Beach Breeze Rehab And Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation practices in the provision of food for the residents. This had the potential to affect 109 Residents on oral diets. The findings included: A). A tour of the main kitchen was conducted on 05/05/25 at 9:30 AM. The surveyor was accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Registered Dietitian. The following was observed: 1. The [NAME] Convection oven had brown residue on the exterior of the oven in the area near the door hinge and on the door handles. 2. The Sunfire oven had brown residue on the exterior of the oven, the door's handle, and on an open ledge located beneath the turn on/off control knobs. 3. The Cleveland Steamer had brown residue stuck on the valve open/close knob. 4. The meat slicer was dirty with debris located on the interior surface below the blade. 5. In the walk-in refrigerator the following items were expired: a. Two one-pound boxes of butter were dated 11/11/24 (brand: Challenge). b. A package of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat Residents with dignity and respect during care for Residents #323, #20, and a Resident that wished to remain anonymous; failed to discuss financial concerns in private for Resident #94; and failed to treat Residents with dignity during dining for Residents #8, #74, #76 and #104. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Guideline: Administrative-Resident Rights-Right to Respect, Dignity and to have Personal Property documented Process: 1. The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to retain and use personal possessions, including furnishings, and clothing, as space permits, unless to do so would infringe upon the rights or health and safety of other residents. 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #323 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #323 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of housekeeping records, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 1 of 4 units ([NAME]) as evidenced by pervasive odors noted on the unit throughout the survey week and maintenance concerns in the dining room. The findings included: 1) During an interview on 05/08/25 at 1:29 PM, when asked how she ensures an odor-free environment, the Housekeeping Manager stated her staff utilize a disinfectant cleaner to wipe down all surfaces, and during a deep cleaning of a room, all linens and curtains were changed out. When asked the process and schedule for deep cleaning the rooms, the Housekeeping Manager explained she had a schedule in which one or two rooms were deep cleaned daily, and when a resident was discharged , that room was also deep cleaned. When asked if there were any additional considerations for the [NAME] unit, which was the secured unit for the memory impaired residents, the Housekeeping Manager stated the housekeeper assigned to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to intervene when 2 residents (#92, #76) ate or drank from 5 other residents' cups or plates, and when 1 resident who preferred to remain anonymous, reported that the [NAME] Hall was chaotic on the weekends. This had the potential to affect 31 residents in the [NAME] Hall, memory support unit. The findings included: During an interview conducted on 05/06/25 at 9:20 AM, as a part of the initial screening process, a resident who wanted to remain anonymous said that [NAME] Hall needed more staff during weekends. She described the environment on the weekends as chaotic. A record review revealed that Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her medical history included Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Oral Dysphagia, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. These diagnoses were present on admission. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to have information displayed in the resident's room for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices, Resident #117. The findings included: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 04/13/25, Resident #117's preferred language was Spanish. The MDS documented that Resident #117 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was 'cognitively intact'. Resident #117's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Stroke, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, Malnutrition, Depression, Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, Dysphagia, Dysarthria and Spinal stenosis. Resident #117's care plan for communication documented, Resident has a potential communication problem related to language barrier. He is Spanish speaking. Date Initiated: 04/09/2025 Revision on:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a receipt for a financial transaction as evidenced by Resident #94 stating he did not sign or receive a copy of a receipt. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Resident Rights-Personal funds effective 04/01/2022, documented, in part, A resident who requests cash with available funds will be given cash or check and a signed receipt will be provided for both resident and records. Record review revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, on a 0-15 scale, indicating no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 9:59 AM, when asked if everyone is treating you well at the facility, Resident #94 stated, I have an issue with the social worker regarding my social security. They gave me some money in January, but I haven't received any since. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident with his original documents upon request for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #56); and the facility failed to deliver mail to 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #94). Findings included: The review of the policy titled Communication with You and Friends, documented, in part You will receive mail addressed to you delivered at the facility unopened, and as soon as possible. 1. Record review revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, on a 0-15 scale, indicating no cognitive impairment. During an interview on 05/05/25 12:27 PM, the resident stated the Office Manager brought her these forms last Tuesday and she asked for the originals. The Office Manager said we don't have originals. I know these are not original because the bottom is cut off and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a resident's smoking for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #31). The findings included: The facility's Smoking Policy, with no reference date, documented: Any smoking-related privileges, restrictions, and concerns (for example, need for close monitoring) shall be noted on the care plan, and all personnel caring for the resident shall be alerted to these issues. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a reference date of 04/5/25, Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating that the resident was 'moderately' cognitively impaired. The assessment documented that Resident #31 required partial/moderate assistance for bed mobility, substantial/maximal assistance for transfers and ambulated via manual wheelchair independently. Resident #31's diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1). Provide alternate means for a resident to communicate with staff for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for communication, Resident #117; and 2). Failed to ensure a resident was provided with appropriate supplies in order to independently maintain their ostomy for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ostomy status, Resident #323. The findings included: 1). Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 04/13/25, Resident #117 was 'Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin' and preferred language was Spanish. The MDS documented that Resident #117 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was 'cognitively intact'. The MDS documented that Resident #117 required 'Substantial/maximal assistance' for bed mobility, was dependent upon staff for transfers and ambulated via manual wheelchair with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide activities designed to meet the interests of one resident (Resident #84), to promote the psychosocial well-being of that resident. This had the potential to affect 31 residents in the [NAME] Hall, memory support unit. The findings included: A record review revealed Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her history of diagnoses included Dementia, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, and Mood Disorder due to Known Physiological Condition. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. This indicated that she had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Section E revealed that Resident #84 exhibited no behaviors that quarter. A review of Resident #84's ongoing care plan initiated 07/30/24 stated that she had a history of trauma; and she required adequate time to make choices related to her care. One intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL