Isles Of Boynton Nursing And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 171.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by failing to provide appropriate supervision to meet the needs 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1), who displayed exit seeking behaviors. The deficient practice allowed Resident #1, on 12/25/24 between 7:15 AM and 7:20 AM, after he removed the right window panel from the window frame in his room, to fall from the window approximately 20 ft to the ground. Resident #1 was found on the ground, in an area approximately three feet wide, between the building and a mature palm tree. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital by ambulance for evaluation and treatment after suffering from serious injuries. The findings include: Record review revealed the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Misappropriation, dated October 2019, defined Neglect as follows: Neglect means the failure of the center, its associates or service providers, to provide goods…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #1, from falling from a second-floor window. The deficient practice allowed Resident #1, on 12/25/24 at between 7:15 AM and 7:20 AM, after he removed the right window panel from the window frame in his room, to fall from the window approximately 20 ft to the ground. Resident #1 was found on the ground, in an area approximately three feet wide, between the building and a mature palm tree. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital by ambulance for evaluation and treatment after suffering from serious injuries. The findings include: Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage without a Loss of Consciousness, History of Falling, Major Depressive Disorder, Alcohol use with Intoxication, and Scalp Laceration without foreign body. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure correct medications were given as per physician's orders for 1 out of 25 opportunities for medication administration affecting Resident #155. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Clinical-Medication Administration with a revised date of 12/10/25 included in part the following: Guidelines for Medication Administration: Have a working knowledge of the medication you are administering; common dosage, common uses, common side effects, and reason the medication is being given to the resident. Use available resources such as drug handbooks, medication package inserts, medication websites, the provider, or the pharmacist if unfamiliar with the medication. Observe the Rights of Medication Administration: Right Medicine. Record review for Resident #155 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Displaced Avulsion Fracture (Chip Fracture) of Left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure resident received wound care in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed for wound care (Resident #21). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dressing -Dry/Clean with an effective date of 04/01/22 included in part the following: Perform hand hygiene, put on clean gloves, Use no-touch technique. Use sterile tongue blades (depressor) and applicators to remove ointment and creams from containers. Apply the ordered dressing and secure with tape or bordered dressing per order. Record review for Resident #21 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Quadriplegia, Chronic Osteomyelitis Left Thigh, Pressure Ulcer of Unspecified Site, Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Major Depressive Disorder.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure securing a device in place for 1 of 6 sampled residents with an indwelling catheter (Resident #21). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing - Physician's Orders with a revised date of 03/10/23 that included in part the following: Treatment orders: all treatments should include the treatment to be used and location of where the treatment should be placed, frequency and if appropriate, how the area should be cleaned and how it should be covered. Reason for the treatment required (diagnosis). Record review for Resident #21 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Quadriplegia, Chronic Osteomyelitis Left Thigh, Pressure Ulcer of Unspecified Site, Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Major Depressive Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain Intravenous (IV) access dressing in a sanitary manner and failed to change an IV access dressing as per facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for IV access, (Resident #194). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Policy and Procedure: Clinical-Medication Administration revised 12/05/2025 documented Purpose: To administer medications as per provider's order and in accordance with regulatory guidelines and practice standards. Intravenous Medication or Fluids (IV therapy): . complete dressing changes as ordered and as needed to the insertion site. Review of the record revealed Resident #194 was admitted to the facility 01/20/26 with a diagnosis of Heart Failure. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #194 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care in a manner consistent with physician orders and facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for tracheostomy care (Residents #223.) The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Policy: Nursing- Tracheostomy Care dated 04/01/22 documented .Equipment and Supplies 1.Gloves (clean and Sterile) 2.Mask and eyewear (as indicated).Procedure Guidelines: 1. Verify Physicians orders.8. Assess patient HR (Heart Rate)/RR (Respiration Rate)/ SaO2 Lung sounds 9.Remove and discard soiled dressing, note drainage and assess stoma site suction trach if necessary.25.Reasses the patient. Using the procedure for tracheostomy suction, suction the resident if needed. Review of the record revealed Resident #223 was admitted to the facility 01/27/26 with diagnoses of Anoxic Brain Damage (when the brain is completely deprived of oxygen, causing brain cells to begin dying)and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure only authorized staff have access to treatment carts for 6 out of 6 treatment carts, failed to ensure med carts are locked at all times for 1 out of 8 med carts, and failed to ensure mediations were secured at the bedside for 1 of 39 sampled residents (Resident #155). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Clinical - Medication Storage and Labeling with a revised date of 12/09/25 included in part the following: Medications and biologicals in medication rooms, carts, boxes, and refrigerators are to be maintained within secured (locked) locations, accessible only to designated staff. 1) On 02/11/26 at 9:30 AM an observation of wound care performed by Staff A Wound Care Registered Nurse (WCRN) who was assisted by Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), for Resident #21. Upon completion of the wound care, Staff A, WCRN, gave his keys (with keys to all med treatment carts) to Staff B, CNA, to stock the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to serve ground meats, per the physician's diet order. This had the potential to affect 1 of 1 sampled resident, who was on a regular texture diet with ground meats (Resident #103). The findings included:A record review revealed that Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He has received Hospice services since 09/09/2022. His admitting diagnoses included Cerebral Atherosclerosis, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with other Behavioral Disturbance, and Sarcopenia (muscle wasting). The resident's diet listed in the electronic medical records was for a Regular diet, with Regular texture food, Regular/Thin Liquids consistency, and Ground Meat since 08/06/25. A nutrition progress note dated 08/06/25 revealed that Resident #103's daughter requested that ground meats were added to his diet for ease of chewing. A record review of the Resident #103's diet in the meat ticket program's listing (Dietary List) of diets showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a refund due to the resident or resident representative within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge from the facility, for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3), reviewed for refunds. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further record review revealed on 02/20/25 he was discharged to an assisted living facility. During an interview on 06/05/25 at 11:15 AM, Resident #1's family member confirmed the resident was discharged from the facility on 02/20/25, and they still have not received the money owed to them. He explained that they paid privately for his stay through 02/28/25. The family member said he called the Business Office Manager (BOM) more than 2 times, and he also sent emails regarding the refund. During an interview with the BOM (Business Office Manager) on 06/05/25 at 3:45 PM, she said that she sent a request for a refund on 04/21/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #121). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Exception Reports dated 11/2019, documented: The Charge Nurse or designee must conduct an investigation of the accident/incident by way of completing the Exception Report and adding any additional information to determine the cause of the incident/accident. Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review revealed a comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] that documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. A progress note dated 07/02/24 documented: The Nurse Practitioner (NP) aware of the positive knee X-ray results. The NP ordered the patient to the hospital ER (emergency room) for further evaluation. This writer informed the family that the patient c/o (complained of) pain to her knee upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to obtain a Level I PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for a Level 1 PASARR (Resident #67 and #90). The findings included: Record review revealed the facility's policy titled, Preadmission Screening (PASSAR/PASSR) dated March 2020 documented It is the policy of the center to follow the Federal and State regulations with regards to pre-screening residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for individuals requiring more than 30 days in the Center. 1. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility post hospitalization on 10/17/23 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Atherosclerosis, Vascular Dementia, Anxiety and Dysphagia. According to the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], she was unable to answer the questions on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. This indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. On 08/28/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,152 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,076 — penalty dated 2025-01-08
• $8,076 — penalty dated 2025-01-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL