphagia Pureed. The findings included: During the review of the approved menu for the Lunch meal for 09/24/24, the following were noted: Lettuce & Tomato Plate (4 ounces) and Pickle Spear (1) to be server to Regular diet. Further review noted that there was no planned vegetable substitution documented for Dysphagia Advanced Diet, Dysphagia Mechanical Soft Diet, and Dysphagia Pureed Diet. Interview with the Corporate Food Service Director (CFSD) at the time of the review confirmed diets failed to have a documented vegetable substitution planned on the approved menu. It was discussed with the CFSD that the menu failed to meet the nutritional requirements for vegetable serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve nutritive value, palatable flavor and appearance for Dysphagia Mechanically Altered Diet, Mechanical Soft Diet, Dysphagia Pureed Diet, and Regular Diet . The findings included: 1) During the initial dietary/food service observation tour conducted on 09/23/24 at 8:45 AM accompanied with the Corporate Food Service Director (CFSD) , it was noted that quarter and half pans of prepared foods were located within the steamer , however the unit was not on. Further observation noted that the steamer contained fully cooked/prepared foods that included the following half pan of Ground Chicken, half pan of Pureed Chicken, quarter pan Pureed Rice, quarter pan Pureed Macaroni Noodles, half pan Purred Spinach, and quarter pan Pureed Carrots. Further observation noted that the foods appeared non-appetizing and tasteless when tested by the surveyor. Interview with the breakfast/lunch cook (Staff I) revealed the ground and pureed foods were prepared in the early…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food in a Mechanically Altered and Pureed Form designed to meet resident needs for 28 (Includes Sampled Resident's # 21, #24, #57, #65, #69, #76, #97, #102, and #04) physician ordered Mechanically Altered Diet, and 9 (Includes Sampled Resident's #53, #58, 59, and #95) physician ordered Dysphagia Pureed Diet. The findings included: During the review of the facility's approved Diet and Nutrition Care Manual - Chapter 2: Consistency Alterations 2-16, 2019 .Noted the following: (A) Mechanically Altered (Level 2) of Mechanical Soft Diet: This diet is used for residents with mild to moderate oral and/or pharyngeal dysphagia. Some chewing is required and difficult to chew foods that are chopped, ground, shredded, cooked, or altered to make it easier to chew and swallow. Foods should be soft and moist enough to form a bolus. (B) Dysphagia Puree (Level 1) Diet: The diet is used for resident who have sever chewing and/or swallowing problems. All foods are pureed to simulate a soft food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a therapeutic diet of Lactose Intolerance/No Dairy was obtained from the attending physician and followed by the facility for 1 (Resident #324) of 5 residents sample for nutrition review. The findings included. On 09/25/24 at 9:00 AM during observation of Resident #324 in his room the resident appeared to be underweight/malnourished, but was alert and oriented. Observation of the breakfast tray noted the tray ticket document NO Dairy/Double Entree Portions, however the food tray contained an 8-ounce carton of whole milk and a single portion of sausage gravy that the ingredients include whole milk. The resident at the time of the observation stated he became Lactose intolerant approximately 5 years ago and has suffered weight loose due to the side effects of being Lactose Intolerant and receives milk and foods made with milk for almost all meals served. Resident #324 revealed he continuously spoke to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for potentially 104 of the 116 residents who eat foods by mouth. The findings included: 1) During the initial dietary/food service observation tour conducted on 09/23/24 at 8:45 AM, and accompanied with the facility's Certified Dietary Manager and Corporate Food Service Director (CFSD), the following were noted: (a) Observation of the cook's preparation sink noted a large cooking pot full of water that contained a 10 pound package of raw chicken. Further observation noted that no cold water was running over the chicken and the CFSD stated that the chicken was thawing, and staff failed to ensure that the cold water was running into the pot at full volume. At the request of the surveyor the temperature of the water within the pot was taken by the CFSD with the facility's calibrated food thermometer and was recorded at 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The surveyor reviewed that the regulatory temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly that potentially effected all of the 116 facility residents. The findings included: During the kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 09/23/24 at 8:45 AM and accompanied with the Certified Dietary Manager and Corporate Food Service Director the garbage/refuse noted to have the garbage/trash container with the lid open and had open garbage and trash spewing onto the [NAME] area around the unit. Further observation of the garbage/refuse area noted that the area behind the dumpster was heavily covered in soiled PPE's (gloves, gowns, masks, unidentifiable resident and nursing waste materials, rotting trash and garbage, and presence and evidence insect and rodent activity. It was estimated that the area was approximately 25 feet long and 5 feet wide and a large area of stagnant, fowl, garbage and trash was located at one end. The surveyor requested that the Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to assure services being provided to residents meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 4 of residents observed during med pass (Resident #54). The findings included: Review of the facility's employee handbook with revised date of 2024 under section titled, Personal Appearance, Dress Code and Uniform Policy included the following in part: Nails must be clean, neat and trimmed to ¼ inch for resident/patient care responsibilities; acrylic and gel nails or any other artificial nails are prohibited under any circumstances. Review of the CDC's (Center for Disease Control) website titled, Clean Hands at https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html Under the section Maintain fingernail and jewelry safety included in part the following: Natural nails should not extend past the fingertip. Do not wear artificial fingernails or extensions when having direct contact with high-risk patients like those at intensive-care units or operating rooms. Germs can live under artificial fingernails both before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident with indwelling urinary catheter receives care to prevent to prevent infection and to provide nephrology consult appointment for 1 of 1 resident observed for catheter care (Resident #117). The findings included: Record review for Resident #117 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following in part: Sepsis Unspecified Organism, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Chronic Prostatitis, Retention of Urine Unspecified, Personal History of Urinary (Tract) Infections, and Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy Unspecified. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #117 dated 09/08/24 documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #117 revealed an order dated 08/19/24 for Urinary Catheter: Provide catheter care every shift and as needed. On 08/23/24 a physician's order was written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to monitor food and supplement intake for 1 (Resident #69) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition and failed to ensure accurate weights for new admission for 1 (Resident # 323) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: 1). Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #69's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Diabetes Mellitus, Dysphagia and Vitamin deficiency. Resident #69's orders included: Regular diet, Dysphagia Mechanical Soft texture, Regular/Thin Liquids consistency - Fortified food at all meals - 04/11/24 with a revision date of 08/30/24 Health Shake put Amt (Amount) ordered PO (by mouth) - three times a day for supplement 4 oz (ounces)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for tube feeding were followed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Residents #18 and #85) The findings included: On 09/23/24 at 11:45 AM an observation was made of Resident #85 lying in bed with bottle of Glucerna 1.2 (formula type) tube feeding at the 800 milliliter mark out of a 1,000 milliliter capacity bottle. The bottle was labeled as started at 09/23/24 at 6:00 AM, the tube feeding was not infusing. On 09/24/24 at 8:30 AM an observation made of Resident #85 lying in bed with bottle of Glucerna 1.2 tube feeding just above the 900 mark out of a 1,000 milliliter capacity bottle. The bottle was labeled as started at 09/24/24 at 5:45 AM the tube feeding was infusing at 70 milliliters per hour. On 09/24/24 at 1:45 PM an observation was made of Resident #85 lying in bed with bottle of Glucerna 1.2 tube feeding just below the 800 mark out of a 1,000 milliliter capacity bottle. The bottle was labeled as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administering and documenting of medications to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for medication administration observation (Resident #54) and for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for controlled medications (Residents #6, and #54), and failed to ensure a discontinued medication was removed from the med cart for 1 of 9 residents reviewed during med reconciliation review (Resident #6) The findings included: Record review for Resident #54 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Spondylosis Lumbar Region, Respiratory Disorders in Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below Knee, Other Specified Depressive Episodes, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The medication error rate was 28% with 7 medication errors identified while observing a total of 25 opportunities, affecting Resident #54. The findings included: Record review for Resident #54 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Spondylosis Lumbar Region, Respiratory Disorders in Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below Knee, Other Specified Depressive Episodes, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #54 dated 07/09/24 documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #54 revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview the facility failed to ensure all disposed medications are stored in a secure manner for 1 of 4 residents observed during med administration (Resident #54). The findings included: On 09/23/24 at 9:45 AM an observation of med administration with Staff D Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #54 was conducted. While preparing the medications for Resident #54, the nurse spilled a pill out of the med cup and put the pill into the uncovered trash bin located on the side of the med cart. During an interview conducted on 09/23/24 at 10:00 AM with Staff D LPN who stated she has worked at the facility for 1 month and she is a new graduate nurse. When asked about drug disposal, the LPN stated the medication should go in the drug buster that is located on her cart in the bottom drawer. The LPN acknowledged she did not dispose of the medication properly.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F584, safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment; F693, tube feeding management; F814, dispose garbage and refuse properly; and F867, QAPI/QAA improvement activities. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect all 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited F584, F693, F814 and F867 during the recertification and Relicensure survey with an exit date of 06/18/23. During an interview with the facility's Administrator on 09/26/24 at 1:05 PM, the Administrator was apprised that these 4 deficiencies will be cited again on this current survey. The Administrator stated he will be working to remedy this.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secured environment for one (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents. This deficient practice enabled resident #1 to exit the facility at 4:30 PM on 10/04/23, undetected. The findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Elopement Prevention effective April 2022 documented: Purpose: It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe environments for all residents and to eliminate and/or control elopement behavior of residents. The facility shall do all that is reasonable to identify and prevent elopement and to act quickly and prudently should it occur. Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization (for example, an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or any necessary supervision to do so. Procedure: 1) During the preadmission screening process, through record review/interview all reasonable efforts are made to ascertain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide accommodation of needs for 3 out of 30 sampled residents (Resident #359 for dialysis machine in the bathroom, Resident #62 for the broken call light and Resident #55 unable to use his bathroom). This has the possibility to affect those residents who share a room with a dialysis patient as well as the 109 residents at the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: 1. On 06/06/23 at 11:33 AM, observed Resident # 359 in bed, awake, alert, call light within reach and he was able to locate the call light button. He stated, I'm getting dialysis in the room they store the equipment in the bathroom. Surveyor observed some of the equipment next to his bed. On 06/06/23 at 11:35 AM, observed Resident #55 in bed, alert and oriented x3, watching TV, call light within reach. He stated, they are bringing my roommate's dialysis in the room, and I cannot use the bathroom, this happens three times a week, equipment is all over the place, I have peed on myself at times as I cannot use the bathroom. On 06/07/23 at 08:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three residents (Resident # 12, the resident's diagnosis was coded wrong, Resident # 75, the MDS was coded wrong for wander guard not in use, Resident # 29, the discharge status was coded wrong), out of 30 sampled resident's at the time of survey. This deficiency has the potential to affect 109 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The Findings included: 1. Record review of the clinical records for Resident # 12 revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Other sequelae of Cerebral Infarction Affecting Unspecified Side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Unspecified Complications; Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavior Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. Record review of Orders dated 05/24/2022 revealed, the resident was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for changing the midline (intravenous(IV) catheter) dressing for one (Resident #77) out of one resident's who was receiving intravenous therapy as evidenced by the midline dressing date being over 7 days old. The findings include: Observation on 6/5/23 at 7:32 AM, Resident #77 was receiving intravenous antibiotics. On 6/6/23 at 8:43 AM, it was observed that Resident #77 midline dressing to right arm appeared to be dated 5/11/23 or 5/17/23 (See photo evidence). It was noted that Resident #77 readmission to the facility was on 5/19/23. It was observed on 6/6/23 at 12:32 PM, 6/7/23 at 3:00PM (see photo evidence) and 6/8/23 at 9:20 AM the midline dressing was observed with dates that appeared to be 5/11/23 or 5/17/23. On 6/8/23 at 9:20 AM, an interview with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed, when asked What date is on Resident #77's midline dressing and how frequently are they changed? Staff H, L.P.N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow prescribed doctor's orders for enteral feedings for three out of 22 residents receiving enteral feedings (Residents #67, #310 and #311) as evidenced by the enteral feeding rates were incorrect. This practice has the potential to affect 22 residents who receive tube feeding at the facility. The findings include: 1. On 6/6/23 at 8:48 AM and on 6/6/23 at 12:33 PM observations of Resident #67 revealed, the enteral feeding rate was set at 40 milliliters(ml) an hour. On 6/7/23 at 11:11 AM, the Enteral feeding rate was set at 70 milliliters an hour. Record review of Resident #67 revealed, Medical diagnoses were respiratory failure, tracheostomy, gastrostomy status, cerebral infarction (stroke) and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. Review of the Physician orders of Resident #67 revealed, a start date of 5/30/23 for Enteral formula to run at 70 milliliters an hour for 22 hours or until 1540 ml is infused within 24 hours. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident # 209) out of 23 residents receiving oxygen treatments, had a doctor's order for oxygen therapy before administration. The facility failed to follow doctor's orders as evidenced by one resident (Resident # 209) out of 23 residents receiving oxygen therapy, the doctor's prescribed 2 Liters per Minute (LPM) and resident #209 was observed to be receiving 1.5 LPM of oxygen. The findings included: Observation of Resident # 209 on 06/05/2023 at 10:09 AM, the resident was sleeping. The resident was observed with a nasal cannula and the oxygen concentrator gauge was set up at 1.5 LPM. (Photographic evidence). Review of the residents physician orders revealed, there was no order for oxygen found. Observation of Resident # 209 on 06/06/2023 at 10:29 AM, the Resident was sleeping. The resident did not have the nasal cannula in place in nose. The oxygen concentrator gauge was set up at 1.5 LPM. (Photographic evidence). Review if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was providing services at least 8 consecutives hours a day, 7 days a week. This had the potential to affect the 109 residents who resided in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: During an observation at First floor Nurse's station, on 06/06/2023 at 7:32 AM, it was noted that the staffing information was posted. It was observed that 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) were providing nursing care to the residents. (Photographic evidence). During an observation at Second floor Nurse's station, on 06/06/2023 at 7:35 AM, it was noted that the staffing information was posted. It was observed that 2 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) were providing nursing care to the residents. (Photographic evidence) During an observation at First floor Nurse's station, on 06/07/2023 at 8:12 AM, it was noted that the staffing information was posted. It was observed that 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) were providing nursing care to the residents. (Photographic evidence).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to assure the garbage and refuse area was clean and discarded furniture were properly disposed and contained on the facility grounds. The findings included: Record review of the Pest Control Policy and Procedure dated 4/02/2022 documented: Purpose-Facility wide pest-control strategies are developed emphasizing kitchens, cafeterias, laundries, central supply areas. Loading docks, construction activities and other regions prone to pest infestations. Procedure- 6) Maintain garbage storage area(s) in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. Observation of the garbage and refuse area with Staff I, Dietary Aide on 6/05/23 at 6:37 am. The area had three trash bins for trash and one trash bin for recycle. The garbage and refuse area had garbage on the ground in piles. Discarded furniture chairs, dressers, air conditioner vent covers, wood planks and empty boxes of exam gloves were scattered on the ground and not contained in the garbage bins. Photographic evidence submitted. Interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and Interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correctly identify quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F641 Accuracy of Assessments, F695 Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning, and F908 Essential Equipment, Safe Operating Condition. This practice has the potential to increase the risk of negative resident outcomes and to affect all 109 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The finding included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit 04/28/2022, Accuracy of Assessments was cited related to the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for three out 40 sampled residents whose MDS were reviewed, Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning was cited related to the facility failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of oxygen for 2 out of 11 residents receiving respiratory treatments at the time of last survey, and Essential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in proper working condition for two out of six laundry machines. This practice has the potential to affect 109 resident's residents at this facility at the time of survey. Findings include: On 06/07/23 at 03:07 PM In an observation/interview with Manager of Housekeeping in laundry room. It was observed that there were 3 washers, and one had a tag on it. It stated, power disconnected 7/17/21. It was observed that there were three dryers and 1 had a sign which stated, Out of order. When asked How long has the dryer been out of order? The Housekeeping Manager stated, About 2 weeks ago. (See photo evidence). It was asked of the Housekeeping Manager and Regional Director of Maintenance to provide documentation of work order for broken washer and dryer. On 06/08/23 at 12:35 PM. In an interview with Maintenance Director. When asked What is the status of the washer being repaired or replaced? The Maintenance Director stated that We are waiting for a quote for the washer, the clothes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 32 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRANCO SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/03/2021 |
| SUNSHINE SNF GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/30/2021 |
| LEIFER, JOEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| RUBIN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/06/2023 |
| SILVA, LESLY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/22/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105903. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.