Garden View Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and a policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services to prevent accidents for 3 of 9 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and falls, as evidenced by the failure to provide supervision while eating for Resident #37; failure to implement preventative measures to prevent a fall related injury for Resident #14; and failure to complete a post fall investigation to determine the cause of the fall for Resident #20.On 06/24/25 it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for Resident #37, a resident with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (Stroke) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), to prevent the likelihood of choking, aspiration (the accidental ingestion of food particles or fluids into the lungs), and/or death. Resident #37, who was ordered to have a mechanically altered diet, was not supervised during meals as per her current care plan and was subsequently provided with a whole hot dog that she consumed. The resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, policy review, and review of professional standards of practice, the facility failed to prepare foods in a form to meet the individual needs for 4 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #37, Resident #10, Resident #15, and Resident #21, reviewed for nutritional concerns. This had the potential to affect 18 current residents who were on mechanically altered diets at the time of the survey.On 06/24/25 it was determined the facility failed to follow a physician ordered diet, that was mechanically altered, for Resident #37, a resident with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), to prevent the likelihood of choking, aspiration (the accidental sucking in of food particles or fluids into the lungs), and or death. Resident #37, who was ordered to have a mechanically altered diet, was provided with a whole hot dog that she consumed.The likelihood of Resident #37 choking on the hot dog with the potential of aspiration or death was determined. The Administrator was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illnesses. This had the potential to affect 63 out of 66 residents who consume foods PO (by mouth).The findings included:During the initial tour of the Main Kitchen on 06/23/25 at 9:15 AM, accompanied by the CDM (Certified Dietary Manager) and the RD (Registered Dietician), the following was observed:1. The gaskets on the door of the reach in cooler had dark brown/black streaks and spots on the rubber pleats. The bottom of the gasket attached to the door was torn. Pieces of the rubberized material that were still attached to the door hung downward. The CDM agreed with this finding. Photographic Evidence Obtained.2. A bag of pasta was observed on the floor behind the lowest shelf in the dry food storage area. A large dark brown/black colored insect was dead and lying on floor in the same area. Another large dark brown/black colored insect was dead and lying on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage of linens in 3 of 3 linen carts.The findings included:On 06/25/2025, it was revealed the facility had four residents under transmission-based precautions due to various health concerns, including positive COVID-19 status, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is a type of staph bacteria resistant to many commonly used antibiotics, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production, which refers to enzymes that make certain bacteria resistant to many beta-lactam antibiotics, and Shingles.On 06/25/2025 at 11:09 AM, an observation revealed that the linen cart in the [NAME] Wing was torn and opened, exposing the linens inside. Additionally, a glove was found on the floor next to the linen cart. At 11:28 AM, the surveyor noted that the linen cart in the East Wing was not fully uncovered, exposing the linens to potential contamination. Similarly, at 11:33 AM, it was observed that the linen cart in the North Unit was also not fully covered, making the linens vulnerable to contaminants.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner to maintain residents' dignity for 2 of 20 sampled residents, reviewed for dignity (Resident #118 and #218).The findings included:1. Record review revealed Resident #118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An assessment completed on 06/19/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 06/23/25 at 1:58 PM, when asked if staff treat her with respect and dignity, Resident #118 stated, When I use the call light to be changed or if I need something, at times it takes over 30 minutes to have it answered, and then sometimes they say I'll have to wait, as they are busy. They are on their own pace, and they'll get to you when they get to you. Some of the staff have a chip on their shoulders. When asked how it makes her feel, Resident #118 stated, Not good. Some of them complain a lot. Most seem stressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the call bell within the reach of 2 of 20 sampled residents, reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #2 and Resident #40).The findings included:1.Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety disorder, Depression, Muscle weakness, and Overactive Bladder. This resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was 08, indicating she was cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated Resident #2 was dependent on assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL), which included toileting, hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of Resident #2's care plan for ADL self-care performance deficit, dated 08/13/20, was related to impaired balance and mobility, weakness, limited range of movement, cognitive loss, and history of Polio Disease. The care plan listed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promptly address grievances voiced for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #10 and Resident #7). The findings included: An interview was conducted on 06/23/25 at 12:47 PM, with Resident #7, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, according to a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 05/17/25, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. When asked of any concerns voiced by the Resident Council, Resident #7 replied, I made recommendations during the meetings when I wasn't president, I suggested that they do something with the patio and the grass, and they still haven't done anything about that. Resident #7 stated that the concern was voiced about 5 months ago, they wrote it down and that was it. I go out on the patio once in a blue moon. They just need a few more plants and some more mulch, like they do the rest of the grounds. During the Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to respond to requests for resident's records in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for records requests (Resident #69). The findings included: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent full assessment, an Admission/Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set, with a reference date of 01/30/25, Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. Resident #69's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety Disorder and Depression. During an interview, on 06/24/25 at 12:31 PM, with Resident 69's family member, it was reported that there had been no response from the facility to the family's request for Resident #69's medical records. The family member stated, My [.] tried to contact them several times to talk to the Business Office Manager (BOM), to get a copy of the contract.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #119, reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current physician orders included the administration of Seroquel and Oxcarbazepine, both twice daily for mood. The medication Seroquel had a classification of an antipsychotic drug. Psychiatric progress notes dated 06/16/25 and 06/23/25 documented, in part, monitoring for agitation, aggression, combativeness, refusal of care, refusal of medications, along with numerous symptoms of Depression. Review of the record lacked any type of behavior monitoring by staff for Resident #119. During an interview on 06/25/25 at 7:43 PM, when asked the process for staff to monitor and document resident behaviors, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurses should document any behaviors on the behavior monitoring forms in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and a review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 3 of 5 sampled residents, reviewed for nutrition (Resident #15, Resident #23 and Resident #37).The findings included:The CMS RAI was reviewed, which provides guidelines for assessing the needs of residents in long-term care facilities. It helps staff gather information about residents' needs in order to create individualized care plans. The RAI manual specifies that weight entries should be based on the most recent weight within the past 30 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of the assessment. If the resident's last recorded weight was taken more than 30 days prior to the ARD date of the assessment, then the facility should weigh the resident again. If a resident cannot be weighed, the directions specify to use the standard no information code (-), and to document the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to follow physician orders for wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents, observed with pressure ulcers (Resident #119). The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Wound Treatment Management revised on 11/23/22 documented, in part, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. Review of the record revealed Resident #119 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) and stage 4 pressure ulcer (a deep wound with full-thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). The wound care physician progress note dated 06/19/25 documented Resident #119 had two stage 4 pressure ulcers, one to the right buttock and one to the left hip. Review of the wound care progress note dated 06/19/25 documented, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with restorative therapy per physician's orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM), (Resident #24).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His medical history included Polyosteoarthritis, Contracture of Muscle Left Lower Leg, Contracture of Muscle Right Lower Leg, Foot Drop Right Foot, Presence of Right Artificial Hip Joint, Short Achilles Tendon (Acquired) Left Ankle, Obesity, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, which indicated that he was cognitively intact. A review of the treatments provided in the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #24 did not receive any restorative therapy during the 7-day lookback period prior to 04/24/25.Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$60,225 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $60,225 — penalty dated 2025-07-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL