Adroit Care Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 149 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 116.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2600629, 2601350Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 8/29/2025 and 9/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) implement a resident's (Resident #1) comprehensive care plan for out on pass with escort only which resulted in the resident eloping and b.) develop a care plan for a resident post elopement. On 8/22/2025, Resident #1 was sitting outside the facility unescorted and was found wandering on a multi-lane highway by a passerby who brought the resident to the police precinct and had a syncopal episode (loss of consciousness) and was transferred to the emergency room.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #1's face sheet, the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses that included but was not limited to: vascular dementia with mood disorder (commonly known as memory and thinking problems caused by poor blood flow to the brain along with mood changes). A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review on 5/6/26, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1), who required care assistance, was free from verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #1's Face Sheet (FS), an admission record summary, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses, which included but are not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic illness, organ failure, or chemical imbalances in the blood, rather than a direct physical injury to the brain), altered mental status, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, depression, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease where the protective cartilage on the ends of bones wears away over time, causing joint pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility). A review of the resident's care plan activity report (CP) revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-24 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food stored in residents' personal refrigerators was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner by failing to a.) ensure thermometers were present in residents' personal refrigerators to monitor internal temperatures, b.) routinely monitor and document refrigerator temperatures on a temperature log, c.) maintain food items at the appropriate internal temperatures, d.) discard food items in accordance with manufacturers' expiration or by the used by dates, and e.) routinely monitor and clean refrigerators.This deficient practice was identified in 6 of 6 residents' rooms (Rooms 302, 304, 314, 319, 330B, and 330C) reviewed for the use of personal refrigerators and was evidenced by the following:On 3/19/26 at 10:20 AM, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM), the surveyor toured the rooms of residents with personal refrigerators. During the tour, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with a clean environment by failing to a.) appropriately dispose of soiled materials and personal protective equipment (PPE) and b.) provide clean bed linen and incontinence supplies maintained in sanitary condition to prevent cross-contamination. This deficient practice was identified in room [ROOM NUMBER] and Resident #16 reviewed for environmental concerns and was evidenced by the following:1). On 3/18/2026 at 11:19 AM, surveyor #1 toured room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed the following: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage posted on the door. Soiled materials including bed linen with other items wrapped inside and a blue disposable chuck) disposed of on top of the garbage receptacle. A disposable glove turned inside-out and discarded on the floor. On 3/20/26 at 9:45 AM, surveyor #1 observed EBP signage posted on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] and a pair of disposable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feedings were provided appropriate care and services to prevent complications by failing to complete formula labels for residents receiving feedings. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #49 and #114) reviewed for tube feeding. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.) On 3/18/26 at 11:24 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #114 lying asleep in bed while receiving a continuous tube feeding (TF). Observation revealed that the TF bag was not labeled with the resident's name, room number, date and time the feeding was initiated, or the prescribed infusion rate per hour. Surveyor #1 reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR), for Resident #114. A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to dysphagia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  REPEAT DEFICIENCYBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store medications securely inside the medication cart by keeping it locked when unattended and b.) failed to ensure that medications were stored under proper temperature controls by failing to maintain unopened insulin vials in the refrigerator. The deficient practice was identified in 2 of 5 medication carts (B side 2nd floor cart and the 2nd floor central medication cart) observed during tour of the facility and medication storage and labeling task inspection.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) On 3/18/2026 at 9:09 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Surveyor #1 observed a medication cart labeled B- Side unlocked along the B side hallway of the 2nd floor. The lock of the cart faced the hallway. There were no medications on top of the cart. There were no residents, visitors, or staff present in the hallway. The surveyor stayed within the line of sight of the medication cart. On 3/18/2026 at 9:12 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices to prevent the spread or reduce the risk of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice by ensuring, a.) respiratory device tubing, masks, and mouthpiece were stored in protective covering between uses identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for respiratory care, b.) proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed under contact precautions (Resident #75). This deficient practice was identified in 1 out of 2 nursing units (third floor unit) and was evidenced by the following:a.) On 03/19/2026 at 09:36AM, the surveyor observed Resident #50's bedside table had oxygen tubing hanging from the bedside table. With the permission of Resident #50, the surveyor requested a staff member to open the top draw…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2600629, 2601350Based on interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 8/29/2025 and 9/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to report a resident elopement to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #1's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to: vascular dementia with mood disorder (commonly known as memory and thinking problems caused by poor blood flow to the brain along with mood changes). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 8/21/2025, revealed that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident had a moderately impaired cognitive status. A review of the Progress Notes (PN) included a Nursing Note dated 8/22/2025 at 7:18 P.M., that the nurse saw Resident #1 around 3:10 P.M., well dressed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: 2600629, 2601350Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 08/29/2025 and 9/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of nursing practice by a.) not documenting a physician's order for a resident (Resident #1) to leave the facility on pass (out on pass) and b.) not following a physician's order for a psychiatric consultation and psychological consultation for a resident (Resident #1) that was ordered at admission to the facility.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45 Chapter 11, Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; the practice of nursing as a Registered Professional Nurse is defined as diagnosing, and treating human response to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to restorative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #NJ185510 Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of other facility documentation, on 05/08/25 and 05/09/25, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a requested medical record for a discharged resident within 2 days of a written request. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents, reviewed (Resident #6), and was evidenced by the following: Resident #6 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. According to the Resident Face Sheet, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Respiratory Disorder, and Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease. The face sheet also revealed that a family member (FM) requesting the Resident's medical record was listed in the Contacts section as Primary, listed the FM's relationship to the resident, and under designation PHI: [protected health information] Full. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 04/03/25, Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 shower rooms. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/06/2024 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor entered the shower room on the second floor and observed tiles on the floor and various hygienic products left in the whirlpool tub. On 11/07/2024 at 09:49 AM, the surveyor entered the shower room on the second floor and observed tiles picked up and placed on the window sill, and items remained in the whirlpool tub. On 11/07/2024 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor entered the shower room on the third floor and observed brown stains on the wall and floor tiles, an empty can of aftershave on the floor, a leaking shower head in a plastic bag, and a broken faucet. On top of the linen cart was one loose, blue incontinent pad and one open bag of incontinence briefs. On 11/08/2024 at 09:35 AM, the surveyor entered the shower room on the third floor and observed in the shower area a leaking shower head in a plastic bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,175 — penalty dated 2025-09-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ