Gainesville Health and Rehabilitation
4000 SW 20th Ave, Gainesville, FL 32607 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (352) 377-1981 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,930 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.5% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.5% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.89 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.3–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.0–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.50 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.57 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to assure residents maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in 3 of 3 resident units reviewed for sufficient staffing.Findings include:During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 6:40 AM, Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN), stated, I work night shift 7p-7a [7 PM to 7 AM]. I had 24 residents assigned to me last night. I am not in charge, but I am an RN. We do not have a supervisor or a charge nurse right now.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 6:56 AM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, I had 36 residents last night. There have been times I have had 37. I am not able to give the best care when I have this many residents. I am tired. There have been times I have had to stay over past the end of my shift because my relief wasn't here.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 6:59 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Right now I have 23 residents and my CNA has 36 residents.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 7:18 AM, Staff C,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a performance improvement plan upon identification of concerns related to staffing. Cross reference to F725:Findings include:Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) agenda dated 6/10/2026 at 11:00 AM read, Updates of all outstanding items from last QAPI Meeting. Approval-Administrator. Review of survey citations/POC [plan of correction]. Current PIPS [performance improvement plans]. Kitchens PIPS. Staffing concerns. New issues/New opportunities. Closing.During an interview on 6/29/2026 at 12:03 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, Staffing has been discussed in QAPI [meeting], but we have no current PIPS for staffing. I was told it shouldn't be a problem with remote staffing because [name of another facility] is using the same staffing program. All department heads and [Medical Director's name] come to QAPI.During an interview on 6/29/2026 at 1:34 PM, the Administrator stated, [Medical Director's name] owns the building. He comes to the QAPI meetings. He is aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in 3 of 3 units reviewed.Findings include:During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 7:18 AM, Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, I have seen a few roaches and gnats, we usually just kill them.During an observation on 6/28/2026 at 8:10 AM, there were three black flying insects in the main dining room (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 9:05 AM, Resident #6 stated, I have seen a lot of gnats and roaches everywhere. I have seen flies in my room and in the hallway. I told the staff about it. They put up some sticky tape, but I still see bugs.During an observation on 6/28/2026 at 9:30 AM in Resident #2's room, there was a black flying insect flying around Resident #2's head and the breakfast tray. Resident #2 swatted at the insect.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 9:30 AM, Resident #2 stated, They have a bug problem here. Roaches, gnats, and flies. I have seen roaches in my room every night.During an observation on 6/28/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #3 and #4) and in 1 of 3 resident units (Unit 2) reviewed for homelike environment.Findings include:During an observation on 6/28/2026 at 9:38 AM, there was a large amount of black and brown debris on the floor on the right side of Resident #4's bed.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 9:38 AM, Resident #4 stated, It has been 2-3 days since anyone mopped my floor.During an observation on 6/28/2026 at 9:46 AM, in Resident #3's room, there were visible dirt and debris on the floor of the room on the right side of the bed and along the wall (Photographic evidence obtained).During an observation on 6/28/2026 at 11:40 AM, there was a piece of flooring missing in the hallway of unit 2 (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 6/28/2026 at 11:53 AM, the Maintenance Director stated that he was aware of the missing flooring in the Unit 2 hallway, and that peel and stick flooring had been ordered.During an interview on 6/28/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment and building components were maintained in a safe operating condition in the facility's kitchen dishwashing area.Findings include: During an observation on 05/12/2026 at 9:45 AM, in the kitchen dishwashing area, there was a garbage disposal unit, which was non-functional and actively leaking water. A continuous flow of water was leaking from the unit, resulting in accumulation of standing water across the floor surface in the immediate work area. Multiple floor tiles were lifted and uneven, with sections of flooring missing, exposing the underlying subfloor/concrete. During an interview on 05/12/2026 at 9:56 AM, Staff A, Kitchen Aide, stated, The sink, garbage disposal and standing water have been that way since I started working here about 4 months ago. I have seen maintenance in the kitchen, but the areas are still broken. I feel like the tile is a fall issue for the staff and feel that the standing dirty water makes the area a risk for contamination of the clean dishes in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained when dietician assessment and recommendations were not followed to maintain body weight for 2, Resident #1 and #2, of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record documented diagnosis that include dementia and other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with mood disturbance, pain in left knee, pain in right knee, vitamin B deficiency unspecified, vitamin D deficiency unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, anemia unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hyperlipidemia unspecified, and hypothyroidism unspecified. Review of Resident #1's weights documented on 10/6/2026 a weight of 106.2 pounds, on 11/3/2025 a weight of 105.4 pounds, on 12/2/2025 a weight of 99.6 pounds, on 1/3/2026 a weight of 95 pounds, on 2/20/2026 a weight of 92.8 pounds, and on 3/2/2026 a weight of 93.2 pounds. This was a significant weight loss of 12.24%. Review of Resident #1's dietary progress note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promptly inform the resident representative when there was a change of condition and weight loss for 2, Resident #1 and #2, of 4 residents reviewed for changes in condition.Fiindings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record documented diagnosis that include dementia and other diseases classified elsewhere, mild, with mood disturbance, pain in left knee, pain in right knee, vitamin B deficiency unspecified, vitamin D deficiency unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, anemia unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hyperlipidemia unspecified, and hypothyroidism unspecified. Review of Resident #1's weights document on 10/6/2026 a weight of 106.2 pounds, on 11/3/2025 a weight of 105.4 pounds, on 12/2/2025 a weight of 99.6 pounds, on 1/3/2026 a weight of 95 pounds, on 2/20/2026 a weight of 92.8 pounds, and on 3/2/2026 a weight of 93.2 pounds. This is a significant weight loss of 12.24%. Review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes from October 1, 2025 through March 2, 2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment in 2 of 4 hallways reviewed for environment. Findings include: During the initial facility tour on 3/11/2026 at 8:45 AM, a strong urine odor was noted throughout the 200 and 300 hallways, including common areas. All rooms toured in the 300 hallway also had a pronounced urine odor. Resident beds were dry, and residents observed were clean and appropriately dressed, either in bed or seated in wheelchairs. In the 200 hallway, two rooms had floor grates with thick dust buildup, and several rooms had floors with dried, sticky residue. In the 300 hallway, the linen closet door vent had a heavy layer of dust. Several rooms had sticky floors with multiple dried stains, scuffed walls, and areas with missing paint. Many rooms also had significant dust accumulation and debris, including straws and cup lids, under the beds. The 300 hallway handrail had missing paint beneath the hand sanitizer dispenser; the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with an assessment which accurately reflects the resident's status for 4 (Resident #151, #76, #302, #74) of 8 resident assessments reviewed for respiratory care, skin conditions, and end stage renal disease care. Findings include: 1.) Review of the admission record for Resident #151 documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included schizophrenia, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, and anemia. Review of the physician's order for Resident #151 dated 3/18/25 read, Aripiprazole Oral Table 30 MG (milligrams) Give one tablet orally at bedtime for schizophrenia. Review of the discharging hospital's history and physical note dated 3/7/25, on page 4, reads .on Aripiprazole 30 mg medication since 6/12/20. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], did not document an active diagnoses of schizophrenia. During an interview on 4/3/25 at 9:34 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to promote a dignified and homelike dining experience while assisting dependent residents with breakfast when staff stood over residents during the meal for 2 (Resident #84 and #54) of 2 residents observed for eating assistance. Findings include: An observation was made on 04/01/24 beginning at 8:53 AM, Resident #54 and Resident #84 [roommates] were in bed, where Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was standing between Resident #54 and Resident #84 who each had a breakfast tray on their bedside table. Staff A, CNA was observed assisting Resident #54 with a spoonful of breakfast then moving to Resident #84 and assisting with a spoonful of breakfast, continuing to move between both residents to assist with eating breakfast. An interview was conducted with Staff A, CNA, related to feeding both residents at the same time. Staff A stated he wasn't sure of the right way as he had only been a CNA for a short time. Review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #151) of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #151 documented an admission date to the facility of 3/14/25 with a pertinent diagnosis that included of heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris [buildup of plague in artery walls without chest pain], and anemia. During an observation on 3/31/25 at 12:29 PM, Resident #151 has oxygen tubing hanging from the over bed table (OBT). During an observation on 4/1/25 at 9:36 AM, Resident #151 has oxygen tubing hanging from the OBT with the oxygen concentrator up against the bed. During an interview on 4/1/25 at 9:36 AM, Resident #151 stated, I only use it when I am short of breath, I only use it when I need to, and I've used it several times. During an observation on 4/2/25 at 7:42 AM, Resident #151 has oxygen tubing hanging from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 5 medication carts and failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in a secured manner for 2 of 3 units. Findings include: 1.) During an observation on 3/31/25 at 9:32 AM of Resident #23's room, 5 unidentifiable pills were sitting in a clear medicine cup on the residents over the bed table, and an unlabeled creamlike substance in a small plastic medicine cup was sitting on the residents bedside table. During an observation on 3/31/25 at 10:00 AM of Resident # 23's room, 2 unidentifiable pills in a clear medicine cup were still sitting on the residents bedside table. During an interview on 4/1/25 at 10:00 AM, Resident #23 stated that the staff always leave his pills on his bedside table and he takes them later. During interview on 4/3/25 at 8:37 AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Unit 300, confirmed the medication on Resident #23's bedside table,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were accurate and complete for 1 (Resident #22) of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: 1) Review of the admission record for Resident #22 documented an admission date of 10/18/24 with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, iron deficiency anemia unspecified, and hypertension. Review of the electronic medical record resident profile for Resident #22 read, Code Status: (Advance Directives) Full Code. Review of Resident #22's physician's order dated 2/5/25 reads, FULL CODE. Review of the Social Services Assessment for Resident #22 dated 1/16/25 documented Do Not Resuscitate on page 1 and the summary note on page 3 read, Resident will remain DO NOT RESUSCITATE (DNR) and plans to remain a short term resident at [the facility's name]. Review of Resident #22's comprehensive resident centered care plan, last revised on 1/21/25, reads, Resident has an established DNR (DO NOT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards of professional practice were followed for administering tube feedings with the use of a tube feeding pump for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #7. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction [a stroke], dysphagia [inability or difficulty swallowing], aphasia [inability to speak], and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician's order dated 3/11/2024 for Resident #7 read, Enteral Feeding: Jevity [a calorie dense, fiber-fortified therapeutic nutrition for long or short-term tube feeding] 1.5 65ml [milliliters]/hr [per hour] continuously x [times] 24 hrs [hours] with auto flush of 55ml/hr water x 24 hours. During an observation on 11/18/2024 at 6:32 AM Resident #7 no Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) supplies (gowns) near Resident #7's room in the hallway or inside of Resident #7's room. Resident #7 was lying in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection when failing to perform hand hygiene or use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing care for 2 of 11 residents, Residents #7 and #9 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #7 documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction [a stroke], dysphagia [inability or difficulty swallowing], aphasia [inability to speak], and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician's order dated 3/11/2024 for Resident #7 read, Enteral Feeding: Jevity [a calorie dense, fiber-fortified therapeutic nutrition for long or short-term tube feeding] 1.5 65ml [milliliters]/hr [per hour] continuously x [times] 24 hrs [hours] with auto flush of 55ml/hr water x 24 hours. Review of the physician's order dated 4/22/2024 for Resident #7 read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBH] due to G-tube [Gastrostomy tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the bed hold policy upon transfer to hospital for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge to hospital, Residents #1, #2 and #3. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder and dysphagia. Further review of the records showed the resident was informed of bed hold policy of the facility. Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 9/5/2024 showed it read, Resident noted physically and verbally to staff this pm [afternoon]. Remain on 1:1 supervision. Resident and his roommate were fighting over the TV remote unable to redirect. Resident got upset and started hitting staff. Call made to on call spoke with Dr. [Physician's name] verbal orders given to transfer resident to [Local Emergency Room's name] for psych evaluation. Review of Resident #1's SNF/NF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were implemented for the prevention of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property related to training for 1 of 10 employees (the Chef) and reporting allegations immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency and other officials as required for 1 (Resident #23) of 3 residents sampled. Findings include: 1. Review of the Chef's personnel records documented a hire date of 8/28/2023. The personnel records did not contain any documentation since date of hire of education on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 8:30 AM, the Executive Director (ED) stated that there was no training documented for the Chef for abuse in his personnel file. The ED stated that the Chef had not attended any in-services given for abuse. 2. Review of the progress note for Resident #23 dated 12/15/2023 at 18:47 (6:47 PM) read, [Resident #23's Name] is upset about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 resident (Resident #68) of 2 reviewed for dialysis services and 1 resident (Resident #81) of 1 reviewed for restraints. Findings include: Review of Resident #68's physician's order dated 10/19/2021 read, Dialysis is Tues, Thus, Sat, .Seat time 10:25 AM. Review of Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] reads, Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs: Check all of the following treatments, procedures and programs that were performed. Dialysis services were not checked off as special treatments received. During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 2:28 PM the MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #68's Name] is on my dialysis list and he has not been sent out to the hospital. He should be marked as yes [on the assessment] for dialysis. It was an error. 2. Review of Resident #81's physician's order documented no orders for restraints. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents that were reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders were referred to the appropriate state designated authority for review for 3 (#4, #69, #40) of 6 resident reviewed. Findings include: 1.) Record review of Resident #4's most recent PASARR Level II, dated 1/18/2017, revealed Resident #4 was assessed as having mental health diagnoses as follows: Axis I: Depressive Disorder; and Bipolar Disorder. Record review of Resident #4's admission record revealed Resident #4 was subsequently diagnosed with psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, on set date 8/2/23. Record review of Resident #4's clinical records failed to reveal documentation Resident #4 was identified with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder and was referred to the appropriate state designated authority for an updated Level II evaluation and determination. 2.) Record review of Resident #69's most recent PASARR Level l,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, and related conditions prior to admission for 1 (#25) of 6 residents reviewed. Findings Include: Review of Resident #25's admission record documented a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, onset date 4/25/23. Review of the psychiatry note dated 4/25/23 read, chief complaint depression, insomnia, and schizophrenia. Plan of Action: continue medication Abilify for schizophrenia, Divalproex for mood and Trazodone for depression. Review of the hospital note dated 9/04/23 read, discharge summary. discharge diagnosis: bi-polar disorder. Review of the clinical record revealed no documented PASARR screening. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 11:17 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that with the diagnosis of schizophrenia, bi-polar, and depression, a PASARR should have been completed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional services with adequate nutritional interventions to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (Resident #19) of 7 residents reviewed nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's admission record documented diagnoses that included other forms of systemic lupus erythematosus, dysphagia, folate deficiency anemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of Resident #19's care plan, revised 4/19/2023, documented a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses of congestive heart failure, hypertension, anxiety, and chronic pain with interventions that include provide and server diet as ordered and RD (registered dietitian) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations. Review of Resident #19's complete blood count with differential lab results, collection date 11/25/2023, documented results that included hemoglobin at 9.6, reference range 12.0 - 16.0, and albumin at 2.7, reference range 3.5 - 5.7. Review of Resident #19's quarterly dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #13) of 2 residents receiving respiratory services. Findings include: During an observation on 12/18/2023 at 10:30 AM, Oxygen Concentrator at bedside. Resident was not currently using oxygen. Oxygen tubing was dated 11/30/2023. The nasal canula was on the floor. A nebulizer mask was observed not bagged. (photo evidence obtained). During an observation on 12/19/2023 at 8:43 AM, the nebulizer mask was under a telephone receiver with no bag. (photo evidence obtained) During an interview on 12/18/2023 at 10:30 AM, Resident #13 said, I am not currently using the oxygen concentrator. During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 8:26 AM the Director of Nursing, stated oxygen tubing is changed every 7 days, and the oxygen tubing was overdue for being changed. She also stated, when a nebulizer is not in use it should be bagged. Review of the admission record for Resident #13 documented the most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principle for 3 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: During an observation on [DATE] at 9:09 AM of station #1 medication cart #1 with Staff D, Registered Nurse, (RN), there was one expired insulin vial with an expiration date of [DATE], one expired Novolog insulin pen with expiration date of [DATE], one unopened Novolog pen with a blue label which read refrigerate until opened, one open Novolin pen with no open or expired date, two open Lantus Solostar insulin pen with no open or expired date, and one open Novolog flexpen with no open or expired date, two medication cups with pre-poured medications, and one opened Advair Diskus with no open or expired date. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:15 AM, Staff D, RN, stated, The insulin pen is not opened, the insulin will be used tonight, it should have been kept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for intravenous catheters (Residents #81, #40). Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/18/2023 at 11:00 AM, Resident #81 was lying in bed with no intravenous (IV) catheter noted on the resident's arms. During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 1:10 PM, Resident #81 stated, I do not have an IV at this moment. They had to take it out about three days ago. Review of Resident #81's physician order dated 12/11/2023 reads, Discontinue peripheral IV per MD [Medical Doctor]. Review of Resident #81's physician order dated 12/8/2023 reads, Give 2 liters of normal saline @ [at] 75 cc/hr x 2 liters [75 milliliters per hour times 2 liters] one time a day for labs until complete. Review of Resident #81's Medication Administration Record for December 2023 showed that 2 liters of normal saline was administered from 12/11/2023 to 12/20/2023. Review of Resident #81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: During an observation on 12/20/2023 at 8:28 AM, Staff G, License Practical Nurse (LPN), started preparing medications for Resident #56 after using hand sanitizer. The medication blister pack fell on the floor and Staff G picked it up from the floor. Without performing hand hygiene, Staff G continued to pour medication in individualized medication cups. Staff G began to crush the medication and placed them back into the individualized medication cups. Staff G donned gloves and opened a capsule and poured the medication in the medication cup and then removed gloves. Staff G entered Resident #56's room and donned gloves and administered medications via the gastric tube. Staff G did not perform hand hygiene. During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 8:59 AM, Staff G, LPN, stated, I should have done hand hygiene after picking up the blister pack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the training program on abuse and neglect was completed for 1 of 10 employees, the Chef. Findings include: Review of personnel records for the Chef, hired on 8/26/2023, revealed no training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation during the orientation training. Review of the in-service on abuse, neglect, and exploitation on 12/18/2023 showed the Chef did not attend the in-service. During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 11:50 AM, the Executive Director (ED) confirmed that the Chef had an orientation training and the training did not include abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The ED also confirmed that the Chef had not attended any in-services on abuse, neglect, and exploitation since her hire date of 8/26/2023.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for enteral nutrition was provided for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3). Findings include: During an observation on 9/06/2023 at 8:10 AM Resident #3 was lying in bed receiving enteral nutrition via a feeding pump running Jevity 1.5 at 60ml (milliliters) per hour and 40ml per hour auto water flushes. During an observation on 9/06/2023 at 10:48 AM Resident #3 was lying in bed receiving enteral nutrition via a feeding pump running Jevity 1.5 at 60ml per hour and 40ml per hour auto water flushes. During an interview on 9/6/2023 at 10:51 AM Staff A, License Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, [Resident #3's name] should be at 20ml per hour flushes but I will check. Staff A looked up physician order in electronic medical record. Staff A stated The order was changed yesterday. It should be at 80 ml per hour. I see they have it on 40ml per hour not on 80ml I will change it. During an interview on 9/6/2023 at 10:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing data was posted on a daily basis in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings include: An observation on 7/11/2022 at 9:00 AM failed to show any nurse staffing data posted in the front lobby or anywhere in the facility. An observation on 7/11/2022 at 10:28 AM failed to show any nurse staffing data posted in the front lobby or anywhere in the facility. During an interview on 7/11/2022 at 10:35 AM, the Administrator stated, I do not know where the staffing is posted. Let me ask if [Staff I, Staff Coordinator's name] in staffing knows where it is posted. I do not know where the form is to fill out for staffing, but the facility is working on getting the form. During an interview on 7/11/2022 at 10:53 AM, Staff I, Staff Coordinator, stated, I was told over two months ago to stop doing the federal staffing sheet. I was told that personnel would be completing the staffing sheet. I have not posted the federal staffing for the last two months. I no longer have the sheet to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practice standards for performing hand hygiene during medication administration in 6 out of 8 observations of medication administration and failed to conduct monthly water supply monitoring. Findings include: During an observation of medication administration on 7/12/2022 at 7:38 AM Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), assembled medication, without performing hand hygiene. Entered Resident #249's room without performing hand hygiene room, donned gloves, and administered normal saline flush to left upper arm PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) after cleaning the needless connector for 3 seconds. During an observation of medication administration on 7/12/2022 at 9:05 AM Staff C, LPN, poured medications for Resident #15 without performing hand hygiene, entered the resident's room without performing hand hygiene and administered medications. Staff C returned to the medication cart and began pouring medications for another resident. During an observation of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were informed and provided written information concerning their right to choose and to formulate an advance directive for 19 of 33 residents reviewed, with missing advanced directives (Residents #10, #15, #30, #82, #71 #77, #74, #75, #64, #249, #7, #24, #28, #37, #42, #49, #81, #248 and #56). Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychoactive substance abuse with other psychoactive substance induced disorder, opioid abuse, hypertension, toxic encephalopathy, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, chronic pain syndrome, disorder of brain, major depressive disorder, and abscess of bursa, left shoulder. Review of records failed to reveal Resident #10 had an advanced directive or was informed of his/her right to choose. 2. Resident #15 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 10:27 AM, Resident #50 was resting in bed with a catheter drainage bag hanging on the right side of the bed. There was no privacy bag covering the clear plastic collection bag. The resident's door was open, and the catheter collection bag was visible from the hall. Review of the admission records for Resident #50 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, generalized anxiety disorder, essential primary hypertension, recurrent depressive disorder, renal and perinephric abscess, and coronary artery disease. During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 11:27 AM, Resident #50 was in bed with a catheter drainage bag hanging on the right side of the bed. There was no privacy bag covering the clear plastic collection bag. The resident's door was open, and the catheter collection bag was visible from the hallway.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for 2 of 4 residents requiring tube feeding equipment, Residents #29 and #64. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 10:56 AM, Resident #29 was receiving tube feedings via a feeding pump. There was a buildup of a dried tan substance covering the tube feeding pole base. There were dried tan substances on the feeding pump covering both the back and front of the pump. There were large spots of a dried amber colored substance that covered the floor next to the resident's bed. During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 3:44 PM, Resident #29 had a feeding pump and pole at bedside with dried tan stains on the feeding pump on both the front and the back of the pump, multiple spots of a dried tan colored substance on the feeding pole base and large dried amber to brown colored spots on the floor next to the resident's bed. During an observation on 7/13/2022 at 8:01 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident #29 was receiving tube feedings via a feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for peripherally inserted central catheters for 2 of 3 reviewed residents, Residents #249 and #100, in a total sample of 51 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 7:20 AM, Resident #249 was observed in bed with a left upper arm double lumen PICC line with a dressing date of 7/7/2022. Three edges of the transparent dressing were pulling up and exposing the insertion site. During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #249 was in bed with a left double lumen PICC line in the left upper arm. The date on the dressing was 7/7/2022. Three edges of the transparent dressing were pulling up and exposed the insertion site. During an interview on 7/12/2022 at 7:30 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Oh, the nurse last night was supposed to change that. It is needing to be changed. I saw that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable in 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed. Findings include: During an observation of Medication Cart #1 with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), on 7/11/2022 at 9:02 AM, there were one Enoxaparin Sodium syringe with no resident identifier and not in the original pharmacy packaging, two opened Lispro insulin pens with no opened or expiration dates, one unopened Glargine insulin pen with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, and one small medication cup with 10 white capsules with no identification of the medication or resident identifier. During an interview on 7/11/2022 at 9:10 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, All insulin should be labeled or kept in the refrigerator until it is ready to be used. I should not have any medication that isn't in the containers that come from pharmacy. I don't know what the pills are. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident. Findings include: Review of the facility records related to reporting the incident occurred on 6/5/2022 between Resident #38 and Resident #10 revealed no five-day report filed as of 7/12/2022. During an interview on 7/12/2022 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator stated, No one had access to the reporting system and therefore we were unable to provide a five-day report for the incident. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/ Neglect/ Exploitation implemented on 9/3/2020 and reviewed on 5/20/2022, reads, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to report all allegations of abuse/ neglect/ exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5% or greater for 2 of 4 residents observed during medication pass, Residents #1 and #5. Medication error rate was 20.8%. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation on 9/7/2022 beginning at 8:58 AM, Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), unlocked the medication cart and logged in to the computer. Staff D started pulling medications from the bubble packs and dropping the pills to a medication cup. Staff D entered Resident #5's room with the medication cup on hand and administered Protonix 2 tabs 20 mg 1 by mouth, Metoprolol Succinate ER 25 mg 1 by mouth, Tamsulosin 0.4 mg 1 cap by mouth, and Reglan 10 mg 1 by mouth. Review of Resident #5's physician order dated 8/28/2022 revealed Pyridoxine HCL 25 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement; Vitamin B-1 250 mg, orally one time a day for supplement; Vitamin A, give 3 mg orally one time a day for supplement;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's nourishment room. Findings include: During a tour of the facility's nourishment room conducted with the facility's Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 7/11/2022 beginning at 10:00 AM, there were one wrapped hoagie style sandwich in a plastic bag on a shelf in the refrigerator, two plastic containers of yogurt parfait in a shelf on the door of the refrigerator, and two frozen individually wrapped tacos and an opened box of frozen popsicles in the freezer. All items listed were not labeled with a resident name or date. During an interview on 7/11/2022 at 10:05 AM, the CDM verified the food items listed were not labeled with resident names or dates to show when they needed to be thrown away. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors revised in October 2019 and reviewed on 5/20/20 22 reads, Action Steps: . 4. When food items are intended for later consumption,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide therapy services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services, Resident #17. Findings include: During an interview on 7/13/2022 at 12:00 PM, Resident #17 stated, I still have not started receiving any therapy [Physical Therapy, PT] yet. During an interview on 7/13/2022 at 12:10 PM, the Therapy Director stated, I have not been here long. I will try to find out from the previous therapy director why [Resident #17's name] has not received therapy [PT] services. During an interview on 7/13/2022 at 2:10 PM, the Therapy Director stated, I did some digging and this resident's PT order was not sent to therapy. I do not know how therapy receives the physician's orders. The resident was not evaluated by therapy and is not receiving physical therapy. During an interview on 7/14/2022 at 10:30 AM, Resident 17 stated, I cannot walk as well now as before I went out to the hospital last month [June 2022]. Review of Resident #17's admission records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,930 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $7,903 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
- $1,882 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
- $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAINESVILLE FL HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2022 |
| LILAC SNF HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2022 |
| ULYSSE, JEAN-MARC | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| GORELICK, BATYA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2020 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105664. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.