Melbourne Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 126.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring staff implemented measures to mitigate risks to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious injury, harm, and/or death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was likelihood he could have sustained serious life-threatening injuries, become lost, been accosted by unknown persons, drowned, or hit by a motor vehicle or high speed train and died. On [DATE] at approximately 8:05 PM, a physically and cognitively impaired resident exited the facility's front entrance when an unknown staff person unlocked the door and allowed him to leave the facility unsupervised. Resident #1 wandered through the parking lot in the dark, crossed a two lane road, and proceeded approximately 0.7 miles along a four lane road…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Elopement, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious life-threatening injury, harm, or even death. While resident #1 was out of the facility unsupervised, there was likelihood he could have sustained serious life-threatening injuries, become lost, been accosted by unknown persons, drowned, or hit by a motor vehicle or high speed train and died. On [DATE] at approximately 8:05 PM, a physically and cognitively impaired resident exited the facility's front entrance when an unknown staff person unlocked the door and allowed him to leave the facility unsupervised. Resident #1 wandered through the parking lot in the dark, crossed a two lane road, and proceeded approximately 0.7 miles along a four lane road with moderate traffic at speed limits of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to follow proper sanitation practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility who eat food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 3/03/25 at 10:00 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Assistant Dietary Manager I, observations in the walk-in found there were four, one-third steamtable pans of leftover food items including mechanical soft pork dated 3/1 and use by 3/07/25, sweet potatoes dated 3/2 and use by 3/08/25, corn dated 3/1 use by 3/07/25, and mashed potatoes dated 3/2 use by 3/08/25. Assistant Dietary Manager I stated their policy was to keep leftover fish, meat, and poultry for three days after prepared, and vegetables for five days. She could not explain why it was written to keep all these food items for six days each. There were two packages of hard-boiled eggs, unsealed and left open to the air, and undated; and a carton of whole eggs was open and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3. Review of resident #25's record revealed an admission date of 11/23/23. His diagnoses include unspecified atrial fibrillation, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and acquired absence of left leg below knee. His quarterly 11/29/24 Minimum Data Set included a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15/15, which indicated intact cognition. On 3/03/25 at 11:05 AM, resident #25 said he had a skin growth on the left side of his nose since his admission to the facility in 2023. He explained in October 2024 he requested help from the facility's Business Office Manager to recertify his health insurance, Medicaid. He said the dermatology group that visited the facility did not take the type of Medicaid he had when he attempted to be seen by them last year; so, he waited for a dermatology visit to be arranged with an outside provider who took his insurance. He said he found out in last December 2024 from the outside dermatology appointment he did not have any active health insurance. He said he has missed a specialty appointment for another skin issue below his right eye, after he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by failing to de-emphasize the institutional character of the dining room for one of one dining room reviewed for dining and failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior of the resident rooms for 3 of 3 residents rooms reviewed for cleanliness, (#13, #20, and #62). Findings: 1. On 3/03/25 at 12:24 PM, in the main dining room, 36 residents were observed eating lunch. There were no table cloths, no centerpieces on the tables and there was no music playing to create a homelike atmosphere for dining. At 12:33 PM, loud country music was started. On 3/05/25 between 10:25 AM and 12:00 PM, residents were observed eating morning snacks at the dining tables in the dining room. A short time later a couple of tables were moved so residents could exercise in an open area of the dining room. Later, the tables were moved back so residents could eat lunch, but no dining room table additions such as tablecloths or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the nursing staffing hours daily, which identified the number of staff working in the facility on the form posted. Findings: On 3/03/05 at 10:24 AM, 3/04/25 at 10:15 AM, 3/05/25 at 8:34 AM, and 3/06/25 at 8:37 AM, the daily Nurse Staffing Form located by the receptionist in the lobby failed to identify the number and type of nursing staff working in the facility on the form posted. On 3/06/25 at 9:53 AM, the Staffing coordinator stated she was responsible for posting the form. The Staffing Coordinator acknowledged that the facility name was not on the Nurse Staffing Form, and that the form did not identify the number and type of staff working. The Coordinator stated the company was undergoing changes, so she was not sure what company name to put on the sheet. ON 3/06/25 at 1:03 PM, the Administrator stated there was a staffing meeting at about 11:00 AM daily. The Administrator explained that last week, the facility received a call that their name was changing, so we stopped putting the facility name on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system for the prevention of communicable diseases by failing to ensure all residents were offered and encouraged to perform hand hygiene before meals for all residents eating meals in the dining room. Findings: On 3/04/25 at 12:00 PM, in the main dining room, approximately 28 residents were observed eating lunch. Several of the residents stated they were not offered a way to clean their hands prior to meals while one resident stated he was only offered a napkin. On 3/05/25 at 10:25 AM, approximately ten residents were observed finishing a morning snack in the main dining room, after which they proceeded to move to the front of the dining room for morning exercise. A short time later at 11:00 AM, 12 residents were observed participating in exercises to music while sitting in their wheelchairs, after which most of these residents moved to the dining tables to eat lunch. None of these residents, nor others who joined the dining room afterwards, were offered a means to clean their hands before the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a medication self-administration assessment to ensure safety for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications, of a total sample of 62 residents, (#44, and #92). Findings: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, emphysema, and general anxiety disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/09/24, revealed resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating she was cognitively intact. On 3/03/25 at 4:12 PM, resident #44 was observed with an Albuterol Tartrate HFA inhaler on her overbed table. The resident stated she took it as needed. On 3/3/25 at 4:33 PM, primary care nurse, License Practical Nurse (LPN) C observed and acknowledged the resident's inhaler at her bedside. LPN C stated the resident had physician orders that she may have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy. She was discharged from the facility on 4/26/24 and readmitted on [DATE] following a right hip fracture. The admission Record or face sheet listed diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, insomnia, depression, and psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, and anxiety. A psychiatry consult from 6/26/24 revealed that resident #26 was admitted with medications for diagnoses of dementia and insomnia. Resident #26 was started on Depakote sprinkles 250 milligrams (mg) two times a day for psychotic disorder on 1/02/24. Resident #26's care plan initiated on 7/12/24 indicated the resident had impaired cognition which affected communication, functional abilities, decision making, and judgement related to psychosis and dementia. The resident's PASARR forms dated 11/03/23 and 6/24/24 were completed by prior to admission to the facility. The form had no diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 62 residents, (#93). Findings: Resident # 93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses of Parkinsonism, anemia, syncope and collapse, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. Her most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which meant she had no impairment in cognition. On 3/03/25 at 4:47 PM, resident #93 explained she and facility staff were very careful with her blood pressure because she passed out a few times and so she spent most of the day at the therapy gym. Review of the physician orders included Vital signs every shift and Midodrine HCL oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice, and per physician orders for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 62 residents, (#35, & #85). Findings: 1. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, pulmonary embolism (PE) and history of breast cancer. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with reference date 2/12/25 revealed resident #35 had no cognitive impairment, no behaviors, no rejection nor refusal of care and required the use of oxygen. The physician orders for oxygen read continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. Resident #35 had a plan of care for shortness of breath related to COPD, recent pneumonia and PE with interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pharmacist recommendations were addressed by the physician for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications, of a total sample of 62 residents, (#57). Findings: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral brain hemorrhage, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. The resident's Care Plan dated 12/16/24 stated the resident was at risk for falls due to weakness and adverse effects of psychotropic medications with intervention to watch for signs and symptoms such as gait disturbance, sedation, lightheadedness, dizziness and change in mental status, mentation, and mood. Review of the medical record revealed on 1/13/25, the pharmacist submitted a recommendation for the physician to evaluate the order for the antidepressant, Mirtazapine (Remeron), and to consider tapering the dose from 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$40,132 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $40,132 — penalty dated 2024-11-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP — 33 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL